He showed up. That puts him above obama and clinton. At least he made the effort. Thats more than those other two have done.
You know what I keep asking, that no one yet has answered?
Suppose a Clinton or an O'bama does show up.
------- what exactly are they supposed to DO?
What exactly is my husband supposed to do when I am in surgery? Knowing he is there is good enough.
People died. People lost their homes. They need to know their president gives a shit more about their tears than his damn ******* golf game.
I think they see that every time a FEMA worker comes around.
Your husband coming when you're in surgery doesn't strain the hospital's resources. A POTUS appearance does.
Has FEMA been there? And how does POTUS strain the resources? Isn't it usual protocol for the President to visit disaster areas?
Federal facilities are all there, yes. O'bama declared a disaster area a week ago which sets that in motion.
And yes it's usual protocol for the POTUS to stay out of the way when emergency rescues are going on, because it diverts logistical supplies, security, aircraft, etc etc from the rescue operations to the President, and there's nothing he can directly do on the site anyway. That's why the governor advised not coming, as governors usually do, until it's under control.
The same was true when Bush came during Katrina -- he landed and stayed well out of the city area where the worst was going on. People don't seem to get the impact a Presidential arrival has. In normal times it's just a traffic headache but when resources and energies are needed elsewhere it's a real distraction.
(Edit -- I misread your post, so yes it's usual protocol for a POTUS to visit a disaster area, but AFTER the emergency has been handled by those who are on the scene to do just that)
Basically all this clamoring for this or that person to "show up" is a lot of hot-air rhetoric by demagogues sitting a thousand miles from the scene whose lives will be zero-impacted by what's going on there and can afford to stir people up.