Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 79,653
- 84,200
- 3,615
Still waiting for what?It's prosecuted under hate crimes.Again, you aren't understanding the thrust of that ruling.Sorry, but you apparently don't understand your own link.No. Hate speech has a legal definition.Hate speech defined by you is what you don’t want to become informed of or disagree withTell your conservative voices not to lie or use hate speech. Then they won't get "shut down".Not irrelevant at all! Every time Twitter or some big authoritarian tech giant shuts out conservative voicesThis is pretty weak. Twitter is not considered the speaker of content published on their platform. That’s the law. Whether they delete something or not is irrelevant.
and lets some leftist voice speak instead they are expressing a preference and their opinion.
Twitter depends entirely on the posts of others and that means they produce virtually no content of their
own and supposedly have a duty to express all points of view.
Sorry about your luck.
Not in this country, fucko.
No?
For something to have a "legal definition" it has to be recognized in a court of law. The highest court in the land has deemed there is no such thing as hate speech, therefore your claims of a legal definition for such are completely bunk.
Sit down, moron.
It doesn't say what you think it does.
Maybe 3 years of supporting tRump has completely destroyed your ability to think for yourself.
Then prove me wrong, assclown. Show us a US court case where someone was convicted of hate speech. Should be super easy, since there's a "legal definition, dontcha know...
Hate Crime Laws
www.justice.gov
Swing and a miss, bozo. Once again, show us a case of someone being convicted of hate speech.
Pssssst.
Still waiting....