“Travis told police Arbery “squared up” like he was going to attack.” So he shot him in the chest.

[Jitss617]

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

the video doesn't tell his story. that's why.

The statements of the McMichals adds to the story but apparently you refuse to acknowledge it.

his statements will be inadmissible, and the video doesn't show a shotgun wound on the man wrestling the gun away from McMichal. does it? You still didn't answer my questions. Why not?

You really hate inconvenient facts.

What makes his statement inadmissible?

his lawyer will make sure of it, he wasn't there. Especially if it was recorded.

Who wasn’t there? His lawyer? You don’t need a lawyer to give a statement to the police. That does not make it inadmissible.

Maybe they Coerced him. Like they need york 5 .. I see a pattern lol

Coerced? Hell. They tried to sweep this all under the rug.

They did? McMichaels is the one that released the video... again why can’t you deal with facts?

I believe it was their buddy Bryan who released the video believing it exonerated them.

I don’t believe these guys are all that smart because it had the opposite effect.

The police and local attorney tried to sweep it under the rug. You’re going to need some evidence the statement was coerced.

It was McMichaels idea to release it because it shows self defense.. smart move.. as you can see they are pushing for a hate crime because there don’t have a murder

The problem is that the MicMichal’s were the aggressors. You do not get the claim self defense when you start the conflict.

They were following a criminal should they show weakness?

 

[colfax_m]

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

the video doesn't tell his story. that's why.

The statements of the McMichals adds to the story but apparently you refuse to acknowledge it.

his statements will be inadmissible, and the video doesn't show a shotgun wound on the man wrestling the gun away from McMichal. does it? You still didn't answer my questions. Why not?

You really hate inconvenient facts.

What makes his statement inadmissible?

his lawyer will make sure of it, he wasn't there. Especially if it was recorded.

Who wasn’t there? His lawyer? You don’t need a lawyer to give a statement to the police. That does not make it inadmissible.

Maybe they Coerced him. Like they need york 5 .. I see a pattern lol

Coerced? Hell. They tried to sweep this all under the rug.

They did? McMichaels is the one that released the video... again why can’t you deal with facts?

I believe it was their buddy Bryan who released the video believing it exonerated them.

I don’t believe these guys are all that smart because it had the opposite effect.

The police and local attorney tried to sweep it under the rug. You’re going to need some evidence the statement was coerced.

It was McMichaels idea to release it because it shows self defense.. smart move.. as you can see they are pushing for a hate crime because there don’t have a murder

The problem is that the MicMichal’s were the aggressors. You do not get the claim self defense when you start the conflict.

They were following a criminal should they show weakness?

There was no witnesses crime. They were operating under McMichal’s “gut feeling”. Therefore, their attempt to arrest him was illegal.

 

[Jitss617]

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

the video doesn't tell his story. that's why.

The statements of the McMichals adds to the story but apparently you refuse to acknowledge it.

his statements will be inadmissible, and the video doesn't show a shotgun wound on the man wrestling the gun away from McMichal. does it? You still didn't answer my questions. Why not?

You really hate inconvenient facts.

What makes his statement inadmissible?

his lawyer will make sure of it, he wasn't there. Especially if it was recorded.

Who wasn’t there? His lawyer? You don’t need a lawyer to give a statement to the police. That does not make it inadmissible.

Maybe they Coerced him. Like they need york 5 .. I see a pattern lol

Coerced? Hell. They tried to sweep this all under the rug.

They did? McMichaels is the one that released the video... again why can’t you deal with facts?

I believe it was their buddy Bryan who released the video believing it exonerated them.

I don’t believe these guys are all that smart because it had the opposite effect.

The police and local attorney tried to sweep it under the rug. You’re going to need some evidence the statement was coerced.

It was McMichaels idea to release it because it shows self defense.. smart move.. as you can see they are pushing for a hate crime because there don’t have a murder

The problem is that the MicMichal’s were the aggressors. You do not get the claim self defense when you start the conflict.

They were following a criminal should they show weakness?

There was no witnesses crime. They were operating under McMichal’s “gut feeling”. Therefore, their attempt to arrest him was illegal.

They said they saw him running from a home that had a no trespassing sign on it.. and it’s not the first time, they actually confronted Arbery previously.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Why does it matter? Your going to jail anyway ha

Not me.

See, I know when deadly force is appropriate, unlike your hero racist rednecks...

Is it appropriate if he’s running at you tries to grab your gun?

No, it's not...

So the chances of him taking your gun to shoot you just went up.. are you suicidal?

well that dude thinks terrorized people run at loaded weapons rather than run where possible help and a call to police is a choice. Very odd fks.

They are all insane. Why can’t we all
Agree all 3 were idiots and Arbery was the bigger idiot and move on?

Three men chased down a man with firearms.

There is no bigger idiot in this situation.

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

The break-in, if it's real, is a separate issue. In no way does that give the McMichael bozos a justification to kill Arbery.

Face it, they're going to go to prison, and Travis McMichael will likely die there...

i agree the break in no loger matters, what arbery did was attack a man legally hold a gun and the great white warrior won that battle Easy.. god bless

It didn't matter then, either.

And, if you're a bettin' man, bank on your "great white warrior" to be gettin' some black dick in general population; count on that...

The way he handled that black in the street if I were black I’d be worried about Travis gettin some hava

Problem is, that redneck *****'s not gonna' have a shotgun that he can aim at someone from 90 feet away.

If he's convicted, I'll betcha' $20 Travis McMichael dies in prison.

Wanna' take that bet?

 

[colfax_m]

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

the video doesn't tell his story. that's why.

The statements of the McMichals adds to the story but apparently you refuse to acknowledge it.

his statements will be inadmissible, and the video doesn't show a shotgun wound on the man wrestling the gun away from McMichal. does it? You still didn't answer my questions. Why not?

You really hate inconvenient facts.

What makes his statement inadmissible?

his lawyer will make sure of it, he wasn't there. Especially if it was recorded.

Who wasn’t there? His lawyer? You don’t need a lawyer to give a statement to the police. That does not make it inadmissible.

Maybe they Coerced him. Like they need york 5 .. I see a pattern lol

Coerced? Hell. They tried to sweep this all under the rug.

They did? McMichaels is the one that released the video... again why can’t you deal with facts?

I believe it was their buddy Bryan who released the video believing it exonerated them.

I don’t believe these guys are all that smart because it had the opposite effect.

The police and local attorney tried to sweep it under the rug. You’re going to need some evidence the statement was coerced.

It was McMichaels idea to release it because it shows self defense.. smart move.. as you can see they are pushing for a hate crime because there don’t have a murder

The problem is that the MicMichal’s were the aggressors. You do not get the claim self defense when you start the conflict.

They were following a criminal should they show weakness?

There was no witnesses crime. They were operating under McMichal’s “gut feeling”. Therefore, their attempt to arrest him was illegal.

They said they saw him running from a home that had a no trespassing sign on it.. and it’s not the first time, they actually confronted Arbery previously.

Show me where they said that.

I do believe you made that up.

 

[Jitss617]

Why does it matter? Your going to jail anyway ha

Not me.

See, I know when deadly force is appropriate, unlike your hero racist rednecks...

Is it appropriate if he’s running at you tries to grab your gun?

No, it's not...

So the chances of him taking your gun to shoot you just went up.. are you suicidal?

well that dude thinks terrorized people run at loaded weapons rather than run where possible help and a call to police is a choice. Very odd fks.

They are all insane. Why can’t we all
Agree all 3 were idiots and Arbery was the bigger idiot and move on?

Three men chased down a man with firearms.

There is no bigger idiot in this situation.

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

The break-in, if it's real, is a separate issue. In no way does that give the McMichael bozos a justification to kill Arbery.

Face it, they're going to go to prison, and Travis McMichael will likely die there...

i agree the break in no loger matters, what arbery did was attack a man legally hold a gun and the great white warrior won that battle Easy.. god bless

It didn't matter then, either.

And, if you're a bettin' man, bank on your "great white warrior" to be gettin' some black dick in general population; count on that...

The way he handled that black in the street if I were black I’d be worried about Travis gettin some hava

Problem is, that redneck *****'s not gonna' have a shotgun that he can aim at someone from 90 feet away.

If he's convicted, I'll betcha' $20 Travis McMichael dies in prison.

Wanna' take that bet?

Your hate for these Americans are worrisome.. why do you hate proud white southerners?

 

[Jitss617]

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

the video doesn't tell his story. that's why.

The statements of the McMichals adds to the story but apparently you refuse to acknowledge it.

his statements will be inadmissible, and the video doesn't show a shotgun wound on the man wrestling the gun away from McMichal. does it? You still didn't answer my questions. Why not?

You really hate inconvenient facts.

What makes his statement inadmissible?

his lawyer will make sure of it, he wasn't there. Especially if it was recorded.

Who wasn’t there? His lawyer? You don’t need a lawyer to give a statement to the police. That does not make it inadmissible.

Maybe they Coerced him. Like they need york 5 .. I see a pattern lol

Coerced? Hell. They tried to sweep this all under the rug.

They did? McMichaels is the one that released the video... again why can’t you deal with facts?

I believe it was their buddy Bryan who released the video believing it exonerated them.

I don’t believe these guys are all that smart because it had the opposite effect.

The police and local attorney tried to sweep it under the rug. You’re going to need some evidence the statement was coerced.

It was McMichaels idea to release it because it shows self defense.. smart move.. as you can see they are pushing for a hate crime because there don’t have a murder

The problem is that the MicMichal’s were the aggressors. You do not get the claim self defense when you start the conflict.

They were following a criminal should they show weakness?

There was no witnesses crime. They were operating under McMichal’s “gut feeling”. Therefore, their attempt to arrest him was illegal.

They said they saw him running from a home that had a no trespassing sign on it.. and it’s not the first time, they actually confronted Arbery previously.

Show me where they said that.

I do believe you made that up.

Police report

 

[colfax_m]

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

the video doesn't tell his story. that's why.

The statements of the McMichals adds to the story but apparently you refuse to acknowledge it.

his statements will be inadmissible, and the video doesn't show a shotgun wound on the man wrestling the gun away from McMichal. does it? You still didn't answer my questions. Why not?

You really hate inconvenient facts.

What makes his statement inadmissible?

his lawyer will make sure of it, he wasn't there. Especially if it was recorded.

Who wasn’t there? His lawyer? You don’t need a lawyer to give a statement to the police. That does not make it inadmissible.

Maybe they Coerced him. Like they need york 5 .. I see a pattern lol

Coerced? Hell. They tried to sweep this all under the rug.

They did? McMichaels is the one that released the video... again why can’t you deal with facts?

I believe it was their buddy Bryan who released the video believing it exonerated them.

I don’t believe these guys are all that smart because it had the opposite effect.

The police and local attorney tried to sweep it under the rug. You’re going to need some evidence the statement was coerced.

It was McMichaels idea to release it because it shows self defense.. smart move.. as you can see they are pushing for a hate crime because there don’t have a murder

The problem is that the MicMichal’s were the aggressors. You do not get the claim self defense when you start the conflict.

They were following a criminal should they show weakness?

There was no witnesses crime. They were operating under McMichal’s “gut feeling”. Therefore, their attempt to arrest him was illegal.

They said they saw him running from a home that had a no trespassing sign on it.. and it’s not the first time, they actually confronted Arbery previously.

Show me where they said that.

I do believe you made that up.

Police report

Incorrect. No where in the police report does it say they saw him leave the property.

Ahmaud Arbery Police Report | DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

They say they saw him “hauling ass” down the street. That’s all.

Oops.

 

[Jitss617]

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

the video doesn't tell his story. that's why.

The statements of the McMichals adds to the story but apparently you refuse to acknowledge it.

his statements will be inadmissible, and the video doesn't show a shotgun wound on the man wrestling the gun away from McMichal. does it? You still didn't answer my questions. Why not?

You really hate inconvenient facts.

What makes his statement inadmissible?

his lawyer will make sure of it, he wasn't there. Especially if it was recorded.

Who wasn’t there? His lawyer? You don’t need a lawyer to give a statement to the police. That does not make it inadmissible.

Maybe they Coerced him. Like they need york 5 .. I see a pattern lol

Coerced? Hell. They tried to sweep this all under the rug.

They did? McMichaels is the one that released the video... again why can’t you deal with facts?

I believe it was their buddy Bryan who released the video believing it exonerated them.

I don’t believe these guys are all that smart because it had the opposite effect.

The police and local attorney tried to sweep it under the rug. You’re going to need some evidence the statement was coerced.

It was McMichaels idea to release it because it shows self defense.. smart move.. as you can see they are pushing for a hate crime because there don’t have a murder

The problem is that the MicMichal’s were the aggressors. You do not get the claim self defense when you start the conflict.

They were following a criminal should they show weakness?

There was no witnesses crime. They were operating under McMichal’s “gut feeling”. Therefore, their attempt to arrest him was illegal.

They said they saw him running from a home that had a no trespassing sign on it.. and it’s not the first time, they actually confronted Arbery previously.

Show me where they said that.

I do believe you made that up.

Police report

Incorrect. No where in the police report does it say they saw him leave the property.

Ahmaud Arbery Police Report | DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

They say they saw him “hauling ass” down the street. That’s all.

Oops.

ok word games, they saw him run from that house.. is what he meant obviously lol

 

[colfax_m]

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

the video doesn't tell his story. that's why.

The statements of the McMichals adds to the story but apparently you refuse to acknowledge it.

his statements will be inadmissible, and the video doesn't show a shotgun wound on the man wrestling the gun away from McMichal. does it? You still didn't answer my questions. Why not?

You really hate inconvenient facts.

What makes his statement inadmissible?

his lawyer will make sure of it, he wasn't there. Especially if it was recorded.

Who wasn’t there? His lawyer? You don’t need a lawyer to give a statement to the police. That does not make it inadmissible.

Maybe they Coerced him. Like they need york 5 .. I see a pattern lol

Coerced? Hell. They tried to sweep this all under the rug.

They did? McMichaels is the one that released the video... again why can’t you deal with facts?

I believe it was their buddy Bryan who released the video believing it exonerated them.

I don’t believe these guys are all that smart because it had the opposite effect.

The police and local attorney tried to sweep it under the rug. You’re going to need some evidence the statement was coerced.

It was McMichaels idea to release it because it shows self defense.. smart move.. as you can see they are pushing for a hate crime because there don’t have a murder

The problem is that the MicMichal’s were the aggressors. You do not get the claim self defense when you start the conflict.

They were following a criminal should they show weakness?

There was no witnesses crime. They were operating under McMichal’s “gut feeling”. Therefore, their attempt to arrest him was illegal.

They said they saw him running from a home that had a no trespassing sign on it.. and it’s not the first time, they actually confronted Arbery previously.

Show me where they said that.

I do believe you made that up.

Police report

Incorrect. No where in the police report does it say they saw him leave the property.

Ahmaud Arbery Police Report | DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

They say they saw him “hauling ass” down the street. That’s all.

Oops.

ok word games, they saw him run from that house.. is what he meant obviously lol

So you’re right as long as you decide it’s okay to insert words into a police report that aren’t there?

 

[Jitss617]

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

the video doesn't tell his story. that's why.

The statements of the McMichals adds to the story but apparently you refuse to acknowledge it.

his statements will be inadmissible, and the video doesn't show a shotgun wound on the man wrestling the gun away from McMichal. does it? You still didn't answer my questions. Why not?

You really hate inconvenient facts.

What makes his statement inadmissible?

his lawyer will make sure of it, he wasn't there. Especially if it was recorded.

Who wasn’t there? His lawyer? You don’t need a lawyer to give a statement to the police. That does not make it inadmissible.

Maybe they Coerced him. Like they need york 5 .. I see a pattern lol

Coerced? Hell. They tried to sweep this all under the rug.

They did? McMichaels is the one that released the video... again why can’t you deal with facts?

I believe it was their buddy Bryan who released the video believing it exonerated them.

I don’t believe these guys are all that smart because it had the opposite effect.

The police and local attorney tried to sweep it under the rug. You’re going to need some evidence the statement was coerced.

It was McMichaels idea to release it because it shows self defense.. smart move.. as you can see they are pushing for a hate crime because there don’t have a murder

The problem is that the MicMichal’s were the aggressors. You do not get the claim self defense when you start the conflict.

They were following a criminal should they show weakness?

There was no witnesses crime. They were operating under McMichal’s “gut feeling”. Therefore, their attempt to arrest him was illegal.

They said they saw him running from a home that had a no trespassing sign on it.. and it’s not the first time, they actually confronted Arbery previously.

Show me where they said that.

I do believe you made that up.

Police report

Incorrect. No where in the police report does it say they saw him leave the property.

Ahmaud Arbery Police Report | DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

They say they saw him “hauling ass” down the street. That’s all.

Oops.

ok word games, they saw him run from that house.. is what he meant obviously lol

So you’re right as long as you decide it’s okay to insert words into a police report that aren’t there?

I know what he meant

 

[colfax_m]

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

the video doesn't tell his story. that's why.

The statements of the McMichals adds to the story but apparently you refuse to acknowledge it.

his statements will be inadmissible, and the video doesn't show a shotgun wound on the man wrestling the gun away from McMichal. does it? You still didn't answer my questions. Why not?

You really hate inconvenient facts.

What makes his statement inadmissible?

his lawyer will make sure of it, he wasn't there. Especially if it was recorded.

Who wasn’t there? His lawyer? You don’t need a lawyer to give a statement to the police. That does not make it inadmissible.

Maybe they Coerced him. Like they need york 5 .. I see a pattern lol

Coerced? Hell. They tried to sweep this all under the rug.

They did? McMichaels is the one that released the video... again why can’t you deal with facts?

I believe it was their buddy Bryan who released the video believing it exonerated them.

I don’t believe these guys are all that smart because it had the opposite effect.

The police and local attorney tried to sweep it under the rug. You’re going to need some evidence the statement was coerced.

It was McMichaels idea to release it because it shows self defense.. smart move.. as you can see they are pushing for a hate crime because there don’t have a murder

The problem is that the MicMichal’s were the aggressors. You do not get the claim self defense when you start the conflict.

They were following a criminal should they show weakness?

There was no witnesses crime. They were operating under McMichal’s “gut feeling”. Therefore, their attempt to arrest him was illegal.

They said they saw him running from a home that had a no trespassing sign on it.. and it’s not the first time, they actually confronted Arbery previously.

Show me where they said that.

I do believe you made that up.

Police report

Incorrect. No where in the police report does it say they saw him leave the property.

Ahmaud Arbery Police Report | DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

They say they saw him “hauling ass” down the street. That’s all.

Oops.

ok word games, they saw him run from that house.. is what he meant obviously lol

So you’re right as long as you decide it’s okay to insert words into a police report that aren’t there?

I know what he meant

How? You weren’t there. You’re just making shit up.

 

[Jitss617]

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

the video doesn't tell his story. that's why.

The statements of the McMichals adds to the story but apparently you refuse to acknowledge it.

his statements will be inadmissible, and the video doesn't show a shotgun wound on the man wrestling the gun away from McMichal. does it? You still didn't answer my questions. Why not?

You really hate inconvenient facts.

What makes his statement inadmissible?

his lawyer will make sure of it, he wasn't there. Especially if it was recorded.

Who wasn’t there? His lawyer? You don’t need a lawyer to give a statement to the police. That does not make it inadmissible.

Maybe they Coerced him. Like they need york 5 .. I see a pattern lol

Coerced? Hell. They tried to sweep this all under the rug.

They did? McMichaels is the one that released the video... again why can’t you deal with facts?

I believe it was their buddy Bryan who released the video believing it exonerated them.

I don’t believe these guys are all that smart because it had the opposite effect.

The police and local attorney tried to sweep it under the rug. You’re going to need some evidence the statement was coerced.

It was McMichaels idea to release it because it shows self defense.. smart move.. as you can see they are pushing for a hate crime because there don’t have a murder

The problem is that the MicMichal’s were the aggressors. You do not get the claim self defense when you start the conflict.

They were following a criminal should they show weakness?

There was no witnesses crime. They were operating under McMichal’s “gut feeling”. Therefore, their attempt to arrest him was illegal.

They said they saw him running from a home that had a no trespassing sign on it.. and it’s not the first time, they actually confronted Arbery previously.

Show me where they said that.

I do believe you made that up.

Police report

Incorrect. No where in the police report does it say they saw him leave the property.

Ahmaud Arbery Police Report | DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

They say they saw him “hauling ass” down the street. That’s all.

Oops.

ok word games, they saw him run from that house.. is what he meant obviously lol

So you’re right as long as you decide it’s okay to insert words into a police report that aren’t there?

I know what he meant

How? You weren’t there. You’re just making shit up.

We will see

 

[colfax_m]

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

the video doesn't tell his story. that's why.

The statements of the McMichals adds to the story but apparently you refuse to acknowledge it.

his statements will be inadmissible, and the video doesn't show a shotgun wound on the man wrestling the gun away from McMichal. does it? You still didn't answer my questions. Why not?

You really hate inconvenient facts.

What makes his statement inadmissible?

his lawyer will make sure of it, he wasn't there. Especially if it was recorded.

Who wasn’t there? His lawyer? You don’t need a lawyer to give a statement to the police. That does not make it inadmissible.

Maybe they Coerced him. Like they need york 5 .. I see a pattern lol

Coerced? Hell. They tried to sweep this all under the rug.

They did? McMichaels is the one that released the video... again why can’t you deal with facts?

I believe it was their buddy Bryan who released the video believing it exonerated them.

I don’t believe these guys are all that smart because it had the opposite effect.

The police and local attorney tried to sweep it under the rug. You’re going to need some evidence the statement was coerced.

It was McMichaels idea to release it because it shows self defense.. smart move.. as you can see they are pushing for a hate crime because there don’t have a murder

The problem is that the MicMichal’s were the aggressors. You do not get the claim self defense when you start the conflict.

They were following a criminal should they show weakness?

There was no witnesses crime. They were operating under McMichal’s “gut feeling”. Therefore, their attempt to arrest him was illegal.

They said they saw him running from a home that had a no trespassing sign on it.. and it’s not the first time, they actually confronted Arbery previously.

Show me where they said that.

I do believe you made that up.

Police report

Incorrect. No where in the police report does it say they saw him leave the property.

Ahmaud Arbery Police Report | DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

They say they saw him “hauling ass” down the street. That’s all.

Oops.

ok word games, they saw him run from that house.. is what he meant obviously lol

So you’re right as long as you decide it’s okay to insert words into a police report that aren’t there?

I know what he meant

How? You weren’t there. You’re just making shit up.

We will see

We’ve already seen that you made shit up to suit your purposes.

Fun times.

 

[Mr Natural]

Your hate for these Americans are worrisome.. why do you hate proud white southerners?

What do Southerners have to be proud of?

 

[Jitss617]

Your hate for these Americans are worrisome.. why do you hate proud white southerners?

What do Southerners have to be proud of?

Being Americans, accomplishing more then the average hood rat in the democrat run towns, freedom, second amendment, limited government..

 

[jc456]

How big of a hole do you expect to see?

a red one.

 

[jc456]

The jury is going to look at a lot more evidence than just the video. They’ll look at the autopsy report which shows he died with three shotgun wounds.

Which is unfortunate because the rest of the evidence you’re ignoring does not help the case of the McMichals.

all they need is the video. play it and tell your story. And the jury will look at you and go, you ok? just saying.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Why does it matter? Your going to jail anyway ha

Not me.

See, I know when deadly force is appropriate, unlike your hero racist rednecks...

Is it appropriate if he’s running at you tries to grab your gun?

No, it's not...

So the chances of him taking your gun to shoot you just went up.. are you suicidal?

well that dude thinks terrorized people run at loaded weapons rather than run where possible help and a call to police is a choice. Very odd fks.

They are all insane. Why can’t we all
Agree all 3 were idiots and Arbery was the bigger idiot and move on?

Three men chased down a man with firearms.

There is no bigger idiot in this situation.

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

The break-in, if it's real, is a separate issue. In no way does that give the McMichael bozos a justification to kill Arbery.

Face it, they're going to go to prison, and Travis McMichael will likely die there...

i agree the break in no loger matters, what arbery did was attack a man legally hold a gun and the great white warrior won that battle Easy.. god bless

It didn't matter then, either.

And, if you're a bettin' man, bank on your "great white warrior" to be gettin' some black dick in general population; count on that...

The way he handled that black in the street if I were black I’d be worried about Travis gettin some hava

Problem is, that redneck *****'s not gonna' have a shotgun that he can aim at someone from 90 feet away.

If he's convicted, I'll betcha' $20 Travis McMichael dies in prison.

Wanna' take that bet?

Your hate for these Americans are worrisome.. why do you hate proud white southerners?

My hate are worrisome?

ESL?

Do I hate them?

I don't hate them.

But I do expect them to pay for what they did, which is they hunted down and killed an unarmed black man then, while he was laying in the street, the trigger-man stood over his lifeless body and called him a "******* n****r".

Proud white southerners that I know have no use for pieces of shit like Gregory and Travis McMichael...

 

[Jitss617]

Why does it matter? Your going to jail anyway ha

Not me.

See, I know when deadly force is appropriate, unlike your hero racist rednecks...

Is it appropriate if he’s running at you tries to grab your gun?

No, it's not...

So the chances of him taking your gun to shoot you just went up.. are you suicidal?

well that dude thinks terrorized people run at loaded weapons rather than run where possible help and a call to police is a choice. Very odd fks.

They are all insane. Why can’t we all
Agree all 3 were idiots and Arbery was the bigger idiot and move on?

Three men chased down a man with firearms.

There is no bigger idiot in this situation.

Why do you leave out the break in? It the hammer in the road? Or the actual evidence of him attacking Travis?

The break-in, if it's real, is a separate issue. In no way does that give the McMichael bozos a justification to kill Arbery.

Face it, they're going to go to prison, and Travis McMichael will likely die there...

i agree the break in no loger matters, what arbery did was attack a man legally hold a gun and the great white warrior won that battle Easy.. god bless

It didn't matter then, either.

And, if you're a bettin' man, bank on your "great white warrior" to be gettin' some black dick in general population; count on that...

The way he handled that black in the street if I were black I’d be worried about Travis gettin some hava

Problem is, that redneck *****'s not gonna' have a shotgun that he can aim at someone from 90 feet away.

If he's convicted, I'll betcha' $20 Travis McMichael dies in prison.

Wanna' take that bet?

Your hate for these Americans are worrisome.. why do you hate proud white southerners?

My hate are worrisome?

ESL?

Do I hate them?

I don't hate them.

But I do expect them to pay for what they did, which is they hunted down and killed an unarmed black man then, while he was laying in the street, the trigger-man stood over his lifeless body and called him a "******* n****r".

Proud white southerners that I know have no use for pieces of shit like Gregory and Travis McMichael...

If you don’t hate them then why are you lying about them?