Why?
Bias, conspiracy or just incompetence?
This has been the most scrutinized event in American history. Scrutinized even by Obama and Clinton's political rivals who arguably would use anything found to their political benefit.
Why don't you accept that this might just have been what it appears to have been? An attempted political hit job against the Obama administration and Clinton.
Why do you fall back on discrediting the investigators rather than accepting their findings? Is it that you can't accept that maybe you swallowed the bait and now you're left red faced?
I agree with you . It was a hit job by the GOP and they found nothing illegal. Which was correct. Nothing illegal was done.
But incompetence is incompetence and if State and Hitlery had done their jobs Benghazi wouldn't have happened.
What incompetent act if done differently would have prevented the entire incident in your mind?
Let's not forget that you're using the benefit of hindsight to reach these conclusions.
Paying heed to the many warning they got. Warnings that others took seriously enough to pull their people out of the are. I.E. The Brits, the Red Cross and others.
If State had done that then there would have been no Benghazi.
You see, that's the beautiful thing about hindsight. It's very easy to say what should have been done after the fact.
Using your standard of hindsight, Stevens should have heeded those same warnings and stayed in Tripoli and none of this would have happened.
GW could have put in anti-air defenses around the NE and prevented 9/11 as well. After all they had Intel that planes could be used.
See how that works? I can change the outcome by simply shifting the responsibility onto or off of whomever I wish. That of course would be dishonest to hold people to that standard. Of course though you have no problem doing so as long as your political opponent takes the hit.