Trump is Losing the Suburbs that Propelled Him to Victory

DrLove

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
21,905
Reaction score
6,551
Points
290
Location
Central Oregon Coast
Suburban support for the Republicans is continuing to slide just as it did during the 2018 midterms. Trump supporters are in for a very rude awakening on Election Day

“It hasn’t ebbed. It’s crashed,” said Lehner, who is not seeking reelection in the district of working-class and white-collar communities the president won comfortably four years ago. “He is really doing poorly among independents.”

Yep, we've seen this slide for many months now with suburban independents. And how about those "suburban housewives". They're really gonna LOVE Donald and Republicans ramming through an activist judge who wants to kill the ACA and a woman's right to choose. :rolleyes:
No we haven’t.
Missed my link eh? :)

trump losing support with independents
god damn you're an idiot.
You hated my Google search which gave you 905,000 sources to choose from.
That makes you the idiot :)
 

DrLove

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
21,905
Reaction score
6,551
Points
290
Location
Central Oregon Coast
another anonymous LOOK TRUMP SUCKS post.
And from an OP from whom I usually expect much better.

I have to wonder if this is a very poor attempt at either sarcasm or trolling.
Trolling more than likely.
I don't know, Don't Taz Me Bro is pretty hit or miss. He writes a few good posts and a lot of dumb ones. I wouldn't say he has any consistent pattern of quality, just the occasional coherent, rational post
the AP post itself is pretty "news looking" but the entire basis of it is unknown research.

was this pelosi and schurmer giving their opinion? what is the basis for this thought process? it isn't there, so it's widely subjective. but it's also something i look for when i read news anymore. when you do this crap, you're hiding something.

why hiding?
I think you're confused. Did you reply to the wrong poster?
don't think so - just saying this is an AP story and not like he pulled it off Occupy Democrats or something.

however, the glaring omission of details on who did this study is pretty huge.
So what were you lecturing me about then since we didn't disagree on anything? I said Don't Taz Me is pretty hit or miss, mostly miss. I didn't argue for the story
i was just indicating this wouldn't be a "miss" to be because AP was the source. *usually* a good one. i simply disagreed with the premise of the story and said why.

but since you seem to want to argue - feel free. just go on without me.
You're losing even your own team members. :laughing0301:
 
Last edited:

easyt65

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
66,085
Reaction score
23,775
Points
2,290
Suburban support for the Republicans is continuing to slide just as it did during the 2018 midterms. Trump supporters are in for a very rude awakening on Election Day

“It hasn’t ebbed. It’s crashed,” said Lehner, who is not seeking reelection in the district of working-class and white-collar communities the president won comfortably four years ago. “He is really doing poorly among independents.”

According to Democrats for months Trump has lost blacks, Latinos, women, Asians, the cities, the suburbs, the homeless vote, and its going to be another 'landslide' .

The only 'surprise' Trump-supporters will get after the election is if a hoard of Democrat lawyers do not attempt to hijack the election and delay long enough for the Democrats to manufacture enough mail-in votes to overcome the reported vote Deficit they need to win the Presidency.
 

DrLove

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
21,905
Reaction score
6,551
Points
290
Location
Central Oregon Coast
Suburban support for the Republicans is continuing to slide just as it did during the 2018 midterms. Trump supporters are in for a very rude awakening on Election Day

“It hasn’t ebbed. It’s crashed,” said Lehner, who is not seeking reelection in the district of working-class and white-collar communities the president won comfortably four years ago. “He is really doing poorly among independents.”

Yep, we've seen this slide for many months now with suburban independents. And how about those "suburban housewives". They're really gonna LOVE Donald and Republicans ramming through an activist judge who wants to kill the ACA and a woman's right to choose. :rolleyes:
No we haven’t.
Missed my link eh? :)

trump losing support with independents
That's not a link, it's just a Google search. And it brought up the NY Times, Watchington Compost, Newsweek, the who's who of leftist propaganda
It included thousands of sources rated unbiased (center) to center right.
But no, you probably won't find anything from Gateway Pundit, DailyCaller or Breitbart in their anywhere. ;)
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
62,626
Reaction score
11,992
Points
2,040
Location
Kazmania
another anonymous LOOK TRUMP SUCKS post.
And from an OP from whom I usually expect much better.

I have to wonder if this is a very poor attempt at either sarcasm or trolling.
Trolling more than likely.
I don't know, Don't Taz Me Bro is pretty hit or miss. He writes a few good posts and a lot of dumb ones. I wouldn't say he has any consistent pattern of quality, just the occasional coherent, rational post
the AP post itself is pretty "news looking" but the entire basis of it is unknown research.

was this pelosi and schurmer giving their opinion? what is the basis for this thought process? it isn't there, so it's widely subjective. but it's also something i look for when i read news anymore. when you do this crap, you're hiding something.

why hiding?
I think you're confused. Did you reply to the wrong poster?
don't think so - just saying this is an AP story and not like he pulled it off Occupy Democrats or something.

however, the glaring omission of details on who did this study is pretty huge.
So what were you lecturing me about then since we didn't disagree on anything? I said Don't Taz Me is pretty hit or miss, mostly miss. I didn't argue for the story
i was just indicating this wouldn't be a "miss" to be because AP was the source. *usually* a good one. i simply disagreed with the premise of the story and said why.

but since you seem to want to argue - feel free. just go on without me.
You said to me "when you do this crap, you're hiding something. why hiding?"

I just asked you what you were talking about. I even suggested you just were confused over which poster you were responding to, which did seem to end up being the case since we didn't disagree on anything. You could have just said your bad instead of acting like a dick about it and saying " since you seem to want to argue - feel free. just go on without me."

Note this is the first post I said anything negative to you. I just quoted two you were rude to me without any apparent reason other than misunderstanding on your part. Which is fine, but you could just say that
 

Dana7360

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2014
Messages
10,495
Reaction score
6,269
Points
1,055
The suburbs are revolting against Trump.
I guess no one is buying his scare tactics about black and brown people coming in to destroy them, take their stuff and rape their daughters eh?
The college educated tend to be just a tad smarter than that.
Yep. What they are scared of, is some pool boy diddling hypocrite evangelical, telling those suburban women how to live their lives.

And if they thought those suburban women were motivated in 2018, they are going to be shocked in another 6 weeks.

What those stupid far right radical extremists don't realize is that you don't tick off women. You don't put our rights in jeopardy.

Women are the majority in this nation.

The last thing any politician should ever want to do is tick off us women.

The next thing we will probably start seeing is for cries to repeal the 19th Amendment.
 

andaronjim

Platinum Member
Joined
May 6, 2015
Messages
23,872
Reaction score
9,113
Points
910
Location
Floor E Da
Suburban support for the Republicans is continuing to slide just as it did during the 2018 midterms. Trump supporters are in for a very rude awakening on Election Day

“It hasn’t ebbed. It’s crashed,” said Lehner, who is not seeking reelection in the district of working-class and white-collar communities the president won comfortably four years ago. “He is really doing poorly among independents.”

Yeah, when those progs show up in the Subs like they did in NY, those independents(Spineless fucks) sway in the direction of the Demoncraps? Only stupid people and progs believe that shit.
 

BlueGin

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
17,442
Reaction score
6,846
Points
350
It would be a huge mistake if people vote to have Antifa run our country.
They will turn our country into another Venezuela.
Why are people so dumb?

This country has been run by anti-fascists for a very, very long time. 2016 was the first and last time a fascist was elected to the Presidency.
You only proved that you don't know what fascism is, moron.
Most lefty loons think everyone is fooled by their moronic gaslighting.
 

iceberg

Gold Member
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
28,973
Reaction score
7,639
Points
290
another anonymous LOOK TRUMP SUCKS post.
And from an OP from whom I usually expect much better.

I have to wonder if this is a very poor attempt at either sarcasm or trolling.
Trolling more than likely.
I don't know, Don't Taz Me Bro is pretty hit or miss. He writes a few good posts and a lot of dumb ones. I wouldn't say he has any consistent pattern of quality, just the occasional coherent, rational post
the AP post itself is pretty "news looking" but the entire basis of it is unknown research.

was this pelosi and schurmer giving their opinion? what is the basis for this thought process? it isn't there, so it's widely subjective. but it's also something i look for when i read news anymore. when you do this crap, you're hiding something.

why hiding?
I think you're confused. Did you reply to the wrong poster?
don't think so - just saying this is an AP story and not like he pulled it off Occupy Democrats or something.

however, the glaring omission of details on who did this study is pretty huge.
So what were you lecturing me about then since we didn't disagree on anything? I said Don't Taz Me is pretty hit or miss, mostly miss. I didn't argue for the story
i was just indicating this wouldn't be a "miss" to be because AP was the source. *usually* a good one. i simply disagreed with the premise of the story and said why.

but since you seem to want to argue - feel free. just go on without me.
You said to me "when you do this crap, you're hiding something. why hiding?"

I just asked you what you were talking about. I even suggested you just were confused over which poster you were responding to, which did seem to end up being the case since we didn't disagree on anything. You could have just said your bad instead of acting like a dick about it and saying " since you seem to want to argue - feel free. just go on without me."

Note this is the first post I said anything negative to you. I just quoted two you were rude to me without any apparent reason other than misunderstanding on your part. Which is fine, but you could just say that
"you" in that instance would be the AP for hiding the info THAT I WAS REFERRING TO.

not you.
not the OP
but the AP for doing this hidden "research" party.

so no - it was not a misunderstanding on my part. now if you wish to continue to argue, go on without me.
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
62,626
Reaction score
11,992
Points
2,040
Location
Kazmania
Suburban support for the Republicans is continuing to slide just as it did during the 2018 midterms. Trump supporters are in for a very rude awakening on Election Day

“It hasn’t ebbed. It’s crashed,” said Lehner, who is not seeking reelection in the district of working-class and white-collar communities the president won comfortably four years ago. “He is really doing poorly among independents.”

Yep, we've seen this slide for many months now with suburban independents. And how about those "suburban housewives". They're really gonna LOVE Donald and Republicans ramming through an activist judge who wants to kill the ACA and a woman's right to choose. :rolleyes:
No we haven’t.
Missed my link eh? :)

trump losing support with independents
That's not a link, it's just a Google search. And it brought up the NY Times, Watchington Compost, Newsweek, the who's who of leftist propaganda
It included thousands of sources rated unbiased (center) to center right.
But no, you probably won't find anything from Gateway Pundit, DailyCaller or Breitbart in their anywhere. ;)
Gotcha. So if you make a stupid statement then I can give you a link to a Google search and it's up to you to figure out which link establishes my point.

You are a turd, I'll give you that one for your choice of avatar
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
62,626
Reaction score
11,992
Points
2,040
Location
Kazmania
another anonymous LOOK TRUMP SUCKS post.
And from an OP from whom I usually expect much better.

I have to wonder if this is a very poor attempt at either sarcasm or trolling.
Trolling more than likely.
I don't know, Don't Taz Me Bro is pretty hit or miss. He writes a few good posts and a lot of dumb ones. I wouldn't say he has any consistent pattern of quality, just the occasional coherent, rational post
the AP post itself is pretty "news looking" but the entire basis of it is unknown research.

was this pelosi and schurmer giving their opinion? what is the basis for this thought process? it isn't there, so it's widely subjective. but it's also something i look for when i read news anymore. when you do this crap, you're hiding something.

why hiding?
I think you're confused. Did you reply to the wrong poster?
don't think so - just saying this is an AP story and not like he pulled it off Occupy Democrats or something.

however, the glaring omission of details on who did this study is pretty huge.
So what were you lecturing me about then since we didn't disagree on anything? I said Don't Taz Me is pretty hit or miss, mostly miss. I didn't argue for the story
i was just indicating this wouldn't be a "miss" to be because AP was the source. *usually* a good one. i simply disagreed with the premise of the story and said why.

but since you seem to want to argue - feel free. just go on without me.
You said to me "when you do this crap, you're hiding something. why hiding?"

I just asked you what you were talking about. I even suggested you just were confused over which poster you were responding to, which did seem to end up being the case since we didn't disagree on anything. You could have just said your bad instead of acting like a dick about it and saying " since you seem to want to argue - feel free. just go on without me."

Note this is the first post I said anything negative to you. I just quoted two you were rude to me without any apparent reason other than misunderstanding on your part. Which is fine, but you could just say that
"you" in that instance would be the AP for hiding the info THAT I WAS REFERRING TO.

not you.
not the OP
but the AP for doing this hidden "research" party.

so no - it was not a misunderstanding on my part. now if you wish to continue to argue, go on without me.
So you meant this to the AP as well? "when you do this crap, you're hiding something. why hiding?"
 

Mad_Jack_Flint

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
1,504
Reaction score
1,200
Points
1,893
Here is my opinion:

Pennsylvania will go Biden ( Home State ),so Trump loses one State he barley won in 2016...

Then I believe Michigan will go to Biden with the Detroit vote sealing the deal...

Then I believe Trump will lose Arizona and Ohio while winning Wisconsin by a narrow margin...

So what does that mean?

Biden will win the Popular and Electoral College vote but by what Margin?
 

iceberg

Gold Member
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
28,973
Reaction score
7,639
Points
290
another anonymous LOOK TRUMP SUCKS post.
And from an OP from whom I usually expect much better.

I have to wonder if this is a very poor attempt at either sarcasm or trolling.
Trolling more than likely.
I don't know, Don't Taz Me Bro is pretty hit or miss. He writes a few good posts and a lot of dumb ones. I wouldn't say he has any consistent pattern of quality, just the occasional coherent, rational post
the AP post itself is pretty "news looking" but the entire basis of it is unknown research.

was this pelosi and schurmer giving their opinion? what is the basis for this thought process? it isn't there, so it's widely subjective. but it's also something i look for when i read news anymore. when you do this crap, you're hiding something.

why hiding?
I think you're confused. Did you reply to the wrong poster?
don't think so - just saying this is an AP story and not like he pulled it off Occupy Democrats or something.

however, the glaring omission of details on who did this study is pretty huge.
So what were you lecturing me about then since we didn't disagree on anything? I said Don't Taz Me is pretty hit or miss, mostly miss. I didn't argue for the story
i was just indicating this wouldn't be a "miss" to be because AP was the source. *usually* a good one. i simply disagreed with the premise of the story and said why.

but since you seem to want to argue - feel free. just go on without me.
You said to me "when you do this crap, you're hiding something. why hiding?"

I just asked you what you were talking about. I even suggested you just were confused over which poster you were responding to, which did seem to end up being the case since we didn't disagree on anything. You could have just said your bad instead of acting like a dick about it and saying " since you seem to want to argue - feel free. just go on without me."

Note this is the first post I said anything negative to you. I just quoted two you were rude to me without any apparent reason other than misunderstanding on your part. Which is fine, but you could just say that
"you" in that instance would be the AP for hiding the info THAT I WAS REFERRING TO.

not you.
not the OP
but the AP for doing this hidden "research" party.

so no - it was not a misunderstanding on my part. now if you wish to continue to argue, go on without me.
So you meant this to the AP as well? "when you do this crap, you're hiding something. why hiding?"
yes.
 

initforme

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2011
Messages
14,243
Reaction score
1,715
Points
265
Here it's gonna be really close. Alot more Biden signs than I thought I'd see. It seems evenly split here. Last election was mostly trump signs. Wierd
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
62,626
Reaction score
11,992
Points
2,040
Location
Kazmania
another anonymous LOOK TRUMP SUCKS post.
And from an OP from whom I usually expect much better.

I have to wonder if this is a very poor attempt at either sarcasm or trolling.
Trolling more than likely.
I don't know, Don't Taz Me Bro is pretty hit or miss. He writes a few good posts and a lot of dumb ones. I wouldn't say he has any consistent pattern of quality, just the occasional coherent, rational post
the AP post itself is pretty "news looking" but the entire basis of it is unknown research.

was this pelosi and schurmer giving their opinion? what is the basis for this thought process? it isn't there, so it's widely subjective. but it's also something i look for when i read news anymore. when you do this crap, you're hiding something.

why hiding?
I think you're confused. Did you reply to the wrong poster?
don't think so - just saying this is an AP story and not like he pulled it off Occupy Democrats or something.

however, the glaring omission of details on who did this study is pretty huge.
So what were you lecturing me about then since we didn't disagree on anything? I said Don't Taz Me is pretty hit or miss, mostly miss. I didn't argue for the story
i was just indicating this wouldn't be a "miss" to be because AP was the source. *usually* a good one. i simply disagreed with the premise of the story and said why.

but since you seem to want to argue - feel free. just go on without me.
You said to me "when you do this crap, you're hiding something. why hiding?"

I just asked you what you were talking about. I even suggested you just were confused over which poster you were responding to, which did seem to end up being the case since we didn't disagree on anything. You could have just said your bad instead of acting like a dick about it and saying " since you seem to want to argue - feel free. just go on without me."

Note this is the first post I said anything negative to you. I just quoted two you were rude to me without any apparent reason other than misunderstanding on your part. Which is fine, but you could just say that
"you" in that instance would be the AP for hiding the info THAT I WAS REFERRING TO.

not you.
not the OP
but the AP for doing this hidden "research" party.

so no - it was not a misunderstanding on my part. now if you wish to continue to argue, go on without me.
So you meant this to the AP as well? "when you do this crap, you're hiding something. why hiding?"
yes.
Yeah, sure
 

DrLove

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
21,905
Reaction score
6,551
Points
290
Location
Central Oregon Coast
Suburban support for the Republicans is continuing to slide just as it did during the 2018 midterms. Trump supporters are in for a very rude awakening on Election Day

“It hasn’t ebbed. It’s crashed,” said Lehner, who is not seeking reelection in the district of working-class and white-collar communities the president won comfortably four years ago. “He is really doing poorly among independents.”

Yep, we've seen this slide for many months now with suburban independents. And how about those "suburban housewives". They're really gonna LOVE Donald and Republicans ramming through an activist judge who wants to kill the ACA and a woman's right to choose. :rolleyes:
No we haven’t.
Missed my link eh? :)

trump losing support with independents
That's not a link, it's just a Google search. And it brought up the NY Times, Watchington Compost, Newsweek, the who's who of leftist propaganda
It included thousands of sources rated unbiased (center) to center right.
But no, you probably won't find anything from Gateway Pundit, DailyCaller or Breitbart in their anywhere. ;)
Gotcha. So if you make a stupid statement then I can give you a link to a Google search and it's up to you to figure out which link establishes my point.

You are a turd, I'll give you that one for your choice of avatar
Yes - Choose your source is an excellent debate tactic. You should learn a few of those since you trash all the sources that don't simply repeat Donald's lies. ;)
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
62,626
Reaction score
11,992
Points
2,040
Location
Kazmania
Here is my opinion:

Pennsylvania will go Biden ( Home State ),so Trump loses one State he barley won in 2016...

Then I believe Michigan will go to Biden with the Detroit vote sealing the deal...

Then I believe Trump will lose Arizona and Ohio while winning Wisconsin by a narrow margin...

So what does that mean?

Biden will win the Popular and Electoral College vote but by what Margin?
Whhhooooaaaaaa. A Democrat predicting a Democrat victory. Crap, this is over for real
 
OP
Dont Taz Me Bro

Dont Taz Me Bro

Diamond Member
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
51,685
Reaction score
16,101
Points
2,290
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
The only 'surprise' Trump-supporters will get after the election is if a hoard of Democrat lawyers do not attempt to hijack the election and delay long enough for the Democrats to manufacture enough mail-in votes to overcome the reported vote Deficit they need to win the Presidency.
Conspiracy theories won’t win you the election
 

iceberg

Gold Member
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
28,973
Reaction score
7,639
Points
290
another anonymous LOOK TRUMP SUCKS post.
And from an OP from whom I usually expect much better.

I have to wonder if this is a very poor attempt at either sarcasm or trolling.
Trolling more than likely.
I don't know, Don't Taz Me Bro is pretty hit or miss. He writes a few good posts and a lot of dumb ones. I wouldn't say he has any consistent pattern of quality, just the occasional coherent, rational post
the AP post itself is pretty "news looking" but the entire basis of it is unknown research.

was this pelosi and schurmer giving their opinion? what is the basis for this thought process? it isn't there, so it's widely subjective. but it's also something i look for when i read news anymore. when you do this crap, you're hiding something.

why hiding?
I think you're confused. Did you reply to the wrong poster?
don't think so - just saying this is an AP story and not like he pulled it off Occupy Democrats or something.

however, the glaring omission of details on who did this study is pretty huge.
So what were you lecturing me about then since we didn't disagree on anything? I said Don't Taz Me is pretty hit or miss, mostly miss. I didn't argue for the story
i was just indicating this wouldn't be a "miss" to be because AP was the source. *usually* a good one. i simply disagreed with the premise of the story and said why.

but since you seem to want to argue - feel free. just go on without me.
You said to me "when you do this crap, you're hiding something. why hiding?"

I just asked you what you were talking about. I even suggested you just were confused over which poster you were responding to, which did seem to end up being the case since we didn't disagree on anything. You could have just said your bad instead of acting like a dick about it and saying " since you seem to want to argue - feel free. just go on without me."

Note this is the first post I said anything negative to you. I just quoted two you were rude to me without any apparent reason other than misunderstanding on your part. Which is fine, but you could just say that
"you" in that instance would be the AP for hiding the info THAT I WAS REFERRING TO.

not you.
not the OP
but the AP for doing this hidden "research" party.

so no - it was not a misunderstanding on my part. now if you wish to continue to argue, go on without me.
So you meant this to the AP as well? "when you do this crap, you're hiding something. why hiding?"
yes.
Yeah, sure
think what you want. since i have no idea what *you* could have been hiding i could not have been referencing you but simply reinforcing my own opinion on the AP article being crap.

have a day.
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
62,626
Reaction score
11,992
Points
2,040
Location
Kazmania
Suburban support for the Republicans is continuing to slide just as it did during the 2018 midterms. Trump supporters are in for a very rude awakening on Election Day

“It hasn’t ebbed. It’s crashed,” said Lehner, who is not seeking reelection in the district of working-class and white-collar communities the president won comfortably four years ago. “He is really doing poorly among independents.”

Yep, we've seen this slide for many months now with suburban independents. And how about those "suburban housewives". They're really gonna LOVE Donald and Republicans ramming through an activist judge who wants to kill the ACA and a woman's right to choose. :rolleyes:
No we haven’t.
Missed my link eh? :)

trump losing support with independents
That's not a link, it's just a Google search. And it brought up the NY Times, Watchington Compost, Newsweek, the who's who of leftist propaganda
It included thousands of sources rated unbiased (center) to center right.
But no, you probably won't find anything from Gateway Pundit, DailyCaller or Breitbart in their anywhere. ;)
Gotcha. So if you make a stupid statement then I can give you a link to a Google search and it's up to you to figure out which link establishes my point.

You are a turd, I'll give you that one for your choice of avatar
Yes - Choose your source is an excellent debate tactic. You should learn a few of those since you trash all the sources that don't simply repeat Donald's lies. ;)
You're just vomiting Democrat dogma now. Booorrriinnnngggggg
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top