Trump Now Gets a $1.8BN Taxpayer Slush Fund to Pay Others

[Godboy]

They will be most appreciative.

Comey,
Bolton,
James,
Sen. Mark Kelly,
Sen. Elissa Slotkin,
Rep. Maggie Goodlander,
Rep. Jason Crow,
Rep. Chrissy Houlahan,
Rep. Chris DeLuzio,
Jerome Powell,
Lisa Cook,
Adam Schiff,
Rep. Eric Swalwell,
Antoney Bilken,
Jacob Sullivan,
Lisa Monaco,
Mark Zaid,
Norman Eisen,
etc.

WW

If any one of them was wrongfully prosecuted, then they deserve compensation too.

 

[dudmuck]

We are giving that 1.8 billion to the HUNDREDS of wrongful prosecution victims, and there isnt one god damn thing that you can do about it.

 

[Marener]

If any one of them was wrongfully prosecuted, then they deserve compensation too.

The people deciding who is wrongfully prosecuted are the people wrongfully prosecuting them.

 

[Rawley]

No, you seem to be confused. There is no court case in South Florida on this topic of this thread.

Yes there is. I posted it above.

This is Trump going straight to the DOJ without a court suit, claiming injury for his IRS tax returns being released in 2019, demanding $10 BILLION for his injuries.

Then Trump dropping going for the $10 billion from the DOJ, but the Doj had to settle and give him this $1.7 billion in a slush fund that he controls...via controlling the Board for 1/6ers

You really need to get a new source for your news.

And to never be audited again for anything and any year since he's been born, and same for Melania, and same for the trump Organization etc.

huh?

These deals and settlement were made with Todd Blanche his ex private attorney, AND NO ONE ELSE. There was and is no Court Case.

Seriously, do a minimal about of homework. You sound like a moron.

 

[Rawley]

Trump owes about $ 85 million in back taxes to the IRS from a 2010 IRS audit that he has been avoiding paying....$100 million estimate now with late fees and penalties.

Again. Where are you getting this nonsense from?

 

[Marener]

Yes, the could sue. They would have a constitutional right to a jury trial. Then anything could happen.

Odds of succeeding at a jury trial are minimal. This fund is designed to bypass that.

ReallY? Is that your opinion or is it law? If it is law, show me the law.

Claims of selective prosecution are pretrial motions to dismiss a case. That’s just a fact.

What weapon was she attacking Byrd with from so far away and trying to wiggle through a window?

Self defense does not require the attacker to be armed with a weapon.

Here is a question you must answer: Has anyone in the United States ever been a victim of selective prosecution in a case that led to them being imprisoned? Ever?

I suppose so, but it’s irrelevant.

Anyone can claim selective prosecution, but they should have to prove their case with a non-partisan arbitrator. Otherwise the criminal justice system would be chaos.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Trump owes about $ 85 million in back taxes to the IRS from a 2010 IRS audit that he has been avoiding paying....$100 million estimate now with late fees and penalties.

Again. Where are you getting this nonsense from?

Report: Trump may face a $100 million-plus tax bill if he loses IRS audit fight over Chicago tower

A report by The New York Times and ProPublica says former President Donald Trump may face an IRS bill in excess of $100 million.

apnews.com

WW

 

[Rawley]

Report: Trump may face a $100 million-plus tax bill if he loses IRS audit fight over Chicago tower

A report by The New York Times and ProPublica says former President Donald Trump may face an IRS bill in excess of $100 million.

apnews.com

WW

LOL SO that was a "might happen" story from two years ago. What happened?

 

[WorldWatcher]

LOL SO that was a "might happen" story from two years ago. What happened?

The President had the audit shut down.

WW

 

[Rawley]

The President had the audit shut down.

WW

How many more years do you think it should have gone on, with no results.

 

[struth]

An IRS legal briefing found that Trump's lawsuit had no legal basis & if they fought it in court they would win. Not only that but the statute of limitiations has long expired at two years. The whole deal is a scam, it's illegal by violating the Emouliments Clause & is an outright theft of taxpayer money.

What’s an IRS legal briefing? It’s not a court order, or even a courts opinion

He filed the lawsuit right at the two year mark of when it was disclosed, SOL wasn’t an issue. The only real issue is if the contractor they hired could be consider an employee

 

[struth]

The people deciding who is wrongfully prosecuted are the people wrongfully prosecuting them.

Well yeah, it’s always been that way…it’s the doj

 

[Seymour Flops]

Odds of succeeding at a jury trial are minimal. This fund is designed to bypass that.

That's your opinion.

Claims of selective prosecution are pretrial motions to dismiss a case. That’s just a fact.

The right to claim selective prosecution doesnt end when the trial starts.

Self defense does not require the attacker to be armed with a weapon.

It requires reasonable force in accordance with the situation.

I suppose so, but it’s irrelevant.

Anyone can claim selective prosecution, but they should have to prove their case with a non-partisan arbitrator. Otherwise the criminal justice system would be chaos.

Correct, except for the part about "a non-partisan arbitrator." Who is that?

But settlenents instead of a trial are very common and very much needed. It only now portrayed as an unprecedented evil because Trump is involved.

 

[struth]

Odds of succeeding at a jury trial are minimal. This fund is designed to bypass that.

Claims of selective prosecution are pretrial motions to dismiss a case. That’s just a fact.

Self defense does not require the attacker to be armed with a weapon.

I suppose so, but it’s irrelevant.

Anyone can claim selective prosecution, but they should have to prove their case with a non-partisan arbitrator. Otherwise the criminal justice system would be chaos.

Yes plantiffs and defendants weight the risk of a jury or bench trial and often come to settlements. The federal rules of civil procedure are designed for that

 

[Marener]

That's your opinion.

The right to claim selective prosecution doesnt end when the trial starts.

Timeliness of a claim matters. They had their chance to claim selective prosecution.

It requires reasonable force in accordance with the situation.

Correct, except for the part about "a non-partisan arbitrator." Who is that?

A judge.

But settlenents instead of a trial are very common and very much needed. It only now portrayed as an unprecedented evil because Trump is involved.

It is unprecedented. Trump’s political allies committed crimes as part of their support for him. Not only are these people not prosecuted for their crimes, we are paying them.

And it’s all being done without any oversight.