Trump cuts more than $400 million in grants to Columbia over antisemitism concerns, potentially more to come

[Marener]

You are lying... the arrests were made across the street where Christians were told to stand... no one blocked any of your precious baby killing office doors..... that was made highly illegal and a felony two decades ago....
See dems know how to stop crime when they want to... the problem is they rarely want to...

I don’t know if you’re ignorant or a liar.

This is the Mt Juliet abortion clinic.

 

[Rambunctious]

I don’t know if you’re ignorant or a liar.

This is the Mt Juliet abortion clinic.

View attachment 1087231

What happened to them?... they all went to prison right?...
Four anti-abortion activists were convicted in federal court for blocking the entrance to a reproductive health clinic in Mount Juliet, Tennessee in 2021. They were sentenced to six months in prison, five years of supervised release, and fines of $10,000.
Just like I said....

 

[Marener]

What happened to them?... they all went to prison right?...
Four anti-abortion activists were convicted in federal court for blocking the entrance to a reproductive health clinic in Mount Juliet, Tennessee in 2021. They were sentenced to six months in prison, five years of supervised release, and fines of $10,000.
Just like I said....

Yes! It was a travesty according to conservatives. The weaponized DoJ attacking religious people!

 

[Rambunctious]

Yes! It was a travesty according to conservatives. The weaponized DoJ attacking religious people!

The law is the law... they knew the law.... I just wish the same harsh penalties would be used for liberal protestors and criminals....

 

[Marener]

The law is the law... they knew the law.... I just wish the same harsh penalties would be used for liberal protestors and criminals....

Right. And now they want to repeal the law for abortion clinics.

Congress Should Repeal the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act

Mark Houck volunteers as a counselor at the Community Women’s Center of America, a crisis pregnancy center in Philadelphia located across the street from the Elizabeth Blackwell Health Center,

www.heritage.org

 

[Rambunctious]

Right. And now they want to repeal the law for abortion clinics.

Congress Should Repeal the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act

Mark Houck volunteers as a counselor at the Community Women’s Center of America, a crisis pregnancy center in Philadelphia located across the street from the Elizabeth Blackwell Health Center,

www.heritage.org

That's an opinion from the Heritage foundation... they can't repeal anything....

 

[Nobody911]

Historical Events That Intensified Antisemitism

Antisemitism has been exacerbated by various historical events throughout the centuries. Here are some key moments that significantly intensified antisemitic sentiments:

1. The First Jewish–Roman War (66-73 CE): This conflict marked a significant turning point in Jewish history, leading to the destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem. The aftermath fostered a narrative of Jewish defeat and persecution, which contributed to long-standing antisemitic attitudes in Roman society and beyond.

2. The Middle Ages: During this period, Jews were often scapegoated for societal problems, including the Black Death, which led to widespread violence and massacres. The blood libel accusations, which falsely claimed that Jews kidnapped and murdered Christian children for ritual purposes, also emerged during this time, further entrenching antisemitic beliefs.

3. The Holocaust (1941-1945): The systematic extermination of six million Jews by the Nazi regime is one of the most horrific manifestations of antisemitism. The Holocaust not only intensified existing antisemitic sentiments but also left a lasting impact on global perceptions of Jews and antisemitism itself.

4. Post-World War II Era: In the aftermath of the Holocaust, while there was a temporary increase in sympathy for Jews, antisemitism persisted and evolved. The establishment of Israel in 1948 led to new forms of antisemitism, often conflating Jewish identity with political actions of the Israeli state, which has been used to justify discrimination against Jews globally.

5. Recent Conflicts: Events such as the Israel-Palestine conflict have also intensified antisemitism. For instance, antisemitic incidents surged significantly following the outbreak of violence in the region, with reports indicating a 400% increase in antisemitic incidents in the U.S. shortly after the recent escalation in October 2023.

6. Modern Conspiracy Theories: In contemporary society, antisemitism has been fueled by conspiracy theories that falsely portray Jews as controlling global events, economies, or media. Such narratives have gained traction during crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, where Jews were unjustly blamed for the virus and its consequences.

These historical events illustrate how antisemitism has been a persistent issue, adapting and intensifying in response to societal changes, conflicts, and crises throughout history.

sources:
1. Timeline of antisemitism - Wikipedia
2. Timeline of Antisemitism and the Holocaust – #ItStartedWithWords
3. Antisemitism - Wikipedia
4. You are being redirected...
5. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us...srael-hamas-war-began-report-says-2023-10-25/
6. You are being redirected...
7. Why the Jews: History of Antisemitism - United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
8. Antisemitic incidents on rise across the U.S., report finds
9. Anti-Jewish harassment occurred in 94 countries in 2020, up from earlier years
10. Antisemitism Explained - United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Is Stopping Funding to Universities Failing to Deal with Antisemitism a Good Idea?

True, it can be considered a good idea or solution, but it is also a complex issue with potential drawbacks. Here are some reasons why this approach might be seen as beneficial:

1. Accountability: Cutting funding can serve as a strong message to universities that they must take allegations of antisemitism seriously and actively work to create a safe environment for all students. If institutions are held accountable for failing to address discrimination, it may encourage them to implement more effective policies and practices to combat antisemitism on campus.

2. Compliance with Laws: Federal funding is often contingent upon compliance with anti-discrimination laws. By enforcing funding cuts for universities that do not adhere to these laws, the government can reinforce the importance of maintaining a discrimination-free environment.

3. Encouraging Change: The threat of losing funding may motivate universities to prioritize the issue of antisemitism and take necessary actions to address it. This could lead to improved training for staff, better reporting mechanisms for students, and a more proactive stance against hate speech and discrimination.

However, there are also potential downsides to this approach:

1. Impact on Education: Cutting funding can have significant consequences for all students, including those who may not be involved in or affected by antisemitism. It could lead to reduced resources for academic programs, scholarships, and support services, ultimately harming the educational environment.

2. Polarization: Such actions could further polarize opinions on campus and in society, potentially leading to backlash against perceived censorship or punitive measures. This could create an environment of fear rather than constructive dialogue about antisemitism and discrimination.

3. Complexity of the Issue: Antisemitism is a multifaceted problem that cannot be solved solely through funding cuts. Effective solutions require comprehensive strategies that include education, awareness, and community engagement, rather than punitive measures alone.

In conclusion, while stopping funding to universities that fail to address antisemitism can be seen as a good idea in terms of accountability and compliance, it is essential to consider the broader implications and the need for a more nuanced approach to effectively combat antisemitism on campuses.

 

[Polishprince]

Of course this fascist OP approves of Presidential lawfare.

This has nothing to do with "lawfare".

What this is about is safeguarding America's investment during WW2, where we spent countless billions to fight antisemitism. Why should America be investing in a nazi school, particularly one named after a genocidal maniac from the 15th Century.

I thought libs are against honoring Columbus?

 

[marvin martian]

You cant relabel speech you don’t like as inciting violence to do an end run on the first amendment.

It's not about speech, it's about actions.

 

[gipper]

Not blocking doors to a university and keeping tuition paying students from class... or holding people hostage and busting up the school... are you crazy or what...
Do you hate Israel too?....

Lies. I thought you dumb conservatives distrusted the mainstream media yet with Israel, you believe the media propaganda unquestioningly. How did you get so fucked up?

 

[gipper]

Historical Events That Intensified Antisemitism

Antisemitism has been exacerbated by various historical events throughout the centuries. Here are some key moments that significantly intensified antisemitic sentiments:

1. The First Jewish–Roman War (66-73 CE): This conflict marked a significant turning point in Jewish history, leading to the destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem. The aftermath fostered a narrative of Jewish defeat and persecution, which contributed to long-standing antisemitic attitudes in Roman society and beyond.

2. The Middle Ages: During this period, Jews were often scapegoated for societal problems, including the Black Death, which led to widespread violence and massacres. The blood libel accusations, which falsely claimed that Jews kidnapped and murdered Christian children for ritual purposes, also emerged during this time, further entrenching antisemitic beliefs.

3. The Holocaust (1941-1945): The systematic extermination of six million Jews by the Nazi regime is one of the most horrific manifestations of antisemitism. The Holocaust not only intensified existing antisemitic sentiments but also left a lasting impact on global perceptions of Jews and antisemitism itself.

4. Post-World War II Era: In the aftermath of the Holocaust, while there was a temporary increase in sympathy for Jews, antisemitism persisted and evolved. The establishment of Israel in 1948 led to new forms of antisemitism, often conflating Jewish identity with political actions of the Israeli state, which has been used to justify discrimination against Jews globally.

5. Recent Conflicts: Events such as the Israel-Palestine conflict have also intensified antisemitism. For instance, antisemitic incidents surged significantly following the outbreak of violence in the region, with reports indicating a 400% increase in antisemitic incidents in the U.S. shortly after the recent escalation in October 2023.

6. Modern Conspiracy Theories: In contemporary society, antisemitism has been fueled by conspiracy theories that falsely portray Jews as controlling global events, economies, or media. Such narratives have gained traction during crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, where Jews were unjustly blamed for the virus and its consequences.

These historical events illustrate how antisemitism has been a persistent issue, adapting and intensifying in response to societal changes, conflicts, and crises throughout history.

sources:
1. Timeline of antisemitism - Wikipedia
2. Timeline of Antisemitism and the Holocaust – #ItStartedWithWords
3. Antisemitism - Wikipedia
4. You are being redirected...
5. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us...srael-hamas-war-began-report-says-2023-10-25/
6. You are being redirected...
7. Why the Jews: History of Antisemitism - United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
8. Antisemitic incidents on rise across the U.S., report finds
9. Anti-Jewish harassment occurred in 94 countries in 2020, up from earlier years
10. Antisemitism Explained - United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Is Stopping Funding to Universities Failing to Deal with Antisemitism a Good Idea?

True, it can be considered a good idea or solution, but it is also a complex issue with potential drawbacks. Here are some reasons why this approach might be seen as beneficial:

1. Accountability: Cutting funding can serve as a strong message to universities that they must take allegations of antisemitism seriously and actively work to create a safe environment for all students. If institutions are held accountable for failing to address discrimination, it may encourage them to implement more effective policies and practices to combat antisemitism on campus.

2. Compliance with Laws: Federal funding is often contingent upon compliance with anti-discrimination laws. By enforcing funding cuts for universities that do not adhere to these laws, the government can reinforce the importance of maintaining a discrimination-free environment.

3. Encouraging Change: The threat of losing funding may motivate universities to prioritize the issue of antisemitism and take necessary actions to address it. This could lead to improved training for staff, better reporting mechanisms for students, and a more proactive stance against hate speech and discrimination.

However, there are also potential downsides to this approach:

1. Impact on Education: Cutting funding can have significant consequences for all students, including those who may not be involved in or affected by antisemitism. It could lead to reduced resources for academic programs, scholarships, and support services, ultimately harming the educational environment.

2. Polarization: Such actions could further polarize opinions on campus and in society, potentially leading to backlash against perceived censorship or punitive measures. This could create an environment of fear rather than constructive dialogue about antisemitism and discrimination.

3. Complexity of the Issue: Antisemitism is a multifaceted problem that cannot be solved solely through funding cuts. Effective solutions require comprehensive strategies that include education, awareness, and community engagement, rather than punitive measures alone.

In conclusion, while stopping funding to universities that fail to address antisemitism can be seen as a good idea in terms of accountability and compliance, it is essential to consider the broader implications and the need for a more nuanced approach to effectively combat antisemitism on campuses.

Protesting your mass slaughter of defenseless people is hardly antisemitic.

Nazi traitor!

 

[gipper]

The law is the law... they knew the law.... I just wish the same harsh penalties would be used for liberal protestors and criminals....

You’re supporting violating the First Amendment. You are a traitor.

 

[gipper]

It's not about speech, it's about actions.

Americans have the right to protest their government. No violence was committed by nearly all campus protesters of the genocide you support.

STOP SUPPORTING TYRANNY!

 

[MarathonMike]

President Trump cut $400 million dollars in grants to Columbia for their anti-Semitic stance during the Gaza protests. I don't agree with that. They and ALL the major universities should have their Federal grants cut because they have been gouging students for decades with insane tuition hikes. They are also sitting on massive endowments that they should be using to fund their own research.

https://www.npr.org/2025/03/07/nx-s1-5321326/trump-administration-columbia-university-400-million-cancelled

 

[Dekster]

Tuition has grown so much due in a large part to states cutting real dollar funding for higher education compared to decades ago.

As for grants, whatever. We have all the medical progress we will ever need. Why bother keep fighting cancer. That just means old people will live longer and suck up more money.

 

[JohnDB]

President Trump cut $400 million dollars in grants to Columbia for their anti-Semitic stance during the Gaza protests. I don't agree with that. They and ALL the major universities should have their Federal grants cut because they have been gouging students for decades with insane tuition hikes. They are also sitting on massive endowments that they should be using to fund their own research.

https://www.npr.org/2025/03/07/nx-s1-5321326/trump-administration-columbia-university-400-million-cancelled

Ahhhh



Large Universities, like Columbia, are not a single entity....they are multiple entities grouped together.



Columbia has a hospital medical center associated with the educational center. Out of this hospital they also do medical research that likely barely breaks even if profitable at all. Most usually operate in the negative. (Medicare and Medicaid patients)



The education portion of Columbia University is highly profitable. The Medical Center usually loses money.

The Education program is over-funded with endowments, low cost loans, underpaid professors, guaranteed student loans and high fees (outside of tuition fees)



Meanwhile the Medical Center is saddled with high insurance costs for malpractice insurance, medical waste disposal, indigent patients, medical billing costs skyrocketing, and low Medicare Medicaid payment schedules. But having this medical center associated closely with Columbia University helps attract the medical students as well as the ongoing research attracting staff and students interested in the pure science.



For most universities, medical research is a money losing proposition. It costs somewhere around $9,000 per patient just to enroll them into medical research. (High end software costs, database management, and medical history records maintenance for the foreseeable future)

 

[MarathonMike]

Tuition has grown so much due in a large part to states cutting real dollar funding for higher education compared to decades ago.

As for grants, whatever. We have all the medical progress we will ever need. Why bother keep fighting cancer. That just means old people will live longer and suck up more money.

Focus. The point is to stop WASTING billions in OUR tax dollars providing funds to ultra-rich universities. They have plenty of money to fund their own research.

 

[JohnDB]

Focus. The point is to stop WASTING billions in OUR tax dollars providing funds to ultra-rich universities. They have plenty of money to fund their own research.

They do not.

Any large scale study involves roughly 1,000+ patients. @ $9K pp....that's 9 million dollars just to enroll patients. Then anything else you do to those patients costs more with staff, medicines, and records. Review panels and etc.

 

[jknowgood]

This is a great start and it needs to hit every one of these universities that allow these circuses to continue. Protesting is a protected right. Vandalizing property, storming in and shutting down classrooms, engaging in threats, intimidation, violence and bigotry is not protesting. Had these demonstrations been against any other group than Jews they would have never been allowed to proliferate the way they did. The universities need to be bled dry of their funding until order has been restored. The students involved need to be expelled and anyone here on a student visa deported back home.

Trump cuts more than $400 million in grants to Columbia over antisemitism concerns, potentially more to come

The Trump administration announced today it will be rescinding more than $400 million in federal grant dollars that would have gone to Columbia, amidst concerns about increased antisemitism on campus and the school's inability to control it.

www.foxnews.com

You're starting to sound more like a republican everyday!

 

[MarathonMike]

They do not.

Any large scale study involves roughly 1,000+ patients. @ $9K pp....that's 9 million dollars just to enroll patients. Then anything else you do to those patients costs more with staff, medicines, and records. Review panels and etc.

Sure they do. They take in billions every year, they are awash in money. Cut the funding, maybe not all of it but most of it and make the cash cows pony up the rest.