Trump is right about the enemy within, the military should be used

[Billiejeens]

Except the people rejected him by clear majorities. Twice.

Have you never understood how we elect Presidents?

 

[lennypartiv]

American citizens.

Citizens who are not patriots. We should be able to deport them.

 

[dudmuck]

Trump won't let liberals like you stand in his way.

18 U.S.C. § 1385 prevents it, not liberals.

However, since the supreme court made president king, all laws are moot.

 

[MagicMike]

Yet another gullible leftist retard. I know you've been told P2025 is Trump's, but it's not.

I know that twice-impeached, feloniously convicted, rape-adjudicated, failed one term former president Trump told you he has nothing to do with Project 2025 but you need to remember that if that ************'s lips are moving he's lying.
It's not a good look to just mindlessly parrot things he says.
It makes you look cultish....and dumb.

 

[Nobody911]

We have to face the enemy, whether they are abroad or at home. They've done enough damage to America already. This is more proof that on election day there really is only one choice for America.

---Trump suggests using the military to address the enemy from within---

Trump suggests using the military to address ‘the enemy from within’

After referring to his American opponents as "scum," the Republican candidate suggested possibly using the military to respond to "the enemy from within."

www.msnbc.com

Trump's Remarks on the Military and "Enemy from Within"

Recently, former President Donald Trump made controversial statements suggesting the potential use of the military to address what he refers to as "the enemy from within." This phrase appears to target his political opponents, whom he describes as "radical left lunatics" and "very bad people".

Context of the Statements

In an interview, Trump expressed that he believes the threat posed by this "enemy from within" is more significant than external threats from countries like China or Russia. He indicated that if necessary, he would consider deploying the National Guard or military forces to manage these perceived threats, particularly on Election Day.

Implications and Reactions

These remarks have sparked alarm and criticism, with many interpreting them as incitements to violence against political opponents. Critics have drawn parallels to his previous rhetoric that contributed to the January 6 Capitol riots, suggesting that such statements could further escalate tensions.

So, Trump's comments reflect a continuation of his aggressive political rhetoric, framing his opponents as a domestic threat and suggesting military intervention as a possible response.

==> That depends. Radical left lunatics? They really want the civil war again in America? Think for yourselves, US citizens!

Sources:

Trump suggests he'll use the military on 'the enemy from within' the U.S. if he's reelected

During his first term as president, Donald Trump tested the limits of how he could use the military to achieve policy goals. If given a second term, the Republican and his allies are preparing to go much further, reimagining the military as an all-powerful tool to deploy on U.S. soil.

www.pbs.org

Trump Says Military Could Handle ‘Enemy From Within’

Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign said Trump’s words “should alarm every American who cares about their freedom and security.”

www.forbes.com

 

[lennypartiv]

So...Trump wants to get rid of our enemies while Democrats side with our enemies.

 

[AntonToo]

So...Trump wants to get rid of our enemies while Democrats side with our enemies.

Dum dum, he is talking about liberals and Democrats. Even specifically mentioning Adam Schiff, a ranking House member.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Citizens who are not patriots. We should be able to deport them.

Change the Constitution if that is what you truly feel.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Dum dum, he is talking about liberals and Democrats. Even specifically mentioning Adam Schiff, a ranking House member.

Schiff may be the junior Senator from California if things go his way and he can beat Steve Garvey.

 

[Skylar]

Citizens who are not patriots. We should be able to deport them.

Nah, that's flagrantly unconstitutional. As you can't strip someone of their rights without any violation of any crime.

But its telling that you want to, comrade.

 

[Skylar]

Change the Constitution if that is what you truly feel.

Change it to include what? A 'patriotism' test? And if you fail, you get deported?

The conservative impulse toward authoritarianism is unfortunate.

 

[Mac1958]

Remember. They’re at war.

I clearly remember after 9/11, when it was pointed out that the attackers were "at war" with us, and I barely even knew of their freakin' existence.

What a weird feeling that was.

Deja vu now. Only it just keeps going.

 

[Mac1958]

Feeling scared for your personal safety?

Of course not. Sorry. You people are far too fragile. Look at the flamboyant, hypersensitive, metrosexual NY City billionaire you adore and follow like Jesus. Holy crap.

 

[Moonglow]

Trump won't let liberals like you stand in his way.

The law stands in his way along with a revolt.

 

[Frankenstein]

Except that prosecutor was corrupt, and the IMF, UE, and even REpublcians in Congress were calling on him to be fired.

It was a quid pro quo and you know it, the only corrupt was the guy making the threat

 

[Lesh]

Citizens who are not patriots. We should be able to deport them.

When they tell you who they are… LISTEN

More than a few of these MAGA types have said they want Trump to do what he is saying he’ll do.

Use the military to jail political opponents.

Would someone in his Admin stop him from doing that? In his first term , yes

This time round? That’s questionable

 

[berg80]

---Trump suggests using the military to address the enemy from within---

trump is the enemy within. How should the military address him?

 

[JoeB131]

I'm just asking you why you think blowing someone isn't considered sex when you and I both know it is? It's not like getting a back-rub.

Okay, personally, I would consider it sex, but I wouldn't consider as good as Penis in Vagina. Some consider Oral to be the New Third Base.

So I can see where Clinton might have sincerely believed because he stopped just short of full sexual intercourse, he was being honest when he said he didn't have sex with Lewinsky. Or as honest as Clinton gets, anyway.

In any event, it most certainly was not worth an impeachment, especially given the judge in the case ruled that it wasn't relevant to whether or not Clinton had harrassed Paula Jones.

I think you're just making excuses for the left, as usual.

Like the fact you folks can't define what a woman is............unless you're trying to get their vote by lying about the GOP position on abortion.

Um, sorry, guy, the GOP position on abortion is pretty clear. You want to ban it. Up until this year, you called for a complete, nation-wide ban on the procedure. The only difference is you are trying to pretend this year that after you've banned it in a third of the country, that you are now being moderate.

Add to that Kamala is a woman and using it as a good excuse for women to vote for her. I thought you guys didn't know what one was.

We are pretty clear on what a woman is. Your obsession with transgenders is kind of sad, though.

Women, both Cis-gender and trans-gender, need to realize what a danger Trump is to rights they hold dear.

I just think you libs are a bunch of lying a holes that can't admit the truth when the truth hurts your chances in politics.

Well, no one thought you could think. Thinking does not consist of repeating whatever you heard on Hate Radio like you had an original idea.

 

[Care4all]

Note the fact that your article is an opinion......not based on facts.

Yes, it is an opinion, based on facts we know happened! Mine is an opinion also, Mud.....

 

[22lcidw]

I know that twice-impeached, feloniously convicted, rape-adjudicated, failed one term former president Trump told you he has nothing to do with Project 2025 but you need to remember that if that ************'s lips are moving he's lying.
It's not a good look to just mindlessly parrot things he says.
It makes you look cultish....and dumb.

The people prosecuting are Communist traitors. So, it goes to belief on any side you are on.