Trump boom - 2.3% growth for 2017, slowest job growth in 6 years

[Aldo Raine]

We went to 9% on a quarterly basis under Reagan, and I believe he had over 5% on a yearly bases one year.

The Reagan MYTH keeps growing with each telling. St Ronnie averaged 3.5% yearly GDP growth, well behind Johnson 5.3%, Kennedy 4.3%, and Clinton 3.9%.

That isn't "well behind Clinton," and his performance was purely the result of the low tax rates Reagan setup, and the peace dividend that allowed him to slash military spending. He can also thank Reagan for that.

Democrats make the economy grow by getting us into wars.

You do know that your sainted Ronnie Raygun raised taxes after ******* up and cutting them, right?

 

[Aldo Raine]

Don't really care who you give credit for 3 point more or less growth, what I see is that the super rich own & control more & more of everything, while the majority of the population is treading water or slipping back.

And this is the biggest problem in the country. Not taxes so much as stagnant wages for the working class. The uber wealthy gett more and more while the working class gets less and less.

You can blame all the new "immigrants" for that, and you promote more immigration. You lament is fundamentally hypocritical.

Automation is to blame for the biggest part of it actually.

 

[bripat9643]

It's already been established that 2.3% is the Obama economy. Over 3% is the Trump economy.

Why did Trump start taking credit for the DOW on election day? When it's been on a steady rise since 2009.

Because he's atributing that to investors having confidence in the economy in the future. Investing is a bet on future growth.

 

[bripat9643]

We went to 9% on a quarterly basis under Reagan, and I believe he had over 5% on a yearly bases one year.

The Reagan MYTH keeps growing with each telling. St Ronnie averaged 3.5% yearly GDP growth, well behind Johnson 5.3%, Kennedy 4.3%, and Clinton 3.9%.

That isn't "well behind Clinton," and his performance was purely the result of the low tax rates Reagan setup, and the peace dividend that allowed him to slash military spending. He can also thank Reagan for that.

Democrats make the economy grow by getting us into wars.

You do know that your sainted Ronnie Raygun raised taxes after ******* up and cutting them, right?

The net result for his administration was a drastic cut in taxes. Snowflake douchebags have been whining about it ever since. On the one hand you blame his tax cuts for the deficits in the 1980s. On the other hand you claim he increased taxes. You're talking out of both sides of your mouth. Which is it? Did he raise taxes or lower them?

 

[bripat9643]

Don't really care who you give credit for 3 point more or less growth, what I see is that the super rich own & control more & more of everything, while the majority of the population is treading water or slipping back.

And this is the biggest problem in the country. Not taxes so much as stagnant wages for the working class. The uber wealthy gett more and more while the working class gets less and less.

You can blame all the new "immigrants" for that, and you promote more immigration. You lament is fundamentally hypocritical.

Automation is to blame for the biggest part of it actually.

Nope. Automation isn't responsible for the fact that STEM salaries have been stagnate for the last 15 years.

 

[Dragonlady]

The economy grew at a 2.6 percent rate to end 2017, the Department of Commerce reported...For all of 2017, GDP growth was 2.3 percent

GDP growth slowed to 2.6 percent to end 2017


Dang! That Trump fella sure turned things around!

Fascinating to watch you elementary minds frame shit like you do....even more fascinating to watch your loonie buddies cheer retarded shit like this on.....haha.
I’m sure you thought you were being super clever with this one...huh? Haha....Okay, here’s your free lesson...use your heads and follow along...you learned this shit in third grade....in 2011 the unemployment rate was 9%, with no place to go but down, especially with $10 trillion pumped into the economy. ‘Full employment’ is considered to be around the 5% mark....so what do you fuckin retards think happens once full employment is reached? Do you think growth trajectory starts to taper off?

oo, post: 19149821, member: 57834"]The economy grew at a 2.6 percent rate to end 2017, the Department of Commerce reported...For all of 2017, GDP growth was 2.3 percent

GDP growth slowed to 2.6 percent to end 2017


Dang! That Trump fella sure turned things around!

Fascinating to watch you elementary minds frame shit like you do....even more fascinating to watch your loonie buddies cheer retarded shit like this on.....haha.
I’m sure you thought you were being super clever with this one...huh? Haha....Okay, here’s your free lesson...use your heads and follow along...you learned this shit in third grade....in 2011 the unemployment rate was 9%, with no place to go but down, especially with $10 trillion pumped into the economy. ‘Full employment’ is considered to be around the 5% mark....so what do you fuckin retards think happens once full employment is reached? Do you think growth trajectory starts to taper off?

Dumbass it was obvious to ANYONE WITH HALF A BRAIN that at full employment Trump can't possibly grow jobs faster than Obama.

Which why Trump's job promises, and you idiots taking that clown seriously was so ******* laughable.

The idiocy of cutting taxes with full employment is seldom mentioned.

Trump talks about all of these jobs to be created by these tax cuts. Who’s going to fill these new jobs if you’ve already achieved full employment? Especially considering he’s cutting immigration by 50%.

What kind of idiots apply stimulus to a booming economy with full employment? What’s worse is they’re going into debt to pay for this stimulus.

 

[bripat9643]

The economy grew at a 2.6 percent rate to end 2017, the Department of Commerce reported...For all of 2017, GDP growth was 2.3 percent

GDP growth slowed to 2.6 percent to end 2017


Dang! That Trump fella sure turned things around!

Fascinating to watch you elementary minds frame shit like you do....even more fascinating to watch your loonie buddies cheer retarded shit like this on.....haha.
I’m sure you thought you were being super clever with this one...huh? Haha....Okay, here’s your free lesson...use your heads and follow along...you learned this shit in third grade....in 2011 the unemployment rate was 9%, with no place to go but down, especially with $10 trillion pumped into the economy. ‘Full employment’ is considered to be around the 5% mark....so what do you fuckin retards think happens once full employment is reached? Do you think growth trajectory starts to taper off?

oo, post: 19149821, member: 57834"]The economy grew at a 2.6 percent rate to end 2017, the Department of Commerce reported...For all of 2017, GDP growth was 2.3 percent

GDP growth slowed to 2.6 percent to end 2017


Dang! That Trump fella sure turned things around!

Fascinating to watch you elementary minds frame shit like you do....even more fascinating to watch your loonie buddies cheer retarded shit like this on.....haha.
I’m sure you thought you were being super clever with this one...huh? Haha....Okay, here’s your free lesson...use your heads and follow along...you learned this shit in third grade....in 2011 the unemployment rate was 9%, with no place to go but down, especially with $10 trillion pumped into the economy. ‘Full employment’ is considered to be around the 5% mark....so what do you fuckin retards think happens once full employment is reached? Do you think growth trajectory starts to taper off?

Dumbass it was obvious to ANYONE WITH HALF A BRAIN that at full employment Trump can't possibly grow jobs faster than Obama.

Which why Trump's job promises, and you idiots taking that clown seriously was so ******* laughable.

The idiocy of cutting taxes with full employment is seldom mentioned.

Trump talks about all of these jobs to be created by these tax cuts. Who’s going to fill these new jobs if you’ve already achieved full employment? Especially considering he’s cutting immigration by 50%.

What kind of idiots apply stimulus to a booming economy with full employment? What’s worse is they’re going into debt to apply this stimulus.

It's "idiocy" only from the point of view of parasites who view my paycheck as their property. Cutting taxes is always smart. Always. The less money politicians have to play with, the better.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Fascinating to watch you elementary minds frame shit like you do....even more fascinating to watch your loonie buddies cheer retarded shit like this on.....haha.
I’m sure you thought you were being super clever with this one...huh? Haha....Okay, here’s your free lesson...use your heads and follow along...you learned this shit in third grade....in 2011 the unemployment rate was 9%, with no place to go but down, especially with $10 trillion pumped into the economy. ‘Full employment’ is considered to be around the 5% mark....so what do you fuckin retards think happens once full employment is reached? Do you think growth trajectory starts to taper off?

oo, post: 19149821, member: 57834"]The economy grew at a 2.6 percent rate to end 2017, the Department of Commerce reported...For all of 2017, GDP growth was 2.3 percent

GDP growth slowed to 2.6 percent to end 2017


Dang! That Trump fella sure turned things around!

Fascinating to watch you elementary minds frame shit like you do....even more fascinating to watch your loonie buddies cheer retarded shit like this on.....haha.
I’m sure you thought you were being super clever with this one...huh? Haha....Okay, here’s your free lesson...use your heads and follow along...you learned this shit in third grade....in 2011 the unemployment rate was 9%, with no place to go but down, especially with $10 trillion pumped into the economy. ‘Full employment’ is considered to be around the 5% mark....so what do you fuckin retards think happens once full employment is reached? Do you think growth trajectory starts to taper off?

Dumbass it was obvious to ANYONE WITH HALF A BRAIN that at full employment Trump can't possibly grow jobs faster than Obama.

Which why Trump's job promises, and you idiots taking that clown seriously was so ******* laughable.

The idiocy of cutting taxes with full employment is seldom mentioned.

Trump talks about all of these jobs to be created by these tax cuts. Who’s going to fill these new jobs if you’ve already achieved full employment? Especially considering he’s cutting immigration by 50%.

What kind of idiots apply stimulus to a booming economy with full employment? What’s worse is they’re going into debt to apply this stimulus.

It's "idiocy" only from the point of view of parasites who view my paycheck as their property. Cutting taxes is always smart. Always. The less money politicians have to play with, the better.

But cutting taxes does not give them less money to play with, it just means they are borrowing more from our children and grandchildren.

Cutting taxes is only a good idea when there is an accompanying cut in spending.

 

[Aldo Raine]

We went to 9% on a quarterly basis under Reagan, and I believe he had over 5% on a yearly bases one year.

The Reagan MYTH keeps growing with each telling. St Ronnie averaged 3.5% yearly GDP growth, well behind Johnson 5.3%, Kennedy 4.3%, and Clinton 3.9%.

That isn't "well behind Clinton," and his performance was purely the result of the low tax rates Reagan setup, and the peace dividend that allowed him to slash military spending. He can also thank Reagan for that.

Democrats make the economy grow by getting us into wars.

You do know that your sainted Ronnie Raygun raised taxes after ******* up and cutting them, right?

The net result for his administration was a drastic cut in taxes. Snowflake douchebags have been whining about it ever since. On the one hand you blame his tax cuts for the deficits in the 1980s. On the other hand you claim he increased taxes. You're talking out of both sides of your mouth. Which is it? Did he raise taxes or lower them?

He did both putz.

 

[bripat9643]

oo, post: 19149821, member: 57834"]The economy grew at a 2.6 percent rate to end 2017, the Department of Commerce reported...For all of 2017, GDP growth was 2.3 percent

GDP growth slowed to 2.6 percent to end 2017


Dang! That Trump fella sure turned things around!

Fascinating to watch you elementary minds frame shit like you do....even more fascinating to watch your loonie buddies cheer retarded shit like this on.....haha.
I’m sure you thought you were being super clever with this one...huh? Haha....Okay, here’s your free lesson...use your heads and follow along...you learned this shit in third grade....in 2011 the unemployment rate was 9%, with no place to go but down, especially with $10 trillion pumped into the economy. ‘Full employment’ is considered to be around the 5% mark....so what do you fuckin retards think happens once full employment is reached? Do you think growth trajectory starts to taper off?

Dumbass it was obvious to ANYONE WITH HALF A BRAIN that at full employment Trump can't possibly grow jobs faster than Obama.

Which why Trump's job promises, and you idiots taking that clown seriously was so ******* laughable.

The idiocy of cutting taxes with full employment is seldom mentioned.

Trump talks about all of these jobs to be created by these tax cuts. Who’s going to fill these new jobs if you’ve already achieved full employment? Especially considering he’s cutting immigration by 50%.

What kind of idiots apply stimulus to a booming economy with full employment? What’s worse is they’re going into debt to apply this stimulus.

It's "idiocy" only from the point of view of parasites who view my paycheck as their property. Cutting taxes is always smart. Always. The less money politicians have to play with, the better.

But cutting taxes does not give them less money to play with, it just means they are borrowing more from our children and grandchildren.

Cutting taxes is only a good idea when there is an accompanying cut in spending.

Cutting taxes makes it difficult for politicians to justify new spending. You just admitted that it doesn't matter whether the money they spend comes from taxes or borrowing.

Politicians have never cut spending. Never.

 

[bripat9643]

We went to 9% on a quarterly basis under Reagan, and I believe he had over 5% on a yearly bases one year.

The Reagan MYTH keeps growing with each telling. St Ronnie averaged 3.5% yearly GDP growth, well behind Johnson 5.3%, Kennedy 4.3%, and Clinton 3.9%.

That isn't "well behind Clinton," and his performance was purely the result of the low tax rates Reagan setup, and the peace dividend that allowed him to slash military spending. He can also thank Reagan for that.

Democrats make the economy grow by getting us into wars.

You do know that your sainted Ronnie Raygun raised taxes after ******* up and cutting them, right?

The net result for his administration was a drastic cut in taxes. Snowflake douchebags have been whining about it ever since. On the one hand you blame his tax cuts for the deficits in the 1980s. On the other hand you claim he increased taxes. You're talking out of both sides of your mouth. Which is it? Did he raise taxes or lower them?

He did both putz.

ROFL! I knew you would talk out of both sides of your mouth.

What was the net result of his administration, lower taxes or higher taxes?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Cutting taxes makes it difficult for politicians to justify new spending. You just admitted that it doesn't matter whether the money they spend comes from taxes or borrowing.

Politicians have never cut spending. Never.

You know this yet you are perfectly fine with ******* over future generations for an extra sawbuck or two a month. I do not understand that poisition

 

[boedicca]

The economy grew at a 2.6 percent rate to end 2017, the Department of Commerce reported...For all of 2017, GDP growth was 2.3 percent

GDP growth slowed to 2.6 percent to end 2017


Dang! That Trump fella sure turned things around!

Fascinating to watch you elementary minds frame shit like you do....even more fascinating to watch your loonie buddies cheer retarded shit like this on.....haha.
I’m sure you thought you were being super clever with this one...huh? Haha....Okay, here’s your free lesson...use your heads and follow along...you learned this shit in third grade....in 2011 the unemployment rate was 9%, with no place to go but down, especially with $10 trillion pumped into the economy. ‘Full employment’ is considered to be around the 5% mark....so what do you fuckin retards think happens once full employment is reached? Do you think growth trajectory starts to taper off?

oo, post: 19149821, member: 57834"]The economy grew at a 2.6 percent rate to end 2017, the Department of Commerce reported...For all of 2017, GDP growth was 2.3 percent

GDP growth slowed to 2.6 percent to end 2017


Dang! That Trump fella sure turned things around!

Fascinating to watch you elementary minds frame shit like you do....even more fascinating to watch your loonie buddies cheer retarded shit like this on.....haha.
I’m sure you thought you were being super clever with this one...huh? Haha....Okay, here’s your free lesson...use your heads and follow along...you learned this shit in third grade....in 2011 the unemployment rate was 9%, with no place to go but down, especially with $10 trillion pumped into the economy. ‘Full employment’ is considered to be around the 5% mark....so what do you fuckin retards think happens once full employment is reached? Do you think growth trajectory starts to taper off?

Dumbass it was obvious to ANYONE WITH HALF A BRAIN that at full employment Trump can't possibly grow jobs faster than Obama.

Which why Trump's job promises, and you idiots taking that clown seriously was so ******* laughable.

The idiocy of cutting taxes with full employment is seldom mentioned.

Trump talks about all of these jobs to be created by these tax cuts. Who’s going to fill these new jobs if you’ve already achieved full employment? Especially considering he’s cutting immigration by 50%.

What kind of idiots apply stimulus to a booming economy with full employment? What’s worse is they’re going into debt to pay for this stimulus.

^^^ Oh TEH Heartbreak of Economic Illiteracy ^^^

Here's a wee clue, the huge drop in the Labor Force Participation Rate during Obabble's Reign of Terror refutes the notion of Full Employment. We still have a great deal of recovery ahead of us.

 

[Aldo Raine]

The Reagan MYTH keeps growing with each telling. St Ronnie averaged 3.5% yearly GDP growth, well behind Johnson 5.3%, Kennedy 4.3%, and Clinton 3.9%.

That isn't "well behind Clinton," and his performance was purely the result of the low tax rates Reagan setup, and the peace dividend that allowed him to slash military spending. He can also thank Reagan for that.

Democrats make the economy grow by getting us into wars.

You do know that your sainted Ronnie Raygun raised taxes after ******* up and cutting them, right?

The net result for his administration was a drastic cut in taxes. Snowflake douchebags have been whining about it ever since. On the one hand you blame his tax cuts for the deficits in the 1980s. On the other hand you claim he increased taxes. You're talking out of both sides of your mouth. Which is it? Did he raise taxes or lower them?

He did both putz.

ROFL! I knew you would talk out of both sides of your mouth.

What was the net result of his administration, lower taxes or higher taxes?

Lower taxes for.the wealthy and higher taxes for the average earner, over time.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Fascinating to watch you elementary minds frame shit like you do....even more fascinating to watch your loonie buddies cheer retarded shit like this on.....haha.
I’m sure you thought you were being super clever with this one...huh? Haha....Okay, here’s your free lesson...use your heads and follow along...you learned this shit in third grade....in 2011 the unemployment rate was 9%, with no place to go but down, especially with $10 trillion pumped into the economy. ‘Full employment’ is considered to be around the 5% mark....so what do you fuckin retards think happens once full employment is reached? Do you think growth trajectory starts to taper off?

oo, post: 19149821, member: 57834"]The economy grew at a 2.6 percent rate to end 2017, the Department of Commerce reported...For all of 2017, GDP growth was 2.3 percent

GDP growth slowed to 2.6 percent to end 2017


Dang! That Trump fella sure turned things around!

Fascinating to watch you elementary minds frame shit like you do....even more fascinating to watch your loonie buddies cheer retarded shit like this on.....haha.
I’m sure you thought you were being super clever with this one...huh? Haha....Okay, here’s your free lesson...use your heads and follow along...you learned this shit in third grade....in 2011 the unemployment rate was 9%, with no place to go but down, especially with $10 trillion pumped into the economy. ‘Full employment’ is considered to be around the 5% mark....so what do you fuckin retards think happens once full employment is reached? Do you think growth trajectory starts to taper off?

Dumbass it was obvious to ANYONE WITH HALF A BRAIN that at full employment Trump can't possibly grow jobs faster than Obama.

Which why Trump's job promises, and you idiots taking that clown seriously was so ******* laughable.

The idiocy of cutting taxes with full employment is seldom mentioned.

Trump talks about all of these jobs to be created by these tax cuts. Who’s going to fill these new jobs if you’ve already achieved full employment? Especially considering he’s cutting immigration by 50%.

What kind of idiots apply stimulus to a booming economy with full employment? What’s worse is they’re going into debt to pay for this stimulus.

^^^ Oh TEH Heartbreak of Economic Illiteracy ^^^

Here's a wee clue, the huge drop in the Labor Force Participation Rate during Obabble's Reign of Terror refutes the notion of Full Employment. We still have a great deal of recovery ahead of us.

People really do not understand Labor Force Participation Rate. A lower Labor Force Participation Rate can indicate a booming economy as less people have to work. More people feel secure enough to retire, more spouses feel secure enough to stay at home and raise children.

Not to mention that they are still well above historical averages.

 

[bripat9643]

That isn't "well behind Clinton," and his performance was purely the result of the low tax rates Reagan setup, and the peace dividend that allowed him to slash military spending. He can also thank Reagan for that.

Democrats make the economy grow by getting us into wars.

You do know that your sainted Ronnie Raygun raised taxes after ******* up and cutting them, right?

The net result for his administration was a drastic cut in taxes. Snowflake douchebags have been whining about it ever since. On the one hand you blame his tax cuts for the deficits in the 1980s. On the other hand you claim he increased taxes. You're talking out of both sides of your mouth. Which is it? Did he raise taxes or lower them?

He did both putz.

ROFL! I knew you would talk out of both sides of your mouth.

What was the net result of his administration, lower taxes or higher taxes?

Lower taxes for.the wealthy and higher taxes for the average earner, over time.

You still didn't answer the question. Were taxes on net lower or higher after his administration.

 

[Aldo Raine]

You do know that your sainted Ronnie Raygun raised taxes after ******* up and cutting them, right?

The net result for his administration was a drastic cut in taxes. Snowflake douchebags have been whining about it ever since. On the one hand you blame his tax cuts for the deficits in the 1980s. On the other hand you claim he increased taxes. You're talking out of both sides of your mouth. Which is it? Did he raise taxes or lower them?

He did both putz.

ROFL! I knew you would talk out of both sides of your mouth.

What was the net result of his administration, lower taxes or higher taxes?

Lower taxes for.the wealthy and higher taxes for the average earner, over time.

You still didn't answer the question. Were taxes on net lower or higher after his administration.

I answered your question, you have reading comprehension problems bro.

 

[boedicca]

oo, post: 19149821, member: 57834"]The economy grew at a 2.6 percent rate to end 2017, the Department of Commerce reported...For all of 2017, GDP growth was 2.3 percent

GDP growth slowed to 2.6 percent to end 2017


Dang! That Trump fella sure turned things around!

Fascinating to watch you elementary minds frame shit like you do....even more fascinating to watch your loonie buddies cheer retarded shit like this on.....haha.
I’m sure you thought you were being super clever with this one...huh? Haha....Okay, here’s your free lesson...use your heads and follow along...you learned this shit in third grade....in 2011 the unemployment rate was 9%, with no place to go but down, especially with $10 trillion pumped into the economy. ‘Full employment’ is considered to be around the 5% mark....so what do you fuckin retards think happens once full employment is reached? Do you think growth trajectory starts to taper off?

Dumbass it was obvious to ANYONE WITH HALF A BRAIN that at full employment Trump can't possibly grow jobs faster than Obama.

Which why Trump's job promises, and you idiots taking that clown seriously was so ******* laughable.

The idiocy of cutting taxes with full employment is seldom mentioned.

Trump talks about all of these jobs to be created by these tax cuts. Who’s going to fill these new jobs if you’ve already achieved full employment? Especially considering he’s cutting immigration by 50%.

What kind of idiots apply stimulus to a booming economy with full employment? What’s worse is they’re going into debt to pay for this stimulus.

^^^ Oh TEH Heartbreak of Economic Illiteracy ^^^

Here's a wee clue, the huge drop in the Labor Force Participation Rate during Obabble's Reign of Terror refutes the notion of Full Employment. We still have a great deal of recovery ahead of us.

People really do not understand Labor Force Participation Rate. A lower Labor Force Participation Rate can indicate a booming economy as less people have to work. More people feel secure enough to retire, more spouses feel secure enough to stay at home and raise children.

Not to mention that they are still well above historical averages.

View attachment 173821

What a bonus misuse of statistics.

The GDP growth rate during the decline was hardly robust. And if you mean "historically" - before the 80s, many women were not in the Labor Force. So by your logic, it must be progress to undo the gains women have made, or to support those gains by driving men out of the labor force. The latter is actually what Prog Policies encourage.

 

[BrokeLoser]

oo, post: 19149821, member: 57834"]The economy grew at a 2.6 percent rate to end 2017, the Department of Commerce reported...For all of 2017, GDP growth was 2.3 percent

GDP growth slowed to 2.6 percent to end 2017


Dang! That Trump fella sure turned things around!

Fascinating to watch you elementary minds frame shit like you do....even more fascinating to watch your loonie buddies cheer retarded shit like this on.....haha.
I’m sure you thought you were being super clever with this one...huh? Haha....Okay, here’s your free lesson...use your heads and follow along...you learned this shit in third grade....in 2011 the unemployment rate was 9%, with no place to go but down, especially with $10 trillion pumped into the economy. ‘Full employment’ is considered to be around the 5% mark....so what do you fuckin retards think happens once full employment is reached? Do you think growth trajectory starts to taper off?

Dumbass it was obvious to ANYONE WITH HALF A BRAIN that at full employment Trump can't possibly grow jobs faster than Obama.

Which why Trump's job promises, and you idiots taking that clown seriously was so ******* laughable.

The idiocy of cutting taxes with full employment is seldom mentioned.

Trump talks about all of these jobs to be created by these tax cuts. Who’s going to fill these new jobs if you’ve already achieved full employment? Especially considering he’s cutting immigration by 50%.

What kind of idiots apply stimulus to a booming economy with full employment? What’s worse is they’re going into debt to apply this stimulus.

It's "idiocy" only from the point of view of parasites who view my paycheck as their property. Cutting taxes is always smart. Always. The less money politicians have to play with, the better.

But cutting taxes does not give them less money to play with, it just means they are borrowing more from our children and grandchildren.

Cutting taxes is only a good idea when there is an accompanying cut in spending.

Right...cut spending...haha
Tell Lefties they’re gonna have to pay their own way like grown adults do and watch them lose all their shit....haha

Trump budget to slash entitlements by $1.7 trillion
Trump budget to slash entitlements by $1.7 trillion

 

[Dragonlady]

Fascinating to watch you elementary minds frame shit like you do....even more fascinating to watch your loonie buddies cheer retarded shit like this on.....haha.
I’m sure you thought you were being super clever with this one...huh? Haha....Okay, here’s your free lesson...use your heads and follow along...you learned this shit in third grade....in 2011 the unemployment rate was 9%, with no place to go but down, especially with $10 trillion pumped into the economy. ‘Full employment’ is considered to be around the 5% mark....so what do you fuckin retards think happens once full employment is reached? Do you think growth trajectory starts to taper off?

oo, post: 19149821, member: 57834"]The economy grew at a 2.6 percent rate to end 2017, the Department of Commerce reported...For all of 2017, GDP growth was 2.3 percent

GDP growth slowed to 2.6 percent to end 2017


Dang! That Trump fella sure turned things around!

Fascinating to watch you elementary minds frame shit like you do....even more fascinating to watch your loonie buddies cheer retarded shit like this on.....haha.
I’m sure you thought you were being super clever with this one...huh? Haha....Okay, here’s your free lesson...use your heads and follow along...you learned this shit in third grade....in 2011 the unemployment rate was 9%, with no place to go but down, especially with $10 trillion pumped into the economy. ‘Full employment’ is considered to be around the 5% mark....so what do you fuckin retards think happens once full employment is reached? Do you think growth trajectory starts to taper off?

Dumbass it was obvious to ANYONE WITH HALF A BRAIN that at full employment Trump can't possibly grow jobs faster than Obama.

Which why Trump's job promises, and you idiots taking that clown seriously was so ******* laughable.

The idiocy of cutting taxes with full employment is seldom mentioned.

Trump talks about all of these jobs to be created by these tax cuts. Who’s going to fill these new jobs if you’ve already achieved full employment? Especially considering he’s cutting immigration by 50%.

What kind of idiots apply stimulus to a booming economy with full employment? What’s worse is they’re going into debt to pay for this stimulus.

^^^ Oh TEH Heartbreak of Economic Illiteracy ^^^

Here's a wee clue, the huge drop in the Labor Force Participation Rate during Obabble's Reign of Terror refutes the notion of Full Employment. We still have a great deal of recovery ahead of us.

You’re just a shining example of economic illiteracy.

The drop in the labour force participation rate started under W and it’s being driven by retiring Baby Boomers, not unemployment.

Since I was a teenager I’ve read what a disaster the retirement of Baby Boomers was going to be for the economy. Fewer and fewer people working to support this huge bulge of retirees. Pension funds will be bankrupted. Taxes will rise to pay for their medical needs. Now conservative idiots are pretending it’s not happening and that unemployment is driving the rate down.

What Baby Boomers’ Retirement Means For the U.S. Economy


Proof positive that conservatives will believe any lie without question if it serves their agenda.