Trolling: The Art Of The Right Wing Media

[buckeye45_73]

Insightful.

Trollin.

Right up there pwned.

perhaps.... if it weren't true that the wingers adore anyone they think annoys people on the left.

if a lefty had said she wished a presidential candidate to be killed in a terrorist attack because she didn't like his politics, people on the right would still be posting about it.

but you guys love coultergeist for it because you think she gets up our noses.

same with limbidiot.

You have any links Coulter or Limbaugh said that, Jillian or are you pulling stuff out of your ass?

 

[Black_Label]

Insightful.

Trollin.

Right up there pwned.

perhaps.... if it weren't true that the wingers adore anyone they think annoys people on the left.

if a lefty had said she wished a presidential candidate to be killed in a terrorist attack because she didn't like his politics, people on the right would still be posting about it.

but you guys love coultergeist for it because you think she gets up our noses.

same with limbidiot.

You have any links Coulter or Limbaugh said that, Jillian or are you pulling stuff out of your ass?

Limbaugh and Coulter make a career out of trolling.

 

[asterism]

no. it's just that you're a dying breed. the internet took the gop by surprise last year. they can't just lie about a president's record and demagogue the shit out of them. they have to actually prove it. i almost feel bad for you guys. the moderate republicans will re-take their party or you guys will kill it. i'm happy either way. but people who think like you do, that all liberals are parasites, are literally an old, dying breed.

or the short answer; demographics, ************.

Liberals are all parasites. They all admit it. They're nothing but a gang of blood sucking ticks. If I'm a "dying breed" then this country is doomed. You see, there are only so many ticks that can survive on a given host. This country has long passed the point where it can sustain the menagerie of parasites feeding on it.

nonsense, red states are the mooching freeloaders to blue states benevolence
PolitiFact | 'Red State Socialism' graphic says GOP-leaning states get lion's share of federal dollars

It's foolish to cite a reference that warns readers of using it:

The data is seven years old

As we noted, the data is for 2005. To the author’s credit, this is disclosed prominently, and because it’s the most recent data of its type available, we can hardly fault the creator of the graphic for using it. Still, since the data has almost certainly shifted in the interim, particularly with the 2009 stimulus and the general increase in deficit spending, those patterns could have shifted as well.

"Because of the high deficit spending we’re seeing at the federal level, it’s likely that every state is currently receiving more in federal spending than its population paid in federal income taxes," the Tax Foundation's Morrison said.

 

[Truthmatters]

Maddow makes claims, but fails to back them up. It's much like many here who instantly resort to name calling, even when some of us sit down and write long posts in an effort to explain our views. I get nasty pm messages that are just disgusting name calling and some try to use as many offensive words as possible. the fact that you think only left leaning posters do this is indicaticve of your inability to see the reality of both sides

One poster here simply writes pubcrappe, pubdupes as a reply to virtually everything. Others simply bash the source of articles or call names. Your sources matter, when you pretend your sources dont matter you look really silly Anyone want to spend some time going through threads and finding examples? There are tons here. That, to me, is what trolls do. They go around and spout talking points and call names. Some of the responses are exactly the same, like the poster just constantly cuts and pastes the same thing regardless of what is being discussed. That is not having an opinion, it's just pasting your stupidity everywhere.

Some accuse you of racism for disagreeing with anything Obama says or does.the right pretends there is no such thing as racism on the right ( Name me one example of an incident you felt was racism rencently if you care to prove me wrong) Some call you greedy because you dread higher taxes and increased health insurance premiums. The cold hard facts show fhigher taxes lesd to more revenues and pretending they dont is merely igniring the facts and using biased sources to keep up the pretense Some call you crazy gun fanatics because you believe in our rights. The right wing members of the scotus have said ALREADY that gun laws are prefectly constitutional The labeling of people simply because they are on the opposite side of the issue is rampant here. want a list of the names I have been called in response to the posting of cold hard court documented FACTS?

Maddow is the queen of trolls. That snarky ***** presents her opinions as if they are facts, then bashes anyone who doesn't buy into her rhetoric. She, like many other loud mouth hacks, are not interested in discussion. She is interesting in talking and expecting others to listen. Period.

Rachel Madow has a steller resume.


She used cold hard facts and pretending she is like your Beck or Hannity or Rush is merely a lie

 

[Truthmatters]

The rightwingers lived up to their trolling just as I suspected, lol

So how does it feel to be a dumbfuck? do you spit or sallow?

troll trolls

 

[Truthmatters]

Rachel Maddow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Asked about her political views by the Valley Advocate, Maddow replied, "I'm undoubtedly a liberal, which means that I'm in almost total agreement with the Eisenhower-era Republican party platform."[8]


A graduate of Castro Valley High School[17] in Castro Valley, California, she attended Stanford University. While a freshman, she was outed by the college newspaper when an interview with her was published by the student newspaper before she could tell her parents.[18] Maddow earned a degree in public policy from Stanford in 1994.[19] At graduation she was awarded the John Gardner Fellowship.[20] She was also the recipient of a Rhodes Scholarship and began her postgraduate study in 1995 at Lincoln College, Oxford. This made her the first openly gay or lesbian American to win an international Rhodes scholarship.[21][22] In 2001, she earned a Doctor of Philosophy (DPhil) in politics from Oxford University.[23] Her thesis is titled HIV/AIDS and Health Care Reform in British and American Prisons (supervisor: Dr Lucia Zedner).

 

[bripat9643]

Rachel Maddow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Asked about her political views by the Valley Advocate, Maddow replied, "I'm undoubtedly a liberal, which means that I'm in almost total agreement with the Eisenhower-era Republican party platform."[8]

Exactly right. Eisenhower was a liberal in the truest sense of the word. He was a tax and spend liberal.

 

[Black_Label]

Rachel Maddow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Asked about her political views by the Valley Advocate, Maddow replied, "I'm undoubtedly a liberal, which means that I'm in almost total agreement with the Eisenhower-era Republican party platform."[8]

Exactly right. Eisenhower was a liberal in the truest sense of the word. He was a tax and spend liberal.

Ike was the last "real" conservative this nation has ever seen. Every other right winger since has been spend, spend, tax, spend, tax, spend, and spend some more hard right goon.

 

[American_Jihad]

Has Wikipedia been overrun by Left-wing trolls and junk historians?

By Guy Walters
6/25/10

James Delingpole's latest column in the Spectator is about Wikipedia, and how it is apparently dominated by a Left-leaning caucus of self-appointed editors who spend their days adjusting entries to fit in with their Weltanschauungen. Delingpole cites his own Wikipedia entry, in which he berates the featuring of an episode in which his suspicions of the credentials of a correspondent to Newsweek proved to be unfounded. Delingpole takes exception not because of the presence of the story, but rather because its inclusion carries a disproportionate emphasis when set against his body of work. His detractors may vouch that Delingpole's implied allegations reveal a structural fault at the heart of his journalistic method, but this would be to ignore the hundreds of columns which have drawn no such complaint.

Charges against Wikipedia are well-rehearsed, and I am not going to repeat them now – by far the most robust opponent is Oliver Kamm over at The Times – but I thought it would be enlightening if I shared what has happened to my own Wikipedia entry.
...

Has Wikipedia been overrun by Left-wing trolls and junk historians? ? Telegraph Blogs

 

[BlindBoo]

this thread is trollery at its finest

No, it's actually a link to very astute and unassailable argument about how the rightwing propaganda machine works.

Messageboard warfare. Don't you know Rachel makes rabid right wingers heads explode?

 

[Black_Label]

this thread is trollery at its finest

No, it's actually a link to very astute and unassailable argument about how the rightwing propaganda machine works.

Messageboard warfare. Don't you know Rachel makes rabid right wingers heads explode?

Anyone that tells the truth makes the right wingers heads explode.

 

[ReallyMeow]

Liberals are all parasites. They all admit it. They're nothing but a gang of blood sucking ticks. If I'm a "dying breed" then this country is doomed. You see, there are only so many ticks that can survive on a given host. This country has long passed the point where it can sustain the menagerie of parasites feeding on it.

nonsense, red states are the mooching freeloaders to blue states benevolence
PolitiFact | 'Red State Socialism' graphic says GOP-leaning states get lion's share of federal dollars

It's foolish to cite a reference that warns readers of using it:

The data is seven years old

As we noted, the data is for 2005. To the author’s credit, this is disclosed prominently, and because it’s the most recent data of its type available, we can hardly fault the creator of the graphic for using it. Still, since the data has almost certainly shifted in the interim, particularly with the 2009 stimulus and the general increase in deficit spending, those patterns could have shifted as well.

"Because of the high deficit spending we’re seeing at the federal level, it’s likely that every state is currently receiving more in federal spending than its population paid in federal income taxes," the Tax Foundation's Morrison said.

Probably? Maybe come back with something a little more concrete. Obama's also been cutting spending, which states do you think took the brunt of that: The blue states that already sacrifice for the red states, because, hey, whats a little more? or The sickly gazelles that couldnt even balance their budgets in the boom time, that deliberately have the worst education in the country so they permanently have high crime/unemployment/poverty levels that they can run off to congress to beg and grovel

No, I expect its only gotten worse in red states. If you cant weather a warm summers day without the ant feeding you, how can you possibly make it through the winter, grasshopper?

 

[g5000]

“Trolling is a key part of the conservative-entertainment/media business model,” she said. “These guys say stuff all the time that they do not intend to be persuasive. They’re not trying to explain something, or bring people along to their way of thinking, they’re just doing something to attract attention, and hopefully condemnation and outrage from the mainstream, and particularly from liberals. They want to offend you. They seek to offend you. That is the point.”

Maddow said that “trolling” was a “tried and true schtick” for conservatives. Not just for media figures, but for politicians as well. She described Rep. Steve King (R-IA) as a “permanent troll.”

The video is in the link, and well worth the watch

Maddow on new NRA ads: Trolling a key aspect of conservative media | The Raw Story

Irony: Rachel Maddow condemning others for trolling.

 

[bripat9643]

Rachel Maddow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Asked about her political views by the Valley Advocate, Maddow replied, "I'm undoubtedly a liberal, which means that I'm in almost total agreement with the Eisenhower-era Republican party platform."[8]

Exactly right. Eisenhower was a liberal in the truest sense of the word. He was a tax and spend liberal.

Ike was the last "real" conservative this nation has ever seen. Every other right winger since has been spend, spend, tax, spend, tax, spend, and spend some more hard right goon.

Liberal Dictionary:
===================================
Real conservative - liberal
moderate - liberal
pragmatist - liberal
open minded - liberal
fiscal conservative - liberal

 

[ReallyMeow]

this is trolling, subtle efforts to hook people in order to elicit a response

this is how it usually works out in practice

and this is all that seems to be here

 

[francoHFW]

Tea Party dictionary:

Real conservative - liberal
moderate - liberal
pragmatist - liberal
open minded - liberal
fiscal conservative - liberal

 

[francoHFW]

Ike was an Independant. Pubs suq. lol

 

[American_Jihad]

Tea Party dictionary:

Real conservative - liberal
moderate - liberal
pragmatist - liberal
open minded - liberal
fiscal conservative - liberal

Did you finally get to Greece and drinking the ouzo or still here practicing...

 

[asterism]

nonsense, red states are the mooching freeloaders to blue states benevolence
PolitiFact | 'Red State Socialism' graphic says GOP-leaning states get lion's share of federal dollars

It's foolish to cite a reference that warns readers of using it:

The data is seven years old

As we noted, the data is for 2005. To the author’s credit, this is disclosed prominently, and because it’s the most recent data of its type available, we can hardly fault the creator of the graphic for using it. Still, since the data has almost certainly shifted in the interim, particularly with the 2009 stimulus and the general increase in deficit spending, those patterns could have shifted as well.

"Because of the high deficit spending we’re seeing at the federal level, it’s likely that every state is currently receiving more in federal spending than its population paid in federal income taxes," the Tax Foundation's Morrison said.

Probably? Maybe come back with something a little more concrete. Obama's also been cutting spending, which states do you think took the brunt of that: The blue states that already sacrifice for the red states, because, hey, whats a little more? or The sickly gazelles that couldnt even balance their budgets in the boom time, that deliberately have the worst education in the country so they permanently have high crime/unemployment/poverty levels that they can run off to congress to beg and grovel

No, I expect its only gotten worse in red states. If you cant weather a warm summers day without the ant feeding you, how can you possibly make it through the winter, grasshopper?

Obama has not cut into spending one bit. No President has in recent history.

As for not balancing budgets, take a look at California vs. Texas.

Analysis: Texas vs California: A tale of two budget deficits | Reuters

 

[Darkwind]

I think I need help with this thread.

What right wing media is this person going on about?

There is no such animal.