Polls are interesting, but they are time-freezes, like snapshots. And there are too many variables to place a lot of value on the 'thought of the moment'. We wont know until election day the results of the only poll that counts.
I love the new poll! Quinnipiac not only has them tied but Trump is outperforming Romney or McCain.
Eat shit and die Never Trumpers you lying sacks of fecal matter who keep putting up polls that over sample D's!
They're TIED: Trump vs. Hillary is suddenly too close to call
However, I sure hope we don't mirror the UK in the way a large voter bloc expressed regret soon as the result was announced. All of us should heed the ramifications of a protest vote as a way to ease anger. We need to look ahead when we crawl out of that frying pan.
I think the Real Clear summation says it better than Quinnipiac"
Doesn't look so rosy when all of the other polls are figured in.
yes. but she's a drug addled nutter and can't focus on reality.
democraticunderground.com LMAO! Aka communism light.comOf course those 33% of Hispanics don't look so good when you have these kind of numbers either.
DumDum, the source is Ballotpedia which came out today.
democraticunderground.com LMAO! Aka communism light.comOf course those 33% of Hispanics don't look so good when you have these kind of numbers either.
DumDum, the source is Ballotpedia which came out today.
And Ballotpedia isn't a polling organization. Where did they get these numbers they are putting out?
I think the point is those results are so far outside the averages, they need to be vetted and new polls show similar numbers to be given any credence.
democraticunderground.com LMAO! Aka communism light.comOf course those 33% of Hispanics don't look so good when you have these kind of numbers either.
DumDum, the source is Ballotpedia which came out today.
And Ballotpedia isn't a polling organization. Where did they get these numbers they are putting out?
From their website:
"Ballotpedia partnered with Evolving Strategies and surveyed voters across seven states (June 10 – 22) regarding their vote preference. We tested six election scenarios. In one set, we matched Hillary Clinton (D) in a series of two-way contests with Donald Trump (R), Ohio Governor John Kasich (R), and House SpeakerPaul Ryan (R). In the second set, we matched these same candidates in a series of three-way contests that also included former governor Gary Johnson.
In all seven states, Clinton polled higher than Trump. The tightest battleground race between the two frontrunners was in Iowa, where Clinton leads Trump by a weighted 4 percentage points. Clinton saw the largest lead in Michigan, where she leads Trump by a weighted 17 percentage points. Comparatively, John Kasich polls ahead of Clinton in five of the seven states, and Paul Ryan polls ahead of Clinton in three states.
Evolving Strategies and Ballotpedia surveyed 4,242 registered voters, with a margin of error of +/-4.0%.
More at the link: Ballotpedia's battleground poll, 2016 - Ballotpedia
democraticunderground.com LMAO! Aka communism light.comOf course those 33% of Hispanics don't look so good when you have these kind of numbers either.
DumDum, the source is Ballotpedia which came out today.
And Ballotpedia isn't a polling organization. Where did they get these numbers they are putting out?
From their website:
"Ballotpedia partnered with Evolving Strategies and surveyed voters across seven states (June 10 – 22) regarding their vote preference. We tested six election scenarios. In one set, we matched Hillary Clinton (D) in a series of two-way contests with Donald Trump (R), Ohio Governor John Kasich (R), and House SpeakerPaul Ryan (R). In the second set, we matched these same candidates in a series of three-way contests that also included former governor Gary Johnson.
In all seven states, Clinton polled higher than Trump. The tightest battleground race between the two frontrunners was in Iowa, where Clinton leads Trump by a weighted 4 percentage points. Clinton saw the largest lead in Michigan, where she leads Trump by a weighted 17 percentage points. Comparatively, John Kasich polls ahead of Clinton in five of the seven states, and Paul Ryan polls ahead of Clinton in three states.
Evolving Strategies and Ballotpedia surveyed 4,242 registered voters, with a margin of error of +/-4.0%.
More at the link: Ballotpedia's battleground poll, 2016 - Ballotpedia
Evolving Strategies isn't a polling company either. They're a consulting firm. This is like "Crusader Frank working with tinydancer surveyed blah blah blah".
I can't wait to see their methodology. I assume there's a link to it.
From their website:
"Ballotpedia partnered with Evolving Strategies and surveyed voters across seven states (June 10 – 22) regarding their vote preference. We tested six election scenarios. In one set, we matched Hillary Clinton (D) in a series of two-way contests with Donald Trump (R), Ohio Governor John Kasich (R), and House SpeakerPaul Ryan (R). In the second set, we matched these same candidates in a series of three-way contests that also included former governor Gary Johnson.
In all seven states, Clinton polled higher than Trump. The tightest battleground race between the two frontrunners was in Iowa, where Clinton leads Trump by a weighted 4 percentage points. Clinton saw the largest lead in Michigan, where she leads Trump by a weighted 17 percentage points. Comparatively, John Kasich polls ahead of Clinton in five of the seven states, and Paul Ryan polls ahead of Clinton in three states.
Evolving Strategies and Ballotpedia surveyed 4,242 registered voters, with a margin of error of +/-4.0%.
More at the link: Ballotpedia's battleground poll, 2016 - Ballotpedia
Evolving Strategies isn't a polling company either. They're a consulting firm. This is like "Crusader Frank working with tinydancer surveyed blah blah blah".
I can't wait to see their methodology. I assume there's a link to it.
I gave you a link in the post. Take a Tums before you read it.
