Trump, the Supreme Court and R. v. W.

[justinacolmena]

to bear and raise a child whose father was her rapist, or

A man cannot possibly be the rapist of a girl who was not yet conceived, let alone born, at the time of the alleged rape.

to bear a child from incest;

Is it considered incest if both parents are of the same race?

to bear a child determined to have Birth Defects and Congenital Anomalies

Here we go again. The DEMOCRATs' slaughterhouse is open for the mass murder of those who have been deemed social undesirables or adjudicated as mental defectives.

 

[rightwinger]

to bear and raise a child whose father was her rapist, or

A man cannot possibly be the rapist of a girl who was not yet conceived, let alone born, at the time of the alleged rape.

to bear a child from incest;

Is it considered incest if both parents are of the same race?

to bear a child determined to have Birth Defects and Congenital Anomalies

Here we go again. The DEMOCRATs' slaughterhouse is open for the mass murder of those who have been deemed social undesirables or adjudicated as mental defectives.

Damn

What a nonsense response

A man cannot possibly be the rapist of a girl who was not yet conceived, let alone born, at the time of the alleged rape.

Do you realize how stupid that is?

 

[Correll]

"Justice Douglas, you must remember one thing. At the constitutional level where we work, ninety percent of any decision is emotional. The rational of part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections"

pg. 8 The Court Years 1939-1975
The Autobiography of William O. Douglas

Advice given to Justice Douglas by the Chief Justice Charles Evan Hughes:

"Hughes made a statement to me which at the time was shattering but which over the years turned out to be true".
ibid

It is clear, R. v. W. is doomed and the consequences of it's repeal will impact generations of women:

• to bear and raise a child whose father was her rapist, or
• to bear a child from incest;
• to bear a child determined to have Birth Defects and Congenital Anomalies

It is also clear that the Trump Administration seeks to repeal the entire ACA, including in the court filing a preexisting condition, leaving a family to pay for a lifetime when the fetus is determined by Amniocentesis or other prenatal tests shows will require a life-long need for medical treatments and medication.

Since the child born with these pre existing conditions only insurance companies will benefit.

Your assumption that RvWade will be overturned seems like panic mongering. Far too many conservative judges, show undue respect to lefty precedent.

This ^^^ is a dumb comment. The R Party has opposed and run on the repeal of R v. W and the ACA. The GOP is cunning and worked hard to pack the Federal Courts with judges and justices willing to support their agenda.

An agenda which goes beyond their opposition for civil rights, human rights, equal rights and equal opportunities for all, including women, people of color, the LGBTQ community and immigrants.

An agenda which which supports Voodoo Economics, now a third effort by Trump&Co. to convince the voter that the tax cuts to the top earners and major corporations will trickle down to Main Street, the middle class and the working poor.

YOu never noticed all the times conservatives courts or republican appointed judges upheld lib precedents?

We are not partisan hacks like you people are. We give some consideration to our professional duties and ethics.


Too much some times.

Your whining about "rights" is dismissed. You had your chance to be serious about your claimed principles with Bill Clinton, and you choose Power.


So **** off wace monger.

"We are not partisan hacks like you people are."

YOu never noticed all the times conservatives courts or republican appointed judges upheld lib precedents?

We are not partisan hacks like you people are. We give some consideration to our professional duties and ethics.


Too much some times.

Your whining about "rights" is dismissed. You had your chance to be serious about your claimed principles with Bill Clinton, and you choose Power.


So **** off wace monger.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, Republicans are looking to replace a Supreme Court seat just weeks before an election and while voting is already taking place; when just 4 years ago, those same Republicans said Americans should decide who should pick a SC replacement when the election was still about 9 months away.

So when you post abject idiocies like, "we are not partisan hacks like you people are," you crack me up.

Jeez, you guys have been playing hard ball for a long time now. You really want to throw your tough guy image out the window by whining like a ******, when you start getting a little blowback?

You know, payback has barely begun. IF you can't take this, you really need to consider dialing it down, before we get really started.

Correct. YOu people are a mindless mob, that puts partisan politics ahead of everything. We don't. We are actual people, not mindless drones like you people.




Jeez, you guys have been playing hard ball for a long time now. You really want to throw your tough guy image out the window by whining like a ******, when you start getting a little blowback?

You know, payback has barely begun. IF you can't take this, you really need to consider dialing it down, before we get really started.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, I'm still laughing my ass off at you for stuttering, "we are not partisan hacks like you people are."

 

[Rye Catcher]

to bear and raise a child whose father was her rapist, or

A man cannot possibly be the rapist of a girl who was not yet conceived, let alone born, at the time of the alleged rape.

to bear a child from incest;

Is it considered incest if both parents are of the same race?

to bear a child determined to have Birth Defects and Congenital Anomalies

Here we go again. The DEMOCRATs' slaughterhouse is open for the mass murder of those who have been deemed social undesirables or adjudicated as mental defectives.

If a child is born with life long birth defects or congenital anomalies would you be willing to pay for the life long medical treatment to benefit the child, and pay for any surgery to get the child alive?

If the Congress repeals abortion in all circumstances, should the national government provide for the care of all children who are born and need full time care from the birth to their death?

 

[Correll]

"Justice Douglas, you must remember one thing. At the constitutional level where we work, ninety percent of any decision is emotional. The rational of part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections"

pg. 8 The Court Years 1939-1975
The Autobiography of William O. Douglas

Advice given to Justice Douglas by the Chief Justice Charles Evan Hughes:

"Hughes made a statement to me which at the time was shattering but which over the years turned out to be true".
ibid

It is clear, R. v. W. is doomed and the consequences of it's repeal will impact generations of women:

• to bear and raise a child whose father was her rapist, or
• to bear a child from incest;
• to bear a child determined to have Birth Defects and Congenital Anomalies

It is also clear that the Trump Administration seeks to repeal the entire ACA, including in the court filing a preexisting condition, leaving a family to pay for a lifetime when the fetus is determined by Amniocentesis or other prenatal tests shows will require a life-long need for medical treatments and medication.

Since the child born with these pre existing conditions only insurance companies will benefit.

Your assumption that RvWade will be overturned seems like panic mongering. Far too many conservative judges, show undue respect to lefty precedent.

This ^^^ is a dumb comment. The R Party has opposed and run on the repeal of R v. W and the ACA. The GOP is cunning and worked hard to pack the Federal Courts with judges and justices willing to support their agenda.

An agenda which goes beyond their opposition for civil rights, human rights, equal rights and equal opportunities for all, including women, people of color, the LGBTQ community and immigrants.

An agenda which which supports Voodoo Economics, now a third effort by Trump&Co. to convince the voter that the tax cuts to the top earners and major corporations will trickle down to Main Street, the middle class and the working poor.

YOu never noticed all the times conservatives courts or republican appointed judges upheld lib precedents?

We are not partisan hacks like you people are. We give some consideration to our professional duties and ethics.


Too much some times.

Your whining about "rights" is dismissed. You had your chance to be serious about your claimed principles with Bill Clinton, and you choose Power.


So **** off wace monger.

Your first two sentences come without support, evidence or examples.

I admit to being partisan; I admit you are a hack.

I support why I am left leaning, for the people policies and fiscally responsible policies and laws. You're a hack because you don't support fiscal responsible spending, unless it helps you.

I asked you a question. One you did not answer.


I repeat the question, you moron.



YOu never noticed all the times conservatives courts or republican appointed judges upheld lib precedents?

We are not partisan hacks like you people are. We give some consideration to our professional duties and ethics.


Too much some times.

 

[Faun]

All this time and you still don't know how to post. Sad, really.

 

[Cecilie1200]

"Justice Douglas, you must remember one thing. At the constitutional level where we work, ninety percent of any decision is emotional. The rational of part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections"

pg. 8 The Court Years 1939-1975
The Autobiography of William O. Douglas

Advice given to Justice Douglas by the Chief Justice Charles Evan Hughes:

"Hughes made a statement to me which at the time was shattering but which over the years turned out to be true".
ibid

It is clear, R. v. W. is doomed and the consequences of it's repeal will impact generations of women:

• to bear and raise a child whose father was her rapist, or
• to bear a child from incest;
• to bear a child determined to have Birth Defects and Congenital Anomalies

It is also clear that the Trump Administration seeks to repeal the entire ACA, including in the court filing a preexisting condition, leaving a family to pay for a lifetime when the fetus is determined by Amniocentesis or other prenatal tests shows will require a life-long need for medical treatments and medication.

Since the child born with these pre existing conditions only insurance companies will benefit.

Repeal of Roe won't make abortion illegal, you disingenuous drip.

Not entirely, abortions will continue in progressive states, but the women in Red States who are abandoned by the impregnator will get an illegal abortion if she can afford it, or she and her issue will live in poverty for decades. Assholes and misogynists, but a repeat myself, don't give a damn about anyone but themself;
something Odd Dude and other callous conservatives take pride in.

Repealing Roe v Wade will only impact women in Red States
They will have to go elsewhere for an abortion.

I really have little sympathy for them. They voted for Trump knowing what the impact is.......they deserve it

But will they be subject to arrest when they return to their red state?

No, because no ‘crime’ was committed in the woman’s state of residence.

I suspect RED STATE Republicans in the Governor Mansion and/or the legislature will pass a bill to punish anyone who leaves their state to have an abortion. Cunning and a lack of ethics has defined the 21st Century Republican Party. The Elephant needs to be replaced with Komodo Dragon; Elephants are social animals, the Komodo Dragon is not.

Yeah, I'll get right on hating and fearing Republican governors for what you "suspect" they're going to do.

Bullshit and delusions have defined the 21st century Democrat Party, the same as they did in the 20th century. The jackass doesn't need to be replaced; it still represents you just fine.

 

[Cecilie1200]

to bear and raise a child whose father was her rapist, or

A man cannot possibly be the rapist of a girl who was not yet conceived, let alone born, at the time of the alleged rape.

to bear a child from incest;

Is it considered incest if both parents are of the same race?

to bear a child determined to have Birth Defects and Congenital Anomalies

Here we go again. The DEMOCRATs' slaughterhouse is open for the mass murder of those who have been deemed social undesirables or adjudicated as mental defectives.

If a child is born with life long birth defects or congenital anomalies would you be willing to pay for the life long medical treatment to benefit the child, and pay for any surgery to get the child alive?

If the Congress repeals abortion in all circumstances, should the national government provide for the care of all children who are born and need full time care from the birth to their death?

So what I hear you saying is, "We should kill defective people, because they're too expensive!"

 

[justinacolmena]

So what I hear you saying is, "We should kill defective people, because they're too expensive!"

They're "Socialist Darwinists" — but it is certainly not a Darwinian "natural selection" but a completely unnatural artificial selection of desired traits for a carefully cultivated "working class" — which has to exist as a proletariat "base" for the Democratic Party's Marxist and dictatorial policies.

 

[Faun]

to bear and raise a child whose father was her rapist, or

A man cannot possibly be the rapist of a girl who was not yet conceived, let alone born, at the time of the alleged rape.

to bear a child from incest;

Is it considered incest if both parents are of the same race?

to bear a child determined to have Birth Defects and Congenital Anomalies

Here we go again. The DEMOCRATs' slaughterhouse is open for the mass murder of those who have been deemed social undesirables or adjudicated as mental defectives.

If a child is born with life long birth defects or congenital anomalies would you be willing to pay for the life long medical treatment to benefit the child, and pay for any surgery to get the child alive?

If the Congress repeals abortion in all circumstances, should the national government provide for the care of all children who are born and need full time care from the birth to their death?

So what I hear you saying is, "We should kill defective people, because they're too expensive!"

No, you moron.

What he said was people should be legally allowed to make that decision for themselves and not have the state decide for them.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

"Justice Douglas, you must remember one thing. At the constitutional level where we work, ninety percent of any decision is emotional. The rational of part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections"

pg. 8 The Court Years 1939-1975
The Autobiography of William O. Douglas

Advice given to Justice Douglas by the Chief Justice Charles Evan Hughes:

"Hughes made a statement to me which at the time was shattering but which over the years turned out to be true".
ibid

It is clear, R. v. W. is doomed and the consequences of it's repeal will impact generations of women:

• to bear and raise a child whose father was her rapist, or
• to bear a child from incest;
• to bear a child determined to have Birth Defects and Congenital Anomalies

It is also clear that the Trump Administration seeks to repeal the entire ACA, including in the court filing a preexisting condition, leaving a family to pay for a lifetime when the fetus is determined by Amniocentesis or other prenatal tests shows will require a life-long need for medical treatments and medication.

Since the child born with these pre existing conditions only insurance companies will benefit.

Another dumbass lefty who does not understand how this works.