If I can find it, YOU CAN FIND IT.... google is your friend!It's the law, my dear....okOf course he's telling the truth, but not, perhaps, all of the truth: a large privately owned company like his is always under audit. The IRS is probably still auditing his taxes from a few years ago and this year's taxes will continue to be audited for at least the next two years.Do you Trumpsters believe President Trump when he tells you he would give us his irs tax returns IF HE WERE NOT under audit?
Or do you believe he is lying about that...?
What are you thinking? He's bluffing, he's lying?
He said it again yesterday.... so, is he telling the truth, or not?
Nixon's were under audit, but he still let 6103 f, take place.... he did not break the law, to stop it...
plus, being under audit has no affect on him being able to show the public, you do know that, don't you? There is no law preventing him from showing us, because he is under audit, and all tax lawyers and CPA's state it would not matter 1 itty bitty bit, for him to show us his tax return if under audit....
but let's just say it would make him uncomfortable to do so and go public...
fine
but that does not give him the right to break the law with 6103f... where only the tax committees in congress gets to see them, and they do not go public
If you actually believe democrats in Congress would keep that information secret if they thought it could be used against Trump in any way, I have a rainbow farting unicorn for sale, cheap.
What are you afraid of and what is Trump afraid of with this oversight?
Why are you supporting him on this, why not just let the law be followed?
YOU MUST THINK he is breaking the law and YOU do not want anyone to find out that he is breaking the law?
WHY ELSE would you all not want the law to be followed, that has been followed for every single instance of congress requesting 6103f?
What is wrong with you guys? Just mind blowing that you all are even arguing over this...?
WHY ELSE would you all not want the law to be followed, that has been followed for every single instance of congress requesting 6103f?
You have a list of "every single instance"?
As far as presidents and vice presidents, offhand I know that it has been used on Nixon, on Ford and on Clinton.


