Clipper
Diamond Member
- Dec 22, 2018
- 21,468
- 14,014
- 1,290
Didn't you read the ammendment, ass breath? BTW, take a good look at your subhuman boy after he misbehaves at trial:
Trump Removed from Maine Primary Ballot
- Thread starter Synthaholic
- Start date
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 90,528
- 82,265
- 3,615
Please explain WTF the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution has to do with state elections laws in Maine?
The fact you continue to try to divert is further proof the hack Maine SOS did not make her decision in any Maine election law.
She admits it was because if YouTube videos of the Piglosi Jan 6 Hollywood production, Moron.
Once again I will ask….cite the specific Maine election law for qualifying to be on the ballot that Trump doesn’t meet.
Clipper
Diamond Member
- Dec 22, 2018
- 21,468
- 14,014
- 1,290
Under Maine law the SOS is allowed to make that determination. And she used the 14 ammendment to come to her decision, Trump trained monkey.
And she didn't come to that conclusion lightly. Your soiled undies had no bearing on her decision.
You need to come up with a compelling argument showing standing where Trump's J6 actions wigged you out.
You'll be a hero.
You have information that Jack Smith, indeed, charged Trump for insurrection or are you still blowing smoke?
Based on her opinion Trump 'engaged' in an insurrection w/o any legal evidence.
Rigby5
Diamond Member
In truth, justice and the American way.. America .. this will make Trump even more popular.....
...
YES!
I do not like Trump at all, but now I have to vote for him.
He started no war and got covid right, which is good, but also screwed up the SCOTUS on abortion.
But it is blatantly treason to block candidates, especially those who used to be president.
Rigby5
Diamond Member
That is impossible.
The right of voters to have access to the candidates of their choice can never be up to a state SOS.
That would be an obvious dictatorship then, and not a republic.
The 14th amendment also obviously does not apply since the 14th amendment was about those who formally signed declarations of secession and caused half a million deaths.
Nothing remotely similar.
For Trump to have been involved in "insurrection", he would have had to have tried to bribe both the police and the military, or organized an armed force capable of defeating the police and the military.
You should look at the ruling, in federal court where a Clinton appointed democrat just said the 14th claim lacks standing.
Tits up for the rabid Trump lovers?
- Moderator
- #1,330
At least you’re consistent at being ignorant and wrong – you are the typical conservative.
‘The report from the CRS specified, "Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment does not expressly require a criminal conviction, and historically, one was not necessary."’
Fact Check: Trump Doesn't Need a Criminal Conviction for Ballot Removal, According to Research on 14th Amendment
The former president was previously charged on four federal felony counts for his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.news.yahoo.com
In fact, disqualification pursuant to Section 3 is a political – not criminal – process; absent jeopardy of loss of freedom by state action, due process does not apply and is not required to disqualify a candidate from holding public office.
Yet the 9th circuit said individual voters have no standing to challenge a candidates position on a ballot and the supremes wouldn't take up an appeal. Go figure.
.
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 90,528
- 82,265
- 3,615
So you still can’t cite any Maine election law that she could use to keep Trump off the ballot.
I accept your concession, Vermin.
GWV5903
Gold Member
GWV5903
Gold Member
Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 83,550
- 76,143
- 3,605
- Thread starter
- #1,334
The CO SC stayed their own ruling, until SCOTUS decides it or declines to hear it.
The CO SoS decided to put him on the ballot, in accordance with the CO SC stay.
This isn't rocket science, and this is no win for Trump. It's a status quo holding pattern.
Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 83,550
- 76,143
- 3,605
- Thread starter
- #1,335
He got caught. Kinda proves my point.
GWV5903
Gold Member
Like I said from the beginning, it will not hold up, is the English language that hard for you to understand? Are you from Eastern Europe maybe?
GWV5903
Gold Member
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
Why would I do that? I do not even agree with these actions, but unlike you I do not need to agree with something to defend the right of a person to do it
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
Why are you posting old news?
If you had bothered to read the ruling from the CO SC instead of relying on FoxNews/OAAN to tell you what to think you would know that this was part of their original decision. Whether he is on the primary ballot or not is irrelevant, this is about the general election.
It is so much fun when you sheep think you have a gotcha moment but just show your ignorance instead.
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
Similar threads
