Trump Challenges Equal Endowment Of Birthright Citizenship For Children Of Illegal Migrants

" Statistical Probabilities For An Expected Value Of Carrying Capacity "

* Not A Requirement That Citizens Of Nation States Be Dictated To Behave As Communists *

I didn’t say that. I have taught and tutored immigrant students - often in their homes - for decades. Got to know them and their families well. I know what I'm talking about.
None are objecting to and are congratulating charity , though it is especially suggested that a missionary practices its volition abroad , rather than disregarding the autonomy of nation states , by inundating its member subjects with an illegal immigration system , such that citizens are deprived to implement a standard of merit based immigration intended by a legal immigration system ,

Why is an expectation for repatriation to nations of origin outside of reason , when changes in a status of governance or economic opportunities for some nation of origin can change ?

Why is there not an expectation that " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " , from us 14th amendment , not be applied correctly to issue jus sangunin citizenship to children born in the us of illegal migrants ?

* Obligated Elsewhere Social Dependents *

About 50% of sojourners whom are not subjects by title in us legal immigration system maintain an employer identification number and pay us taxes ; social security totalization is applied , and the irs does not report the legality of immigration status to immigration services .

While migrant export of us dollars to family members in nations of origin may help to support the us dollar as a reserve currency , if the us dollar is devalued by an inability of the us to repatriate foreign nationals and through debt created by social dependents , by a debase application of " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " , then the us dollar will be devalued for use as a reserve currency ,

Dedollarisation refers to countries reducing reliance on the U.S. dollar as a reserve currency, medium of exchange or as a unit of account.[1]
 
Last edited:
" Basic Expectations For Nation Sovereignty Versus Dementia Of Sanctimonious Humanists "

* Dissolution Seeds Of Gluttony For Myopic Vanity *

" Statistical Probabilities For An Expected Value Of Carrying Capacity "

* Obligated Elsewhere Social Dependents *


Dedollarisation refers to countries reducing reliance on the U.S. dollar as a reserve currency, medium of exchange or as a unit of account.[1]
Communists , with an authoritarian ego expecting blind obedience to sanctimonious dictates for morose idealism , seek to implement indiscriminate immigration , without regard to the sovereignty of us citizens , except to increase dependents on us citizens , and thereby satiate the communist pride for theft .


* Cash Markets On Social Subsistence Below Commerce Creditors Radar Billing Real Property Owners Billed*

The US dollar's position in global reserves is often questioned because of the growing share of unallocated reserves, and because of the doubt regarding dollar stability in the long term.[22][23] However, in the aftermath of the 2008 to 2010 financial crisis, the dollar's share in the world's foreign-exchange trades rose slightly from 85% in 2010 to 87% in 2013.[24][better source needed][needs update]

The dollar's role as the undisputed reserve currency of the world allows the United States to impose unilateral sanctions against actions performed between other countries, for example the American fine against BNP Paribas for violations of U.S. sanctions that were not laws of France or the other countries involved in the transactions.[25] In 2014, China and Russia signed a 150 billion yuan central bank liquidity swap line agreement to get around European and American sanctions on their behaviors.
[26]

The euro is currently the second most commonly held reserve currency, representing about 20% of international foreign currency reserves.

As of 30 September 2021, the pound sterling represented the fourth largest proportion (by USD equivalent value) of foreign currency reserves and 4.78% of those reserves.[35]

The Chinese renminbi officially became a supplementary forex reserve asset on 1 October 2016.[38] It represents 10.92% of the IMF's Special Drawing Rights (SDR) currency basket.[39][40] The Chinese renmimbi is the third reserve currency after the U.S. dollar and euro within the basket of currencies in the SDR.[39] (As shown in the table above, the renmimbi is the fifth largest component of international currency reserves.)
 
Last edited:
Nope all the court has to recognize is that illegal aliens, like current tourists and diplomats (Diplomats and their families are specifically mentioned as NOT being covered) owe allegiance to their home country. By the way, that is the standard for most of the civilized world.

Here is a list of all the countries that allow birthright citizenship:

Antigua and Barbuda
2Argentina
3Barbados
4Belize
5Bolivia
6Brazil
7Canada
8Chile
9Cuba
10Dominica
11Ecuador
12El Salvador
13Fiji
14Grenada
15Guatemala
16Guyana
17Honduras
18Jamaica
19Mexico
20Nicaragua
21Panama
22Paraguay
23Peru
24Saint Kitts and Nevis
25Saint Lucia
26Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
27Trinidad and Tobago
28United States
29Uruguay
30Venezuela
You might notice that of the thirty, only Canada and the USA are first world countries.
And I wouldn't be surprised if Trump has bought citizenship to one of those other ones for tax purposes. A of rich people have.
 
* Parents Of Skim Wrong Arc Were Self Sufficient Legal Migrants *

* Preponderance Of Additional Meaning From The Term ' Thereof ' *

Who said anything about changing it?
How about honoring it?
With respect to the us 14th amendment clause " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " , a judicial analysis of the entire clause requires that the term " thereof " be evaluated beyond a conjecture that only " and subject to the jurisdiction " be the basis of analysis .

The term " thereof " includes a connotation that an individual is also a subject of us jurisdiction , and not simply subject to it by virtue of being within its domain of ability to enforce law .

A migrant with legal visa is required to maintain self sufficient standing and migrants which are not self sufficient and with a legal visa can be deported , and migrants without a legal visa are not valid subjects by title in us legal immigration system , especially when including self sufficiency as a criteria for legal migrant status .

A migrant that is not a valid subject of us jurisdiction is not included as a subject by title on an official ledger of invitation , based on meritorious expectation towards self sufficiency and independence of individuals within us republic , and is defined as a non legal subject by title of us jurisdiction , such are therefore non legal migirants , or illegal migrants .

As migrants whom are not subjects by title in us legal immigration system , their offspring are to receive citizenship , jus sanguinis in the nation of origin for the mother , rather than jus solis in etas unis .

The motivation to conscript 18 years of social subsistence through jus solis citizenship violates equal protection , in equal protection is espoused for all individuals even through to deporation , however citizenship is a positive liberty and unequally endowed to citizens for safety and security .
 
* Parents Of Skim Wrong Arc Were Self Sufficient Legal Migrants *

* Preponderance Of Additional Meaning From The Term ' Thereof ' *


With respect to the us 14th amendment clause " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " , a judicial analysis of the entire clause requires that the term " thereof " be evaluated beyond a conjecture that only " and subject to the jurisdiction " be the basis of analysis .

The term " thereof " includes a connotation that an individual is also a subject of us jurisdiction , and not simply subject to it by virtue of being within its domain of ability to enforce law .

A migrant with legal visa is required to maintain self sufficient standing and migrants which are not self sufficient and with a legal visa can be deported , and migrants without a legal visa are not valid subjects by title in us legal immigration system , especially when including self sufficiency as a criteria for legal migrant status .

A migrant that is not a valid subject of us jurisdiction is not included as a subject by title on an official ledger of invitation , based on meritorious expectation towards self sufficiency and independence of individuals within us republic , is defined as a non legal subject by title of us jurisdiction , such are therefore non legal migirants , or illegal migrants .

As migrants whom are not subjects by title in us legal immigration system , their offspring are to receive citizenship , jus sanguinis in the nation of origin for the mother , rather than jus solis in etas unis .

The motivation to conscript 18 years of social subsistence through jus solis citizenship violates equal protection , in equal protection is espoused for all individuals even through to deporation , however citizenship is a positive liberty and unequally endowed to citizens for safety and security .

There ya go
 
* Parents Of Skim Wrong Arc Were Self Sufficient Legal Migrants *

* Preponderance Of Additional Meaning From The Term ' Thereof ' *


With respect to the us 14th amendment clause " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " , a judicial analysis of the entire clause requires that the term " thereof " be evaluated beyond a conjecture that only " and subject to the jurisdiction " be the basis of analysis .

The term " thereof " includes a connotation that an individual is also a subject of us jurisdiction , and not simply subject to it by virtue of being within its domain of ability to enforce law .

A migrant with legal visa is required to maintain self sufficient standing and migrants which are not self sufficient and with a legal visa can be deported , and migrants without a legal visa are not valid subjects by title in us legal immigration system , especially when including self sufficiency as a criteria for legal migrant status .

A migrant that is not a valid subject of us jurisdiction is not included as a subject by title on an official ledger of invitation , based on meritorious expectation towards self sufficiency and independence of individuals within us republic , and is defined as a non legal subject by title of us jurisdiction , such are therefore non legal migirants , or illegal migrants .

As migrants whom are not subjects by title in us legal immigration system , their offspring are to receive citizenship , jus sanguinis in the nation of origin for the mother , rather than jus solis in etas unis .

The motivation to conscript 18 years of social subsistence through jus solis citizenship violates equal protection , in equal protection is espoused for all individuals even through to deporation , however citizenship is a positive liberty and unequally endowed to citizens for safety and security .
An opinion, and an inaccurate one, at tat.
 
Last edited:
* Parents Of Skim Wrong Arc Were Self Sufficient Legal Migrants *

* Preponderance Of Additional Meaning From The Term ' Thereof ' *


With respect to the us 14th amendment clause " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " , a judicial analysis of the entire clause requires that the term " thereof " be evaluated beyond a conjecture that only " and subject to the jurisdiction " be the basis of analysis .

The term " thereof " includes a connotation that an individual is also a subject of us jurisdiction , and not simply subject to it by virtue of being within its domain of ability to enforce law .

A migrant with legal visa is required to maintain self sufficient standing and migrants which are not self sufficient and with a legal visa can be deported , and migrants without a legal visa are not valid subjects by title in us legal immigration system , especially when including self sufficiency as a criteria for legal migrant status .

A migrant that is not a valid subject of us jurisdiction is not included as a subject by title on an official ledger of invitation , based on meritorious expectation towards self sufficiency and independence of individuals within us republic , and is defined as a non legal subject by title of us jurisdiction , such are therefore non legal migirants , or illegal migrants .

As migrants whom are not subjects by title in us legal immigration system , their offspring are to receive citizenship , jus sanguinis in the nation of origin for the mother , rather than jus solis in etas unis .

The motivation to conscript 18 years of social subsistence through jus solis citizenship violates equal protection , in equal protection is espoused for all individuals even through to deporation , however citizenship is a positive liberty and unequally endowed to citizens for safety and security .
1733874020660.webp
 
" Executive Has Everything To Do With Enforcing Current Constitutional Law "

* Citizenship For Foreign Nationals Without Allegiance *

You have no basis in law for such authority by the executive.
The incompetence lays with politicians who have failed to setup a system where children of illegal migrants are provided citizenship to the country or maternal origin , as individuals without citizenship in some country is another problem .

The constitution stipulates the requirement that the parents of a child born in the us must be a subject of etas unis , a subject by title in us legal immigration system , or a us citizen , in order to receive citizenship jus soli .
 
Back
Top Bottom