Trump Indicted

[Curried Goats]

He is a former president, and former presidents are allowed to have them, dipshit.

Is that why Trump is facing charges in federal court for having and concealing them? Cosplaying doesn't play in Court, Soy Boy.

 

[Godboy]

They’re not allowed to have classified documents.

They’re definitely not allowed to hide them when the government subpoenas them.

I don’t think you have a good grasp on the facts here.

Yes they can. They have always been able to have documents.

 

[The Duke]

Tough talk, Kowardly Keyboard Kommando. Even on this thread as soon as you got called on your threats to a fellow poster, you backed right down with "I was just joking."

Why would I literally want to hurt teh Toto? Toro

If I really did, I'd steal all his single-malt. That'd get 'im good!

 

[Godboy]

Is that why Trump is facing charges in federal court for having and concealing them? Cosplaying doesn't play in Court, Soy Boy.

He is facing charges because the DOJ has been weaponized. Its not going to work though. It going to backfire spectacularly.

 

[Curried Goats]

He is facing charges because the DOJ has been weaponized. Its not going to work though. It going to backfire spectacularly.

Cosplaying also doesn't work as a defense.

 

[bodecea]

No, the point is if you are a member of the dem political class, you are above the law.

History tells us that this is the last step before a revolution occurs. Right now we are following the course of the collapse of the Roman Republic to a "T".

The same levels of political corruption, the same abuses of power, the same theft of taxpayer monies etc.

Now, the question is, what comes after.

One thing I can safely tell you, we are living in interesting times.

And, if you are at all familiar with foreign cultures, you will recognize that phrase as a curse.

But, you progbots are too ignorant and stupid to understand.

And where are the indictment charges for Former Secretary of State Clinton, Former President Obama, and President Biden? Where are they? YOUR orange sexual abuser god had four years to indict them.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Let Biden answer for the documents he had.
His defense will be he wasn’t aware he had them and turned them over as soon as they were found.

Trump does not have that defense. He admitted he took them, tried to hide them, refused to return them

Ignorance doesn’t hold up in court.

 

[Billy000]

Hillary did a LOT worse and she got away with it ? How come they aren’t investigating the crooked deals of the Biden family?

Address my question first and then I’ll address Biden. Deflection won’t work.

 

[bodecea]

Runaway Hawley?

 

[bodecea]

This isn't a miscarriage of justice. This is the total loss of justice. This stupidity is an insult to every serviceman who sacrificed his life on the battlefield for freedom. All those sacrifices were in vain as a result of Garland's power grab.

You don't speak for Servicemembers.

 

[LibertyKid]

I won't be surprised if this turns into another "nothing burger" and wasted time, money and human resources.

 

[Marener]

Yes they can. They have always been able to have documents.

No. Those documents are legally required to be submitted to NARA.

The former president can get access to them, but they don’t keep them.

 

[rightwinger]

Ignorance doesn’t hold up in court.

It will as regards to the degree of prosecution and potential sentence

Trump admits he intentionally took Secret Documents and shared them

 

[bodecea]

And right after the anniversary of D-Day too.

The Anniversary of Anti-Fascism day.

 

[Foolardi]

I don't like him but I would gladly take him over Trump if those are my two options.

Anyone but Trump.

No need to understand yer psyche.It's as common as the old
commercial ...
I Wonder Where the YELLOW Went!

 

[The Duke]

No. Those documents are legally required to be submitted to NARA.

The former president can get access to them, but they don’t keep them.

Unlike you, I have done a fair amount of research into this, and presidents are allowed broad powers on what they can keep.

Case precedence says Trump can have or destroy pretty much whatever he wants. Lemme see if I still have that stuff..

"The Court notes at the outset that there is broad language in Armstrong I stating that the PRA accords the President “virtually complete control” over his records during his time in office. 924 F.2d at 290. In particular, the court stated that the President enjoys unconstrained authority to make decisions regarding the disposal of documents: “[a]lthough the President must notify the Archivist before disposing of records . . . neither the Archivist nor Congress has the authority to veto the President’s disposal decision.”"

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2010cv1834-13

National Archivist has no right or power to choose what a president keeps or doesn't.

Bush Executive Order 13292 on Classified National Security Information

to amend executive order 12958, signed March 25, 2003

sgp.fas.org

 

[bodecea]

From 2015:



You've been promising a revolution forever.

What comes after? More promises from your ***** ass.

The Proud Boys won't take him...................waaaaaaaay too old and decrepit.

 

[XponentialChaos]

But you don't have any TDS at all! No Sir!

You have BDS and you're a *****.

 

[Marener]

Unlike you, I have done a fair amount of research into this, and presidents are allowed broad powers on what they can keep.

Case precedence says Trump can have pretty much whatever he wants. Lemme see if I still have that stuff..

There is no precedent for a president taking classified documents to keep.

Even if there were, he received a subpoena for them and has to turn them over.

 

[g5000]

Unlike you, I have done a fair amount of research into this, and presidents are allowed broad powers on what they can keep.

Case precedence says Trump can have pretty much whatever he wants. Lemme see if I still have that stuff..

Let me guess.

Your "research" involves reading the Gateway Pundit.