JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,756
- 2,220
This is just amazing to me. Wokesters are now attacking neutral third parties and scientists that dare say anything that Trump likes, whether they support Trump or not, lol.
The Dr Didier Raoult who first advanced Hydroxychloroquine as a possible alternative treatment for COIVID19, is not just wrong according to Woketard, but he is a TRUMPIAN now, despite being French and having never ever voted for Trump in his life.
slate.com
lol, if Trump is for it, Dims must be against it and anyone else Trump thinks is an expert!
Now we have over 6,000 doctors survey by a health care multinational corporation, Sermo, found that world wide, Hydroxychloroquine is the prefered and most effective treatment for COvID19,
www.washingtontimes.com
'But', says the Woketard, 'wasnt Hydroxywhatever debunked in a study by AP?'
roflmao, no, that was a VA study done that was not peer reviewed or actual science, just a report.
And Raoult promptly rebutted it before the VA could set the record straight and inform the Wokeistanis that it was not a scientific study.
techstartups.com
But it cant be good since ORANGE MAN BAD ! ! ! ! ALWAYS NOW AND FOR EVER! ! ! ! !
I say, if liberals dont want to do HCQ because Trump is for it, then by all means dont force it on them. That just means there is more for the rest of us.
The Dr Didier Raoult who first advanced Hydroxychloroquine as a possible alternative treatment for COIVID19, is not just wrong according to Woketard, but he is a TRUMPIAN now, despite being French and having never ever voted for Trump in his life.
The Trumpian French Doctor Behind the Chloroquine Hype
The source of the hopes for a coronavirus cure should raise a lot of red flags.
The Trumpian French Doctor Behind the Chloroquine Hype
lol, if Trump is for it, Dims must be against it and anyone else Trump thinks is an expert!
Now we have over 6,000 doctors survey by a health care multinational corporation, Sermo, found that world wide, Hydroxychloroquine is the prefered and most effective treatment for COvID19,
Hydroxychloroquine rated ‘most effective therapy’ by doctors for coronavirus: Global survey
An international poll of more than 6,000 doctors released Thursday found that the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine was the most highly rated treatment for the novel coronavirus.
www.washingtontimes.com
An international poll of more than 6,000 doctors released Thursday found that the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine was the most highly rated treatment for the novel coronavirus.
The survey conducted by Sermo, a global health care polling company, of 6,227 physicians in 30 countries found that 37% of those treating COVID-19 patients rated hydroxychloroquine as the “most effective therapy” from a list of 15 options.
Of the physicians surveyed, 3,308 said they had either ordered a COVID-19 test or been involved in caring for a coronavirus patient, and 2,171 of those responded to the question asking which medications were most effective.
'But', says the Woketard, 'wasnt Hydroxywhatever debunked in a study by AP?'
roflmao, no, that was a VA study done that was not peer reviewed or actual science, just a report.
And Raoult promptly rebutted it before the VA could set the record straight and inform the Wokeistanis that it was not a scientific study.
Renowned French Dr. Didier Raoult issued a response to biases in the study critical of hydroxychloroquine - Tech Startups
As we said countless times in many of our articles, hydroxychloroquine has become the most controversial drug since President Trump touted the malaria drug as a potential game-changer. Ever since, the mainstream media has repeatedly labeled the drug has "unproven." With anecdotal evidences that...
techstartups.com
“In the current period, it seems that passion dominates rigorous and balanced scientific analysis and may lead to scientific misconduct. The article by Magagnoli et al. (Magagnoli, 2020) is an absolutely spectacular example of this. Indeed, in this work, it is concluded, in the end, that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) would double the mortality in patients with COVID with a fatality rate of 28% (versus 11% in the NoHCQ group), which is extraordinarily hard to believe. The analysis of the data shows two major biases, which show a willing to be convinced before starting the work :
The first is that lymphopenia is twice as common in the HCQ groups (25% in the HCQ, 31% in the HCQ+AZ group versus 14% in the no HCQ group, p =.02) and there is an absolute correlation between lymphopenia (<0.5G/L) and fatality rate, which is well known (Tan, 2020) and confirmed here : 28% deaths, 22% and 11% in the HCQ, HCQ+AZ and No HCQ group, respectively. Lymphopenia is the most obvious criterion of patient severity (in our cohort, lymphocytes in dead individuals (n=22, mean ± standard deviation, 0.94 ± 0.45), versus in the living (n=2405, 1.79 ± 0.84, p < .0001)). As the authors acknowledge, the severity of the patients in the different groups was very different, and their analysis can only make sense if there is a selection of patients with the same degree of severity, i.e. the same percentage of lymphopenia.
The second major bias is that in an attempt to provide meaningful data, by eliminating the initial severity at the time of treatment, two tables are shown: one table where drugs are prescribed before intubation, and which shows no significant difference in the 3 different groups (9/90 (10%) in the HCQ group, 11/101 (10. 9%) HCQ+AZ, and 15/177 (8.5%) in the group without HCQ, chi-square = 0.47, ddl = 2, p = 0.79), and one table, where it is not clear when the drugs were prescribed, where there are significant differences.
These differences are most likely related to the fact that the patients had been intubated for some time before receiving hydroxychloroquine in desperation. It is notable that this is unreasonable at the time of the cytokine storm, as it is unlikely that hydrochloroquine alone would be able to control patients at this stage of the disease.
Moreover, incomprehensibly, the “untreated” group actually received azithromycin in 30% of cases, without this group being analyzed in any distinct way. Azithromycin is also a proposed treatment for COVID (Gautret, 2020) with in vitro efficacy (Andreani, 2020), and to mix it with patients who are supposedly untreated is something that is closer to scientific fraud than reasonable analysis.
But it cant be good since ORANGE MAN BAD ! ! ! ! ALWAYS NOW AND FOR EVER! ! ! ! !
I say, if liberals dont want to do HCQ because Trump is for it, then by all means dont force it on them. That just means there is more for the rest of us.
