T
my favorite line for that is "8 YEARS OF LIBERAL CONTROL AND NOW NO ONE KNOWS WHICH BATHROOMS TO USE"
If you use the liberal term meddling it is exactly what liberals are talking about, the entire reason they call it "meddling" is because it is broad enough to mean whatever they want it to mean because there is no proof of trump being complicit in a crime, where as there is plenty of proof of the mayor of london meddling in the election
which are? be as specific as you can
once again a liberal education rears its ugly head
No he "meddled" in it right out in the open on television, antonio knew exactly what I was talking about.
Parts of the dossier were verified. You have no evidence that unverified parts were presented to the FISC.
That had nothing whatsoever to do with President Trump's campaign other than an excuse to illegally listen in to people in the Trump campaign.
If they had so much on Carter Page, why did they need to use the phony dossier bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC?
Who was colluding?
How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claimsParts of the dossier were verified. You have no evidence that unverified parts were presented to the FISC.
That had nothing whatsoever to do with President Trump's campaign other than an excuse to illegally listen in to people in the Trump campaign.
If they had so much on Carter Page, why did they need to use the phony dossier bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC?
Who was colluding?
Show me in a link, evidence used for the dossier, where a private citizen’s actions of communications and meetings of suspicious illegal activity connected to a foreign government power has been collaberated and verified by the CIA. Evidence that is not supported solely by a paid retired British operative as the only foreign intelligence source. A government agency who’s business is in uncovering government threats, the sharing of information, and knowledgeable in known foreign operatives that can be specifically linked to the Kremlin. Any information that can be collaberated by Secret Intelligence Service (MI-6), CIA, someone involved in the gathering of foreign intelligence for personal or national gain. Again a independent foreign source that is “credible”, with integrity that is not left to question, that can not be in any way traced to a certain political party's Wallet.
Of course she lost because of Comey. Her double- digit lead in the polls evaporated after the FBI reopened the case.LOLLOL
Great, now compare that with, ”Manafort was tapped at his apartment in Trump tower,” to see why you’ve exposed yourself yet again to the forum that you’re nothing but an unabashed liar.
if the Mueller committee did not get the dirt on Manafort by wiretapping his apartment in TRump tower, where did they get it? You don't know, I don't know. But based on CNN and WAsh post, it could have been obtained by tapping Trump tower.
eventually we will know the truth.
But you never explained why you are so full of hate. Can you explain that now?
the FBI was complicit in trying to help Hillary win. of course they would say that.
The same FBI that cost her the election by publicly announcing they were reopening the investigation into her email server; while Americans were voting???
Dayam, you’re ******* crazy too.
she did not lose because of Comey
she lost because
1. she was a terrible candidate
2. she has a history of lying and corruption
3. she is old and sick
4. Obama was a terrible president
5. Trump appealed to blue collar America of all races
6. Voters wanted a business approach to government
7. americans are fed up with the lying media
8. The DNC shit on Bernie
Do you think it matters if an unabashed liar like you denies reality?
How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claimsParts of the dossier were verified. You have no evidence that unverified parts were presented to the FISC.
That had nothing whatsoever to do with President Trump's campaign other than an excuse to illegally listen in to people in the Trump campaign.
If they had so much on Carter Page, why did they need to use the phony dossier bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC?
Who was colluding?
Show me in a link, evidence used for the dossier, where a private citizen’s actions of communications and meetings of suspicious illegal activity connected to a foreign government power has been collaberated and verified by the CIA. Evidence that is not supported solely by a paid retired British operative as the only foreign intelligence source. A government agency who’s business is in uncovering government threats, the sharing of information, and knowledgeable in known foreign operatives that can be specifically linked to the Kremlin. Any information that can be collaberated by Secret Intelligence Service (MI-6), CIA, someone involved in the gathering of foreign intelligence for personal or national gain. Again a independent foreign source that is “credible”, with integrity that is not left to question, that can not be in any way traced to a certain political party's Wallet.
Verified: Former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page met with representatives of Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Verified: The Kremlin targeted educated youth and swing state voters during its cyber attacks in the 2016 campaign.
Verified: Trump maintains ties to rich businessmen from Azerbaijan.
dude, it takes two thirds of the senate to remove him. It ain't ever going to happen. it's why our FF's wrote the language that way. you can jerk off all day on your thought, but it ain't ever gonna happen. what a waste of money.
Trump’s won because of Comey.Of course she lost because of Comey. Her double- digit lead in the polls evaporated after the FBI reopened the case.LOL
The same FBI that cost her the election by publicly announcing they were reopening the investigation into her email server; while Americans were voting???
Dayam, you’re ******* crazy too.
she did not lose because of Comey
she lost because
1. she was a terrible candidate
2. she has a history of lying and corruption
3. she is old and sick
4. Obama was a terrible president
5. Trump appealed to blue collar America of all races
6. Voters wanted a business approach to government
7. americans are fed up with the lying media
8. The DNC shit on Bernie
Do you think it matters if an unabashed liar like you denies reality?
The truth about Hillary and her corrupt campaign doomed her. Doesn't really matter where the truth came from does it? the American people rejected her, Obama, democrat socialism, the lying media, and the corrupt cheating DNC.
Trump won because the American people are tired of lying do-nothing wash establishment pukes that are only in it to enrich themselves and to cater to their funders.
Trump cannot be bought, he is not a member of the establishment. that is why both parties are trying to bring him down. He is the first independent president we have had in a long long time.
He didn't need the presidency to get rich, he already was. he didn't need it to become famous, he already was. He didn't need it for power, he already had it.
He is trying to fix the mess created by years of incompetence by both parties, and the corruption that we all know dominates DC.
You hate him because he beat crooked Hillary, and because he isn't a polished politician who can talk all day and say nothing. He is a real person, talks like a real American, and you lefties cannot stand that. What does that say about you?
You know you’re brain-dead? Where did I say that 46K swung the election?? I didn’t. You’re obviously listening to your hallucinations and not what I’m saying because what I said is that Comey swung the election.How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claimsParts of the dossier were verified. You have no evidence that unverified parts were presented to the FISC.
That had nothing whatsoever to do with President Trump's campaign other than an excuse to illegally listen in to people in the Trump campaign.
If they had so much on Carter Page, why did they need to use the phony dossier bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC?
Who was colluding?
Show me in a link, evidence used for the dossier, where a private citizen’s actions of communications and meetings of suspicious illegal activity connected to a foreign government power has been collaberated and verified by the CIA. Evidence that is not supported solely by a paid retired British operative as the only foreign intelligence source. A government agency who’s business is in uncovering government threats, the sharing of information, and knowledgeable in known foreign operatives that can be specifically linked to the Kremlin. Any information that can be collaberated by Secret Intelligence Service (MI-6), CIA, someone involved in the gathering of foreign intelligence for personal or national gain. Again a independent foreign source that is “credible”, with integrity that is not left to question, that can not be in any way traced to a certain political party's Wallet.
Verified: Former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page met with representatives of Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft.
Verified: The Kremlin targeted educated youth and swing state voters during its cyber attacks in the 2016 campaign.
Verified: Trump maintains ties to rich businessmen from Azerbaijan.
Russian interests spent 46 thousand dollars putting crap on facebook. The dem machine spent hundreds of millions doing the same thing, and you are saying that 46K swung the election? Do you understand how stupid that sounds?
