Trump in Latrobe, PA and his obvious disinhibition problem

All you have is the fact that I posted the guy's statement (which is going viral as we speak).

The Democrats claim that ALL victims have a right to be heard, right?

All you posted an unsubstantiated allegation with no proof to back it up. You post hearsay. When was the clip make, under what circumstances was it made, where was it made and who was present when was made.

You have no proof that the clip is real. You have no affidavit filed attesting to the validity of clip, nor do you any sworn testimony attesting to the validity of the clip. Nor do you know if the person on the clip is telling the truth..

You are liar until you prove otherwise.
 
All you posted an unsubstantiated allegation with no proof to back it up. You post hearsay. When was the clip make, under what circumstances was it made, where was it made and who was present when was made.

You have no proof that the clip is real. You have no affidavit filed attesting to the validity of clip, nor do you any sworn testimony attesting to the validity of the clip. Nor do you know if the person on the clip is telling the truth..

You are liar until you prove otherwise.
I posted his actual statement.

Why are you calling a victim that came forward a liar???

Or are you trying to say that the "victims" that came forward against Republicans are also liars, according to the burden of proof that you are proposing?
 
I posted his actual statement.

Why are you calling a victim that came forward a liar???

Or are you trying to say that the "victims" that came forward against Republicans are also liars, according to the burden of proof that you are proposing?

No you did not. You post an unsubstantiated and unproved allegation.

You have no way to prove what is said on the clip is true.

When was clip recorded and under what circumstances was the clip made. Who was present when the clip made. Where was the clip made. Did person on the clip swear "To Tell The Truth, The Whole Truth and Noting But The Truth So Help Them God"?

Was an affidavit filed as to the validity of statement?

Was there sworn testimony as to the validity of statement?

Where was the clip made, when was the clip made and who was present when the clip was made?

Who was the person on the clip and how do YOU know that person is telling the truth.

You have not proved anything, in fact you have posted a slanderous clip that if Harris/Walz wanted to, could YOU and this site in open court.

You have no way to prove what was on the clip was in fact true. You have open yourself a slander suit. You have opened this site to slander suit.

You need prove what you posted is true and you no means by which to prove it.

YOU ARE A LIAR!!!.
 
No you did not. You post an unsubstantiated and unproved allegation.

You have no way to prove what is said on the clip is true.

When was clip recorded and under what circumstances was the clip made. Who was present when the clip made. Where was the clip made. Did person on the clip swear "To Tell The Truth, The Whole Truth and Noting But The Truth So Help Them God"?

Was an affidavit filed as to the validity of statement?

Was there sworn testimony as to the validity of statement?

Where was the clip made, when was the clip made and who was present when the clip was made?

Who was the person on the clip and how do YOU know that person is telling the truth.

You have not proved anything, in fact you have posted a slanderous clip that if Harris/Walz wanted to, could YOU and this site in open court.

You have no way to prove what was on the clip was in fact true. You have open yourself a slander suit. You have opened this site to slander suit.

You need prove what you posted is true and you no means by which to prove it.

YOU ARE A LIAR!!!.
I posted information that is clearly available on the internet.

Your attempt to deny me my First Ammendment rights under the US Constitution, along with your empty threats, are noted.

Now kindly go fuck yourself.
 
I posted information that is clearly available on the internet.

Your attempt to deny me my First Ammendment rights under the US Constitution, along with your empty threats, are noted.

Now kindly go fuck yourself.
Clear your conscience. Ask your imaginary friend for forgiveness.
 
I posted information that is clearly available on the internet.

Your attempt to deny me my First Ammendment rights under the US Constitution, along with your empty threats, are noted.

Now kindly go fuck yourself.

Which means you have posted nothing. You have zero means by which you prove the clip is in fact true.

You post an unsubstantiated and unsupported of sexual misconduct. You have no means by which you can prove that clip to be true.

A unknown individual claimed something happened. No legal way to prove it has happened. No way to legally prove what this individual said is true. You posted an empty and unfounded allegation. You cannot it to be true and by your above you are admitting that one simple fact.

I am in no way/shape/form denying your First Amendment Rights. You have a right to post your lies, but by the same right, i have the right to call you out when you post your lies. You can go fuck yourself for your outright, down right fucking lies.

What the fuck does your non-existent Magical, Mystical, Mythical Sky Man say about lying? "Thou Shalt Not Lie", yet you deliberately posted a lie. You go fuck yourself your lies.
 
Last edited:
Then how did he get her those positions?


DURRRRRR
He had a couple of picks for the independent committee, so did others he worked with in Congress who created it, to have independent outsiders study the issue and come up with solutions or better methods to handle it. She was an excellent pick, took the issue seriously, and when she left, he replaced her as his pick, with another excellent outsider pick to take her spot.

He wasn't her boss, she wasn't in Congress or a staffer in congress....

Try again, lowlife!
 
He had a couple of picks for the independent committee, so did others he worked with in Congress who created it, to have independent outsiders study the issue and come up with solutions or better methods to handle it. She was an excellent pick, took the issue seriously, and when she left, he replaced her as his pick, with another excellent outsider pick to take her spot.

He wasn't her boss, she wasn't in Congress or a staffer in congress....

Try again, lowlife!
So, he had the POWER to place her in high paying positions that she wasn't ever going to get on her own merit.

In other words he was HER SUPERIOR, you hypocritical, feckless twit.
 
I'm not in to pornography
Only because no such video, or any other evidence, exists. You just make up facts to fit your narrative. Hmm, you sound just like your candidate Donald 'All I Know Is What's On The Internet' Trump. I wouldn't want either of you to have the nuclear codes.
 
Only because no such video, or any other evidence, exists. You just make up facts to fit your narrative. Hmm, you sound just like your candidate Donald 'All I Know Is What's On The Internet' Trump. I wouldn't want either of you to have the nuclear codes.
Yet over 50 times now it has been proven that you are the people who lied.

Huh.
 
Yet over 50 times now it has been proven that you are the people who lied.

Huh.

As opposed to the thousands of out and out LIES told Diaper Don? You have not proven your accusation, while at the same time believing every lie your Orange Shit Gibbon god told you,
 
It seems a certain member of USMB fell for some good old fashioned Russian Bullshit.

Notorious propaganda unit likely spread ‘wild and baseless’ Tim Walz abuse claims: report​



A notorious Russian-backed propaganda unit with a history of pushing Kremlin talking points through fake whistleblower videos and deepfakes is the likely culprit behind a sex abuse smear campaign aimed at Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, according to a report in Wired.

The publication on Monday said it conducted an analysis using “several deepfake detector tools” to trace the origins of a fake Walz video that spread rapidly on X last week to being AI-generated. The video, which purports to show a former student of Walz detailing abuse claims during his days as a teacher, reached over 4.3 million views before it was deleted.

And, according to several specialists following the disinformation campaign against the Republican vice presidential nominee, the latest disinformation campaign “is tied to a network called Storm-1516, which has been linked to, among other things, a previous effort that falsely claimed Vice President Kamala Harris perpetrated a hit-and-run in San Francisco in 2011. Storm-1516 has a long history of posting fake whistleblower videos, and often deepfake videos, to push Kremlin talking points to the West,” Wired reported.

Congrats dufus, you fell for Russian Propaganda. Be proud.....I told you early on that you had no proof and there is proof, the whole fucking story is Russian Propaganda.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom