Trump doesn't know what (or who) Habeas Corus is!!!

[BackAgain]

I was replying in kind.

And yeah, I know it's corpus. Just so you know.

Your thread headline would suggest otherwise, you idiot.

 

[Delldude]

That he never should have been asked about

Cover ups are cool with you?

 

[Delldude]

My party? I never voted for them. I've never been a member. I've never had anything to do with them. Why do you think they're mine? Do you think I own half the world or something?

LoL....
Yet you spend all your posts supporting them.

 

[Lesh]

Cover ups are cool with you?

Covering up what? A blow job between consenting adults?

 

[Delldude]

Yep, another great addition to another thread from Skye, who doesn't know what Habeas Corpus is, but will criticize someone for not writing it properly once.

Thought it was habeas corus.

 

[Delldude]

Covering up what? A blow job between consenting adults?

On the job on the public dime....then lied under oath.....

 

[Delldude]

Covering up what? A blow job between consenting adults?

Donald Trump gets blow job in the oval office.

Wonder how that would roll.

 

[JoeB131]

So blow jobs on the public dime in the people's house is ok by you?

Did he otherwise get the work done?

The thing about Clinton was that the worst thing we had to worry about when he was in charge was "Is he getting a blow job?".

Not "Are we in the middle of a recession?" or "are we being wiped out by a deadly plague?" or "are there riots in the streets?" or "did we just get into a war on a lie?"

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

About a blow job for Christ sakes

You do understand that it was because he lied in a formal proceeding (which he swore not to do, btw), not because he lied about a blowjob, right? You understand that fact is irrelevant to the point, yes?

 

[frigidweirdo]

You do understand that it was because he lied in a formal proceeding (which he swore not to do, btw), not because he lied about a blowjob, right? You understand that fact is irrelevant to the point, yes?

But why were they asking him about a blow job in the first place?

 

[frigidweirdo]

LoL....
Yet you spend all your posts supporting them.

No, not really.

However I do spend most of my time speaking with Republicans. And so, generally I'll take an opposing view to them. And when I don't, I often don't even really talk about it.

So, it's kind of logical that my views would be closer to Democrats. However I do criticize the Democrats too.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

But why were they asking him about a blow job in the first place?

That’s irrelevant to the point.

 

[frigidweirdo]

That’s irrelevant to the point.

No, it's not.

I mean, I'm not really sure why you're talking about this topic in the first place, but my main guess (I'm lazy, stressed and can't be bothered if you want a reason) is that you're trying to compare then with now.

The Republicans went after Clinton, they set him up, knowing that men would lie about their sexual affairs simply to stop their wives finding out about it.

They didn't do this because they believed it was proper politics. They deliberately did this, and now they have the Dems doing the same to them and they whine like little children about it, as if they would never do such a thing. When they're WORSE.

 

[Hurricanelover]

Trump doesn't give a single shit about our constitutional system of government. He works like an old time king pre-1790's europe.

This is the entire goal of the right. They want to give the power back to the elites and **** the vision of the liberals that bought this nation that worked for the little guy. **** republicans and the elites that support them.

 

[Mac-7]

Trump doesn't give a single shit about our constitutional system of government. He works like an old time king pre-1790's europe.

This is the entire goal of the right. They want to give the power back to the elites and **** the vision of the liberals that bought this nation that worked for the little guy. **** republicans and the elites that support them.

You come off sounding not just liberal, but actually far, far left

Trump can be a blowhard at times - actually quite often, but the bottom line is that he respects this country and wants what's best for America as he sees it

For instance the illegal alien problrm

Biden invited tens of millions of unvetted persons into our country in just four years

Many Americans, particularly MAGAs consider that wrong and want the government to correct its mistake

Trump is doing everything within his power to deport as many as possible within the law

That makes him a great American in my book

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

No, it's not.

Yes, it is.

I mean, I'm not really sure why you're talking about this topic in the first place, but my main guess (I'm lazy, stressed and can't be bothered if you want a reason) is that you're trying to compare then with now.

I’m not the one who brought up Clinton. All I did was remind Lesh that Clinton was impeached for lying to Congress, not for lying about a blowjob.

The Republicans went after Clinton, they set him up, knowing that men would lie about their sexual affairs simply to stop their wives finding out about it.

You’re going to have to provide some sort of citation for this claim. Besides, Democrats hounded Trump for four years over equally frivolous acts and for what turned out to be a massive hoax.

They didn't do this because they believed it was proper politics. They deliberately did this, and now they have the Dems doing the same to them and they whine like little children about it, as if they would never do such a thing. When they're WORSE.

Two words: Russian Collusion.

Democrats tried to impeach Trump, not over something trivial, but over something that didn’t even ******* happen.

I never gave a shit about the blowjob scandal or the outcome of the impeachment. But if what Republicans did was chickenshit then what Democrats did borders on criminal if not treason.

 

[Delldude]

Did he otherwise get the work done?

The thing about Clinton was that the worst thing we had to worry about when he was in charge was "Is he getting a blow job?".

Not "Are we in the middle of a recession?" or "are we being wiped out by a deadly plague?" or "are there riots in the streets?" or "did we just get into a war on a lie?"

So blow jobs and lying are ok with you?

LoL......

 

[frigidweirdo]

Yes, it is.

I’m not the one who brought up Clinton. All I did was remind Lesh that Clinton was impeached for lying to Congress, not for lying about a blowjob.


You’re going to have to provide some sort of citation for this claim. Besides, Democrats hounded Trump for four years over equally frivolous acts and for what turned out to be a massive hoax.

Two words: Russian Collusion.

Democrats tried to impeach Trump, not over something trivial, but over something that didn’t even ******* happen.

I never gave a shit about the blowjob scandal or the outcome of the impeachment. But if what Republicans did was chickenshit then what Democrats did borders on criminal if not treason.

No, you didn't start the Clinton thing, JoeB131 did and he said "Your side impeached Clinton over a blow job. Please don't whine to me about how Trump was treated unfairly."

Which is what I've been saying. That the Republicans started it, and now whine about it.

You want some kind of evidence that the Republicans went after Clinton?

So what Clinton was accused of doing was sexual harassment against Paula Jones. Totally plausible as Clinton was a bit of a sex pest. And the Whitewater affair.

Clinton got asked in the Jones case about Monica Lewinsky.

He was asked if he had a "sexual relationship", "sexual affair", or "sexual relations" with Lewinsky.

He said he hadn't.

Based on the decision by the Supreme Court about whether a president can be prosecuted for things he does as a president, and that he cannot, what Clinton did was not as a president.

So really he shouldn't have been impeached for "lying" (I mean, it depends on how you want to see "sexual relations", it's a bit vague unless they're actually *******, isn't it?) he should have been prosecuted in a court of law, as this wasn't an act of the presidency.

Then Ken Starr went off on all the things that Clinton was doing. Were they really impeachment material or court material?

That some Republicans voted with Clinton, and the fact that the Republicans didn't have 67 members anyway, it was kind of pointless taking it to impeachment. Wasn't it? Unless they had something mindblowing, it was never going to get Clinton out of office.

It was designed to make Clinton look bad.

 

[JoeB131]

You do understand that it was because he lied in a formal proceeding (which he swore not to do, btw), not because he lied about a blowjob, right? You understand that fact is irrelevant to the point, yes?

Except- The judge ruled that whether or not he got a blow job was utterly irrelevant to the formal proceeding.

She further ruled the formal proceeding had absolutely no legal merit, because the woman suing Clinton, in addition to being a liar, wasn't a direct report and therefore could not be sexually harassed by him.

Asking him about a blowjob was an attempt to embarrass him personally. This is why 67% of people opposed impeachment and made the Repukes pay a heavy price for trying it at the polls

 

[j-mac]

Except- The judge ruled that whether or not he got a blow job was utterly irrelevant to the formal proceeding.

She further ruled the formal proceeding had absolutely no legal merit, because the woman suing Clinton, in addition to being a liar, wasn't a direct report and therefore could not be sexually harassed by him.

Asking him about a blowjob was an attempt to embarrass him personally. This is why 67% of people opposed impeachment and made the Repukes pay a heavy price for trying it at the polls

Clinton would be a “Trumper” in today’s leftest eyes.