Trump fails to release the files after his humiliation

[struth]

Total gibberish. That’s not how it works. You tried to pass that fake file off as the 468 photo and now this. Come on man.

Fake? I took you right to it in the Epstein file

File number 468!

 

[citygator]

Fake? I took you right to it in the Epstein file

File number 468!

The file online posts refer to as “file 468” is in the context of the DOJ’s Epstein Files Transparency Act release of investigative files and images from the broader federal investigation.

Your file was released on a different DOJ site and a separate document collection — not the court-records docket.

Specifically:

• The transparency release used identifiers like EFTA00000468 (an internal numbering system for images and metadata).
• The “file 468” people are discussing in news articles refers to a photo that was briefly available and then removed from the transparency site — that’s not what you linked.

I think its pretty apparent that you dont care about accuracy, just disinformation. It's a team sport to you and lying is just a tool.

 

[struth]

The file online posts refer to as “file 468” is in the context of the DOJ’s Epstein Files Transparency Act release of investigative files and images from the broader federal investigation.

Your file was released on a different DOJ site and a separate document collection — not the court-records docket.

Specifically:

• The transparency release used identifiers like EFTA00000468 (an internal numbering system for images and metadata).
• The “file 468” people are discussing in news articles refers to a photo that was briefly available and then removed from the transparency site — that’s not what you linked.

I think its pretty apparent that you dont care about accuracy, just disinformation. It's a team sport to you and lying is just a tool.

It hasn’t been removed

It’s still there

 

[citygator]

It hasn’t been removed

It’s still there

You are linking the wrong database genius.

This is the correct one.

Epstein Files Transparency Act release (correct recent public release):

DOJ Disclosures

www.justice.gov

This the incorrect one you linked.

Older civil case docket archive (not the same release):

Court Records

www.justice.gov

I mean, where do you get this stuff?

 

[struth]

You are linking the wrong database genius.

This is the correct one.

Epstein Files Transparency Act release (correct recent public release):

DOJ Disclosures

www.justice.gov

This the incorrect one you linked.

Older civil case docket archive (not the same release):

Court Records

www.justice.gov

I mean, where do you get this stuff?

Here’s a link on the DOJ website to this “damning” photo you claim is not not on their website

Age Verification | United States Department of Justice

www.justice.gov

Either way that file number is there on their url

Explain to us what’s damning about it? Or is there some other url you are talking about?

I get this stuff from the DOJ library they provided of all the Epstein files

 

[citygator]

Here’s a link on the DOJ website to this “damning” photo you claim is not not on their website

Age Verification | United States Department of Justice

www.justice.gov

Either way that file number is there on their url

Explain to us what’s damning about it? Or is there some other url you are talking about?

I get this stuff from the DOJ library they provided of all the Epstein files

You first linked the wrong file genius, anyone can scroll up, claiming it was always there. I exposed your lie.

Hours later, after you posted the wrong file, this file was reuploaded by the DOJ AFTER the democrat committee called them out.

Here is the information on the change to reupload the pic:

 

[struth]

You first linked the wrong file genius, anyone can scroll up, claiming it was always there. I exposed your lie.

Hours later, after you posted the wrong file, this file was reuploaded by the DOJ AFTER the democrat committee called them out.

Here is the information on the change to reupload the pic:

Ok, so what’s so damning about the photo?

 

[citygator]

Ok, so what’s so damning about the photo?

The issue is there are missing files and thousands of redactions and if they are willing to edit out that simple photo they were busted on just cuz it was trump and Epstein, what worse stuff did they edit out that they werent caught on?

 

[struth]

The issue is there are missing files and thousands of redactions and if they are willing to edit out that simple photo they were busted on just cuz it was trump and Epstein, what worse stuff did they edit out that they werent caught on?

I was told it was a damning photo, it’s not?

There is a disclaimer on the front page of the website to the library that says there will be more released

This photo wasn’t missing it was provided and for all you and the dembots trying to distract folks from the content of the files, was unintentionally removed then reloaded

Why don’t we focus on the thousands of pages we do have? You know that show your party deeply involved with Epstein even after he was convicted and his strong ties to members of the Clinton and Obama admin….

 

[Mac1958]

I don't know if Trump did anything wrong, but I do know that you'll never see people and their enablers ACT more guilty.

Absolutely bizarre. Right out in the open.

 

[citygator]

I was told it was a damning photo, it’s not?

There is a disclaimer on the front page of the website to the library that says there will be more released

This photo wasn’t missing it was provided and for all you and the dembots trying to distract folks from the content of the files, was unintentionally removed then reloaded

Why don’t we focus on the thousands of pages we do have? You know that show your party deeply involved with Epstein even after he was convicted and his strong ties to members of the Clinton and Obama admin….

I have zero expectations that there is a file that has proof implicating anyone, democrat, republican, or Trump. I just know that Trump is still hindering the release of the files for stuff as simple as him being in a picture with Epstein and you'll run to his defense even when you have all the wrong information and files that were fed to you to respond to me.

Ask yourself, if they dont mind feeding you lies that I easily show as bogus, what else have they fed you that you've ate up?

 

[struth]

I have zero expectations that there is a file that has proof implicating anyone, democrat, republican, or Trump. I just know that Trump is still hindering the release of the files for stuff as simple as him being in a picture with Epstein and you'll run to his defense even when you have all the wrong information and files that were fed to you to respond to me.

Ask yourself, if they dont mind feeding you lies that I easily show as bogus, what else have they fed you that you've ate up?

How do you know that he is still hindering the release? Is it because you haven’t found any proof of your false narrative? And that your party has been the one that has shown to have been deeply embedded with Epstein even after he was convicted and has strong ties to Dem admins?

How do you know Trump has anything to do with one pic? One that isn’t damning or controversial at all?

 

[rightwinger]

I don't know if Trump did anything wrong, but I do know that you'll never see people and their enablers ACT more guilty.

Absolutely bizarre. Right out in the open.

Most of the people in those files did nothing wrong

Epstein had a high profile group of acquaintances that he lavished gifts and parties.
Associating with Epstein was the thing to do.

Doesn’t equate to engaging in sex with young women

 

[Mac1958]

Most of the people in those files did nothing wrong

Epstein had a high profile group of acquaintances that he lavished gifts and parties.
Associating with Epstein was the thing to do.

Doesn’t equate to engaging in sex with young women

Yep. The better way to do this would have been to give to some bipartisan group and have it filter names out.

Some well-known names have already been soiled without any proof.

But we don't do anything "the better way" any more. There ARE no bipartisan groups.

 

[citygator]

How do you know that he is still hindering the release? Is it because you haven’t found any proof of your false narrative? And that your party has been the one that has shown to have been deeply embedded with Epstein even after he was convicted and has strong ties to Dem admins?

How do you know Trump has anything to do with one pic? One that isn’t damning or controversial at all?

Lol. That's not even worth an answer but because I like you:

• Trump had Bondi release already public info as "new" with pomp and circumstance to see if that would stop the demands for data
• Then when that didnt work he had Patel and Bongino go on a tour to claim there were no more files
• When that didnt work he opposed the legislative bill to release the files, until he lost that battle and reversed to save face
• Recently he used the most liberal interpretation of the bill's exceptions to illegally hide more than it authorized to hide

I have no idea what or why he is hiding the Epstein files, but he absolutely is.

 

[jknowgood]

And yet a jury found that he did, all the same.

So, now, it's a fact in the public record. the appeals? They failed. His one lawsuit against someone saying he is a rapist that actually made it to the courtroom? Laughed out of the court immediately.

Because he actually did precisely what we heard him, on recorded audio, brag about doing.

Trump bragged about doing the very thing the jury found he did to her.

"Smart people don't like me."

Yes, because you're stupid. He wasn't convicted.

 

[sparky]

https://www.justice.gov/epstein

~S~

 

[struth]

Lol. That's not even worth an answer but because I like you:

• Trump had Bondi release already public info as "new" with pomp and circumstance to see if that would stop the demands for data
• Then when that didnt work he had Patel and Bongino go on a tour to claim there were no more files
• When that didnt work he opposed the legislative bill to release the files, until he lost that battle and reversed to save face
• Recently he used the most liberal interpretation of the bill's exceptions to illegally hide more than it authorized to hide

I have no idea what or why he is hiding the Epstein files, but he absolutely is.

Hahaa he signed the bill that made it law to release them! Haha you keep living in an alternate reality

What i find troubling was how one of espteins victim’s sisters reported to the fbi in 1996 and was ignored…and given the relationship with the Clinton admin we know why now…sick stuff

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/19/us/epstein-fbi-complaint-1996-maria-farmer.html

This is in the Epstein files that Trump released and you ignore, just like Clinton did

 

[BS Filter]

Tim Walz is cracking up. Investigation of fraud is now "weaponization of the Federal Government against Minnesota".

 

[struth]

Tim Walz is cracking up. Investigation of fraud is now "weaponization of the Federal Government against Minnesota".

These demafacist think they are above the law