Trump backs down

[miketx]

So American for real Americans is making a felonious accusation against the former president without a single iota of proof to show that it happened?

I see it as harsh pain, but not for liberals. They don't need to do anything to embarrass themselves, they can just sit back and watch Republicans make asses of themselves. This is why I'm not a conservative.

Why are not a conservative? Is it because you can't clearly see what the government is doing so you watch all the MSN and decide what you are?

 

[radical right]

I would think that Obama could posibly press charges, or sue the orange shitlord over this.

The president is immune from criminal charges while in office, and although Obama could sue, I don't know if the intention to harm Obama could be proved, since Trump isn't rational enough to know the results of, or control his anger outbursts.

 

[Lewdog]

I would think that Obama could posibly press charges, or sue the orange shitlord over this.

The president is immune from criminal charges while in office, and although Obama could sue, I don't know if the intention to harm Obama could be proved, since Trump isn't rational enough to know the results of, or control his anger outbursts.

I bet there are 49 lawyers that would be more than happy to work on this case against Trump for not only libel in is tweet, but to work on getting him impeached.

 

[radical right]

I bet there are 49 lawyers that would be more than happy to work on this case against Trump for not only libel in is tweet, but to work on getting him impeached.

I'm sure there are. But I don't think Obama would want to go anywhere near being the person to take down Donald Trump. There are too many nut jobs in the Trump camp. Not to mention drawing the wrath of the Russians for taking out their golden goose.

 

[Roudy]

Assuming that Trump isnt dumb.............

Hasnt he saved Sessions with this nonsense ?

Its only a few days ago that Sessions was exposed as a liar and that all seems to be forgotten now.

How was Sessions exposed as a liar, by forgetting to mention standard meetings with a Russian ambassador that Hillary Clinton and her campaign also had? LOL

Ok,

This is how it works.

He was asked a question........and gave an answer that was untrue.

It isnt a complicated proposition.

His answer was totally true and accurate. Spicer had no meetings with Russian officials in the capacity referred to in the question. This is yet more fake news by the fake news media.

Oh dear, is this another entry in the rwnj mythology ?
Yup he so didnt lie that he had to step back from the investigation because, um, HE HAS NO CREDIBILITY.

He was going to recuse himself anyhow. The question was whether he or anybody in the campaign communicated or collaborated with Russia, and his answer was limited to that scope, not his entire 30 year tenure in office. And Obama's and Hillary's lackey, CIA's Clapper even confirmed "no evidence of collaboration". This is yet another left wing nutjob concocted media driven controversy, which will fall flat on its face.

 

[Roudy]

So all the claims by NY Times and WAPO about verified sources saying that Trump was being wiretapped were baseless and fake news?!

What a surprise!

Produce an article that says Trump was wiretaped or shut the **** up.

Here we go, dickhead, now eat some shit.

Well, they don't say the wiretaps were on Trump or Trump Tower but rather the info comes from wiretaos on the Russuans & if your orange buddy was wiretapped it would have been when he spoke with the Russians as their phones were tapped./

Are you blind, deaf and dumb? It clearly says communications and and financial transactions were investigated as part of a broad investigation into the Trump association and Russian officials. Of which nothing came out, zip, zero. So there's your proof, asswipe.

Now, who ordered this broad investigation, what did Obama know, and did he provide this info to the Hillary campaign, all of which would make it criminal? That is the investigation that the Trump admin. is now requesting, you ignorant fool. Drag these Obama criminals into the hearing by the hair and put whoever is responsible for the investigation and the leaks behind bars.

 

[RealDave]

Assuming that Trump isnt dumb.............

Hasnt he saved Sessions with this nonsense ?

Its only a few days ago that Sessions was exposed as a liar and that all seems to be forgotten now.

How was Sessions exposed as a liar, by forgetting to mention standard meetings with a Russian ambassador that Hillary Clinton and her campaign also had? LOL

Ok,

This is how it works.

He was asked a question........and gave an answer that was untrue.

It isnt a complicated proposition.

His answer was totally true and accurate. Spicer had no meetings with Russian officials in the capacity referred to in the question. This is yet more fake news by the fake news media.

Oh dear, is this another entry in the rwnj mythology ?
Yup he so didnt lie that he had to step back from the investigation because, um, HE HAS NO CREDIBILITY.

He was going to recuse himself anyhow. The question was whether he or anybody in the campaign communicated or collaborated with Russia, and his answer was limited to that scope, not his entire 30 year tenure in office. And Obama's and Hillary's lackey, CIA's Clapper even confirmed "no evidence of collaboration". This is yet another left wing nutjob concocted media driven controversy, which will fall flat on its face.

Then you will be all for an investigation by a special prosecutor since there is nothing to find.

 

[RealDave]

So all the claims by NY Times and WAPO about verified sources saying that Trump was being wiretapped were baseless and fake news?!

What a surprise!

Produce an article that says Trump was wiretaped or shut the **** up.

Here we go, dickhead, now eat some shit.

Well, they don't say the wiretaps were on Trump or Trump Tower but rather the info comes from wiretaos on the Russuans & if your orange buddy was wiretapped it would have been when he spoke with the Russians as their phones were tapped./

Are you blind, deaf and dumb? It clearly says communications and and financial transactions were investigated as part of a broad investigation into the Trump association and Russian officials. Of which nothing came out, zip, zero. So there's your proof, asswipe.

Now, who ordered this broad investigation, what did Obama know, and did he provide this info to the Hillary campaign, all of which would make it criminal? That is the investigation that the Trump admin. is now requesting, you ignorant fool. Drag these Obama criminals into the hearing by the hair and put whoever is responsible for the investigation and the leaks behind bars.

You are the dumbest ******* asshole on the entire planet. No where does your article say that the wiretap was on Trump's or Trump tower phones.


No whete.

Provide some proof or shut the **** up.

If a man is suspected of distributing child pornography & the FBI has hids phone tapped and you call. I have news, they know what you are saying.

 

[Czernobog]

Now if Hillary, the DNC, the left and the media would just walk back their unfounded accusations of collusion with the Russians, we could call it even and all go home.

Funny. Tell that to 17 national intelligence agencies.

You mean all those folks Trump is going to fire?

And that's how you squash any impartial investigation. They arrive at findings you don't like? Just keep firing them, until you get someone who's says what you want them to say...

Power really does have its perks...
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

What were the 93 lawyers fired by Bill Clinton investigating?

 

[Political Junky]

Chickenshit Trump send out Spicer to back down from his wire tap claim. The spineless orange wonder did have the guts to do it himself.

Or what? What does he have to fear? Liberals need no evidence for their claims, why does he?

Trump tweeted the evidence needed.

 

[Auld Phart]

Now if Hillary, the DNC, the left and the media would just walk back their unfounded accusations of collusion with the Russians, we could call it even and all go home.

Funny. Tell that to 17 national intelligence agencies.

You mean all those folks Trump is going to fire?

And that's how you squash any impartial investigation. They arrive at findings you don't like? Just keep firing them, until you get someone who's says what you want them to say...

Power really does have its perks...
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

What were the 93 lawyers fired by Bill Clinton investigating?

The same thing the attempt to claim Trump is 'firing' lawyers to prevent/hinder an investigation.

But, you knew that, didn't you?

 

[Eloy]

I saw a blonde with an underbite on TV and she said Donald Trump might have meant President Obama could have been tapping into Donald Trump's microwave.

 

[Qball]

Once again Trump keeps demonstrating his greatest strength: the lithe ability to make his detractors look as bad as he is.

For months we've been hearing jaw-jaw from the media from anonymous sources about investigations into Trump being in bed with Russian hackers who conspired to cheat Hillary out of the nomination. Every bit of gossip from the Intel community gets reported on with fairly little vetting as to whether it moves the needle with respect to the overarching questions of "do we know who hacked the DNC?" and "why?" because as long as we keep doing this word association between "Russia" and "Trump", we can continue to hammer him on it.

Trump tweets that Obama had him wire tapped and everybody goes crazy about evidence. Uh, how much hard evidence do we have that Russia hacked the DNC or that Trump's campaign had anything to do with it? And more importantly, if the Intelligence community has dirt on Trump colluding with Russia or any other foreign body to steal the election, how might they have obtained that information? That's the thing about claiming you have dirt on someone. You might be telling on yourself in the process.

 

[Eloy]

No-one knows what Donald Trump means from one day to the next. People who voted for him need their heads examined.

 

[Czernobog]

Funny. Tell that to 17 national intelligence agencies.

You mean all those folks Trump is going to fire?

And that's how you squash any impartial investigation. They arrive at findings you don't like? Just keep firing them, until you get someone who's says what you want them to say...

Power really does have its perks...
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk

What were the 93 lawyers fired by Bill Clinton investigating?

The same thing the attempt to claim Trump is 'firing' lawyers to prevent/hinder an investigation.

But, you knew that, didn't you?

Uh, wrong! When you suggested that the connection between the Trump campaign/Administration and the Russians was unfounded, and needed to be apologized for, you were reminded that it has been linked by, and was being investigated by, and I quote, "17 national intelligence agencies.", to which you specifically responded, "You mean all those folks Trump is going to fire?", directly tying those firings to the investigations they are attempting to oversee.

My response was directly related to your post; your response, on the other hand, was the typical bait, and switch, red herring, whenever you guys get into trouble defending Trump: "Oh shit! They're onto us! Quick! Bring up Obama, Hillary, or Bill Clinton!!!"

 

[Roudy]

So all the claims by NY Times and WAPO about verified sources saying that Trump was being wiretapped were baseless and fake news?!

What a surprise!

Produce an article that says Trump was wiretaped or shut the **** up.

Here we go, dickhead, now eat some shit.

Well, they don't say the wiretaps were on Trump or Trump Tower but rather the info comes from wiretaos on the Russuans & if your orange buddy was wiretapped it would have been when he spoke with the Russians as their phones were tapped./

Are you blind, deaf and dumb? It clearly says communications and and financial transactions were investigated as part of a broad investigation into the Trump association and Russian officials. Of which nothing came out, zip, zero. So there's your proof, asswipe.

Now, who ordered this broad investigation, what did Obama know, and did he provide this info to the Hillary campaign, all of which would make it criminal? That is the investigation that the Trump admin. is now requesting, you ignorant fool. Drag these Obama criminals into the hearing by the hair and put whoever is responsible for the investigation and the leaks behind bars.

You are the dumbest ******* asshole on the entire planet. No where does your article say that the wiretap was on Trump's or Trump tower phones.


No whete.

Provide some proof or shut the **** up.

If a man is suspected of distributing child pornography & the FBI has hids phone tapped and you call. I have news, they know what you are saying.

What's the matter, you smelly undereducated leftie bum, having reading comprehension problems? The article clearly says there was a WIRETAP on the Trump campaign and Trump campaign advisors such as Maniford. Guess where the Trump campaign HQ was located? Think hard.... yup...that would be TRUMP TOWERS. Either way, mental midget, there is certainly enough evidence for Trump's allegations to possibly be true and definitely warrants an investigation.

 

[Roudy]

How was Sessions exposed as a liar, by forgetting to mention standard meetings with a Russian ambassador that Hillary Clinton and her campaign also had? LOL

Ok,

This is how it works.

He was asked a question........and gave an answer that was untrue.

It isnt a complicated proposition.

His answer was totally true and accurate. Spicer had no meetings with Russian officials in the capacity referred to in the question. This is yet more fake news by the fake news media.

Oh dear, is this another entry in the rwnj mythology ?
Yup he so didnt lie that he had to step back from the investigation because, um, HE HAS NO CREDIBILITY.

He was going to recuse himself anyhow. The question was whether he or anybody in the campaign communicated or collaborated with Russia, and his answer was limited to that scope, not his entire 30 year tenure in office. And Obama's and Hillary's lackey, CIA's Clapper even confirmed "no evidence of collaboration". This is yet another left wing nutjob concocted media driven controversy, which will fall flat on its face.

Then you will be all for an investigation by a special prosecutor since there is nothing to find.

Eh, did the thought ever occur to you that you don't get to tell the intelligence committee how to conduct an investigation?

 

[AsianTrumpSupporter]

 

[DrainBamage]

Liberals need no evidence for their claims, why does he?

And again we see the bizarre logic that whether something is right isn't important, as long as one can point the finger at previous administration and say they did the same.

What the heck is wrong with you people.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

A president should not behave like that. The president's words carry a lot of weight world wide. Things like that diminish his presidency and his credibility.

Kind of like that quote: with great power comes great responsibility

Explain the FISA applications ****** or stfu.