It's the big BOLDED figure on top. 85 BILLION as in B.
More than the 75 BILLION you claimed the US spend. A number as of January 2024, so NOT counting the 50 odd BILLION contributed in February.
As for relevance. Be obtuse as much as you want. But contributing these funds, so NATO doesn't have to provide manpower is the exact tactic the US is employing. It's funny how you somehow think that military support by the country members of NATO is NOT a part of NATO strategy. Does that work for everything? I see no such distinction when the US uses its military expenditure to lambast other NATO countries.