It's not up to debate. Fred Christ Trump *WAS* born in the Bronx, not in fricken Germany. Rump knows that, he gave the eulogy when the old man died (although he spent the time talking about himself).
And yet Rump has now, at least four times, explicitly said Fred was born in GERMANY. In a "wonderful place" he didn't name. That's not up to argument, it's what we call a "fact".
So the question is, *WHY* is Rump telling a lie, repeatedly, that is easily disproved with documentation?
And keep in mind this is the same schlemiel who kept yammering on and on and on about O'bama's birth certificate. Are birth certificates to be believed or are they NOT?
Donald Trump: the son of an immigrant
The couple had a son, Frederick, in New York City, in 1905. This was Donald Trump’s father. His birth in America, and subsequent automatic US citizenship, disproves rumors that The Donald is himself an “anchor baby”born to noncitizen US immigrants.
CS Monitor knew trump's father was born in NYC but the trump fluffers here think trump himself didn't know that.
Rump seems to be test-driving the Orwellian "who controls the past controls the future" motif just to see if he can get away with it.
Nazi theory ...
Nazi?!
You dumbass.
Yes, it's the first word of a written observation by George Orwell. It's a QUOTE. The rest of which you illegally wiped out because like the topic title, you're too much of a candyassed WIMP to deal with the content. So your purpose here appears to be to troll the thread to derail the actual topic.
Why is that? Simple cowardice? Or stupidity?
Let's see Orwell's full quote, for those who don't have the balls to read it.
Nazi theory indeed specifically denies that such a thing as "the truth" exists. ... The implied objective of this line of thought is a nightmare world in which the Leader, or some ruling clique, controls not only the future but the past. If the Leader says of such and such an event, "It never happened" – well, it never happened. If he says that two and two are five – well, two and two are five. This prospect frightens me much more than bombs.[23]
Orwell would a few years later incorporate this self-delusionary practice into his epic tour de force, "1984":
In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense.
Get that Wimples? Blatant and forced denial of the readily self-evident. Much like standing in front of people and claiming your father was born in Germany when the whole ******* world KNOWS he wasn't.