YoursTruly
Platinum Member
- Dec 21, 2019
- 9,510
- 5,852
- 940
Trump threatened our democracy, as did his cult........................and still are, TRAITORS.
Exactly what does "threatened our democracy" even mean?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump threatened our democracy, as did his cult........................and still are, TRAITORS.
A failed insurrection.Trump threatened our democracy, as did his cult........................and still are, TRAITORS.
Exactly what does "threatened our democracy" even mean?
No, they were too busy hiding facts and telling him lies for him to justify his taking actionsWhat stopped Trump from doing an investigation, was he too busy trying take information from individuals forcefully to see who was leaking classified information about his pillow humping acts?
Weewee on the PeopleTrump threatened our democracy, as did his cult........................and still are, TRAITORS.
Exactly what does "threatened our democracy" even mean?
Even the democrats admit that it was no insurrection. There have been no arrests or trials for insurrection as there is no proof that this is what happened. The only death that occurred was that of an unarmed protestor. And the government is hiding who fired the shot.A failed insurrection.Trump threatened our democracy, as did his cult........................and still are, TRAITORS.
Exactly what does "threatened our democracy" even mean?
Your delusional.Even the democrats admit that it was no insurrection. There have been no arrests or trials for insurrection as there is no proof that this is what happened. The only death that occurred was that of an unarmed protestor. And the government is hiding who fired the shot.A failed insurrection.Trump threatened our democracy, as did his cult........................and still are, TRAITORS.
Exactly what does "threatened our democracy" even mean?
"Science" does not declare someone a racist, you stupid fuck.The scientists on it have declared him to be a racist.
I didn't address that issue. I simply added that fact to the reason that Trump did not actively push for an investigation because the CCP wasn't going to allow anybody (other than Chinese Communists) to investigate....in a country whose government allows only self-investigation.
So you agree that the democrats and the republicans were arm in arm in Trumps first investigation for impeachment?
Oh gee Trump got the flu! The guidelines were nothing but political theatre for a yearly flu with an almost 100% survival rate.Gaslight revisionist history. Trump didn’t launch an investigation because he was too busy praising China and sucking up to Xi. See all the times he praised China in the link below.
Determining the origin had no bearing on instituting public safeguards. Trump mocked safeguards, violated them for rallies, lied incessantly, and ended up CONTRACTING the virus as the most guarded human in the fucking world. He couldn’t protect himself from an emergency helicopter ride and from being dosed with experimental drugs. He was a disaster and is using this topic to distract. Don’t be a sucker.
15 times Trump praised China as coronavirus was spreading across the globe
The president has lambasted the WHO for accepting Beijing’s assurances about the outbreak, but he repeated them, as well.www.politico.com
Trump has consistently mocked adherence to public health guidelines
The basement campaign is looking pretty good.www.vox.com
Not according to the governments own statements.Your delusional.Even the democrats admit that it was no insurrection. There have been no arrests or trials for insurrection as there is no proof that this is what happened. The only death that occurred was that of an unarmed protestor. And the government is hiding who fired the shot.A failed insurrection.Trump threatened our democracy, as did his cult........................and still are, TRAITORS.
Exactly what does "threatened our democracy" even mean?
5 died and over 140 injured.
The dumb bitch got what she deserved.
Learn to read, moron. I wrote, "Scientists" not "Science". Gad, trumptards really are morons."Science" does not declare someone a racist, you stupid fuck.The scientists on it have declared him to be a racist.
SCIENTISTS do not declare someone a racist, you stupid fuck. Scientists do science, not racism.Learn to read, moron. I wrote, "Scientists" not "Science". Gad, trumptards really are morons.
You ever have the flu? You get airlifted to a hospital for 3 days? Maybe Trump was just a pussy.Oh gee Trump got the flu! The guidelines were nothing but political theatre for a yearly flu with an almost 100% survival rate.Gaslight revisionist history. Trump didn’t launch an investigation because he was too busy praising China and sucking up to Xi. See all the times he praised China in the link below.
Determining the origin had no bearing on instituting public safeguards. Trump mocked safeguards, violated them for rallies, lied incessantly, and ended up CONTRACTING the virus as the most guarded human in the fucking world. He couldn’t protect himself from an emergency helicopter ride and from being dosed with experimental drugs. He was a disaster and is using this topic to distract. Don’t be a sucker.
15 times Trump praised China as coronavirus was spreading across the globe
The president has lambasted the WHO for accepting Beijing’s assurances about the outbreak, but he repeated them, as well.www.politico.com
Trump has consistently mocked adherence to public health guidelines
The basement campaign is looking pretty good.www.vox.com
Another day. Another moron. That quote is from the article that started this thread, idiot. Learn to read.SCIENTISTS do not declare someone a racist, you stupid fuck. Scientists do science, not racism.Learn to read, moron. I wrote, "Scientists" not "Science". Gad, trumptards really are morons.
So what? You TDSers sure like to whine.Another day. Another moron. That quote is from the article that started this thread, idiot. Learn to read.
What is it with trumptards and reading comprehension? No wonder you morons follow Trump.
This one?Not according to the governments own statements.Your delusional.Even the democrats admit that it was no insurrection. There have been no arrests or trials for insurrection as there is no proof that this is what happened. The only death that occurred was that of an unarmed protestor. And the government is hiding who fired the shot.A failed insurrection.Trump threatened our democracy, as did his cult........................and still are, TRAITORS.
Exactly what does "threatened our democracy" even mean?
5 died and over 140 injured.
The dumb bitch got what she deserved.
The delusion is yours, backed by zero facts. Good little sheep.
Even If this were true and not another government coverup, why are they hiding the name of the officer? Because he broke the law and acted against the public good? Just more government bs to attempt to make themselves look good.This one?Not according to the governments own statements.Your delusional.Even the democrats admit that it was no insurrection. There have been no arrests or trials for insurrection as there is no proof that this is what happened. The only death that occurred was that of an unarmed protestor. And the government is hiding who fired the shot.A failed insurrection.Trump threatened our democracy, as did his cult........................and still are, TRAITORS.
Exactly what does "threatened our democracy" even mean?
5 died and over 140 injured.
The dumb bitch got what she deserved.
The delusion is yours, backed by zero facts. Good little sheep.
According to a Justice Department statement, the investigation failed to provide evidence that the officer violated 18 U.S.C. § 242, depriving Babbitt of her rights under color of law.
"In order to establish a violation of this statute, prosecutors must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the officer acted willfully to deprive Ms. Babbitt of a right protected by the Constitution or other law, here the Fourth Amendment right not to be subjected to an unreasonable seizure," a DOJ statement read.
"Prosecutors would have to prove not only that the officer used force that was constitutionally unreasonable, but that the officer did so 'willfully,' which the Supreme Court has interpreted to mean that the officer acted with a bad purpose to disregard the law."
Poor little Q NUT.
A failed insurrection.Trump threatened our democracy, as did his cult........................and still are, TRAITORS.
Exactly what does "threatened our democracy" even mean?
That is the democratic method. Just repeat whatever you are told without question.A failed insurrection.Trump threatened our democracy, as did his cult........................and still are, TRAITORS.
Exactly what does "threatened our democracy" even mean?
So you don't even know. You're just spewing the same talking points the media is spewing.
Regardless of who is President, our President is important enough to be air lifted to a hospital for any medical reason. In the midst of a plandemic involving flu-like symptoms for a supposedly more deadly virus, the air lift was definitely justified.You ever have the flu? You get airlifted to a hospital for 3 days? Maybe Trump was just a pussy.
So you think the murdering cop did not willfully pull the trigger on his firearm? You think he didn't know it might kill her? You think killing her was reasonable?This one?Not according to the governments own statements.Your delusional.Even the democrats admit that it was no insurrection. There have been no arrests or trials for insurrection as there is no proof that this is what happened. The only death that occurred was that of an unarmed protestor. And the government is hiding who fired the shot.A failed insurrection.Trump threatened our democracy, as did his cult........................and still are, TRAITORS.
Exactly what does "threatened our democracy" even mean?
5 died and over 140 injured.
The dumb bitch got what she deserved.
The delusion is yours, backed by zero facts. Good little sheep.
According to a Justice Department statement, the investigation failed to provide evidence that the officer violated 18 U.S.C. § 242, depriving Babbitt of her rights under color of law.
"In order to establish a violation of this statute, prosecutors must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the officer acted willfully to deprive Ms. Babbitt of a right protected by the Constitution or other law, here the Fourth Amendment right not to be subjected to an unreasonable seizure," a DOJ statement read.
"Prosecutors would have to prove not only that the officer used force that was constitutionally unreasonable, but that the officer did so 'willfully,' which the Supreme Court has interpreted to mean that the officer acted with a bad purpose to disregard the law."
Poor little Q NUT.