Trump Now Gets a $1.8BN Taxpayer Slush Fund to Pay Others

It's Trump IRS suit. Your cult is trying to claim it's a January sixth fund.

No idea what you're talking about.
No, you seem to be confused. There is no court case in South Florida on this topic of this thread. This is Trump going straight to the DOJ without a court suit, claiming injury for his IRS tax returns being released in 2019, demanding $10 BILLION for his injuries.

Then Trump dropping going for the $10 billion from the DOJ, but the Doj had to settle and give him this $1.7 billion in a slush fund that he controls...via controlling the Board for 1/6ers
And to never be audited again for anything and any year since he's been born, and same for Melania, and same for the trump Organization etc.

These deals and settlement were made with Todd Blanche his ex private attorney, AND NO ONE ELSE. There was and is no Court Case.
 
No idea what you're talking about
Trump owes about $ 85 million in back taxes to the IRS from a 2010 IRS audit that he has been avoiding paying....$100 million estimate now with late fees and penalties.
 
No, you seem to be confused. There is no court case in South Florida on this topic of this thread. This is Trump going straight to the DOJ without a court suit, claiming injury for his IRS tax returns being released in 2019, demanding $10 BILLION for his injuries.

Then Trump dropping going for the $10 billion from the DOJ, but the Doj had to settle and give him this $1.7 billion in a slush fund that he controls...via controlling the Board for 1/6ers
And to never be audited again for anything and any year since he's been born, and same for Melania, and same for the trump Organization etc.

These deals and settlement were made with Todd Blanche his ex private attorney, AND NO ONE ELSE. There was and is no Court Case.
Another low informed dembot pushing propaganda over facts

 
The claim refers to the Anti-Weaponization Fund, a $1.776 billion program established on May 18, 2026, as part of a settlement between the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and President Donald Trump to resolve his lawsuit against the IRS. [1, 2, 3]
Critics and lawmakers have raised concerns that the fund lacks eligibility restrictions, potentially allowing payments to individuals convicted of serious crimes, including child sex offenses. Key details include: [1, 2]
  • Eligibility Concerns: Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen highlighted the case of Andrew Paul Johnson, a Florida man and January 6 rioter who was pardoned by Trump but subsequently convicted of child molestation.
  • Bribe Allegations: Johnson reportedly attempted to bribe his victims by promising them money he expected to receive from the "slush fund" for his role in the Capitol riot.
  • DOJ Response: During a Senate hearing on May 19, 2026, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche refused to commit to barring convicted child predators from the fund, stating that anyone who believes they were victims of "government weaponization" is eligible to apply.
  • Legislative Action: House Republicans recently blocked an amendment proposed by Representative Jim McGovern that would have prohibited payments from the fund to convicted felons, including those who assaulted police on January 6.
  • Fund Purpose: The DOJ describes the program as a "lawful process" for victims of "lawfare" to seek redress, with a commission of five members appointed by the Attorney General to oversee payouts. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
For the life of me....I do not get how this fund for 1/6ers even was related to Trumps tax returns being released by a govt contractor for the IRS....who is now serving time in prison for his conviction. How does this FUND even relate to trump being harmed for the $10 billion? How can it even be an option for some settlement by Todd Blanche?
 
Some info on who stole Trump's and 400,000 other people's tax returns. The IRS is not even at fault....




Gemini A I

It was an outside contractor, NOT an IRS employee, and he stole vastly more than just Donald Trump’s tax information.

Here are the specific details of what happened:
Who Leaked the Information?

The leaker was Charles Edward Littlejohn. He was not a direct employee of the IRS; he was a tech contractor working for Booz Allen Hamilton, a major defense and technology consulting firm that held contracts with the IRS.

Federal prosecutors later revealed that Littlejohn actually sought out and took the contracting job with the specific, politically motivated intent of gaining access to Trump's tax returns to leak them to the media. He was caught, pleaded guilty, and in January 2024, he was sentenced to the maximum five years in federal prison.

Did He Leak More Than Just Trump's Taxes?

Yes, by an enormous margin. This has been described as the largest data breach in IRS history.

The Scope: While initial reports estimated he took data from a few thousand wealthy people, the IRS later disclosed to Congress that Littlejohn stole and leaked the confidential tax data of 405,427 taxpayers.

Who Was Targeted: Roughly 89% of those records belonged to business entities, but the breach also targeted 15 years of tax records for the highest-net-worth individuals in the United States.

The Media Outlets: Littlejohn split his stolen data between two major news organizations:
The New York Times received Donald Trump's tax information (which they published in 2020).

ProPublica received the massive trove of data regarding America's wealthiest billionaires—including Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk—which they used for a 2021 series exposing how little the ultra-wealthy pay in federal income taxes.

The IRS has since stated that they found no evidence Littlejohn distributed the data anywhere else online or that it was used for identity theft, as his sole motivation was getting the data to the press.
 
Some info on who stole Trump's and 400,000 other people's tax returns. The IRS is not even at fault....




Gemini A I

It was an outside contractor, NOT an IRS employee, and he stole vastly more than just Donald Trump’s tax information.

Here are the specific details of what happened:
Who Leaked the Information?

The leaker was Charles Edward Littlejohn. He was not a direct employee of the IRS; he was a tech contractor working for Booz Allen Hamilton, a major defense and technology consulting firm that held contracts with the IRS.

Federal prosecutors later revealed that Littlejohn actually sought out and took the contracting job with the specific, politically motivated intent of gaining access to Trump's tax returns to leak them to the media. He was caught, pleaded guilty, and in January 2024, he was sentenced to the maximum five years in federal prison.

Did He Leak More Than Just Trump's Taxes?

Yes, by an enormous margin. This has been described as the largest data breach in IRS history.

The Scope: While initial reports estimated he took data from a few thousand wealthy people, the IRS later disclosed to Congress that Littlejohn stole and leaked the confidential tax data of 405,427 taxpayers.

Who Was Targeted: Roughly 89% of those records belonged to business entities, but the breach also targeted 15 years of tax records for the highest-net-worth individuals in the United States.

The Media Outlets: Littlejohn split his stolen data between two major news organizations:
The New York Times received Donald Trump's tax information (which they published in 2020).

ProPublica received the massive trove of data regarding America's wealthiest billionaires—including Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk—which they used for a 2021 series exposing how little the ultra-wealthy pay in federal income taxes.

The IRS has since stated that they found no evidence Littlejohn distributed the data anywhere else online or that it was used for identity theft, as his sole motivation was getting the data to the press.
It was a contractor hired by the irs!
 
Google AI didn't back up your claims at all:


Again, I asked to name the "people". You named one guy who did far more than that.


This is unfounded speculation on your part that they were coerced into taking a pea deal. Most saw the evidence and jumped at the plea deal. That is why there were so few trials.




It was an act of domestic terrorism.

The one person (not "people" as you claimed) that you brought up was released early.

Feel free to name some more. I'm looking forward to the batting practice.
Why do i need to dig up more names for you? Nah bro, all you need to do is just sit back and watch my party give a billion dollars to Jan 6 protesters. You whining about it isnt going to change a damn thing anyway, right? :dunno:
 
Why do i need to dig up more names for you?
Because you said there were people (plural) for one thing. For another thing, the one flaccid example you gave didn't meet your requirements for the alleged draconian measures you said were used.


Nah bro, all you need to do is just sit back and watch my party give a billion dollars to Jan 6 protesters. You whining about it isnt going to change a damn thing anyway, right? :dunno:

Remember back when you guys were complaining about wastes of taxpayer money? Now you don't seem to mind it at all.
Remember back when you guys said you supported the cops? Now you can't wait to give money to those who assaulted them.
Remember back when you guys said that you wanted waste, fraud, and corruption identified? Now you're cheering waste, fraud and corruption.

I know this is all a big joke to you and your professional-wrestling-is-real outlook on the world keeps you in this cycle of ignorance you seem to enjoy. But there are real world consequences for this stuff; ask those 2 girls that Trump's fellow pedophile raped. But you don't care...as stated; this is just a big joke to you. RIght?
 
Because you said there were people (plural) for one thing.
There are, clearly, but Im ok with giving it all to just one guy. Imagine how many buffalo hats he could buy with all that money. :dunno:
 
For the life of me....I do not get how this fund for 1/6ers even was related to Trumps tax returns being released by a govt contractor for the IRS....who is now serving time in prison for his conviction. How does this FUND even relate to trump being harmed for the $10 billion? How can it even be an option for some settlement by Todd Blanche?
What fund for 1/6ers?
 
Theres no decision to make...

You said they did A, B, and C....your example did A, B, C, D, E & F.

Its not my fault you're a congenital liar.
We are giving that 1.8 billion to the HUNDREDS of wrongful prosecution victims, and there isnt one god damn thing that you can do about it.
 
15th post
We are giving that 1.8 billion to the HUNDREDS of wrongful prosecution victims, and there isnt one god damn thing that you can do about it.

They will be most appreciative.

Comey,
Bolton,
James,
Sen. Mark Kelly,
Sen. Elissa Slotkin,
Rep. Maggie Goodlander,
Rep. Jason Crow,
Rep. Chrissy Houlahan,
Rep. Chris DeLuzio,
Jerome Powell,
Lisa Cook,
Adam Schiff,
Rep. Eric Swalwell,
Antoney Bilken,
Jacob Sullivan,
Lisa Monaco,
Mark Zaid,
Norman Eisen,
etc.

WW
 
We are giving that 1.8 billion to the HUNDREDS of wrongful prosecution victims, and there isnt one god damn thing that you can do about it.
A terrorist compensation fund is a new low.
 
No, I said they could sue, which invalidated your belief that the settlement fund would somehow save the government money. In my opinion, and in the opinion of most realistic people, there is no legitimate claim to damages. In my opinion, although they could sue, they would lose (assuming the government actually is interested in fighting their lawsuit).
Yes, the could sue. They would have a constitutional right to a jury trial. Then anything could happen.
Claims of selective prosecution are settled pre-trial. It's not grounds for a lawsuit years and years later.
ReallY? Is that your opinion or is it law? If it is law, show me the law.
This commentary about Ashlii Babbitt is nonsensical. She did not receive the "death penalty". She was shot by an officer acting in self defense.
What weapon was she attacking Byrd with from so far away and trying to wiggle through a window?

Here is a question you must answer: Has anyone in the United States ever been a victim of selective prosecution in a case that led to them being imprisoned? Ever?
 
His tax returns were illegally released
An IRS legal briefing found that Trump's lawsuit had no legal basis & if they fought it in court they would win. Not only that but the statute of limitiations has long expired at two years. The whole deal is a scam, it's illegal by violating the Emouliments Clause & is an outright theft of taxpayer money.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom