trump begs Florida judge to restore his Twitter account

[kaz]

dblack Isn't a Democrat? Is he? Usually I find him logical. To me this is less about Trump and more about Twitter arbitrarily banning shit like the Star of David with zero repercussions. Imagine a business or a restaurant doing that.

Yes, dblack is a Democrat. He always finds a way to support their interests. Always

 

[dblack]

No one is forced to follow Trump's tweets.

Hey! We agree on something. It's irrelevant (of course), but it's a start.

You really haven't ever made this clear you aren't libertarian at all. Clearly why I was having a hard time viewing you as a libertarian at all. I suppose your blind support of totalitarian Democrats was a clue too

You forgot Nazi. You're slipping.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

To me these issues are handled by civil courts deciding whether or not they've violated their TOS. If the TOS says they can do shit like that, and people still sign up anyway, it's on them.

But still, this has exactly nothing to do with Trump's suit. He just wants his megaphone back and has told his lawyers to "make it happen". It's just like the election fraud thing. He declares the desired outcome, and goes looking for excuses to justify it.

Agreed.

 

[kaz]

Being denied a phone by who?

You forgot today is stupid day on the site.

You were saying people have a right to make a phone call and Faun didn't grasp that and thought you meant people have a right to a physical phone. He did that because he's stupid and it's stupid day

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

So we agree. The Courts should handle it. Legal experts cannot agree on how to regulate Twitter. So I certainly do not know either. But their carte blanche on anti semitism is disturbing.

Agreed.

 

[kaz]

Hey! We agree on something. It's irrelevant (of course), but it's a start.

You forgot Nazi. You're slipping.

More of your stupid made up shit. It is stupid day, you're an honoree!

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

You forgot today is stupid day on the site.

You were saying people have a right to make a phone call and Faun didn't grasp that and thought you meant people have a right to a physical phone. He did that because he's stupid and it's stupid day

Deliberately missing the point is a mainstay for some of these mini-tyrants on here. It protects them from having to defend their arguments.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Child porn is a crime. No one disputes that websites are obligated to censor that.

What a ******* dumbass. Do you NAZIs have any arguments that haven't already been shot down 1000 times already?

Uh, you seem confused again. You lost the argument. Your orange lard and master is banned.

 

[kaz]

Deliberately missing the point is a mainstay for some of these mini-tyrants on here. It protects them from having to defend their arguments.

Yes. I also view it as if someone tells you they are so stupid they can't read, there really is no reason to disagree with them

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

That is the issue. Twitter having power is not the issue. The issue is their ability to silence anyone who disagrees with them. Only a monopoly can do that

That's really not my concern. That can be handled in civil court, user vs. platform.

My biggest concern is government using the private sector to circumvent constitutional protections.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Uh, you seem confused again. You lost the argument. Your orange lard and master is banned.

Are you ever not a complete leftist asshole? Honest question.

 

[Nostra]

LOL - here ya go: https://www.google.com/search?q=twi...69i57j69i60.4192j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

But don't be coy. It's not a real argument. Trumpsters don't care whether Twitter is a monopoly. They just want to force them to let Trump back on.

Pinterest is an alternative to Twitter?

 

[Nostra]

I used to have a Twitter account but I got rid of it.
Twitter is a waste of time and I hope the company gets broken up and the CEO dies of the clap.

He would have to get laid first. Have you seen him? More likely to die of bed bugs.

 

[kaz]

That's really not my concern. That can be handled in civil court, user vs. platform.

My biggest concern is government using the private sector to circumvent constitutional protections.

I agree with your concern, but the ability to silence their competition isn't your concern? Seriously?

And what difference does it make if the civil courts can fix it if that clearly is not happening? How can they fix it anyway since they have immunity? Immunity in this is specifically from civil cases, so how can the civil courts fix it anyway?

 

[dblack]

My biggest concern is government using the private sector to circumvent constitutional protections.

And if that's happening, we should nail them. If Trump can prove that members of Congress, or officials from the White House, told Twitter (or any other company) - "do what we tell you or we'll **** you up" (or any other sort of threat), that's a serious breach and something we should raise hell about.

But I don't think that's established. It's certainly possible. But it seems to me more likely that these companies are simply got sick of Trump's trolling, and after the Jan 6th became worried about the legal repercussions. They're also facing very real and intractable problems with people using their platforms to spread propaganda, and their at a loss for how to deal with them, legally and practically.

 

[kaz]

And if that's happening, we should nail them. If Trump can prove that members of Congress, or officials from the White House, told Twitter (or any other company) - "do what we tell you or we'll **** you up" (or any other sort of threat), that's a serious breach and something we should raise hell about.

But I don't think that's established. It's certainly possible. But it seems to me more likely that these companies are simply sick of Trump's trolling. They're also facing very real and intractable problems with people using their platforms to spread propaganda, and their at a loss for how to deal with them, legally and practically.

Only a total Democrat shill would call the Biden administration telling social media companies what posts to suppress free market. Wow

 

[dblack]

Pinterest is an alternative to Twitter?

LOL - that's what I figured. Ostrich up. Ignore all the others on the lists and pretend that Twitter is a monopoly regardless. So you'll have an excuse to make them do what you want. This is pure statism.

 

[Faun]

Pinterest is an alternative to Twitter?

Why not?

Better Social Media Stock: Twitter vs. Pinterest | The Motley Fool

Which niche social network can generate stronger growth in 2020?

www.fool.com

 

[dblack]

Only a total Democrat ...

Yes, yes. I know.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Are you ever not a complete leftist asshole? Honest question.

Are you ever going to snap out of crybaby mode?

Bripat says there arent any arguments. Strange...Trump is banned. Maybe snap ya boi back to reality. Redirect that whiny little ***** energy to something good.