Trump Ending Automatic Green Cards for Migrants Marrying U.S. Citizens

So we have 40 years to fix the problem before it gets to a dire point, create financial incentive/regulations and stop paying third worlds to come here and breed would fix the problem and very short order as with telling women to stop going to college and giving them financial incentives to marry and have kids young and reform family courts and divorce law to stop men from getting divorce raped.

OH, my God, are you an INCEL? This sounds like something an INCEL would say.

Let's get real, lower birth rates are a feature of First World Countries. When you give a woman a choice to be something more than a birthing machine, they'll take it every time. This isn't even an American Problem, we have one of the stronger replacement rates
 
But we have plenty of white racist assholes in this country, we don't need to import more.
If you were ordered to China for additional programming, that would free up space for at least one more.
 
OH, my God, are you an INCEL? This sounds like something an INCEL would say.

Let's get real, lower birth rates are a feature of First World Countries. When you give a woman a choice to be something more than a birthing machine, they'll take it every time. This isn't even an American Problem, we have one of the stronger replacement rates
No, they are an end result of the failure of neoliberalism, feminism and other egalitarian ideas. Turns out woman don’t want the corporate world and gladly want to be at home mothers given the chance.

More over we don’t need an increasing population to prop up an economy.
 
That's not a Venn diagram. That's a flow chart! :cool:

I guess you support birthright citizenship by that chart. Step A? Is that correct?

So I suck at charts. The US Constitution says it's ok if you were born here. But if their parents, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, and grandparents are here illegally, they need to get the **** out.
 
Or a White Persian Jew ?
And Japan is now undergoing a Demographic Death Spiral.. Where's it's population will drop by half in the next 50 years.
And? Cheaper everything it will cause more people to have kids
Um, as someone who has gone through the process of a Marriage Sponsorship Green Card, this statement is absurd.

To get my wife's green card, we had to submit over 200 pages of documents proving that our marriage was a legitimate one, including tax returns, photographs, statements from friends, etc.

Could these things be faked? Maybe, but unlikely.
sounds like a you problem.
 
Children who have a parent who is a citizen is born a citizen. How many people did you ask because I feel like it wasn’t very many.
How will you know if the parent is a citizen? Who will make the determination? Where will the documentation be stored?

Currently, it is very simple: all you need to do to prove your US citizenship is to obtain a live birth certificate from the town/city clerk where you were born. There is no politics involved, and the records of the town/city have traditionally been extremely reliable (although nothing is perfect).

What will replace this system? When our country was first created, you had to own property to be considered a full citizen and vote. Should we go back to that system?
 
MyGod you’re an idiot. We have proof who is a citizen. It’s very easy to prove who and isn’t.

Today, we have proof because all you need is a copy of your live birth certificate from the town/city where you were born.

The proposal is to get rid of that. You will no longer be able to use a birth certificate.

How would you prove you are a citizen if you can't use your birth certificate? What document? Who will create the document? Who will store the document?



Everything can be Weaponized politically that is not an excuse to do nothing.

And no, it actually doesn’t need to be put into the constitution because by your very same logic, every gun control law in America would require us to re-interpret and rewrite the second amendment, (not that I’m in favor of any gun control laws as all gun control laws infringements) we’re not changing the 14th amendment. We’re just properly interpreting it as applying to people who are subject to our full political jurisdiction illegals are not.

The SCOTUS has already repealed practically every gun control law in every state, in case you haven't been paying attention. So yes, the US Constitution is the law of the land, and it would need to be changed.

So we have 40 years to fix the problem before it gets to a dire point, create financial incentive/regulations and stop paying third worlds to come here and breed would fix the problem and very short order as with telling women to stop going to college and giving them financial incentives to marry and have kids young and reform family courts and divorce law to stop men from getting divorce raped.

There’s nothing wrong with a shrinking population, wages, go up cost of living goes down. Housing becomes more affordable land becomes more affordable. And with advent and automation and robotics we probably don’t need a lot of people going forward.

I agree with the firing squad idea.
I'm glad we can agree on at least one thing ;-) There are probably other things.
 
No, they are an end result of the failure of neoliberalism, feminism and other egalitarian ideas. Turns out woman don’t want the corporate world and gladly want to be at home mothers given the chance.

Really, which women are these? Certainly not the women I work with. they enjoy their careers and having independence over their money.

More over we don’t need an increasing population to prop up an economy.
Well, um, yeah, actually, we do. The problem is after a certain point, you have a population with too many old people and not enough young people to support them.


Have you ever met a White South African ?
Um yeah, they were kind of jerks.

But millions of welfare bums is acceptable to import, why?

Because they don't go on welfare, they want to work. In fact, even LEGAL immigrants aren't eligible for most government programs.

sounds like a you problem.
INCEL who can't get laid says what?

And Japan will still be Japan.

If being a dying country of old people is still being a country, I guess.
 
15th post
Really, which women are these? Certainly not the women I work with. they enjoy their careers and having independence over their money.


Well, um, yeah, actually, we do. The problem is after a certain point, you have a population with too many old people and not enough young people to support them.



Um yeah, they were kind of jerks.



Because they don't go on welfare, they want to work. In fact, even LEGAL immigrants aren't eligible for most government programs.


INCEL who can't get laid says what?



If being a dying country of old people is still being a country, I guess.
“The women I spoke too” it’s called anecdotal evidence and it’s a fallacy..

“ they were jerks”, considering there’s fewer than 100,000 white South Africa Connors in the United States. I respectfully doubt that you did.
 
Another piece of the puzzle.

MAGA.


Immigration lawyers are warning that federal agencies are increasingly skeptical when migrants claim to have legitimate marriages with Americans.
The policy shift comes after President Donald Trump’s deputies began cracking down on rising rates of marriage-related visa fraud by migrants who pay Americans for temporary marriages.
While marrying a U.S. citizen has never been a locked-in guarantee that a migrant would be issued a green card, marriages have previously offered a huge boost to a migrant’s request for legal status. But that may be changing as immigration attorneys are finding that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) are giving such marriages much closer scrutiny than ever before.
Immigration attorney Brad Bernstein of Spar & Bernstein is warning his clients that marrying a U.S. citizen is no longer the near-guarantee of legal residence for foreign nationals, NDTV reported.
One new wrinkle in requests for marriage-related green cards is residency. The Trump administration is prioritizing a shared domicile for the migrant and the U.S. citizen, a requirement that was not prioritized in the past. Bernstein says.
“Immigration officers do not care why you live apart, and they do not care if it’s for work, school, money, or convenience,” the attorney added.
“So, if you’re not living in the same house every day, immigration is going to start questioning the marriage. And once they question it, they’re investigating, and once they come knocking on your door, they’re looking to deny you. So, if you want a marriage green card, you live together. Period,” he explained.
USCIS has warned migrants that a marriage to a U.S. citizen has to be real, not just an arrangement of convenience. And the agency will deny green cards to those who married with “no good faith, intent to live together as spouses and intended to circumvent immigration laws.”
In November, the Trump administration even suggested that migrants who already hold green cards could find their status reexamined and reassessed.
In a message posted on Thanksgiving Day, USCIS Director Joseph Edlow announced, “At the direction of @POTUS, I have directed a full scale, rigorous reexamination of every Green Card for every alien from every country of concern.”
...


Well ****........

There goes my retirement money.
 
“The women I spoke too” it’s called anecdotal evidence and it’s a fallacy..

Okay, let's look at polls. How many women want careers.


  • Women (Harris voters) emphasize a fulfilling job/career (51%), having money to do things you want (46%), and emotional stability (39%). Marriage and children rank at just 6%.
But...


  • Women (Trump voters) prioritize financial independence 40% and job/career 32%, having children 26% and marriage much lower at 20%.

“ they were jerks”, considering there’s fewer than 100,000 white South Africa Connors in the United States. I respectfully doubt that you did.
I encounter a lot of people in my side business, most of them foreign nationals. Two of them happened to be South Africans. One of them stiffed me after I did the work for her. The other one claimed to have been a member of their security services under Apartheid.
 
Okay, let's look at polls. How many women want careers.


  • Women (Harris voters) emphasize a fulfilling job/career (51%), having money to do things you want (46%), and emotional stability (39%). Marriage and children rank at just 6%.
But...


  • Women (Trump voters) prioritize financial independence 40% and job/career 32%, having children 26% and marriage much lower at 20%.


I encounter a lot of people in my side business, most of them foreign nationals. Two of them happened to be South Africans. One of them stiffed me after I did the work for her. The other one claimed to have been a member of their security services under Apartheid.

Again, you’re just proving the brainwashing power of feminism for me thank you

To be perfectly honest, it kind of sounds like you’re the jerk here.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom