Trump Sets Up Members Of Congress By Releasing Completely Unredacted Epstein Files......And They Fell Into The Trap

[meaner gene]

Oh, like a slam book but for grownups (sort of).

Each Democrat had a prepared list of burns for Bondi. The didn't try to hide that they were reading directly from it.

You mean "burns", like asking the Attorney General why she hasn't followed the law, and released the Epstein files, neither all of them, or on time.
Why she didn't follow the law and release a redaction justification.

Those kind of "burns"?

 

[meaner gene]

Driving a car into an officer while trying to flee is less of a threat than crawling through a window?

It depends how many thousand armed people you have right behind you, chanting to kill someone.

 

[meaner gene]

Watch this video and you tell me who was the attacker and who was the counterattacker.



Everyone on this board knows that there is no way that those democrats would have treated a male united states attorney general like that.

Congressional testifiers are there to answer the questions legislators pose to them. Not waste time rambling off topic b.s.
They're supposed to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It depends how many thousand armed people you have right behind you, chanting to kill someone.

When did that happen, I mean before the Anti ICE rally in MN?

 

[Seymour Flops]

You mean "burns", like asking the Attorney General why she hasn't followed the law, and released the Epstein files, neither all of them, or on time.
Why she didn't follow the law and release a redaction justification.

Those kind of "burns"?

Yes, and she responded with burns of her own. Such as did you ask merrick garland any of that? Why don't you care about your own constituents?Being murdered by illegal aliens?

Of course, you only want to call them "burns" because it was a female republican.

Our choice was to sit there and take their mud slinging or sling some mud back.

If she had been a democrat slinging mud back at republicans, your media would be gushing over what a strong woman she was and how taken aback the republicans were.

When you watched the view next, you would see whoopi goldberg, say, "of course, those republicans were surprised, they are used to their submissive white christian wives."

 

[meaner gene]

When did that happen, I mean before the Anti ICE rally in MN?

1/6/21

 

[meaner gene]

Yes, and she responded with burns of her own. Such as did you ask merrick garland any of that? Why don't you care about your own constituents?Being murdered by illegal aliens?

Of course, you only want to call them "burns" because it was a female republican.

Our choice was to sit there and take their mud slinging or sling some mud back.

If she had been a democrat slinging mud back at republicans, your media would be gushing over what a strong woman she was and how taken aback the republicans were.

When you watched the view next, you would see whoopi goldberg, say, "of course, those republicans were surprised, they are used to their submissive white christian wives."

Actually the republicans slung "burns" at Merrick Garland, and he didn't respond back in kind. He answered their questions without distractions.

 

[meaner gene]

Yes, and she responded with burns of her own. Such as did you ask merrick garland any of that? Why don't you care about your own constituents?Being murdered by illegal aliens?

Of course, you only want to call them "burns" because it was a female republican.

In 2023 and 2024, Republican lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate heavily questioned and criticized Attorney General Merrick Garland, primarily alleging that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been "weaponized" to target conservatives and protect President Joe Biden and his family. These confrontations have focused on high-profile investigations, including those into former President Donald Trump, Hunter Biden, and the handling of classified documents.

Garland didn't respond in kind.

 

[meaner gene]

Of course, you only want to call them "burns" because it was a female republican.

Of course if it was Trump responding to a female republican

In 2015, Donald Trump notoriously remarked that then-Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly had "blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever".

You had no problem with that.

 

[Rawley]

If only she used her brain to track down and prosecute the child traffickers, rapists and killers on the Epstein list

You mean the ones that have evaded detection by the hundreds of lawyers and cops and investigators for the two decades preceding Bondi?

 

[meaner gene]

You mean the ones that have evaded detection by the hundreds of lawyers and cops and investigators for the two decades preceding Bondi?

Do you really want to go there.
It was a republican who after the DOJ wrote a 56 page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, didn't prosecute Epstein in an agreement where Florida would charge him with a lesser offense, and they made a deal to give immunity to Epstein's known co-conspirators.

Remember that prosecutor. Who Trump rewarded by making him Secretary of Labor.

 

[Crepitus]

Trump owns them.

This is so choice.

"THE TRUMP TEAM JUST EXECUTED THE GREATEST TRAP IN POLITICAL HISTORY.

And Congress walked right into it.This week, Attorney General Pam Bondi sat before the House Judiciary Committee. Standard oversight hearing. Routine questions.Then she pulled out a document.Labeled: "Jayapal Pramila — Search History."The room went SILENT.HERE'S WHAT HAPPENEDThe DOJ gave Congress access to the unredacted Epstein files this week. Every member got their own login. Their own computer. Their own session.What Congress didn't know?The DOJ was tracking EVERY SINGLE SEARCH.Every name they looked up.Every document they opened.Every file they downloaded.ALL OF IT. LOGGED.And then brought the receipts to the hearing."

Wait, they were spying on congressmen?

Pretty sure that's illegal, first of all.

Secondly, what do they think it will accomplish?

 

[Leo123]

Hernandez helped to traffic $400 million in illegal drugs into the USA.

He was the 'fall guy' for Biden's failed drug czar, Kamala. Drug trafficking from Honduras did not stop after Hernandez' arrest. Biden and Kamala accomplished nothing. They did not go after the entrenched transnational networks.

 

[Rawley]

Do you really want to go there.
It was a republican who after the DOJ wrote a 56 page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, didn't prosecute Epstein in an agreement where Florida would charge him with a lesser offense, and they made a deal to give immunity to Epstein's known co-conspirators.

Remember that prosecutor. Who Trump rewarded by making him Secretary of Labor.

1,000% Ratty. Kudos

 

[Seymour Flops]

Actually the republicans slung "burns" at Merrick Garland, and he didn't respond back in kind. He answered their questions without distractions.

What did he say when democrats asked him about releasing the epstein files?

 

[meaner gene]

He was the 'fall guy' for Biden's failed drug czar, Kamala. Drug trafficking from Honduras did not stop after Hernandez' arrest. Biden and Kamala accomplished nothing. They did not go after the entrenched transnational networks.

Very bad logic there Columbo.
Every drug trafficker we arrested from Noreaga to El Chappo didn't stop drugs from coming in the USA.

Hernandez wasn't the first, last or only person to help smuggle drugs into the US. But he did help bring in $400 million worth.

 

[meaner gene]

What did he say when democrats asked him about releasing the epstein files?

If they asked him in the middle of the Maxwell prosecution and appeal, he would have sited the ongoing case exclusion from release.

files in the middle of an ongoing prosecution, is generally restricted by policy and law to prevent prejudice to the defendant's right to a fair trial, protect witness safety, or avoid compromising the investigation.

 

[airplanemechanic]

No one with eyes thinks a 5 mph car was a danger to the officer who easily moved out of the way and shot Renee FROM the side and twice from BEHIND all against published policy. We know for sure since he wasnt run over or hit or hurt.

Firing at a vehicle doesnt stop it instantly which is why it isnt policy:

View attachment 1219359

He didn't shoot solely to disable the vehicle, he shot to stop the ******* thing from running over him.

 

[citygator]

He didn't shoot solely to disable the vehicle, he shot to stop the ******* them from running over him.

He shot twice from behind including the kill shot.

 

[airplanemechanic]

He shot twice from behind including the kill shot.

Are we talking about the same shooting? You mean that lesbian that ran over that ICE guy with the Honda? Or another one?