Trump Doesn't Know if He Has to Uphold the Constitution Because He's Not a Lawyer

[jc456]

Take it up with the O/P then.
Run along now, champ.

I did. Stop pushing the propaganda. He never said it. it's all fake fking news. Don't get short with me, I was merely bringing to your attention the fact it was never stated. You posted it.

 

[jc456]

Having taken an oath to "to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States," Trump said, "I don't know," when asked “Don’t you need to uphold the Constitution of the United States as president?”

The honest answer, devoid of meany-mouth equivocations, is, "Yes, I do."

dude, again, that question was never asked, you misrepresentative propagandist. never was asked.

 

[schmidlap]

dude, again, that question was never asked, you misrepresentative propagandist. never was asked.

Of course, I quoted verbatim.

Any legitimate president knows that he must honor his oath to uphold the Constitution

 

[jc456]

Of course, I quoted verbatim.

Any legitimate president knows that he must honor his oath to uphold the Constitution

nope, it was not asked. Tell me the time in the video. Mark it for us.

 

[jc456]

Here's a new one for you

https://truthsocial.com/group/make-america-great-again/posts/114456448605660119

 

[Theowl32]

Remember, 15 years ago during the Tea Party movement the right would carry around little pocket Constitutions and dress up like colonial-era Americans. They don't even pretend to care about the Constitution anymore. Like Christianity, it's lost currency on the right. The entire movement is just Trump.

Which if you know anything about Washington lawyers and lying, then perhaps you'd actually know that most politicians are lawyers. That's a hint. What, don't think the democrats and the lawyers that represent them never lie?

Already understand fully that you are naive and as sassy as a bag of nickels, but...


Sigh

If you worldly leftists weren't hypocrites about EVERYTHING, you wouldn't be leftists.

 

[BackAgain]

Of course, not issue with that. But the Congress has said you DON'T have to enter at a border crossing and request asylum. On that you have to be present in the US.

Which is kind of a Catch-22. So the language and intent of that needs to be tightened up.

I'm assuming (<<-- opinion) that the intent may have been for someone here legally who after the fact needs to request aslyum. For example someone on a student visa and war breaks out while they are here.

But as it stands right now, someone can be here illegally and then request asylum within a specified period.

WW

8 U.S. Code § 1158 - Asylum

www.law.cornell.edu

So? Then don’t cross the border before seeking asylum. Problem solved.

 

[Lesh]

Something you clearly have zero knowledge about.

Duh. That only applies when we are depriving them of life, liberty or property. Shipping them back to the shithole they came from does none of those three. This is well settled law.

Stop listening to the fucking morons on NBC et al. They make you sound like a moron.

Habeas corpus dimwit

 

[jc456]

Habeas corpus dimwit

what about it?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Habeas corpus dimwit

So... how do you think this applies here?

 

[Lesh]

So... how do you thin this applies here?

Read the fifth

 

[M14 Shooter]

Read the fifth

As the term is not found in the 5th, this does nothing to tell me why you think it applies here.

 

[Lesh]

As the term is not found in the 5th, this does nothing to tell me why you think this applies here.

Read the first sentence

 

[jc456]

Read the first sentence

why didn't you just copy it and paste it?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Read the first sentence

The entire amendment is one sentence.
You mean the first clause.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger

Habeus Corpus isn't in there.
So... how do you think the term applies here?

 

[Foxfyre]

Remember, 15 years ago during the Tea Party movement the right would carry around little pocket Constitutions and dress up like colonial-era Americans. They don't even pretend to care about the Constitution anymore. Like Christianity, it's lost currency on the right. The entire movement is just Trump.

Don't you ever get tired of your TDS? Is it possible you will ever give President Trump any benefit of the doubt on these things? When speaking extemporaneously he says things in ways that are easily plucked out of context and then presented as something he actually never intended.

He was clearly saying that he didn't know if he had to follow the Constitution as some were interpreting that. He had great attorneys who were suggesting that interpretation could be wrong.

I would deeply appreciate you using the full context of what he actually said and obviously intended when you start threads like this. It would greatly increase your stature as a person of integrity.

Jimmy Failla had a blast this weekend teasing Michelle Obama for her extemporaneous statement that she was speaking as a black MAN--he had the video of her saying it. He was very careful to say, however, that Michelle was a woman because he is a man of principle and did not want to be party to the crowd trying to make her a man but he had to appreciate how that sounded to many.

So make jokes if you want. But at least be intellectually honest and also include the truth.

 

[jc456]

Don't you ever get tired of your TDS? Is it possible you will ever give President Trump any benefit of the doubt on these things? When speaking extemporaneously he says things in ways that are easily plucked out of context and then presented as something he actually never intended.

I would deeply appreciate you using the full context of what he actually said and obviously intended when you start threads like this. It would greatly increase your stature as a person of integrity.

Jimmy Failla had a blast this weekend teasing Michelle Obama for her extemporaneous statement that she was speaking as a black MAN--he had the video of her saying it. He was very careful to say, however, that Michelle was a woman because he is a man of principle and did not want to be party to the crowd trying to make her a man but he had to appreciate how that sounded to many.

So make jokes if you want. But at least be intellectually honest and also include the truth.

well, that question wasn't actually asked, and there's that.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Don't you ever get tired of your TDS?

Ever get tired of being an NPC?

 

[Foxfyre]

Ever get tired of being an NPC?

If I am that, whatever it is, I'm sure you can post examples of why that is so.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

If I am that, whatever it is

You most certainly are.

Have a nice day.