Trump Strikes

No way Trump can just “control” Iran’s energy — he can try to choke Iran with sanctions and push other countries to stop buying Iranian oil, but China isn’t gonna meekly hand over that leverage. China buys a lot of Iranian crude, keeps lines open with workarounds, and sees Iranian energy as a cheap, strategic supply. That said, China won’t go full-on confrontational either — it balances trade with the U.S., avoids big risks from sanctions, and moves carefully (buying, storage swaps, ship-to-ship deals, slow infrastructure ties).

So: Trump can tighten the screws and make life hard for Tehran, but China will push back in its own way — buying, storing, and investing selectively — not letting the U.S. unilaterally “control” Iran’s energy, though both pressure and risk make big-cash, public Chinese projects slower and quieter.

Yeah — Iran’s not standing alone.

  • Iran’s got a bunch of allies and proxies doing work for it: Hezbollah in Lebanon, militias in Iraq and Syria, and the Houthis in Yemen — they strike stuff, open new fronts, and make the region messy.
  • Big powers like Russia and China aren’t sending troops, but they help in other ways — political backing, weapons or dual-use stuff, and economic ties that blunt sanctions.
  • Regional players (Turkey, Qatar, Gulf states) aren’t exactly on Iran’s team but they’re juggling interests, so things get complicated fast.
  • Bottom line: it’s not a one-on-one. It’s a networked fight — direct clashes, proxy attacks, diplomatic moves, and economic pressure all mixed together.

Yeah — looks more likely to drag on than end quick. Could still blow up into something bigger if a major strike or miscalculation happens, but for now the incentives push toward a prolonged, low-to-medium intensity conflict. :)
 
The Trump Haters are giving themselves whiplash violently swinging between TRUMP ALWAYS CHICKEN'S OUT!!!! and TRUMP IS A MADMAN STARTING WORLD WAR 3!!!! :aargh: :aargh: :aargh:
While all you do is go around this forum attacking people for not wanting to suck Trump's dick, even if they're underaged.
 
You are getting very strange. Are you OK? :confused-84:

You're not getting very strange. You're always strange. You barely talk about issues, just going around attacking people who don't agree with you.

I would ask if you're okay, but I get the feeling you've got TCS, Trump Cult Syndrome.
 
It takes a special kind of fool to buy this.

Iran had no functioning internet at the time.

The post is from an anti Iranian political activist.

Can you say "green screen"????????????

You probably think AI is reliable too!
Sigh. You just refuse to understand.

But you probably thought Biden was reliable. So spare me the churlish insults.
 
Sigh. You just refuse to understand.
Proving his is not an honest opinion.

But you probably thought Biden was reliable. So spare me the churlish insults.
Biden chose Harris as his VP to make HIM look good, and Obuma picked Biden as his VP to make HIM look good, and Obumma is an absolute POC, so what does that really say of their party now? Hell, the best of them almost makes Kamala look good now.
 
Sigh. You just refuse to understand.

But you probably thought Biden was reliable. So spare me the churlish insults.
You fell for it. It’s obvious AI slop. But it’s what you wanted to believe.
 
Resources(oil & gas)are limited. If folks actually shared instead of hogging everything, the world would be a lot nicer. What do you reckon? :)

👉👉 US + Israel vs. Iran + proxies + ( China + Russia + North Korea )

yeah — a big deal from 1961 called the Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance. It’s basically a Cold War-era mutual‑defense and cooperation pact that China and North Korea signed to back each other politically, economically, and (if needed) militarily. It’s meant to keep a buffer on China’s border, deter attacks, and tie Pyongyang into Beijing’s orbit.

Why it exists: after Korea got split and wars were fresh, North Korea needed buddies and China wanted a stable buffer zone — so they made a pact: trade, tech help, “we got your back” if someone attacks, and no joining alliances against each other. Over time China’s been more about keeping the peace and avoiding collapse on the peninsula (refugee flows, chaos, U.S.-China flareups), not marching straight into DPRK wars — so the relationship is close but complicated.

Recent vibes: the treaty still matters; leaders flex the alliance (visits, diplomatic reaffirmations) but Beijing’s been cautious about automatic military intervention and leans more on economic leverage and diplomacy. Analysts debate how “solid” the alliance is now, especially with North Korea’s nukes and shifting regional dynamics.

On paper, the 1961 treaty obliges the two to give mutual aid if one is attacked. But in practice China has signaled it won’t automatically send troops for every provocation; Beijing prefers using diplomacy, economic pressure, and limited support to keep the peninsula stable UNLESS IT SEES A DIRECT, SERIOUS THREAT TO ITS OWN SECURITY. :)

sources:

 
Back
Top Bottom