Trump has no serious first amendment defense in a court of law. Here’s why

[toobfreak]

Trump has no serious first amendment defense in a court of law. Here’s why​

Moron, it is one thing to use statements used by a criminal convicted of proven crimes, but quite another to try to make the statements themselves THE ACTUAL CRIMES THEMSELVES to GET a conviction!

Too funny. How far not to go by a bloke who HAS no 1st Amendment protections in his country himself and cannot speak freely.

 

[Donald H]

You Progressive Fascists (but I repeat myself) need to keep pushing for your 1,000 year American Reich!

You're all going to either accept the 2020 election as legitimate, or reject it and take measures to change the result.

The question can't continue to go unanswered for much longer.

As a Canadian I lean heavily toward Trump and the only remedy that can bring justice for him.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

You're all going to either accept the 2020 election as legitimate, or reject it and take measures to change the result.

The question can't continue to go unanswered for much longer.

As a Canadian I lean heavily toward Trump and the only remedy that can bring justice for him.

I think most republicans know that he was lying.

 

[jbrownson0831]

I think most republicans know that he was lying.

About what? Plenty of evidence about how the 2020 election was stolen, whether or not any judge ever wants to hear it.
Keep campaigning for Trump Commie. When he wins you and your ilk get all the credit.

 

[mudwhistle]

Sure thing, counselor. I'm aware that you know the law better than Jack Smith, so I'm sure you'll be proven right.

Jack Smith may know the law....but he needs a mindlessly biased jury and a corrupt judge to go around it.
Jack Smith has had many of his convictions overturned on appeal because of clear prosecutorial overreach.
This is just harassment by the Biden administration anyway.
They know Biden would have lost if they hadn't cheated, and they know Trump would beat him again this time.
So instead he's using the courts to attack his best opponent.
Everyone else has been bribed and won't give him much of a fight.
Right now he's not even making any plans to campaign.

 

[mudwhistle]

I think most republicans know that he was lying.

Even if he was lying....it's not against the law.
If we arrested every politician for lying they'd all be in prison.
Beginning with Joe Biden who is the worst liar of them all.

 

[mudwhistle]

View attachment 814742 Moron, it is one thing to use statements used by a criminal convicted of proven crimes, but quite another to try to make the statements themselves THE ACTUAL CRIMES THEMSELVES to GET a conviction!

Too funny. How far not to go by a bloke who HAS no 1st Amendment protections in his country himself and cannot speak freely.

We can't say what's on our minds anymore in the U.S.S.A. (United Soviet Socialist America)

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You're all going to either accept the 2020 election as legitimate, or reject it and take measures to change the result.

The question can't continue to go unanswered for much longer.

As a Canadian I lean heavily toward Trump and the only remedy that can bring justice for him.

2020 election legitimately showed how the CCP/democrat Party/Sinaloa Cartel Dream Team could cheat in the tens of millions column

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Not a crime to object to presidential elections.

read the indictment(s) None says it's a crime to - how is it you frame it -- "Object" to presidential elections.

and then we have what you think is not a crime: Objecting to presidential elections.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Presidential immunity.

LOL

that ship sailed long ago

 

[themagadon]

read the indictment(s) None says it's a crime to - how is it you frame it -- "Object" to presidential elections.

and then we have what you think is not a crime: Objecting to presidential elections.

Huh

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Huh

No one objected to the presidential election.

And why would anyone object to a presidential election? It's proscribed in the US Constitution.

read the indictment(s) No one says it's a crime to - how is it you frame it -- "Object" to presidential elections.
and then we have what you think is not a crime: Objecting to presidential elections.

 

[themagadon]

No one objected to the presidential election.

And why would anyone object to a presidential election? It's proscribed in the US Constitution.

Oh he didn’t object.. lol ok buddy lol

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Oh he didn’t object.. lol ok buddy lol

Object to the presidential election?

Nope. English, your second language?

 

[themagadon]

Object to the presidential election?

Nope. English, your second language?

Ohh it is ok lol

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Ohh it is ok lol

What are you trying to say? What did Trump do and say about the election results?

 

[themagadon]

What are you trying to say? What did Trump do and say about the election results?

Trump objected to the election results.. but you said he can’t lol

Okay lol

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

He has right to say, "I think they stole the election from me" Just like you have a right to say, "Joe Biden is a Communist" He has a right to ask for a recount and to question an election. He believes the votes were not properly administered.

When I went to bed that night at 10:00, everyone in the "other forum" said was Trump winning and likely was the next President. at 2:00 am I woke up Trump was on the TV but very upset and talked about a large amount of votes coming in for Joe Biden. Trump questioned that and had a right to. Of course, the Liberals have twisted this all the way to Egypt.

Let's find out what they have and what he has. Let's see what happens. Of course, if its a Liberal jury in all cases, we all know what will happen. Once again, it won't be fair to Trump to have a Liberal Trump Hating Jury.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Trump objected to the election results.. but you said he can’t lol

Okay lol

Nope. You wrote that Trump 'objected to the presidential election' not the results of the state elections.

And I did not say he can't object to presidential elections. He could, but it would be objecting to the US Constitutional mandates

 

[Dante Reawakened]

He has right to say, "I think they stole the election from me" Just like you have a right to say, "Joe Biden is a Communist" He has a right to ask for a recount and to question an election. He believes the votes were not properly administered.

When I went to bed that night at 10:00, everyone in the "other forum" said was Trump winning and likely was the next President. at 2:00 am I woke up Trump was on the TV but very upset and talked about a large amount of votes coming in for Joe Biden. Trump questioned that and had a right to. Of course, the Liberals have twisted this all the way to Egypt.

Let's find out what they have and what he has. Let's see what happens. Of course, if its a Liberal jury in all cases, we all know what will happen. Once again, it won't be fair to Trump to have a Liberal Trump Hating Jury.

Fake Electors Scheme is not legal. Trump asked for a recount? Where?


and

What you want Trump to have a FOX News MAGA jury?