Trump says no welfare checks if the brder wall is not approved

[The Original Tree]

Republicans in states that had no chance at ever getting the EC votes for a Republican contender probably didn't even bother to vote. If you live in NY or California, what's the point of voting if you're a Republican?

https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/texas

Donald J. Trump Rep. 4,685,047 52.2%

Hillary Clinton Dem. 3,877,868 43.2

Hillary won the popular vote by the number of votes she got in Texas. Ironic ain't it.

There are multiple sex positions for homosexuals to engage in sex, but no matter what your position or your partner's, it is still two hairy men lusting after hairy man butt.

And no matter what your position is on The Election, both candidates played by the same rules under the Electoral College, which means Hillary Clinton is still a lying corrupt treasonous drunk, and Donald Trump is Still President!

And you are still a bitter fool.

 

[bendog]

Then they should have voted in different places to elect Hillary. They didn't, Trump won, and if you want the government shut down, deny the wall!

You finally admit Hillary got more votes, but the quirk of EC allocation was what elected Trump, not his popularity.

The EC was no quirk. It was designed so that population centers did not dominate rural areas. Given that urban centers have become the cesspools of America today, it shows magnificent foresight of the framers of the Constitution.

I wonder what state had the most EVs in 1796

 

[sealybobo]

Now that will wake up the protesters living off solely of their Soros protest income.

Trump won in November. That was 9 months ago. When I got unemployment it was only good for 5 months. So people on welfare have had 9 months to figure this shit out. So at this point it's obvious they're just milking it and they will never get off unless thrown off.

Did they think it would last forever?

You ***** Republicans don't have the balls to end welfare. You needed Clinton to do it

 

[imawhosure]

Republicans in states that had no chance at ever getting the EC votes for a Republican contender probably didn't even bother to vote. If you live in NY or California, what's the point of voting if you're a Republican?

https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/texas

Donald J. Trump Rep. 4,685,047 52.2%

Hillary Clinton Dem. 3,877,868 43.2

Hillary won the popular vote by the number of votes she got in Texas. Ironic ain't it.

There are multiple sex positions for homosexuals to engage in sex, but no matter what your position or your partner's, it is still two hairy men lusting after hairy man butt.

And no matter what your position is on The Election, both candidates played by the same rules under the Electoral College, which means Hillary Clinton is still a lying corrupt treasonous drunk, and Donald Trump is Still President!

And you are still a bitter fool.

Hey TOT-------> are you a hunter? Do you have a NY CAREBEAR on your wall too?

When mounted on a wall, do you know how to make a NY CAREBEAR SMART! Easy-peezy..........at Christmas, you hang lights on its antlers, and it instantly becomes BRIGHT and starts spewing liberal ideas and instantly claims it is Rudolph's son, lololololol!

 

[radical right]

The EC was no quirk. It was designed so that population centers did not dominate rural areas. Given that urban centers have become the cesspools of America today, it shows magnificent foresight of the framers of the Constitution.

WRONG.

https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/colorado


Hillary Clinton Dem. 1,338,870 48.2%

Donald J. Trump Rep. 1,202,484 43.3

Where did Clinton win by 130,000 votes?

Vote by county Clinton Trump
Denver 244,551 62,690

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You ***** Republicans don't have the balls to end welfare. You needed Clinton to do it

Clinton? As in Bill Clinton? The same Bill Clinton that vetoed THE REPUBLICAN WELFARE REFORM BILL twice?

 

[bendog]

Debt cieling is not about spending, it's about PAYING THE BILLS.

but even if it WAS about spending - Trump's wall is just another SPENDING item.

Food stamps have been costing the country 70 billion a year the past couple of years. A Trump wall cold cost anywhere from 13 to 20 billion dollars one time only.

My money says the wall is a much better investment than supporting people who don't want to work for their own food.

Food stamps and welfare fulfill a need for many Americans, granted there is abuse in the system, like all systems. Take it from me as a landlord and a small business owner in poor and minority neigborhoods. The people served by social services and EBT do need help, although yes, there is abuse, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. If people want to preach their religion, fine. I don't see a reason why they should get a tax kickback for it though.

States run by Republican governors have proven many people don't need food stamps. They enforced requirements such as having a job working 20 hours a week, volunteering their time 20 hours a month, or being enrolled in a vocational program to prepare for a job. Most of those hungry people decided to drop out of the food stamp program.

Besides, if we cut food stamps in half for one year, used that money to build the wall, then we can return food stamps to it's current level, we would have enough to build the highest tech wall available.

There are maybe 40 votes in the Senate to pull this off. LOL

Until 2018, lol. You are going to find out, that the rinos are going to get hosed in the primary election. You are also going to find out, that the NEW people, along with the Democratic seats we pick up, are going to cause you to buy a lot of Alka-Seltzer.

You think Sherrod Brown Bill Nelson and Bob Casey have been hurt in the past two weeks?

 

[radical right]

Exactly. That's why it's stupid to use the popular vote for any argument; nobody was trying to get the most votes Both contenders were trying to get the most electoral votes. Two totally different games.

NOPE, most presidential election before this one, went to get the most americans to vote for you, What Howard Dean called the 50 state strategy. Otherwise, Clinton wouldn't have bothered spending a dime in Texas.

 

[Brain357]

You ***** Republicans don't have the balls to end welfare. You needed Clinton to do it

Clinton? As in Bill Clinton? The same Bill Clinton that vetoed THE REPUBLICAN WELFARE REFORM BILL twice?

He vetoed till they got it right. I don't see any reforms happening now..

 

[Bassman007]

Now that will wake up the protesters living off solely of their Soros protest income.

Trump won in November. That was 9 months ago. When I got unemployment it was only good for 5 months. So people on welfare have had 9 months to figure this shit out. So at this point it's obvious they're just milking it and they will never get off unless thrown off.

Did they think it would last forever?

You ***** Republicans don't have the balls to end welfare. You needed Clinton to do it

There are people on welfare for ever..............they think it's just how people live, some of these people have never even had a job

 

[imawhosure]

Food stamps have been costing the country 70 billion a year the past couple of years. A Trump wall cold cost anywhere from 13 to 20 billion dollars one time only.

My money says the wall is a much better investment than supporting people who don't want to work for their own food.

Food stamps and welfare fulfill a need for many Americans, granted there is abuse in the system, like all systems. Take it from me as a landlord and a small business owner in poor and minority neigborhoods. The people served by social services and EBT do need help, although yes, there is abuse, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. If people want to preach their religion, fine. I don't see a reason why they should get a tax kickback for it though.

States run by Republican governors have proven many people don't need food stamps. They enforced requirements such as having a job working 20 hours a week, volunteering their time 20 hours a month, or being enrolled in a vocational program to prepare for a job. Most of those hungry people decided to drop out of the food stamp program.

Besides, if we cut food stamps in half for one year, used that money to build the wall, then we can return food stamps to it's current level, we would have enough to build the highest tech wall available.

There are maybe 40 votes in the Senate to pull this off. LOL

Until 2018, lol. You are going to find out, that the rinos are going to get hosed in the primary election. You are also going to find out, that the NEW people, along with the Democratic seats we pick up, are going to cause you to buy a lot of Alka-Seltzer.

You think Sherrod Brown Bill Nelson and Bob Casey have been hurt in the past two weeks?

Nope I don't! But I can tell you this--------> Missouri is a goner, Indiana is a goner, Montana is a goner, etc. And the people taking their place along with people like Jeff Flakey-Flakes, you aren't going to like AT ALL.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Exactly. That's why it's stupid to use the popular vote for any argument; nobody was trying to get the most votes Both contenders were trying to get the most electoral votes. Two totally different games.

NOPE, most presidential election before this one, went to get the most americans to vote for you, What Howard Dean called the 50 state strategy. Otherwise, Clinton wouldn't have bothered spending a dime in Texas.

And Trump didn't waste much time in NY and California and he won. What does that tell you?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You ***** Republicans don't have the balls to end welfare. You needed Clinton to do it

Clinton? As in Bill Clinton? The same Bill Clinton that vetoed THE REPUBLICAN WELFARE REFORM BILL twice?

He vetoed till they got it right. I don't see any reforms happening now..

Bull. He vetoed it until just before he started his reelection campaign. Then the Republicans stuck the bill in front of him again and said "Veto it now MFr!" That's the only reason he signed it.

 

[radical right]

And Trump didn't waste much time in NY and California and he won. What does that tell you?

It explains why Trump didn't win the popular vote.

Seems Trump planned it that way.

 

[Aletheia4u]

Now that will wake up the protesters living off solely of their Soros protest income.

That is the best way to get all of Hillary's supporters to cooperate. And that is to starve them into submission. They all are going to be surprise one day and don't see their food stamps in the mail box. I can see them all marching to the border with bricks to hurry up and build that wall.

 

[jknowgood]

Actually this is what Trump sais:

"I will bring this country to a brink of default and total disaster unless you give me what I want."

Actually, the facts being what they are and the USA having a 20 trillion dollar national debt, it should be said that

Obama bought the country to the brink of default, and I Donald Trump an going to build a wall to keep the crack and meth out, or at least slow it so that we the USA can get on with making America Great Again.

But I'm not the Donald's speechwriter...................yet

Oh, man. How hard did you have to hit yourself in the head with a sledgehammer to think a wall will keep out drugs? And how many times?

Drug dealers aren't as stupid as you are, unfortunately.

Ultralight aircraft being used to transport drugs

How does Trump plan to stop welfare payments? What welfare payments?

Hopefully your welfare payments.

 

[imawhosure]

Food stamps have been costing the country 70 billion a year the past couple of years. A Trump wall cold cost anywhere from 13 to 20 billion dollars one time only.

My money says the wall is a much better investment than supporting people who don't want to work for their own food.

Food stamps and welfare fulfill a need for many Americans, granted there is abuse in the system, like all systems. Take it from me as a landlord and a small business owner in poor and minority neigborhoods. The people served by social services and EBT do need help, although yes, there is abuse, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. If people want to preach their religion, fine. I don't see a reason why they should get a tax kickback for it though.

States run by Republican governors have proven many people don't need food stamps. They enforced requirements such as having a job working 20 hours a week, volunteering their time 20 hours a month, or being enrolled in a vocational program to prepare for a job. Most of those hungry people decided to drop out of the food stamp program.

Besides, if we cut food stamps in half for one year, used that money to build the wall, then we can return food stamps to it's current level, we would have enough to build the highest tech wall available.

There are maybe 40 votes in the Senate to pull this off. LOL

Until 2018, lol. You are going to find out, that the rinos are going to get hosed in the primary election. You are also going to find out, that the NEW people, along with the Democratic seats we pick up, are going to cause you to buy a lot of Alka-Seltzer.

You think Sherrod Brown Bill Nelson and Bob Casey have been hurt in the past two weeks?

Oh, and by the way--------> You know those 3 states that Trump won by a large margin. Know what is going to happen? To keep their seats, they are going to have to vote FOR the agenda before re-election, or get tossed. By my count right now, I am seeing a 56 seat GOP majority, and the new ones are going to be ready to vote for EVERYTHING. It is possible (not likely) to see the Republicans getting 60. I know you will scoff at that, but by polls, that is MORE likely, than Democrats regaining the House, or Senate. That is NOT an opinion, that is a mathematical fact!

 

[Bassman007]

Now that will wake up the protesters living off solely of their Soros protest income.

That is the best way to get all of Hillary's supporters to cooperate. And that is to starve them into submission. They all are going to be surprise one day and don't see their food stamps in the mail box. I can see them all marching to the border with bricks to hurry up and build that wall.

But if the wall is built this way it will be full of holes to let drugs in

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

And Trump didn't waste much time in NY and California and he won. What does that tell you?

It explains why Trump didn't win the popular vote.

Seems Trump planned it that way.

No, what explains him not winning the popular vote is because he wasn't trying to win the popular vote. If the game was to win the popular vote, he would have campaigned differently.

 

[bendog]

Food stamps and welfare fulfill a need for many Americans, granted there is abuse in the system, like all systems. Take it from me as a landlord and a small business owner in poor and minority neigborhoods. The people served by social services and EBT do need help, although yes, there is abuse, but don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. If people want to preach their religion, fine. I don't see a reason why they should get a tax kickback for it though.

States run by Republican governors have proven many people don't need food stamps. They enforced requirements such as having a job working 20 hours a week, volunteering their time 20 hours a month, or being enrolled in a vocational program to prepare for a job. Most of those hungry people decided to drop out of the food stamp program.

Besides, if we cut food stamps in half for one year, used that money to build the wall, then we can return food stamps to it's current level, we would have enough to build the highest tech wall available.

There are maybe 40 votes in the Senate to pull this off. LOL

Until 2018, lol. You are going to find out, that the rinos are going to get hosed in the primary election. You are also going to find out, that the NEW people, along with the Democratic seats we pick up, are going to cause you to buy a lot of Alka-Seltzer.

You think Sherrod Brown Bill Nelson and Bob Casey have been hurt in the past two weeks?

Oh, and by the way--------> You know those 3 states that Trump won by a large margin. Know what is going to happen? To keep their seats, they are going to have to vote FOR the agenda before re-election, or get tossed. By my count right now, I am seeing a 56 seat GOP majority, and the new ones are going to be ready to vote for EVERYTHING. It is possible (not likely) to see the Republicans getting 60. I know you will scoff at that, but by polls, that is MORE likely, than Democrats regaining the House, or Senate. That is NOT an opinion, that is a mathematical fact!

Trump won Fl by 2%, PA was even and Ohio by 3%. If the election were held today, Bruan Hilda would be potus.