Trump: One classy guy

[bripat9643]

Really a none issue when demo supporters and politicians say 10 times worse vocabulary. Look at Barack Obama's interview with Marc Maron. He said a slur! Ahhhh should I overreact immaturely like a liberal?!

What did Obama say? And, please, don't forget to provide the context. You'd be a moron to simply say, "Obama said ******, so......derp, derp, derp".

He said the N-word. The context doesn't matter.

 

[bripat9643]

How are the wingnuts who decry the fall of western civilization under Obama going to ignore Trump bringing it to you on a golden platter.



So presidential.

And sticking a cigar in the ***** of an intern is presidential?

Consensual sex in private? Nope, not concerned at all.

The Oval office isn't exactly what I would call "private." If a CEO got caught getting a BJ from a subordinate during business hours, he would get canned on the spot.

 

[HappyJoy]

It really doesn't matter one little bit... we've had several foul-mouthed Presidents... it's just that this one is richer than God, and doesn't think he needs filters.

Give me an example, when has a candidate out loud in public called an opponent a *****.

Maybe never, but it doesn't bother me a bit. His behavior is far less oafish than the buy who was getting hummers in the Ofal office, and you leftwing turd defended him to the hilt.

What Clinton did was behind closed doors. It wasn't a matter of defending him, it was about if it mattered at all. You think Clinton is the only President to ever cheat on his wife?

 

[HappyJoy]

Really a none issue when demo supporters and politicians say 10 times worse vocabulary. Look at Barack Obama's interview with Marc Maron. He said a slur! Ahhhh should I overreact immaturely like a liberal?!

What did Obama say? And, please, don't forget to provide the context. You'd be a moron to simply say, "Obama said ******, so......derp, derp, derp".

He said the N-word. The context doesn't matter.

Of course context matters. How would it not?

 

[bripat9643]

It really doesn't matter one little bit... we've had several foul-mouthed Presidents... it's just that this one is richer than God, and doesn't think he needs filters.

Give me an example, when has a candidate out loud in public called an opponent a *****.

Maybe never, but it doesn't bother me a bit. His behavior is far less oafish than the buy who was getting hummers in the Ofal office, and you leftwing turd defended him to the hilt.

What Clinton did was behind closed doors. It wasn't a matter of defending him, it was about if it mattered at all. You think Clinton is the only President to ever cheat on his wife?

What mattered is that he lied about it in front of a judge while he was under oath. Furthermore, it constituted sexual harassment according to legislation that Slick signed into law. But the issue under discussion here isn't whether it was legal. The issue is whether that's the kind of behavior we'd like to see in a President. Anyone who isn't a scathing hypocrite would agree that it isn't.

 

[bripat9643]

Really a none issue when demo supporters and politicians say 10 times worse vocabulary. Look at Barack Obama's interview with Marc Maron. He said a slur! Ahhhh should I overreact immaturely like a liberal?!

What did Obama say? And, please, don't forget to provide the context. You'd be a moron to simply say, "Obama said ******, so......derp, derp, derp".

He said the N-word. The context doesn't matter.

Of course context matters. How would it not?

Because if any Republican used that word, libs would be tearing into him as if they were pit bulls fighting over a roast. They wouldn't give a damn about the context. Why should a Democrat be treated any different?

 

[HappyJoy]

It really doesn't matter one little bit... we've had several foul-mouthed Presidents... it's just that this one is richer than God, and doesn't think he needs filters.

Give me an example, when has a candidate out loud in public called an opponent a *****.

Maybe never, but it doesn't bother me a bit. His behavior is far less oafish than the buy who was getting hummers in the Ofal office, and you leftwing turd defended him to the hilt.

What Clinton did was behind closed doors. It wasn't a matter of defending him, it was about if it mattered at all. You think Clinton is the only President to ever cheat on his wife?

What mattered is that he lied about it in front of a judge while he was under oath. Furthermore, it constituted sexual harassment according to legislation that Slick signed into law. But the issue under discussion here isn't whether it was legal. The issue is whether that's the kind of behavior we'd like to see in a President. Anyone who isn't a scathing hypocrite would agree that it isn't.

It did not constitute sexual harassment, was he charged with it?

Other Presidents have been known to philander, it's nothing new.

What is new is calling your opponent a *****, it just further divides us all.

 

[HappyJoy]

Really a none issue when demo supporters and politicians say 10 times worse vocabulary. Look at Barack Obama's interview with Marc Maron. He said a slur! Ahhhh should I overreact immaturely like a liberal?!

What did Obama say? And, please, don't forget to provide the context. You'd be a moron to simply say, "Obama said ******, so......derp, derp, derp".

He said the N-word. The context doesn't matter.

Of course context matters. How would it not?

Because if any Republican used that word, libs would be tearing into him as if they were pit bulls fighting over a roast. They wouldn't give a damn about the context. Why should a Democrat be treated any different?

If a Republican said this?

it's not just a matter of it not being polite to say '******' in public. That's not the measure of whether racism still exists or not. It's not just a matter of overt discrimination. Societies don't, overnight, completely erase everything that happened 200 to 300 years prior.

Yeah, liberals wouldn't be the ones complaining but I'm sure there would be calls of RINOism, why is that?

 

[bripat9643]

It really doesn't matter one little bit... we've had several foul-mouthed Presidents... it's just that this one is richer than God, and doesn't think he needs filters.

Give me an example, when has a candidate out loud in public called an opponent a *****.

Maybe never, but it doesn't bother me a bit. His behavior is far less oafish than the buy who was getting hummers in the Ofal office, and you leftwing turd defended him to the hilt.

What Clinton did was behind closed doors. It wasn't a matter of defending him, it was about if it mattered at all. You think Clinton is the only President to ever cheat on his wife?

What mattered is that he lied about it in front of a judge while he was under oath. Furthermore, it constituted sexual harassment according to legislation that Slick signed into law. But the issue under discussion here isn't whether it was legal. The issue is whether that's the kind of behavior we'd like to see in a President. Anyone who isn't a scathing hypocrite would agree that it isn't.

It did not constitute sexual harassment, was he charged with it?

Other Presidents have been known to philander, it's nothing new.

What is new is calling your opponent a *****, it just further divides us all.

Yeah, Clinton's repugnant behavior isn't "new" because he set the precedent 9 years ago. It seems only Democrats are allowed to set such precedents.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

How are the wingnuts who decry the fall of western civilization under Obama going to ignore Trump bringing it to you on a golden platter.



So presidential.

It's been going downhill for decades.

Which of the candidates do you think is going to reverse it?

Twiddling thumbs
twiddling thumbs


Nope, they won't change it.

Reverse what? Acting like a complete asshole while running for President and leading the GOP? Sorry, this is a first.

Further confirmation of the fact Trump isn't a serious candidate.

 

[bripat9643]

Really a none issue when demo supporters and politicians say 10 times worse vocabulary. Look at Barack Obama's interview with Marc Maron. He said a slur! Ahhhh should I overreact immaturely like a liberal?!

What did Obama say? And, please, don't forget to provide the context. You'd be a moron to simply say, "Obama said ******, so......derp, derp, derp".

He said the N-word. The context doesn't matter.

Of course context matters. How would it not?

Because if any Republican used that word, libs would be tearing into him as if they were pit bulls fighting over a roast. They wouldn't give a damn about the context. Why should a Democrat be treated any different?

If a Republican said this?

it's not just a matter of it not being polite to say '******' in public. That's not the measure of whether racism still exists or not. It's not just a matter of overt discrimination. Societies don't, overnight, completely erase everything that happened 200 to 300 years prior.

Yeah, liberals wouldn't be the ones complaining but I'm sure there would be calls of RINOism, why is that?

Obama is calling Americans a bunch of racists, so yeah any Republican who accused all Americans of being racist would be called a RINO, but that wouldn't stop Dims from attacking him. They would demand his head on a platter.

 

[bripat9643]

How are the wingnuts who decry the fall of western civilization under Obama going to ignore Trump bringing it to you on a golden platter.



So presidential.

It's been going downhill for decades.

Which of the candidates do you think is going to reverse it?

Twiddling thumbs
twiddling thumbs


Nope, they won't change it.

Reverse what? Acting like a complete asshole while running for President and leading the GOP? Sorry, this is a first.

Further confirmation of the fact Trump isn't a serious candidate.

You'll be saying that after he's inaugurated.

 

[Searcher44]

No excuse for this. None. He's a foul-mouthed pig.

This guy is running for potus and calls another candidate a ***** ... and his supporters just gobble it up.

He didn't call anybody anything.

Oh, you fall for his coy bullshit.

I think Cruz and Trump are assholes but you're over reacting to that incident. That's a candidate being real and not a phony for a change. He's not Prez yet and won't be. Call him on the real harmful shit he says, not this softball stuff. He spun it deftly and was pretty funny.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I love it when people look over the fact he didn't say it himself. He was quoting someone to merely just quote. Perhaps a hint to the crowd to tone it down on words like that. Cause he did say his reprimand. So for all the libs who are reaching hard. Just stop reaching. I could probably look up enough political demos using enough curse words said while they talk on TV. Trump didn't say it!

A hint to the crowd to tone it down? Did you hear the crowd tone it down? What Trump did was echo what the lady in the crowd said in calling Cruz a ***** and the crowd roared. He mad sure everyone knew what she said.

Hey, he can't control if the crowd cheered for the lady. Freedom of speech, Jack. But he did reprimand her about it. So I don't know what's the big deal if he quoted someone... Plus he didn't say if he agreed so....

Yes, they did cheer for her, but Trump had her repeat it, then HE said it himself.

“The other night in the debate,” he told thousands in Manchester, “they asked Ted Cruz a serious question: what do you think of waterboarding? Is it OK? I thought he’d say absolutely, and he didn’t. And he said, well, he’s concerned because some people –”


Advertisement
A woman near the front of the crowd interrupted. “He’s a *****!”


Trump admonished her for saying “a terrible thing”.


“You know what she just said?” he asked. “Shout it out, because I don’t want to say it.”


“You’re not allowed to say that,” he continued. “I never expect to hear that from you again.”


Trump paused, looked out at his election-eve audience and leaned into the microphone: “She said he’s a *****.”


The audience cheered – shouting “Trump! Trump!” – before he gave the woman a mock admonishment and returned to his rambling, more than 45-minute speech. “For the press,” he said, looking up at the television cameras, “this is a serious reprimand.”

Trump repeats crowd member's '*****' insult as New Hampshire votes

The news reporter even stated that Trump gave her a mock admonishment. Matter of fact, in an interview with Lester Holt of NBC this evening, when asked about the comment, he said that the standing ovation was actually for the woman, not him.

But, he still called Cruz a *****, even if he was quoting the supporter.

And these are the type of people Trump represents, crude, boorish, ignorant, hateful, bigoted conservatives, about a third of the GOP – the type of people you shield your children from, move away from in a restaurant or movie theater, the same conservatives subscribing to this very thread in defense of Trump.

It's not just about ideology and politics, it's about a way of life common to about a third of conservatives based on fear, intimidation, insults, and personal attacks – what we see day in and day out on this very forum from conservatives.

 

[Papageorgio]

It really doesn't matter one little bit... we've had several foul-mouthed Presidents... it's just that this one is richer than God, and doesn't think he needs filters.

Give me an example, when has a candidate out loud in public called an opponent a *****.

Maybe never, but it doesn't bother me a bit. His behavior is far less oafish than the buy who was getting hummers in the Ofal office, and you leftwing turd defended him to the hilt.

What Clinton did was behind closed doors. It wasn't a matter of defending him, it was about if it mattered at all. You think Clinton is the only President to ever cheat on his wife?

Do you think Trump is the only candidate to call a person a *****?

Trump should never use the term, it demeans the position, so does having an affair on a person you took a oath to be faithful to.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

How are the wingnuts who decry the fall of western civilization under Obama going to ignore Trump bringing it to you on a golden platter.



So presidential.

It's been going downhill for decades.

Which of the candidates do you think is going to reverse it?

Twiddling thumbs
twiddling thumbs


Nope, they won't change it.

Reverse what? Acting like a complete asshole while running for President and leading the GOP? Sorry, this is a first.

Further confirmation of the fact Trump isn't a serious candidate.

You'll be saying that after he's inaugurated.

As if on cue: the crude, boorish, ignorant, hateful, bigoted conservative.

 

[HappyJoy]

What did Obama say? And, please, don't forget to provide the context. You'd be a moron to simply say, "Obama said ******, so......derp, derp, derp".

He said the N-word. The context doesn't matter.

Of course context matters. How would it not?

Because if any Republican used that word, libs would be tearing into him as if they were pit bulls fighting over a roast. They wouldn't give a damn about the context. Why should a Democrat be treated any different?

If a Republican said this?

it's not just a matter of it not being polite to say '******' in public. That's not the measure of whether racism still exists or not. It's not just a matter of overt discrimination. Societies don't, overnight, completely erase everything that happened 200 to 300 years prior.

Yeah, liberals wouldn't be the ones complaining but I'm sure there would be calls of RINOism, why is that?

Obama is calling Americans a bunch of racists, so yeah any Republican who accused all Americans of being racist would be called a RINO, but that wouldn't stop Dims from attacking him. They would demand his head on a platter.

Nobody accused all Americans of being racist and you are now way off topic.

 

[HappyJoy]

How are the wingnuts who decry the fall of western civilization under Obama going to ignore Trump bringing it to you on a golden platter.



So presidential.

It's been going downhill for decades.

Which of the candidates do you think is going to reverse it?

Twiddling thumbs
twiddling thumbs


Nope, they won't change it.

Reverse what? Acting like a complete asshole while running for President and leading the GOP? Sorry, this is a first.

Further confirmation of the fact Trump isn't a serious candidate.

To about 20% of the population is, so...yeah, I agree.

 

[bripat9643]

He said the N-word. The context doesn't matter.

Of course context matters. How would it not?

Because if any Republican used that word, libs would be tearing into him as if they were pit bulls fighting over a roast. They wouldn't give a damn about the context. Why should a Democrat be treated any different?

If a Republican said this?

it's not just a matter of it not being polite to say '******' in public. That's not the measure of whether racism still exists or not. It's not just a matter of overt discrimination. Societies don't, overnight, completely erase everything that happened 200 to 300 years prior.

Yeah, liberals wouldn't be the ones complaining but I'm sure there would be calls of RINOism, why is that?

Obama is calling Americans a bunch of racists, so yeah any Republican who accused all Americans of being racist would be called a RINO, but that wouldn't stop Dims from attacking him. They would demand his head on a platter.

Nobody accused all Americans of being racist and you are now way off topic.

Wrong. Obama did. He does it all the time.

 

[SmokeALib]

Dims hate successful people.