Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #21
Hey, I was wondering when you were going to bring that whole mind reading thing into play. You know that bit where you pretend you know what's better for someone else than they do themselves? It's a real hoot to watch you try to be all elitist and stuff.Naw, I just have watched the GOP play these fake moral panics to get stupid white people to vote against their own economic interests...
CrimIncel Joe seems to think that it's against the economic interests of white people to be allowed to work and earn an honest living, free from the burden of having to give up a substantial part of our hard-earned incomes to support worthless, burdensome parasites such as CrimIncel Joe and its type.
Why it thinks this only applies to white people, I don't know that I can say. The will to make an honest living, and to reserve to one's own purposes, what one has rightfully worked to earn, surely has nothing to do with race.
Uhh, it's not even controversial that women are physically inferior to men in sports that emphasize size, agility and strength. That's why you will never see the top women's tennis player defeat the top men's player, the top women's basketball team beat the top men's team, the top female golfer defeat the top male golfer using the same tees, the top female MMA fighter defeat the top male MMA fighter, and so on. You, OTOH, are quite misogynistic because you simply do not care about allowing girls to thrive competing with other girls, to be secure in their bathrooms and showers free from men. You would put them at risk to satisfy your own political goals.So what you are saying is women are inferior... got it.. you're totally not misogynistic.
Exactly. It remains a hard biological fact, that in many of the physical attributes that apply to most sports, men are at a very strong advantage over women. That is why, if women's sports are to exist at all, in any viable form, women need to compete against other women, and not against men.
This is not to say that women are inferior, just very different.
It is also a fact, driven by our biology, that compared to women, men are, in general bigger, stronger, more aggressive, more sexually-driven, more inclined to use force and violence to get what we want. For this reason, when women are in particularly vulnerable positions, such as when bathing, changing clothes, or whatever, society is particularly obligated to protect them from men who might wish to give in to our more savage nature, to the end of taking advantage of women.
Why would a creature like CrimIncel Joe be so opposed to allowing women this protection?
I think it's obvious. Like any Incel, its only hope of getting any intimate contact with a woman would be against her will, in a situation where she is denied the necessary protection against male predators in an especially vulnerable situation. Too weak and cowardly even to try to commit a rape where the intended victim is less vulnerable.