Trump On Woodward Tape Admitting To Lying About Seriousness Of Coronavirus

basquebromance

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
62,350
Reaction score
9,449
Points
2,070
250 thousand DEAD DEAD DEAD Americans and this POS thinks he won?
 

jbrownson0831

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
Messages
5,340
Reaction score
3,821
Points
1,893
250 thousand DEAD DEAD DEAD Americans and this POS thinks he won?
Half of those dead in Dem led states with Killer Cuomo at the helm.....the other 44 US states listened to the President and handled things with the leftyflu just fine. Wonder why those few Dem states killed so many???
 

lennypartiv

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2019
Messages
6,857
Reaction score
2,825
Points
255
Really? We could have stopped it with accelerated herd immunity? Wanna talk to Sweden about that? They tried the experiment, and it failed miserably, which is why they are now starting to impose restrictions.
Ignore Sweden, it was the Brazilians who did herd immunity right. Some think a handful of regions in Brazil are now close to reaching herd immunity.
 

basquebromance

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
62,350
Reaction score
9,449
Points
2,070
America is one of the epicenters of the pandemic, and this is not due to natural causes. It stems from a political position, from the political indifference which Trump has demonstrated.

I believe they made a conscious calculation, macabre but conscious, to say “let it run its course,” and then concentrated on “protecting” employment in order to present themselves as “guardians” of the economy, as those who wanted to prevent the economy from coming to a halt, as the supposed defenders of the people’s interests, of all those people who could not quarantine themselves

Basing themselves on this fallacy, they made the following calculation: how many people are going to die? A hundred thousand? Two hundred thousand? Three hundred thousand? The difference was not so important for them. What was the impact of these deaths? How many loved ones did each of these casualties leave behind? I believe that they made exactly these kinds of cold mathematical calculations, the mathematics of horror.

Assuming that every person has ten loved ones, if three hundred thousand people die (a tragedy that would represent the greatest human disaster in history), then we are talking about three million directly affected people, or a little more than 1 percent of our population.

On the other hand, unemployment, leading to the deterioration of living conditions, might affect thirty, or forty, or fifty million people. I think the calculation they made was exactly this: “What does it matter how many die?” While at the same time they decided to present themselves as the “guardians” of the economy.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top