Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Reporter's job, is to find out what gvt is doing behind closed doors...sometimes they succeed...
Trump was suppose to be arraigned on Friday, but trump team refused because he wanted a protest, so he chose 4 days later....on Tuesday.
This time laps between indictment and arraignment allowed the leak of how many counts against trump in his indictment..
It's all a show Marty
That's false!
Most prosecutors do exactly what Bragg did...a separate count for each criminal offense.
What proceedings were leaked? The grand jury did not leak it....It's a crime to leak information on Grand Jury Proceedings. I guess some crimes are more equal than others.
It's always Trump's Fault. Do you even realize how far off the deep end you have gone?
Not G5000 or ElmerMudd deep end, but only a few feet above them?
What proceedings were leaked? The grand jury did not leak it....
Once the indictment were filed, many more people had access to the counts filed...thats why the arraignment was set for the next day...till Trump team changed it, based on a lie....that SS was not ready...secret services claims they were ready so trump team lied to move out the arraignment for his SHOW that he directed on Tuesday....
And yes, there was a leak to how many counts...but NOT what the counts were, and even that, should not have happened...
No it isnt.It's one Criminal offense. At most they charge multiple levels for a given offense to give the jury a choice, between say murder and manslaughter.
It's like charging the person for each M&M in a bag instead of just stealing the bag of M&M's.
No it isnt.
This is not just stormy Daniel's payoff, it is the national Enquirer McDougal catch and kill that he paid for and cooked the books, and the bellman with the maid who was impregnated by trump national Enquirer catch and kill story...that trump paid for...ALL at different times...all different falsification of business records...
Why are you pretending it was one incident?? Huh???
I believe there might be some confusion regarding the legality of the actions mentioned in the article to which you are referring (the hush money payments and catch and kill scheme, right?). While it is true that the FEC did not prosecute or look into the matter, that does not automatically mean that the actions were legal. There are other federal and state bodies that may have jurisdiction over these matters, and in this case, it appears that the investigation has fallen under the purview of the Manhattan District Attorney's Office.None of which are illegal. Even the FEC didn't care to prosecute or even look into it. Any of this would be a fine, much like the one Clinton had to pay due to the Steele Dossier. There has to be an underlying crime for any falsification to matter criminally. That is the point may of us are trying to make.
He recorded the writing of the checks, and who he wrote them to. They were documented and accounted for. What they were for doesn't matter.
I believe there might be some confusion regarding the legality of the actions mentioned in the article to which you are referring (the hush money payments and catch and kill scheme, right?). While it is true that the FEC did not prosecute or look into the matter, that does not automatically mean that the actions were legal. There are other federal and state bodies that may have jurisdiction over these matters, and in this case, it appears that the investigation has fallen under the purview of the Manhattan District Attorney's Office.
It is also important to note that the issue at hand is not solely about the hush money payments themselves, but rather the alleged falsification of business records in an attempt to conceal these payments. Falsifying records to cover up the true nature of these transactions may constitute a crime, even if the payments themselves do not.
One of the claims being made by Bragg is that the 'enhancing crime', which is the crime that enhances what would otherwise be a misdemeanor, to a felony, are the attempts by Trump and his conspirators to prevent the facts of Trump's sexual encounters with Daniels and McDougal from coming to light, and thus harming his chances in the 2016 election. Afterall, he only won by 70,000 votes in three swing states. This act can be construed as a deceptive candidacy, which is apparently illegal in NY. It won't matter, for the purpose of enhancing the misdemeanors to felonies, if the underlying crime's statute of limitations has passed, or even it if is a federal crime, and not a state crime, as I understand New York law (noting my caveat: "IANAL" these are lay opinions). Also note that in the SOF, a tax crime could also be the enhancing crime raising the misdemeanors to a felony, and that crime would fall under NY law as NY has a state income tax and NYC (and Yonkers) have a municipal tax (I believe).
Furthermore, the point about the fines paid by Clinton in relation to the Steele Dossier is not an entirely accurate comparison. The cases differ in the underlying facts, circumstances, and potential criminal charges.
As for your statement about the checks being recorded and accounted for, the concern is not just about the checks themselves, but whether they were purposefully disguised within the financial records in an effort to evade scrutiny. If it is proven that these transactions were part of a larger cover-up, then it could indeed matter, both legally and in the court of public opinion.
It is essential to consider the entire context of the case to fully understand the potential legal implications and not dismiss the investigation simply because the FEC has not pursued it.
Cheers,
Rumpole
And He's guilty as sin by your metric. You aren't Nancy Pelosi by chance?Yep, without a trial, that can not be proven, or disproven.
I believe
"...34 felony counts for falsifying business records in his determination to steal the presidency in 2016 and what we saw today unsealed to day both in the indictment and the statement of facts that accompanied the indictment was a massive conspiracy, a massive scheme to basically the voters of the united states by concealing deeply damaging information and evidence about Donald Trumps unsuitability to be a candidate for the presidency" ---Glenn Kirschner, former Washington DC prosecutor
But there has been no crime cited by Bragg.The 34 charges are for 34 false business transactions, each time they cooked the books to falsify records to avoid taxes....and hide the real expense for the three sexual accusations, porn star, playboy playmate, and bellman tell all on the maid affair with trump child.
Truly, truly patheticThe 34 charges are for 34 false business transactions, each time they cooked the books to falsify records to avoid taxes....and hide the real expense for the three sexual accusations, porn star, playboy playmate, and bellman tell all on the maid affair with trump child.
I haven't seen the underlying crime that would make them felonies ...released by bragg yet, and he needs to...But there has been no crime cited by Bragg.
What's pathetic? The charges involve 3 separate payoffs for 3 different sexual encounters and separately falsifying each....Truly, truly pathetic
What's pathetic? The charges involve 3 separate payoffs for 3 different sexual encounters and separately falsifying each....
Why haven't trump lawyers tried to get this case dismissed yet?
Trump lawyers asked for January 2024....why oh why?Becasue they know they're lying and are going to get caught too early; don't be surprised when they get close to Dec. 4 they bump further out.
I'm just sitting back and waiting for trump lawyers to do their thing with motions in the court to get it dropped or reduced and seeing what happens in the legal process...What propaganda are you listening to that's telling you this is a justifiable case?
What propaganda are you listening to that's telling you this is a justifiable case?
And He's guilty as sin by your metric. You aren't Nancy Pelosi by chance?
The Democratic National Committee is not involved with the N.Y. State prosecutors and indictments.His bosses at DNC.
