Trump Humiliated As Just 18 Supporters Show Up To Protest Nevada Mail-In Voting

[22lcidw]

There seems to be people living in cities and around them a bit nervous. There can be an affect in voting come November. People crave safety. Has there been enough anarchy to persuade them to vote Repub? Have any who have lived off of government for most of their lives feel that it can continue one way or the other and still vote Prog?

 

[pyetro]

This is funny.

Trump Humiliated As Just 18 Supporters Show Up To Protest Nevada Mail-In Voting

The Chair of the RNC claimed that Trump supporters were out in full force in Nevada, as she tweeted a picture with 18 people in it.

www.politicususa.com

Mail voting is extremely popular.
Poor Trump got embarrassed. Not the photo op he planned.

 

[The Original Tree]

Remember Kids:

Satan is the author of destruction, so when Democrats want to destroy your schools and close them, close your theaters, cancel sports, close the polls, cancel fairs, destroy our economy, throw millions of people out of work, and close countless factories and small businesses, over a hyped up Scamdemic that has not even come close to infecting 1/10th of a percent of our population.

Yet we are destroying not just our economies but our communities and our country over Politician's Mandates.

Covid isn't destroying anything more than happens in FLU season, but Leftist Radicals are destroying everything with their Unconstitutional Mandates.

So the moral of the story is Satan = Democrats

Don't be a Democrat.

 

[Dana7360]

Trumpie's will launch into denial and make comical excuses. This low Trump turnout thing is becoming routine. Coupled with his manipulated Pelosi videos his desperation and failures are on full display.

Yes he doesn't have as many supporters or they aren't willing to risk their lives.

Either way, I think it's funny.

Why in the world would you think any of what is happening is funny? Sorry, that is warped.

I think it's funny only 18 people showed up.

If you can't see the humor in that, I don't care.

I can and do.

As for trying to stop mail in voting, I don't think that's funny at all. I think it's unAmerican and very irresponsible.

But if you want to put your life in jeopardy to vote, go for it.

I hope you don't die.

What is very UNAMERICAN is to allow mail in voting and not know who the heck is voting.

Really? They don't know who is voting?

My state has been 100% mail in ballot since 2005.

Oregon has been 100% mail in ballot since 2000.

Colorado has been 100% mail in ballot since 2013.

In the last 20 years there has been 143 criminal prosecutions of mail in vote fraud. Which works out to 1 case of fraud per state every 6 or 7 years or works out to .00006% of fraud rate.

Do you want to keep standing by what you posted above?

What proof do you have of your claim? Just saying something doesn't make it true. Study after study says your statement is nothing but garbage.

Why Is Voting By Mail (Suddenly) Controversial? Here's What You Need To Know

President Trump's warnings of potential fraud don't line up with what elections experts predict or with how most Americans feel about voting by mail. Here are the facts about mail ballots.

www.npr.org

Let’s put the vote-by-mail ‘fraud’ myth to rest

Vote fraud in the United States is exceedingly rare, with mailed ballots and otherwise.

thehill.com

 

[Dana7360]

Anyone who votes by mail ain't to swift.

Vote early. I do and never have a problem casting my vote.

Really?

Tell that to the people of Oregon, Washington and Colorado.

All three states have been 100% mail in ballot for years.

So everyone in those states and everyone who votes by mail in ballot all around the nation aren't too swift according to you.

Maybe you should look in a mirror when you say those words. You're talking about yourself. You certainly aren't very swift.

Vote in person and put your life in jeopardy. I don't care. What I do care about is those who aren't like you and want to vote safely while you and people like you do all you can to prevent it.

Are you saying all the military who are over in Iraq and Afghanistan aren't too swift? They all vote mail in ballot. I sure would like to see you say your dishonest words of being not too swift to one of our soldiers who are putting their lives on the line for our nation even though putin has bounties on their heads and trump won't do anything about it because he doesn't care. Now you are saying they shouldn't be able to vote and if they do, they aren't very swift.

Wow. I guess you aren't a vet. I am. That's the difference between someone like you and someone like me. I'm a real American. You take from this nation but don't give back. I sacrificed years of my life to give back to this nation. I guess you weren't too swift and just couldn't be bothered could you? Now you want to deny our military overseas the right to vote and say they aren't too swift if they do.

Bite me.

 

[Claudette]

Anyone who votes by mail ain't to swift.

Vote early. I do and never have a problem casting my vote.

Really?

Tell that to the people of Oregon, Washington and Colorado.

All three states have been 100% mail in ballot for years.

So everyone in those states and everyone who votes by mail in ballot all around the nation aren't too swift according to you.

Maybe you should look in a mirror when you say those words. You're talking about yourself. You certainly aren't very swift.

Vote in person and put your life in jeopardy. I don't care. What I do care about is those who aren't like you and want to vote safely while you and people like you do all you can to prevent it.

Are you saying all the military who are over in Iraq and Afghanistan aren't too swift? They all vote mail in ballot. I sure would like to see you say your dishonest words of being not too swift to one of our soldiers who are putting their lives on the line for our nation even though putin has bounties on their heads and trump won't do anything about it because he doesn't care. Now you are saying they shouldn't be able to vote and if they do, they aren't very swift.

Wow. I guess you aren't a vet. I am. That's the difference between someone like you and someone like me. I'm a real American. You take from this nation but don't give back. I sacrificed years of my life to give back to this nation. I guess you weren't too swift and just couldn't be bothered could you? Now you want to deny our military overseas the right to vote and say they aren't too swift if they do.

Bite me.

I would never vote by mail. Hell I registered my car by mail this time. I mailed it out on the 16th of July and still haven't gotten my stickers. Mail is slow. Early voting is not.

Bite me dumbass.

 

[healthmyths]

Trumpie's will launch into denial and make comical excuses. This low Trump turnout thing is becoming routine. Coupled with his manipulated Pelosi videos his desperation and failures are on full display.

Yes he doesn't have as many supporters or they aren't willing to risk their lives.

Either way, I think it's funny.

Why in the world would you think any of what is happening is funny? Sorry, that is warped.

I think it's funny only 18 people showed up.

If you can't see the humor in that, I don't care.

I can and do.

As for trying to stop mail in voting, I don't think that's funny at all. I think it's unAmerican and very irresponsible.

But if you want to put your life in jeopardy to vote, go for it.

I hope you don't die.

What is very UNAMERICAN is to allow mail in voting and not know who the heck is voting.

Really? They don't know who is voting?

My state has been 100% mail in ballot since 2005.

Oregon has been 100% mail in ballot since 2000.

Colorado has been 100% mail in ballot since 2013.

In the last 20 years there has been 143 criminal prosecutions of mail in vote fraud. Which works out to 1 case of fraud per state every 6 or 7 years or works out to .00006% of fraud rate.

Do you want to keep standing by what you posted above?

What proof do you have of your claim? Just saying something doesn't make it true. Study after study says your statement is nothing but garbage.

View attachment 370558

Why Is Voting By Mail (Suddenly) Controversial? Here's What You Need To Know

President Trump's warnings of potential fraud don't line up with what elections experts predict or with how most Americans feel about voting by mail. Here are the facts about mail ballots.

www.npr.org

Let’s put the vote-by-mail ‘fraud’ myth to rest

Vote fraud in the United States is exceedingly rare, with mailed ballots and otherwise.

thehill.com

I think you have achieved a Emily Litella moment... you know SNL character who comes on news and make an outlandish statement like:
"What is all this fuss I hear about the Supreme Court decision on a "deaf" penalty? It's terrible! Deaf people have enough problems as it :is!
The news anchor would interrupt Litella to point out her error, along the lines, "That's death penalty, Ms. Litella, not deaf ... death." Litella would wrinkle her nose, say something like, "Oh, that's very different," then meekly turn to the camera and say, smiling, "Never mind!"

Emily Litella - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

There is a BIG difference between "MAIL-IN" ballots and "ABSENTEE Ballots"...
Believe me personally, I know as I've registered in Florida for ABSENTEE balloting for 20 years...
BUT MAIL in balloting is grossly difference, Emily!!

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

California, Michigan, and New Hampshire expanded mail-in voting for the 2020 election, while Democrats in Congress want a universal, all-mail system.

www.dailysignal.com

Absentee voting is prone to fraud, election experts say, but has more safeguards than all-mail voting.
“The main difference is [in] voting by absentee ballot, a voter has to request a ballot in most cases and fill out a form and sign to authenticate the request,” Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission who is a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal With all-mail [voting], they just send out a ballot and without certainty it’s going to a live voter,” von Spakovsky said.
“The problem with all-mail voting is that ballots are mailed to every registered voter. We know voter registration rolls are in bad shape all across the country, with multiple duplications and sending out ballots to people that don’t live there.” .

In one practice, known as ballot harvesting, political operatives may collect absentee ballots from voters and even be present when a voter makes selections. California formally legalized ballot harvesting last year, and a Senate bill sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., would expand it nationally.

So Emily... time for you to say "NEVER MIND"!!!

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Trumpie's will launch into denial and make comical excuses. This low Trump turnout thing is becoming routine. Coupled with his manipulated Pelosi videos his desperation and failures are on full display.

Yes he doesn't have as many supporters or they aren't willing to risk their lives.

Either way, I think it's funny.

Why in the world would you think any of what is happening is funny? Sorry, that is warped.

I think it's funny only 18 people showed up.

If you can't see the humor in that, I don't care.

I can and do.

As for trying to stop mail in voting, I don't think that's funny at all. I think it's unAmerican and very irresponsible.

But if you want to put your life in jeopardy to vote, go for it.

I hope you don't die.

What is very UNAMERICAN is to allow mail in voting and not know who the heck is voting.

Really? They don't know who is voting?

My state has been 100% mail in ballot since 2005.

Oregon has been 100% mail in ballot since 2000.

Colorado has been 100% mail in ballot since 2013.

In the last 20 years there has been 143 criminal prosecutions of mail in vote fraud. Which works out to 1 case of fraud per state every 6 or 7 years or works out to .00006% of fraud rate.

Do you want to keep standing by what you posted above?

What proof do you have of your claim? Just saying something doesn't make it true. Study after study says your statement is nothing but garbage.

View attachment 370558

Why Is Voting By Mail (Suddenly) Controversial? Here's What You Need To Know

President Trump's warnings of potential fraud don't line up with what elections experts predict or with how most Americans feel about voting by mail. Here are the facts about mail ballots.

www.npr.org

Let’s put the vote-by-mail ‘fraud’ myth to rest

Vote fraud in the United States is exceedingly rare, with mailed ballots and otherwise.

thehill.com

I think you have achieved a Emily Litella moment... you know SNL character who comes on news and make an outlandish statement like:
"What is all this fuss I hear about the Supreme Court decision on a "deaf" penalty? It's terrible! Deaf people have enough problems as it :is!
The news anchor would interrupt Litella to point out her error, along the lines, "That's death penalty, Ms. Litella, not deaf ... death." Litella would wrinkle her nose, say something like, "Oh, that's very different," then meekly turn to the camera and say, smiling, "Never mind!"

Emily Litella - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

There is a BIG difference between "MAIL-IN" ballots and "ABSENTEE Ballots"...
Believe me personally, I know as I've registered in Florida for ABSENTEE balloting for 20 years...
BUT MAIL in balloting is grossly difference, Emily!!

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

California, Michigan, and New Hampshire expanded mail-in voting for the 2020 election, while Democrats in Congress want a universal, all-mail system.

www.dailysignal.com

Absentee voting is prone to fraud, election experts say, but has more safeguards than all-mail voting.
“The main difference is [in] voting by absentee ballot, a voter has to request a ballot in most cases and fill out a form and sign to authenticate the request,” Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission who is a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal With all-mail [voting], they just send out a ballot and without certainty it’s going to a live voter,” von Spakovsky said.
“The problem with all-mail voting is that ballots are mailed to every registered voter. We know voter registration rolls are in bad shape all across the country, with multiple duplications and sending out ballots to people that don’t live there.” .

In one practice, known as ballot harvesting, political operatives may collect absentee ballots from voters and even be present when a voter makes selections. California formally legalized ballot harvesting last year, and a Senate bill sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., would expand it nationally.

So Emily... time for you to say "NEVER MIND"!!!

I don't believe that the Feds should have any say in the matter. It's a State Rights issue. And for anyone in the Federal Government to even say a thing about it is NOT doing their jobs including both sides.

 

[irosie91]

This is funny.

Trump Humiliated As Just 18 Supporters Show Up To Protest Nevada Mail-In Voting

The Chair of the RNC claimed that Trump supporters were out in full force in Nevada, as she tweeted a picture with 18 people in it.

www.politicususa.com

so----just WHO attends protests these days? ----YA GOTTA BE AN IDIOT to go

 

[healthmyths]

Trumpie's will launch into denial and make comical excuses. This low Trump turnout thing is becoming routine. Coupled with his manipulated Pelosi videos his desperation and failures are on full display.

Yes he doesn't have as many supporters or they aren't willing to risk their lives.

Either way, I think it's funny.

Why in the world would you think any of what is happening is funny? Sorry, that is warped.

I think it's funny only 18 people showed up.

If you can't see the humor in that, I don't care.

I can and do.

As for trying to stop mail in voting, I don't think that's funny at all. I think it's unAmerican and very irresponsible.

But if you want to put your life in jeopardy to vote, go for it.

I hope you don't die.

What is very UNAMERICAN is to allow mail in voting and not know who the heck is voting.

Really? They don't know who is voting?

My state has been 100% mail in ballot since 2005.

Oregon has been 100% mail in ballot since 2000.

Colorado has been 100% mail in ballot since 2013.

In the last 20 years there has been 143 criminal prosecutions of mail in vote fraud. Which works out to 1 case of fraud per state every 6 or 7 years or works out to .00006% of fraud rate.

Do you want to keep standing by what you posted above?

What proof do you have of your claim? Just saying something doesn't make it true. Study after study says your statement is nothing but garbage.

View attachment 370558

Why Is Voting By Mail (Suddenly) Controversial? Here's What You Need To Know

President Trump's warnings of potential fraud don't line up with what elections experts predict or with how most Americans feel about voting by mail. Here are the facts about mail ballots.

www.npr.org

Let’s put the vote-by-mail ‘fraud’ myth to rest

Vote fraud in the United States is exceedingly rare, with mailed ballots and otherwise.

thehill.com

I think you have achieved a Emily Litella moment... you know SNL character who comes on news and make an outlandish statement like:
"What is all this fuss I hear about the Supreme Court decision on a "deaf" penalty? It's terrible! Deaf people have enough problems as it :is!
The news anchor would interrupt Litella to point out her error, along the lines, "That's death penalty, Ms. Litella, not deaf ... death." Litella would wrinkle her nose, say something like, "Oh, that's very different," then meekly turn to the camera and say, smiling, "Never mind!"

Emily Litella - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

There is a BIG difference between "MAIL-IN" ballots and "ABSENTEE Ballots"...
Believe me personally, I know as I've registered in Florida for ABSENTEE balloting for 20 years...
BUT MAIL in balloting is grossly difference, Emily!!

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

California, Michigan, and New Hampshire expanded mail-in voting for the 2020 election, while Democrats in Congress want a universal, all-mail system.

www.dailysignal.com

Absentee voting is prone to fraud, election experts say, but has more safeguards than all-mail voting.
“The main difference is [in] voting by absentee ballot, a voter has to request a ballot in most cases and fill out a form and sign to authenticate the request,” Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission who is a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal With all-mail [voting], they just send out a ballot and without certainty it’s going to a live voter,” von Spakovsky said.
“The problem with all-mail voting is that ballots are mailed to every registered voter. We know voter registration rolls are in bad shape all across the country, with multiple duplications and sending out ballots to people that don’t live there.” .

In one practice, known as ballot harvesting, political operatives may collect absentee ballots from voters and even be present when a voter makes selections. California formally legalized ballot harvesting last year, and a Senate bill sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., would expand it nationally.

So Emily... time for you to say "NEVER MIND"!!!

I don't believe that the Feds should have any say in the matter. It's a State Rights issue. And for anyone in the Federal Government to even say a thing about it is NOT doing their jobs including both sides.

What you "believe" is contrary to your other beliefs it appears.
I don't believe... I provide FACTS.. and if you believe in civil rights, then you believe that the Federal Government CAN dictate voting methods.

During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, southern politicians who supported the continuation of racial segregation and enforcement of state-level “Jim Crow” laws denounced anti-discrimination laws like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as federal interference with states’ rights. Even after passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, several southern states passed “Interposition Resolutions” contending that the states retained the right to nullify the federal laws.

What Are States' Rights?

States rights are the rights and power that fall to the states, rather than to the federal government, according to the Constitution.

www.thoughtco.com

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Trumpie's will launch into denial and make comical excuses. This low Trump turnout thing is becoming routine. Coupled with his manipulated Pelosi videos his desperation and failures are on full display.

Yes he doesn't have as many supporters or they aren't willing to risk their lives.

Either way, I think it's funny.

Why in the world would you think any of what is happening is funny? Sorry, that is warped.

I think it's funny only 18 people showed up.

If you can't see the humor in that, I don't care.

I can and do.

As for trying to stop mail in voting, I don't think that's funny at all. I think it's unAmerican and very irresponsible.

But if you want to put your life in jeopardy to vote, go for it.

I hope you don't die.

What is very UNAMERICAN is to allow mail in voting and not know who the heck is voting.

Really? They don't know who is voting?

My state has been 100% mail in ballot since 2005.

Oregon has been 100% mail in ballot since 2000.

Colorado has been 100% mail in ballot since 2013.

In the last 20 years there has been 143 criminal prosecutions of mail in vote fraud. Which works out to 1 case of fraud per state every 6 or 7 years or works out to .00006% of fraud rate.

Do you want to keep standing by what you posted above?

What proof do you have of your claim? Just saying something doesn't make it true. Study after study says your statement is nothing but garbage.

View attachment 370558

Why Is Voting By Mail (Suddenly) Controversial? Here's What You Need To Know

President Trump's warnings of potential fraud don't line up with what elections experts predict or with how most Americans feel about voting by mail. Here are the facts about mail ballots.

www.npr.org

Let’s put the vote-by-mail ‘fraud’ myth to rest

Vote fraud in the United States is exceedingly rare, with mailed ballots and otherwise.

thehill.com

I think you have achieved a Emily Litella moment... you know SNL character who comes on news and make an outlandish statement like:
"What is all this fuss I hear about the Supreme Court decision on a "deaf" penalty? It's terrible! Deaf people have enough problems as it :is!
The news anchor would interrupt Litella to point out her error, along the lines, "That's death penalty, Ms. Litella, not deaf ... death." Litella would wrinkle her nose, say something like, "Oh, that's very different," then meekly turn to the camera and say, smiling, "Never mind!"

Emily Litella - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

There is a BIG difference between "MAIL-IN" ballots and "ABSENTEE Ballots"...
Believe me personally, I know as I've registered in Florida for ABSENTEE balloting for 20 years...
BUT MAIL in balloting is grossly difference, Emily!!

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

California, Michigan, and New Hampshire expanded mail-in voting for the 2020 election, while Democrats in Congress want a universal, all-mail system.

www.dailysignal.com

Absentee voting is prone to fraud, election experts say, but has more safeguards than all-mail voting.
“The main difference is [in] voting by absentee ballot, a voter has to request a ballot in most cases and fill out a form and sign to authenticate the request,” Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission who is a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal With all-mail [voting], they just send out a ballot and without certainty it’s going to a live voter,” von Spakovsky said.
“The problem with all-mail voting is that ballots are mailed to every registered voter. We know voter registration rolls are in bad shape all across the country, with multiple duplications and sending out ballots to people that don’t live there.” .

In one practice, known as ballot harvesting, political operatives may collect absentee ballots from voters and even be present when a voter makes selections. California formally legalized ballot harvesting last year, and a Senate bill sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., would expand it nationally.

So Emily... time for you to say "NEVER MIND"!!!

I don't believe that the Feds should have any say in the matter. It's a State Rights issue. And for anyone in the Federal Government to even say a thing about it is NOT doing their jobs including both sides.

What you "believe" is contrary to your other beliefs it appears.
I don't believe... I provide FACTS.. and if you believe in civil rights, then you believe that the Federal Government CAN dictate voting methods.

During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, southern politicians who supported the continuation of racial segregation and enforcement of state-level “Jim Crow” laws denounced anti-discrimination laws like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as federal interference with states’ rights. Even after passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, several southern states passed “Interposition Resolutions” contending that the states retained the right to nullify the federal laws.

What Are States' Rights?

States rights are the rights and power that fall to the states, rather than to the federal government, according to the Constitution.

www.thoughtco.com

You confuse Civil Rights and Jim Crowe with States Rights. There is nothing in the constitution that states how a state MUST conduct an election as long as Civil Rights are observed.

 

[my2¢]

Not only was it funny at first glance, but then I got a 2nd boost noticing all the masks.

 

[healthmyths]

Trumpie's will launch into denial and make comical excuses. This low Trump turnout thing is becoming routine. Coupled with his manipulated Pelosi videos his desperation and failures are on full display.

Yes he doesn't have as many supporters or they aren't willing to risk their lives.

Either way, I think it's funny.

Why in the world would you think any of what is happening is funny? Sorry, that is warped.

I think it's funny only 18 people showed up.

If you can't see the humor in that, I don't care.

I can and do.

As for trying to stop mail in voting, I don't think that's funny at all. I think it's unAmerican and very irresponsible.

But if you want to put your life in jeopardy to vote, go for it.

I hope you don't die.

What is very UNAMERICAN is to allow mail in voting and not know who the heck is voting.

Really? They don't know who is voting?

My state has been 100% mail in ballot since 2005.

Oregon has been 100% mail in ballot since 2000.

Colorado has been 100% mail in ballot since 2013.

In the last 20 years there has been 143 criminal prosecutions of mail in vote fraud. Which works out to 1 case of fraud per state every 6 or 7 years or works out to .00006% of fraud rate.

Do you want to keep standing by what you posted above?

What proof do you have of your claim? Just saying something doesn't make it true. Study after study says your statement is nothing but garbage.

View attachment 370558

Why Is Voting By Mail (Suddenly) Controversial? Here's What You Need To Know

President Trump's warnings of potential fraud don't line up with what elections experts predict or with how most Americans feel about voting by mail. Here are the facts about mail ballots.

www.npr.org

Let’s put the vote-by-mail ‘fraud’ myth to rest

Vote fraud in the United States is exceedingly rare, with mailed ballots and otherwise.

thehill.com

I think you have achieved a Emily Litella moment... you know SNL character who comes on news and make an outlandish statement like:
"What is all this fuss I hear about the Supreme Court decision on a "deaf" penalty? It's terrible! Deaf people have enough problems as it :is!
The news anchor would interrupt Litella to point out her error, along the lines, "That's death penalty, Ms. Litella, not deaf ... death." Litella would wrinkle her nose, say something like, "Oh, that's very different," then meekly turn to the camera and say, smiling, "Never mind!"

Emily Litella - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

There is a BIG difference between "MAIL-IN" ballots and "ABSENTEE Ballots"...
Believe me personally, I know as I've registered in Florida for ABSENTEE balloting for 20 years...
BUT MAIL in balloting is grossly difference, Emily!!

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

California, Michigan, and New Hampshire expanded mail-in voting for the 2020 election, while Democrats in Congress want a universal, all-mail system.

www.dailysignal.com

Absentee voting is prone to fraud, election experts say, but has more safeguards than all-mail voting.
“The main difference is [in] voting by absentee ballot, a voter has to request a ballot in most cases and fill out a form and sign to authenticate the request,” Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission who is a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal With all-mail [voting], they just send out a ballot and without certainty it’s going to a live voter,” von Spakovsky said.
“The problem with all-mail voting is that ballots are mailed to every registered voter. We know voter registration rolls are in bad shape all across the country, with multiple duplications and sending out ballots to people that don’t live there.” .

In one practice, known as ballot harvesting, political operatives may collect absentee ballots from voters and even be present when a voter makes selections. California formally legalized ballot harvesting last year, and a Senate bill sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., would expand it nationally.

So Emily... time for you to say "NEVER MIND"!!!

I don't believe that the Feds should have any say in the matter. It's a State Rights issue. And for anyone in the Federal Government to even say a thing about it is NOT doing their jobs including both sides.

What you "believe" is contrary to your other beliefs it appears.
I don't believe... I provide FACTS.. and if you believe in civil rights, then you believe that the Federal Government CAN dictate voting methods.

During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, southern politicians who supported the continuation of racial segregation and enforcement of state-level “Jim Crow” laws denounced anti-discrimination laws like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as federal interference with states’ rights. Even after passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, several southern states passed “Interposition Resolutions” contending that the states retained the right to nullify the federal laws.

What Are States' Rights?

States rights are the rights and power that fall to the states, rather than to the federal government, according to the Constitution.

www.thoughtco.com

You confuse Civil Rights and Jim Crowe with States Rights. There is nothing in the constitution that states how a state MUST conduct an election as long as Civil Rights are observed.

Prove it! Where are your links. I provided MY proof... I don't believe you till you put up a link because JUST because YOU say so certainly doesn't make it true...I mean who the f...k are YOU???

 

[healthmyths]

Trumpie's will launch into denial and make comical excuses. This low Trump turnout thing is becoming routine. Coupled with his manipulated Pelosi videos his desperation and failures are on full display.

Yes he doesn't have as many supporters or they aren't willing to risk their lives.

Either way, I think it's funny.

Why in the world would you think any of what is happening is funny? Sorry, that is warped.

I think it's funny only 18 people showed up.

If you can't see the humor in that, I don't care.

I can and do.

As for trying to stop mail in voting, I don't think that's funny at all. I think it's unAmerican and very irresponsible.

But if you want to put your life in jeopardy to vote, go for it.

I hope you don't die.

What is very UNAMERICAN is to allow mail in voting and not know who the heck is voting.

Really? They don't know who is voting?

My state has been 100% mail in ballot since 2005.

Oregon has been 100% mail in ballot since 2000.

Colorado has been 100% mail in ballot since 2013.

In the last 20 years there has been 143 criminal prosecutions of mail in vote fraud. Which works out to 1 case of fraud per state every 6 or 7 years or works out to .00006% of fraud rate.

Do you want to keep standing by what you posted above?

What proof do you have of your claim? Just saying something doesn't make it true. Study after study says your statement is nothing but garbage.

View attachment 370558

Why Is Voting By Mail (Suddenly) Controversial? Here's What You Need To Know

President Trump's warnings of potential fraud don't line up with what elections experts predict or with how most Americans feel about voting by mail. Here are the facts about mail ballots.

www.npr.org

Let’s put the vote-by-mail ‘fraud’ myth to rest

Vote fraud in the United States is exceedingly rare, with mailed ballots and otherwise.

thehill.com

I think you have achieved a Emily Litella moment... you know SNL character who comes on news and make an outlandish statement like:
"What is all this fuss I hear about the Supreme Court decision on a "deaf" penalty? It's terrible! Deaf people have enough problems as it :is!
The news anchor would interrupt Litella to point out her error, along the lines, "That's death penalty, Ms. Litella, not deaf ... death." Litella would wrinkle her nose, say something like, "Oh, that's very different," then meekly turn to the camera and say, smiling, "Never mind!"

Emily Litella - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

There is a BIG difference between "MAIL-IN" ballots and "ABSENTEE Ballots"...
Believe me personally, I know as I've registered in Florida for ABSENTEE balloting for 20 years...
BUT MAIL in balloting is grossly difference, Emily!!

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

California, Michigan, and New Hampshire expanded mail-in voting for the 2020 election, while Democrats in Congress want a universal, all-mail system.

www.dailysignal.com

Absentee voting is prone to fraud, election experts say, but has more safeguards than all-mail voting.
“The main difference is [in] voting by absentee ballot, a voter has to request a ballot in most cases and fill out a form and sign to authenticate the request,” Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission who is a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal With all-mail [voting], they just send out a ballot and without certainty it’s going to a live voter,” von Spakovsky said.
“The problem with all-mail voting is that ballots are mailed to every registered voter. We know voter registration rolls are in bad shape all across the country, with multiple duplications and sending out ballots to people that don’t live there.” .

In one practice, known as ballot harvesting, political operatives may collect absentee ballots from voters and even be present when a voter makes selections. California formally legalized ballot harvesting last year, and a Senate bill sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., would expand it nationally.

So Emily... time for you to say "NEVER MIND"!!!

I don't believe that the Feds should have any say in the matter. It's a State Rights issue. And for anyone in the Federal Government to even say a thing about it is NOT doing their jobs including both sides.

What you "believe" is contrary to your other beliefs it appears.
I don't believe... I provide FACTS.. and if you believe in civil rights, then you believe that the Federal Government CAN dictate voting methods.

During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, southern politicians who supported the continuation of racial segregation and enforcement of state-level “Jim Crow” laws denounced anti-discrimination laws like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as federal interference with states’ rights. Even after passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, several southern states passed “Interposition Resolutions” contending that the states retained the right to nullify the federal laws.

What Are States' Rights?

States rights are the rights and power that fall to the states, rather than to the federal government, according to the Constitution.

www.thoughtco.com

You confuse Civil Rights and Jim Crowe with States Rights. There is nothing in the constitution that states how a state MUST conduct an election as long as Civil Rights are observed.

Amendment 15 - Race No Bar to Vote. Ratified 2/3/1870.
1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

Amendment 26 - Voting Age Set to 18 Years. Ratified 7/1/1971.
1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.

Voting - What does the Constitution say?

Summary (March 30, 2014). The word "vote" (and its variants "voted", "votes", "voting", etc.) occur a total of 39 times throughout the Constitution of the United States and the 27 Amendments. They...

www.votefortheconstitution.com

What about the above amendments???

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Trumpie's will launch into denial and make comical excuses. This low Trump turnout thing is becoming routine. Coupled with his manipulated Pelosi videos his desperation and failures are on full display.

Yes he doesn't have as many supporters or they aren't willing to risk their lives.

Either way, I think it's funny.

Why in the world would you think any of what is happening is funny? Sorry, that is warped.

I think it's funny only 18 people showed up.

If you can't see the humor in that, I don't care.

I can and do.

As for trying to stop mail in voting, I don't think that's funny at all. I think it's unAmerican and very irresponsible.

But if you want to put your life in jeopardy to vote, go for it.

I hope you don't die.

What is very UNAMERICAN is to allow mail in voting and not know who the heck is voting.

Really? They don't know who is voting?

My state has been 100% mail in ballot since 2005.

Oregon has been 100% mail in ballot since 2000.

Colorado has been 100% mail in ballot since 2013.

In the last 20 years there has been 143 criminal prosecutions of mail in vote fraud. Which works out to 1 case of fraud per state every 6 or 7 years or works out to .00006% of fraud rate.

Do you want to keep standing by what you posted above?

What proof do you have of your claim? Just saying something doesn't make it true. Study after study says your statement is nothing but garbage.

View attachment 370558

Why Is Voting By Mail (Suddenly) Controversial? Here's What You Need To Know

President Trump's warnings of potential fraud don't line up with what elections experts predict or with how most Americans feel about voting by mail. Here are the facts about mail ballots.

www.npr.org

Let’s put the vote-by-mail ‘fraud’ myth to rest

Vote fraud in the United States is exceedingly rare, with mailed ballots and otherwise.

thehill.com

I think you have achieved a Emily Litella moment... you know SNL character who comes on news and make an outlandish statement like:
"What is all this fuss I hear about the Supreme Court decision on a "deaf" penalty? It's terrible! Deaf people have enough problems as it :is!
The news anchor would interrupt Litella to point out her error, along the lines, "That's death penalty, Ms. Litella, not deaf ... death." Litella would wrinkle her nose, say something like, "Oh, that's very different," then meekly turn to the camera and say, smiling, "Never mind!"

Emily Litella - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

There is a BIG difference between "MAIL-IN" ballots and "ABSENTEE Ballots"...
Believe me personally, I know as I've registered in Florida for ABSENTEE balloting for 20 years...
BUT MAIL in balloting is grossly difference, Emily!!

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

California, Michigan, and New Hampshire expanded mail-in voting for the 2020 election, while Democrats in Congress want a universal, all-mail system.

www.dailysignal.com

Absentee voting is prone to fraud, election experts say, but has more safeguards than all-mail voting.
“The main difference is [in] voting by absentee ballot, a voter has to request a ballot in most cases and fill out a form and sign to authenticate the request,” Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission who is a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal With all-mail [voting], they just send out a ballot and without certainty it’s going to a live voter,” von Spakovsky said.
“The problem with all-mail voting is that ballots are mailed to every registered voter. We know voter registration rolls are in bad shape all across the country, with multiple duplications and sending out ballots to people that don’t live there.” .

In one practice, known as ballot harvesting, political operatives may collect absentee ballots from voters and even be present when a voter makes selections. California formally legalized ballot harvesting last year, and a Senate bill sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., would expand it nationally.

So Emily... time for you to say "NEVER MIND"!!!

I don't believe that the Feds should have any say in the matter. It's a State Rights issue. And for anyone in the Federal Government to even say a thing about it is NOT doing their jobs including both sides.

What you "believe" is contrary to your other beliefs it appears.
I don't believe... I provide FACTS.. and if you believe in civil rights, then you believe that the Federal Government CAN dictate voting methods.

During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, southern politicians who supported the continuation of racial segregation and enforcement of state-level “Jim Crow” laws denounced anti-discrimination laws like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as federal interference with states’ rights. Even after passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, several southern states passed “Interposition Resolutions” contending that the states retained the right to nullify the federal laws.

What Are States' Rights?

States rights are the rights and power that fall to the states, rather than to the federal government, according to the Constitution.

www.thoughtco.com

You confuse Civil Rights and Jim Crowe with States Rights. There is nothing in the constitution that states how a state MUST conduct an election as long as Civil Rights are observed.

Prove it! Where are your links. I provided MY proof... I don't believe you till you put up a link because JUST because YOU say so certainly doesn't make it true...I mean who the f...k are YOU???

You haven't prove a damned thing. What you have proved is that you believe that a state only has the right to do what YOU think they can. But it doesn't work that way in real life.

The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription

Read it and weep. Yes, Congress can change the elections a little bit. But not the time or the place nor the method. As long as Civil Rights are considered, the State can do just about anything as long as every legal voter gets the chance to vote. This includes in person and mail in voting. But if you have a State that is out of control on either one, the Congress can step in and modify it. But it has to be out of control. As it stands now, the In Person Voting in some of the states is more out of control than the Mail-in Voting States.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Trumpie's will launch into denial and make comical excuses. This low Trump turnout thing is becoming routine. Coupled with his manipulated Pelosi videos his desperation and failures are on full display.

Yes he doesn't have as many supporters or they aren't willing to risk their lives.

Either way, I think it's funny.

Why in the world would you think any of what is happening is funny? Sorry, that is warped.

I think it's funny only 18 people showed up.

If you can't see the humor in that, I don't care.

I can and do.

As for trying to stop mail in voting, I don't think that's funny at all. I think it's unAmerican and very irresponsible.

But if you want to put your life in jeopardy to vote, go for it.

I hope you don't die.

What is very UNAMERICAN is to allow mail in voting and not know who the heck is voting.

Really? They don't know who is voting?

My state has been 100% mail in ballot since 2005.

Oregon has been 100% mail in ballot since 2000.

Colorado has been 100% mail in ballot since 2013.

In the last 20 years there has been 143 criminal prosecutions of mail in vote fraud. Which works out to 1 case of fraud per state every 6 or 7 years or works out to .00006% of fraud rate.

Do you want to keep standing by what you posted above?

What proof do you have of your claim? Just saying something doesn't make it true. Study after study says your statement is nothing but garbage.

View attachment 370558

Why Is Voting By Mail (Suddenly) Controversial? Here's What You Need To Know

President Trump's warnings of potential fraud don't line up with what elections experts predict or with how most Americans feel about voting by mail. Here are the facts about mail ballots.

www.npr.org

Let’s put the vote-by-mail ‘fraud’ myth to rest

Vote fraud in the United States is exceedingly rare, with mailed ballots and otherwise.

thehill.com

I think you have achieved a Emily Litella moment... you know SNL character who comes on news and make an outlandish statement like:
"What is all this fuss I hear about the Supreme Court decision on a "deaf" penalty? It's terrible! Deaf people have enough problems as it :is!
The news anchor would interrupt Litella to point out her error, along the lines, "That's death penalty, Ms. Litella, not deaf ... death." Litella would wrinkle her nose, say something like, "Oh, that's very different," then meekly turn to the camera and say, smiling, "Never mind!"

Emily Litella - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

There is a BIG difference between "MAIL-IN" ballots and "ABSENTEE Ballots"...
Believe me personally, I know as I've registered in Florida for ABSENTEE balloting for 20 years...
BUT MAIL in balloting is grossly difference, Emily!!

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

California, Michigan, and New Hampshire expanded mail-in voting for the 2020 election, while Democrats in Congress want a universal, all-mail system.

www.dailysignal.com

Absentee voting is prone to fraud, election experts say, but has more safeguards than all-mail voting.
“The main difference is [in] voting by absentee ballot, a voter has to request a ballot in most cases and fill out a form and sign to authenticate the request,” Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission who is a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal With all-mail [voting], they just send out a ballot and without certainty it’s going to a live voter,” von Spakovsky said.
“The problem with all-mail voting is that ballots are mailed to every registered voter. We know voter registration rolls are in bad shape all across the country, with multiple duplications and sending out ballots to people that don’t live there.” .

In one practice, known as ballot harvesting, political operatives may collect absentee ballots from voters and even be present when a voter makes selections. California formally legalized ballot harvesting last year, and a Senate bill sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., would expand it nationally.

So Emily... time for you to say "NEVER MIND"!!!

I don't believe that the Feds should have any say in the matter. It's a State Rights issue. And for anyone in the Federal Government to even say a thing about it is NOT doing their jobs including both sides.

What you "believe" is contrary to your other beliefs it appears.
I don't believe... I provide FACTS.. and if you believe in civil rights, then you believe that the Federal Government CAN dictate voting methods.

During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, southern politicians who supported the continuation of racial segregation and enforcement of state-level “Jim Crow” laws denounced anti-discrimination laws like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as federal interference with states’ rights. Even after passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, several southern states passed “Interposition Resolutions” contending that the states retained the right to nullify the federal laws.

What Are States' Rights?

States rights are the rights and power that fall to the states, rather than to the federal government, according to the Constitution.

www.thoughtco.com

You confuse Civil Rights and Jim Crowe with States Rights. There is nothing in the constitution that states how a state MUST conduct an election as long as Civil Rights are observed.

Amendment 15 - Race No Bar to Vote. Ratified 2/3/1870.
1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

Amendment 26 - Voting Age Set to 18 Years. Ratified 7/1/1971.
1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.

Voting - What does the Constitution say?

Summary (March 30, 2014). The word "vote" (and its variants "voted", "votes", "voting", etc.) occur a total of 39 times throughout the Constitution of the United States and the 27 Amendments. They...

www.votefortheconstitution.com

What about the above amendments???

I would say that it cements what I have been saying.

 

[iceberg]

This is funny.

Trump Humiliated As Just 18 Supporters Show Up To Protest Nevada Mail-In Voting

The Chair of the RNC claimed that Trump supporters were out in full force in Nevada, as she tweeted a picture with 18 people in it.

www.politicususa.com

yet it's still as many as biden has for his "bunker talk" in the first half hour when all they had to do was go online and click a link.

 

[healthmyths]

Trumpie's will launch into denial and make comical excuses. This low Trump turnout thing is becoming routine. Coupled with his manipulated Pelosi videos his desperation and failures are on full display.

Yes he doesn't have as many supporters or they aren't willing to risk their lives.

Either way, I think it's funny.

Why in the world would you think any of what is happening is funny? Sorry, that is warped.

I think it's funny only 18 people showed up.

If you can't see the humor in that, I don't care.

I can and do.

As for trying to stop mail in voting, I don't think that's funny at all. I think it's unAmerican and very irresponsible.

But if you want to put your life in jeopardy to vote, go for it.

I hope you don't die.

What is very UNAMERICAN is to allow mail in voting and not know who the heck is voting.

Really? They don't know who is voting?

My state has been 100% mail in ballot since 2005.

Oregon has been 100% mail in ballot since 2000.

Colorado has been 100% mail in ballot since 2013.

In the last 20 years there has been 143 criminal prosecutions of mail in vote fraud. Which works out to 1 case of fraud per state every 6 or 7 years or works out to .00006% of fraud rate.

Do you want to keep standing by what you posted above?

What proof do you have of your claim? Just saying something doesn't make it true. Study after study says your statement is nothing but garbage.

View attachment 370558

Why Is Voting By Mail (Suddenly) Controversial? Here's What You Need To Know

President Trump's warnings of potential fraud don't line up with what elections experts predict or with how most Americans feel about voting by mail. Here are the facts about mail ballots.

www.npr.org

Let’s put the vote-by-mail ‘fraud’ myth to rest

Vote fraud in the United States is exceedingly rare, with mailed ballots and otherwise.

thehill.com

I think you have achieved a Emily Litella moment... you know SNL character who comes on news and make an outlandish statement like:
"What is all this fuss I hear about the Supreme Court decision on a "deaf" penalty? It's terrible! Deaf people have enough problems as it :is!
The news anchor would interrupt Litella to point out her error, along the lines, "That's death penalty, Ms. Litella, not deaf ... death." Litella would wrinkle her nose, say something like, "Oh, that's very different," then meekly turn to the camera and say, smiling, "Never mind!"

Emily Litella - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

There is a BIG difference between "MAIL-IN" ballots and "ABSENTEE Ballots"...
Believe me personally, I know as I've registered in Florida for ABSENTEE balloting for 20 years...
BUT MAIL in balloting is grossly difference, Emily!!

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

California, Michigan, and New Hampshire expanded mail-in voting for the 2020 election, while Democrats in Congress want a universal, all-mail system.

www.dailysignal.com

Absentee voting is prone to fraud, election experts say, but has more safeguards than all-mail voting.
“The main difference is [in] voting by absentee ballot, a voter has to request a ballot in most cases and fill out a form and sign to authenticate the request,” Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission who is a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal With all-mail [voting], they just send out a ballot and without certainty it’s going to a live voter,” von Spakovsky said.
“The problem with all-mail voting is that ballots are mailed to every registered voter. We know voter registration rolls are in bad shape all across the country, with multiple duplications and sending out ballots to people that don’t live there.” .

In one practice, known as ballot harvesting, political operatives may collect absentee ballots from voters and even be present when a voter makes selections. California formally legalized ballot harvesting last year, and a Senate bill sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., would expand it nationally.

So Emily... time for you to say "NEVER MIND"!!!

I don't believe that the Feds should have any say in the matter. It's a State Rights issue. And for anyone in the Federal Government to even say a thing about it is NOT doing their jobs including both sides.

What you "believe" is contrary to your other beliefs it appears.
I don't believe... I provide FACTS.. and if you believe in civil rights, then you believe that the Federal Government CAN dictate voting methods.

During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, southern politicians who supported the continuation of racial segregation and enforcement of state-level “Jim Crow” laws denounced anti-discrimination laws like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as federal interference with states’ rights. Even after passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, several southern states passed “Interposition Resolutions” contending that the states retained the right to nullify the federal laws.

What Are States' Rights?

States rights are the rights and power that fall to the states, rather than to the federal government, according to the Constitution.

www.thoughtco.com

You confuse Civil Rights and Jim Crowe with States Rights. There is nothing in the constitution that states how a state MUST conduct an election as long as Civil Rights are observed.

Prove it! Where are your links. I provided MY proof... I don't believe you till you put up a link because JUST because YOU say so certainly doesn't make it true...I mean who the f...k are YOU???

You haven't prove a damned thing. What you have proved is that you believe that a state only has the right to do what YOU think they can. But it doesn't work that way in real life.

The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription

Read it and weep. Yes, Congress can change the elections a little bit. But not the time or the place nor the method. As long as Civil Rights are considered, the State can do just about anything as long as every legal voter gets the chance to vote. This includes in person and mail in voting. But if you have a State that is out of control on either one, the Congress can step in and modify it. But it has to be out of control. As it stands now, the In Person Voting in some of the states is more out of control than the Mail-in Voting States.

ONCE again your hyperbole is SHOWING!!! You write without one shred of proof..
As it stands now, the In Person Voting in some of the states is more out of control than the Mail-in Voting States.
Where is your PROOF DUMMY!!! Give me links. Substantion for your dumb ass comment as I'm proving the invalidity of MAIL-IN!
3 Weeks After Primary, N.Y. Officials Still Can’t Say Who Won Key Races
Tens of thousands of absentee ballots in New York are still uncounted and many races have yet to be called. What will November look like?
More than three weeks after the New York primaries, election officials have not yet counted an untold number of mail-in absentee ballots, leaving numerous closely watched races unresolved, including two key Democratic congressional contests.

The absentee ballot count — greatly inflated this year after the state expanded the vote-by-mail option because of the coronavirus pandemic — has been painstakingly slow, and hard to track, with no running account of the vote totals available.

3 Weeks After Primary, N.Y. Officials Still Can’t Say Who Won Key Races (Published 2020)

Tens of thousands of absentee ballots in New York are still uncounted and many races have yet to be called. What will November look like?

www.nytimes.com

AGAIN where is YOUR proof of your GROSS exaggeration???

 

[Hellbilly]

So twice as many as any recent Biden rally.

Wow. Never heard that before.

 

[healthmyths]

Trumpie's will launch into denial and make comical excuses. This low Trump turnout thing is becoming routine. Coupled with his manipulated Pelosi videos his desperation and failures are on full display.

Yes he doesn't have as many supporters or they aren't willing to risk their lives.

Either way, I think it's funny.

Why in the world would you think any of what is happening is funny? Sorry, that is warped.

I think it's funny only 18 people showed up.

If you can't see the humor in that, I don't care.

I can and do.

As for trying to stop mail in voting, I don't think that's funny at all. I think it's unAmerican and very irresponsible.

But if you want to put your life in jeopardy to vote, go for it.

I hope you don't die.

What is very UNAMERICAN is to allow mail in voting and not know who the heck is voting.

Really? They don't know who is voting?

My state has been 100% mail in ballot since 2005.

Oregon has been 100% mail in ballot since 2000.

Colorado has been 100% mail in ballot since 2013.

In the last 20 years there has been 143 criminal prosecutions of mail in vote fraud. Which works out to 1 case of fraud per state every 6 or 7 years or works out to .00006% of fraud rate.

Do you want to keep standing by what you posted above?

What proof do you have of your claim? Just saying something doesn't make it true. Study after study says your statement is nothing but garbage.

View attachment 370558

Why Is Voting By Mail (Suddenly) Controversial? Here's What You Need To Know

President Trump's warnings of potential fraud don't line up with what elections experts predict or with how most Americans feel about voting by mail. Here are the facts about mail ballots.

www.npr.org

Let’s put the vote-by-mail ‘fraud’ myth to rest

Vote fraud in the United States is exceedingly rare, with mailed ballots and otherwise.

thehill.com

I think you have achieved a Emily Litella moment... you know SNL character who comes on news and make an outlandish statement like:
"What is all this fuss I hear about the Supreme Court decision on a "deaf" penalty? It's terrible! Deaf people have enough problems as it :is!
The news anchor would interrupt Litella to point out her error, along the lines, "That's death penalty, Ms. Litella, not deaf ... death." Litella would wrinkle her nose, say something like, "Oh, that's very different," then meekly turn to the camera and say, smiling, "Never mind!"

Emily Litella - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

There is a BIG difference between "MAIL-IN" ballots and "ABSENTEE Ballots"...
Believe me personally, I know as I've registered in Florida for ABSENTEE balloting for 20 years...
BUT MAIL in balloting is grossly difference, Emily!!

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

8 Key Points to Distinguish Absentee and All-Mail Voting

California, Michigan, and New Hampshire expanded mail-in voting for the 2020 election, while Democrats in Congress want a universal, all-mail system.

www.dailysignal.com

Absentee voting is prone to fraud, election experts say, but has more safeguards than all-mail voting.
“The main difference is [in] voting by absentee ballot, a voter has to request a ballot in most cases and fill out a form and sign to authenticate the request,” Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission who is a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal With all-mail [voting], they just send out a ballot and without certainty it’s going to a live voter,” von Spakovsky said.
“The problem with all-mail voting is that ballots are mailed to every registered voter. We know voter registration rolls are in bad shape all across the country, with multiple duplications and sending out ballots to people that don’t live there.” .

In one practice, known as ballot harvesting, political operatives may collect absentee ballots from voters and even be present when a voter makes selections. California formally legalized ballot harvesting last year, and a Senate bill sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., would expand it nationally.

So Emily... time for you to say "NEVER MIND"!!!

I don't believe that the Feds should have any say in the matter. It's a State Rights issue. And for anyone in the Federal Government to even say a thing about it is NOT doing their jobs including both sides.

What you "believe" is contrary to your other beliefs it appears.
I don't believe... I provide FACTS.. and if you believe in civil rights, then you believe that the Federal Government CAN dictate voting methods.

During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, southern politicians who supported the continuation of racial segregation and enforcement of state-level “Jim Crow” laws denounced anti-discrimination laws like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as federal interference with states’ rights. Even after passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, several southern states passed “Interposition Resolutions” contending that the states retained the right to nullify the federal laws.

What Are States' Rights?

States rights are the rights and power that fall to the states, rather than to the federal government, according to the Constitution.

www.thoughtco.com

You confuse Civil Rights and Jim Crowe with States Rights. There is nothing in the constitution that states how a state MUST conduct an election as long as Civil Rights are observed.

Amendment 15 - Race No Bar to Vote. Ratified 2/3/1870.
1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

Amendment 26 - Voting Age Set to 18 Years. Ratified 7/1/1971.
1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.

Voting - What does the Constitution say?

Summary (March 30, 2014). The word "vote" (and its variants "voted", "votes", "voting", etc.) occur a total of 39 times throughout the Constitution of the United States and the 27 Amendments. They...

www.votefortheconstitution.com

What about the above amendments???

I would say that it cements what I have been saying.

YOU SAID...I don't believe that the Feds should have any say in the matter. It's a State Rights issue.
Where do the above two amendments clearly state "it's a "State Rights issue"?
There is nothing in those two that it's a "STATE Rights".
Contrary here is what the Constitution holds:
Although the Elections Clause makes states primarily responsible for regulating congressional elections,
it vests ultimate power in Congress. Congress may pass federal laws regulating congressional elections that automatically displace (“preempt”) any contrary state statutes, or enact its own regulations concerning those aspects of elections that states may not have addressed.
The Framers of the Constitution were concerned that states might establish unfair election procedures or attempt to undermine the national government by refusing to hold elections for Congress.

Interpretation: Elections Clause | Constitution Center

Interpretations of Elections Clause by constitutional scholars

constitutioncenter.org

NOW the above IS NOT my opinion Emily.... IT is Constitutional experts. So your contention is contradicted by EXPERTS!