pretty common these days to put up any pic at all to represent what is being talked about. for buzzfeed to ***** about this is funny cause on their front page we find:
The Leaders Of North Korea And South Korea Will Meet At A Historic Summit In April
pretty sure that's not an actual occurrence of them shaking hands when they've not met yet.
A Former Russian Spy And His Daughter May Have Been Poisoned At Their Front Door, UK Police Say
pretty sure that's just them, NOT them being poisoned by the russians.
The NYPD Is Arguing, Once Again, That Punishments For Police Misconduct Must Remain Secret
i see no police misconduct here? is this just a representative picture??? I THINK IT IS!!!
yet when you hate someone, it's different.
You have really stepped up you Trump defense mode these days.
Sent from my iPhone using
USMessageBoard.com
and i'm sure you see it that way.
did you look at the other 3 articles? do they not do the same? it just happens to be a pet peeve of mine due to my being a journalism photographer in my college years to make sure the picture matches the story. hell no it does not here. but neither do the pics i pulled from the 3 articles i stated. the russian spy and his daughter is a stretch yes cause that would be a hard one to have an actual pic of so bio pics are commonly used. the others are fair examples of simply using a pic that illustrates the overall story but is not the actual event in question.
so i'm more bagging on the articles that do this but unfortunately it's just become common and normal now. but, still a pet peeve of mine.
but you think what you want.
No, the articles do not do the same thing as Trump did.
Take the first article for example, while the story is about a future meeting between SK and NK they have a very clear caption under the picture stating what it is.
Now, look at Trump’s tweet, do you see a caption under the picture letting the viewer of the tweet know the wall pictured was not actually what the tweet was speaking of? Do you see anything in the tweet from Trump that would lead the reader of the tweet to know the picture did not depict what the tweet was about?
Sent from my iPhone using
USMessageBoard.com
great. now read his actual tweet.
"Great briefing this afternoon on the start of our Southern Border WALL!"
he's not saying the wall is under construction now is he? he said they having a briefing on the start of it. if we're having a briefing on starting it, we've not started yet have we?
unless you hate trump and need a bullet to fling at him this am. this could be interpreted many ways and is vague on its own. you can see it the way you are now, sure. but you can see it the way i'm talking about also. unless again, you hate trump.
