Trump Ballroom Unlikely To Be Built

It's your opinion the east wing didn't need to be torn down. Are you privy to the restrictions on where exactly they could put a large building in that area and make it fit into the current security setup? As for extravagant, this is TRUMP!, he does everything extravagant.

Do you have any idea what they're going to put in the ballroom? No? Just complaining?

That sounds like something you'll have to ask in the next meeting, during the Q&A.
I have not yet heard Trump say the Arc is under construction. He has said the Arc will be taller than the Arc de Triumph in Paris.
 
I have not yet heard Trump say the Arc is under construction. He has said the Arc will be taller than the Arc de Triumph in Paris.
Also was leaked by elon there could be a tesla tower to transmit endless free power to
Slighly Democrat cause.
Congress has to post their expense accounts.

This is more phalic than obama snake on the plane boner.
 
Still a bad look, no matter who is paying for it.

It's like the boss driving up in a new Limo after he just cut 10% of the staff.

It's just a bad look.
Again, looks pretty good to me, as far as gvt. buildings go

1770743520422.webp
 
Since this is actually what he did for a living, I find that surprising.
ACTUALY PRETTY SURE he subbed Everything OUT.
TAKE some more checking, but think that is correct, since his dad died.
THAT is probably legal, just not hands on.
 
Think about it. Who has control of the WH? A judge or the president? The only "Laws" I'm aware of are the standard building codes that all architects know and use every day. Public comment is easy, even during construction. WTF does the "public" know about ballroom design? Trump owns the National Capital Planning Commission review board, so no problem.

What law? If a judge oversteps his authority Trump would appeal on Constitutional grounds, and win.

True. But it won't matter either way. No one is going to stop construction.
You in favor of what democrats said about "demolishing the new ballroom the first chance they get"?
And, of course, they would use taxpayer money to do it, all out of juvenile spite.
 
Good thing we don't have any of those around, they sound scary.
Sorry, my post was for nomarl.peole.living in reality, not cultists who pretend Trump isnt an adjudicated rapist.

And also fat.
 
Sorry, my post was for nomarl.peole.living in reality, not cultists who pretend Trump isnt an adjudicated rapist.

And also fat.
Let me know when you find some nomarl.peole.living in reality in your fever swamp. Look carefully, there might actually be some in there somewhere.
 
I will keep that in mind. I commented on Democrats. Did you vote for republicans in your past?

Name me any independent that won a seat in congress. I mean the so-called independents are not a party.

But to discuss the ball room, given the very wealthy are paying for it, and the concept is very glamorous, why would you be against it?
Again, looks pretty good to me, as far as gvt. buildings go

View attachment 1217480
What if DC used kelo v new london
to move the whitehouse to greenland ?
I already know that Pfizer & Denmark are in.
Mexico will pay for it all.
All ice people
are rapists & murderers.
 
Sorry, my post was for nomarl.peole.living in reality, not cultists who pretend Trump isnt an adjudicated rapist.

And also fat.
Had Trump been convicted of Rape, the Judge would have put him in jail. Why make up nonsense?
 
Frankly, I can't think of a better metaphor for the whole Trump Regime. They are very good at tearing things down, but they suck at actually building anything.


In October, Donald Trump traumatized all true patriots by tearing down the East Wing of the White House. The move, he claims, will clear the way for a ballroom for holding large events that are typically held in tents on the South Lawn. A debate immediately arose online over whether or not the next Democratic president should tear down the ballroom or keep it, albeit with the necessary extensive renovations to remove all the tackiness Trump brings to any project.

Two months later, it increasingly seems that such discussion was a wasted effort, as the chance this ballroom will actually be built is rapidly disappearing. Perhaps it could have if Trump had delegated the management of the project to someone competent, but that’s not what he did. Instead, the famously lazy and disorganized president decided to blow off his actual governance duties in favor of micromanaging a construction project he is incapable of handling. Finishing the ballroom in the next three years would be difficult for anyone, but it’s quickly becoming clear it will be nearly impossible for the famed real estate tycoon to pull it off.

For anyone who has dealt with any renovation project more complex than patching drywall, the ballroom’s construction is waving every red flag possible, signaling endless delays that will stretch for months — and, in all likelihood, for years. Despite announcing plans for the ballroom in July, it’s clear there’s no idea what it’s going to look like, how big it will be or how it will be laid out. Trump keeps changing things, driven by a short-sighted impulsiveness that keeps pushing him to expand the scope of the project. Initially, it was supposed to seat 650 people in 90,000 square feet, but he kept throwing tantrums about how he wanted it bigger. Earlier this month, he even ran off the initial architect, and odds are that will happen again.

Then there’s the red tape. Even though a judge ruled against the National Trust for Historic Preservation in their lawsuit to temporarily halt construction, he required the White House to avoid building anything foundational and demanded plans for the structure be submitted by the end of the year. But as the White House hasn’t even scheduled meetings with the National Capital Planning Commission to start the process, meeting that deadline appears unlikely.
.

:laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:salon:laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:






.
 
15th post
JoeB131 there was never any reason to build it. How many times would it be used in a year that it needed to be built. In order to figure it out all one has to do is find out how many times a president has held a gathering anywhere in Washington D.C. in any given year. It's doesn't surprise me that no news agency has ever calculated it.
.

tick-tick-tick-tick-tick






.
 
Back
Top Bottom