Trump doesn't know what (or who) Habeas Corus is!!!

[Toddsterpatriot]

But why were they asking him about a blow job in the first place?

Because he sexually harassed underlings.

 

[struth]

But why were they asking him about a blow job in the first place?

Because he was being sued for sexual harassment

 

[struth]

Yeah, you're not President. You don't need to know what it is, until you're in prison, at least. Or until the President decides to suspend it.

A President on the other hand should have an idea of what it is, because he's the executive, he's in charge of the FBI. He's got the power, if he were to suspend it, it'd be a huge thing.

That's why Trump should know.

HC isn’t a power the president has

 

[JoeB131]

Explain Biden's failing numbers coming out of the last part of 2024 than?

Jobs Statistics:​

• President Trump has created 345,000 jobs since taking office in January

Guy, 345,000 over nine months vs. 16 million created by Biden over four years. The job market TRULY SUCKS right now.

 

[JoeB131]

And selling MIRV technology to China for campaign donations.

China already had that technology.

And the market demanded that we go to China because at the time, we were desperate to get satellites up into space

 

[JoeB131]

Because he sexually harassed underlings.

Except Paula Jones wasn't an underling, she was just someone he met at a hotel.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

No, you didn't start the Clinton thing, JoeB131 did and he said "Your side impeached Clinton over a blow job. Please don't whine to me about how Trump was treated unfairly."

Which is what I've been saying. That the Republicans started it, and now whine about it.

Does this absolve the Democrat party for basically persecuting a sitting President for four years straight?

The Clinton thing was a one-off even if it was frivolous and it happened almost thirty years ago. Democrats, however, did two impeachments in four years, one of which was based on an overheard phone conversation and the another that was based on a lie.

If we assume the clinton case was frivolous, that Republicans “started it, and we’re making comparisons, Democrats took political retribution to a whole new level.

You want some kind of evidence that the Republicans went after Clinton?

No. I want evidence that Republicans collectively and concertingly set Clinton up.

So what Clinton was accused of doing was sexual harassment against Paula Jones. Totally plausible as Clinton was a bit of a sex pest. And the Whitewater affair.

Clinton got asked in the Jones case about Monica Lewinsky.

He was asked if he had a "sexual relationship", "sexual affair", or "sexual relations" with Lewinsky.

He said he hadn't.

Based on the decision by the Supreme Court about whether a president can be prosecuted for things he does as a president, and that he cannot, what Clinton did was not as a president.

So really he shouldn't have been impeached for "lying" (I mean, it depends on how you want to see "sexual relations", it's a bit vague unless they're actually *******, isn't it?) he should have been prosecuted in a court of law, as this wasn't an act of the presidency.

Then Ken Starr went off on all the things that Clinton was doing. Were they really impeachment material or court material?

That some Republicans voted with Clinton, and the fact that the Republicans didn't have 67 members anyway, it was kind of pointless taking it to impeachment. Wasn't it? Unless they had something mindblowing, it was never going to get Clinton out of office.

It was designed to make Clinton look bad.

Maybe. The difference is, Clinton’s impeachment was based on his lie whereas Trump’s impeachments were based on Democrat lies.

 

[Lisa558]

No, Trump is not fit to be president.

But it was the same ignorance and stupidity of the voters that put him in office.

You were ready to vote for someone so demented he couldn’t remember how to exit the podium.

 

[Lisa558]

Yeah, you're not President. You don't need to know what it is, until you're in prison, at least. Or until the President decides to suspend it.

A President on the other hand should have an idea of what it is, because he's the executive, he's in charge of the FBI. He's got the power, if he were to suspend it, it'd be a huge thing.

That's why Trump should know.

He stopped the illegals from swarming in and has brokered a deal for HAMAS to return the hostages and Israel to retreat.

You people are REALLY desperate.

 

[excalibur]

Trump reaches deal with AstraZeneca to lower U.S. drug prices​

Trump reaches deal with AstraZeneca to lower U.S. drug prices

Trump announced the agreement with AstraZeneca on Friday, after striking a similar deal with Pfizer late last month.

www.cnbc.com

 

[frigidweirdo]

Most people don't know what Habeas Corpus is, so Trump is in the majority. Anyway Habeas Corpus has already been suspended, by Lincoln.

Great, Trump is as thick as the masses.

I thought the whole point of having a president was to have someone in power who was BETTER than the masses, who could do BETTER than other people.

 

[JoeB131]

Does this absolve the Democrat party for basically persecuting a sitting President for four years straight?

The Clinton thing was a one-off even if it was frivolous and it happened almost thirty years ago. Democrats, however, did two impeachments in four years, one of which was based on an overheard phone conversation and the another that was based on a lie.

If we assume the clinton case was frivolous, that Republicans “started it, and we’re making comparisons, Democrats took political retribution to a whole new level.

Um, I'm sorry, trying to overturn an election or trying to shake down a foreign government to get dirt on your rival is a LOT more serious than lying about a blow job because you are embarrassed about it.

No. I want evidence that Republicans collectively and concertingly set Clinton up.

You mean other than the millions of dollars spent by Scaife trying to create a case against Clinton? Paula Jones' lawsuit was garbage, thrown out by the courts multiple times, but they kept it alive.

Ken Starr Spent 70 million dollars on a panty-sniffing raid.

Maybe. The difference is, Clinton’s impeachment was based on his lie whereas Trump’s impeachments were based on Democrat lies.

What lies? He did try to shake down Zelenskyy for dirt on Biden. He did incite a riot at the Capitol.

 

[struth]

Except Paula Jones wasn't an underling, she was just someone he met at a hotel.

Wrong she was a state employee when he was gov of Arkansas

 

[struth]

Great, Trump is as thick as the masses.

I thought the whole point of having a president was to have someone in power who was BETTER than the masses, who could do BETTER than other people.

Well that’s cause you are a fascist

In America, the president is not better than any other person.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Except Paula Jones wasn't an underling, she was just someone he met at a hotel.

A state employee.

 

[Lisa558]

Great, Trump is as thick as the masses.

I thought the whole point of having a president was to have someone in power who was BETTER than the masses, who could do BETTER than other people.

Most adults know how to exit a stage or answer a question. Yet you would have voted for Biden.

And was Biden not able to bring about a cease-fire and a hostage return? Was he able to secure the border? Was he able to block the Islamic Terrorist Regime from building nukes?

The fact is that Trump has been wildly successful, on multiple levels of great import, and he is probably going to get the Nobel Price, so you lefties are in a meltdown.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Does this absolve the Democrat party for basically persecuting a sitting President for four years straight?

The Clinton thing was a one-off even if it was frivolous and it happened almost thirty years ago. Democrats, however, did two impeachments in four years, one of which was based on an overheard phone conversation and the another that was based on a lie.

If we assume the clinton case was frivolous, that Republicans “started it, and we’re making comparisons, Democrats took political retribution to a whole new level.


No. I want evidence that Republicans collectively and concertingly set Clinton up.

Maybe. The difference is, Clinton’s impeachment was based on his lie whereas Trump’s impeachments were based on Democrat lies.

You reap what you sow.

You can't complain the other side are doing to you, what you did to them.

And your view of the difference between Trump and Clinton's impeachments is laughable.

Trump is a criminal, everyone knows it. He's just smart enough to get other people to do the criminal activity for him most of the time.

 

[Lisa558]

Well that’s cause you are a fascist

In America, the president is not better than any other person.

And in the case of Trump, he IS better than most people. How many of us could have put together the Mid-East peace deal, for example?

 

[White 6]

Trump Not Knowing How To Respond To A Simple Question Is Going Viral Because People Cannot Believe It's Real

"This would be extremely hilarious if not so extremely dangerous," one user said of the President's latest fubbed comments.

uk.yahoo.com

"Q: Have you given any more thought to possibly suspending habeas corpus?
TRUMP: Suspending who?
Q: Habeas corpus
TRUMP: I don't know. I'd rather leave that to Kristi."

"Oh, I don’t know. I’d rather leave that to Kristi. What do you think?” Trump said, punting the question to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem."

"“No, sir, I haven’t been a part of any discussions on that,” Noem replied."

A President should know what Habeas Corpus is. It's literally a huge power he could wield, but should in most cases.

Trump hasn't got a clue. Is he fit to be President? Never was.

It is definitely mid ranged Dementia. Were it anybody but him, it would be sad, but it is him, and he is still ordering or going along, when he has no business, commanding anything, not troops, not ICE, not commanding Attorney General (as if she were his personal lawyer) to prosecute his political enemies, not commanding the US Navy to attack/bomb Venezuelan boats in international waters, no stop and search, without providing any proof of wrong doing, not even knowing the names of the people killed in the boats, not to mention a total misuse of the military on the high seas.

 

[Lisa558]

Wrong she was a state employee when he was gov of Arkansas

Clinton also paid her $850,000 to drop the case against him.