Trump orders new census that does NOT count illegal immigrants

[StatesRightsForever]

Thank you. Clear and concise. The SCOTUS needs to address the issue. Congress has no jurisdiction on this issue.

You have it backwards. Congress writes the laws, not the SC.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

In fact, that is their only reason for existence--to have the final say on all things Constitutional~

So you support letting unelected judges run the country.? That is not only stupid, it is contrary to the constitution. THINK

 

[JohnDB]

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

It was 1803 but yes, congress should have removed marshall from the SC for giving the courts authority to repeal laws when the constitution says only congress can do that.

Quote verbatim the section of the Constitution that says only Congress can repeal laws, please.

And, yes, 1803.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Where does the constitution say that, you moron?? Fact is the constitution never explicitly says who has authority to declare laws unconstitutional which means, by the 10A, the states have it. WHY CAN'T YOU THINK?

Now you say that, "the constitution never explicitly says who has authority to declare laws unconstitutional," when you wrote only Congress can do that.

Your stretch on the 10th Amendment can never construe that the states have such powers.

Have you ever read it fully? I think not. You don't understand it, obviously.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

So you support letting unelected judges run the country.? That is not only stupid, it is contrary to the constitution. THINK

Your comment is a stupid one contrary to the Constitution.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You have it backwards. Congress writes the laws, not the SC.

Yes, and the SC determines whether they meet the parameters of the Constitution's authority for Congress.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

article 3 is clear the power to rule on matters involving the Government rests with the Supreme Court and any Federal Court established that is inferior to the Supreme Court with the final say resting with the Supreme Court.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Talk to the Founding Fathers.

Got an Ouija board handy?

 

[StatesRightsForever]

Quote verbatim the section of the Constitution that says only Congress can repeal laws, please.

And, yes, 1803.

The very first words of the constitution after the preamble are : " All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states."

So courts can't write laws or repeal them. But they do it all the time.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

Now you say that, "the constitution never explicitly says who has authority to declare laws unconstitutional," when you wrote only Congress can do that.

Your stretch on the 10th Amendment can never construe that the states have such powers.

Have you ever read it fully? I think not. You don't understand it, obviously.

The 10A says any power not given to the feds or denied to the states is reserved to the states and the people. Since the constitution never talks about who has the power to declare laws unconstitutional, that means the states have it. THINK

 

[StatesRightsForever]

Yes, and the SC determines whether they meet the parameters of the Constitution's authority for Congress.

Where does the constitution say the SC has the power to do that.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

article 3 is clear the power to rule on matters involving the Government rests with the Supreme Court and any Federal Court established that is inferior to the Supreme Court with the final say resting with the Supreme Court.

What a liar you are. give us the quote that says that. Nobody can find it.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The very first words of the constitution after the preamble are : " All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states."

So courts can't write laws or repeal them. But they do it all the time.

The word you don't get is "legislative." Look it up. Then look up "judicial."

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

What a liar you are. give us the quote that says that. Nobody can find it.

Marbury v Madison 1803 clears it up for you. If you don't accept it, no one cares because it does not matter.

 

[Edgetho]

Where does the constitution say the SC has the power to do that.

SCOTUS has no power. All they have is Opinions. That's it. Nothing more.

If The Founding Fathers had wanted SCOTUS to have actual 'power', they would have given them an Enforcement Arm. But they have none. All they have is Opinion.

Once they give an Opinion, they have to ask the Executive Branch to enforce it. Opinions, without the power to enforce them are nothing more than suggestions. And that's all SCOTUS has. Suggestions.

The Legislative and the Executive Branches can ignore SCOTUS any time they're in the mood

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

SCOTUS has no power. All they have is Opinions. That's it. Nothing more.

If The Founding Fathers had wanted SCOTUS to have actual 'power', they would have given them an Enforcement Arm. But they have none. All they have is Opinion.

Once they give an Opinion, they have to ask the Executive Branch to enforce it. Opinions, without the power to enforce them are nothing more than suggestions. And that's all SCOTUS has. Suggestions.

The Legislative and the Executive Branches can ignore SCOTUS any time they're in the mood

That is your wrongful opinion. No one cares too much, I think. That's my opinion, but it is far closer than yours.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

What a liar you are. give us the quote that says that. Nobody can find it.

I am sorry you can't read English nor understand it, go to school.

 

[Edgetho]

I am sorry you can't read English nor understand it, go to school.

Your interpretation of Article III is juvenile and without merit.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Your interpretation of Article III is juvenile and without merit.

LOL sure it is. would that be why all the legal experts agree with me?