trump orders generals to draw up plans to invade Greenland.

[Couchpotato]

And the Moron would pay it.

If we could buy Greenland for 10 billion we definitely should.

 

[candycorn]

Why? If it belongs to Denmark and they decide they want to sell it to Barbados shouldn't that be their prerogative?

Thanks for the chuckle.

 

[Couchpotato]

Thanks for the chuckle.

No worries. BTW your boy didnt play great but gotta tip the cap to him. Played with confidence and a short memory. Got the win that’s all that counts

 

[krichton]

Hopefully Mr. Trump isn't really going to "invade" Greenland. The Dems win 90% of the House in the midterms if he does.

Trump will regain the house and senate once we've beaten and taken over France, Italy, UK, etc.

 

[krichton]

Wow, that might be the most ignorant post ever,

You'll find no shortage of that here!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Greenland Says It Chooses Denmark and Rules Out Joining US​

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-13/greenland-says-it-will-choose-denmark-and-rules-out-joining-us?embedded-checkout=true

 

[krichton]

As I said, Trump has shown an interest in the annexation of Canada, something no modern president has done. I will support the annexation of Greenland first if it sees me moved closer to the goal of annexing Canada. That's called compromise, something you childish loons don't understand. Now run along child, adults are talking here.

So you think going to war with NATO is the right path moving forward for the US? Yikes. Why would you want the US to lose every ally and become a rogue, pariah state? Calling other people childish loons, while you harbor some weird desire for the US to become the next Nazi germany is literally something only a 7 year old would dream up and think was a good idea. It's really no wonder that Donald Trump is the one coming up with it.

 

[Rogue AI]

So you think going to war with NATO is the right path moving forward for the US? Yikes. Why would you want the US to lose every ally and become a rogue, pariah state? Calling other people childish loons, while you harbor some weird desire for the US to become the next Nazi germany is literally something only a 7 year old would dream up and think was a good idea. It's really no wonder that Donald Trump is the one coming up with it.

There will be no war. Europe will cave to Trump's demand or risk losing NATO. They cannot afford that. If it did get us out of NATO, all the better. That Cold War relic needs to disappear.

 

[Rogue AI]

So you think going to war with NATO is the right path moving forward for the US? Yikes. Why would you want the US to lose every ally and become a rogue, pariah state? Calling other people childish loons, while you harbor some weird desire for the US to become the next Nazi germany is literally something only a 7 year old would dream up and think was a good idea. It's really no wonder that Donald Trump is the one coming up with it.

Calling everything you don't like, 'nazi', is something children do. Run along child.

 

[dudmuck]

There will be no war. Europe will cave to Trump's demand or risk losing NATO. They cannot afford that. If it did get us out of NATO, all the better. That Cold War relic needs to disappear.

 

[krichton]

There will be no war. Europe will cave to Trump's demand or risk losing NATO. They cannot afford that. If it did get us out of NATO, all the better. That Cold War relic needs to disappear.

So you want to see an end to the most powerful alliance in the history of mankind, to what end exactly? To become weaker? To allow for more chaos in the world? I doubt you can honestly answer. You're simply waiting to take your next cue from our orange cone in chief.

 

[krichton]

Calling everything you don't like, 'nazi', is something children do. Run along child.

You're advocating for imperialism in the same way that Nazi Germany conducted it, so why wouldn't I call it like I see it?

 

[drudge X]

Trump may do a regime change in Cuba and Iran before Greenland.

 

[Rogue AI]

So you want to see an end to the most powerful alliance in the history of mankind, to what end exactly? To become weaker? To allow for more chaos in the world? I doubt you can honestly answer. You're simply waiting to take your next cue from our orange cone in chief.

I want to see an end to the greatest liability this country ever entered. It might allow for chaos with the Eurotrash but would open us to pursue our interests with no regards to their interests. NATO is a shackle, not a strength. The sooner we are out of that relic, the better.

 

[drudge X]

See, China cannot corner the rare earth market if US makes Greenland great. China gave every country that has a dispute with them the middle finger when these countries cite international law. So who cares what China thinks.

China issues new Greenland warning to Trump administration

China urged the U.S. to respect international law in the Arctic and stop using Greenland as a pretext, as Trump renews plans to acquire the territory.

www.newsweek.com

 

[krichton]

I want to see an end to the greatest liability this country ever entered. It might allow for chaos with the Eurotrash but would open us to pursue our interests with no regards to their interests. NATO is a shackle, not a strength. The sooner we are out of that relic, the better.

And by other interests you mean occupying more countries and more wars, correct?

 

[drudge X]

So you want to see an end to the most powerful alliance in the history of mankind, to what end exactly? To become weaker? To allow for more chaos in the world? I doubt you can honestly answer. You're simply waiting to take your next cue from our orange cone in chief.

Let’s tell it like it is. NATO is still around because the US allows the organization to be around. Without US, NATO would shut its door within 72 hours.

 

[Rogue AI]

And by other interests you mean occupying more countries and more wars, correct?

No, there is little need to occupy anything beyond Greenland and Canada, and neither should require war. It is time to focus on our hemisphere, being shackled to the Eurotrash hampers that. We must expend unnecessary resources for that relic that could better used elsewhere.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Hopefully Mr. Trump isn't really going to "invade" Greenland. The Dems win 90% of the House in the midterms if he does.

Given the population density of Greenland, we could invade for days before we found a greenlander.

Denmark would be wise to play this like a business and make a deal with the US to get a % of revenue.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Denmark would be wise to play this like a business and make a deal with the US to get a % of revenue.

Why? Because the fat orange charity thief and his pet white supremacists will talk mean?