SweetSue92
Diamond Member
Okay, I accept your answer of "Donald Trump caused me endless butthurt."
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Transcript of DA Bragg's indictment press conference
- Thread starter Rumpole
- Start date
Okay, I accept your answer of "Donald Trump caused me endless butthurt."
- Feb 22, 2017
- 104,361
- 35,117
- 2,290
Okay, I accept your answer of "Donald Trump caused me endless butthurt."
Whatever makes you happy!
Now get out there and run every stop sign since you are above the law!
Yep, without a trial, that can not be proven, or disproven.None of this has been proven in a court of law, only in your mind.
Trump would have lost in 2016 if these these affairs had not been covered up from the American voters, right at the heels of the Access Hollywood tape of grabbing women by their pussy, if you are a star you can get away with it.Thanks, you just made my point for me.
Laws that prevent serious bodily injury and harm are justifiable.
Laws that have people indicted because they entered into a LAWFUL contract with another free citizen but then falsified that record to the harm of absolutely NO ONE are ridiculous.
You either know this and are gaslighting....
Or you are totally idiotic beyond the point of comprehension.
Choose one.
So yes it caused great harm to our nation....
And also, illegally avoiding taxes harms the citizens who do pay their taxes.
Last edited:
The 34 charges are for 34 false business transactions, each time they cooked the books to falsify records to avoid taxes....and hide the real expense for the three sexual accusations, porn star, playboy playmate, and bellman tell all on the maid affair with trump child.But what criminal code did Trump violate to trigger 34 charges?
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,319
- 32,332
- 2,300
Maybe Trump team told the judge they needed time to prepare their defence?
Maybe 8 months is normal?
I truly do not know.....? What I do know is the defence team can request a speedy trial, if the court calendar allows.
Lots of bending over backwards by you to put this on Trump, as usual.
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,319
- 32,332
- 2,300
it shows repetition of the crime...
Doing it in one transaction, maybe it was a mistake??
doing it a dozen times is hard to talk your way out of imo...it shows a group of people conspiring together...over and over again to accomplish the illegal act....?
It is how N.Y. LAW is written...
Most prosecutors don't string things out like this, Bragg decided to do so purely for political hackery.
It's one action distributed into multiple payments. It would be like accusing someone of 30 counts of murder because the person took 30 days to die.
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,319
- 32,332
- 2,300
Yes, trump is innocent until proven
Yes, trump is innocent until proven guilty o
Oh, this involves 3 transactions Marty..
One payoff to the National Enquirer for playboy bunny Karen McDougal tell all, that they did a catch and kill on
For $150,000, that Trump reimbursed the National Enquirer for.....
A second one to the National Enquirer for a Bellman at Trump Tower who said Trump got a maid pregnant and she had his baby, another catch and kill story....by the N/E, of which Trump reimbursed them for the $30,000 N/E paid him.
Then lastly, the $130,000 for Stormy Daniel's Hush Money payoff.
On all three he falsified business record. That's serial....
he did not do it alone silly willy...
The judge with the defense lawyers and prosecutor AGREE on a date that is best for all involved....is what I just read the process is....so Trump lawyers need this time to prepare...plus I am pretty certain they will be busy with discovery, of which both the prose union and the defence team share what info/EVIDENCE they got, plus a motion or two filed before trial likely...
But the prosecutor and judge have to AGREE with defense, and Visa versa.
None of which are illegal, and if anything would be a federal issue. again Bragg is using jiggery pokery to make a federal non issue into a state one.
And same with you trying to put it on bragg or judge...yet you don't see what y'all are doing... hypocritical, no?Lots of bending over backwards by you to put this on Trump, as usual.
The law says the date is determine by ALL THREE PARTIES AGREEING TO A DATE FOR TRIAL. the defense team has more say in the time because the defendant has the right to the time needed to prepare their defense after the Discovery period is complete.
Plus Dec 4th is the week the primary begins
...trump likely has some sort of scheme planned out to tie the two, together...
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,319
- 32,332
- 2,300
And same with you trying to put it on bragg or judge...yet you don't see what y'all are doing... hypocritical, no?
The law says the date is determine by ALL THREE PARTIES AGREEING TO A DATE FOR TRIAL. the defense team has more say in the time because the defendant has the right to the time needed to prepare their defense after the Discovery period is complete.
Plus Dec 4th is the week the primary begins
...trump likely has some sort of scheme planned out to tie the two, together...
Even Never Trumpers are saying this entire thing is a sham.
The Defense asked for December? You have proof of this?
It isn't anything like that, don't be so obtuse, you're smarter than that....imo.Most prosecutors don't string things out like this, Bragg decided to do so purely for political hackery.
It's one action distributed into multiple payments. It would be like accusing someone of 30 counts of murder because the person took 30 days to die.
34 separate times they falsified business records for the three separate sexual encounter coverups...
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,319
- 32,332
- 2,300
It isn't anything like that, don't be so obtuse, you're smarter than that....imo.
34 separate times they falsified business records for the three separate sexual encounter coverups...
You don't have to be smart to figure out this has all the makings of a railroad attempt.
Again, even Never Trumpers are saying this is weak ass shit.
The defense agreed or even chose the December fourth date, and the other two agreed to their date.Even Never Trumpers are saying this entire thing is a sham.
The Defense asked for December? You have proof of this?
POINT BEING, this date is what the defense wanted or chose, or agreed to being a good date
It was not done to screw trump by a lone judge as y'all are lying about....
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,319
- 32,332
- 2,300
The defense agreed or even chose the December fourth date, and the other two agreed to their date.
POINT BEING, this date is what the defense wanted or chose, or agreed to being a good date
It was not done to screw trump by a lone judge as y'all are lying about....
Again, you have no links for this......
The only person making a circus show out of it, is Trump...he announced his arrest before a grand jury decision, and has been trying to control the narrative and circus he created since....You don't have to be smart to figure out this has all the makings of a railroad attempt.
Again, even Never Trumpers are saying this is weak ass shit.
The billionaire hussler needs your last dollar...
He is unfit to serve America...imo.
It's the law, protocol on how trial dates are picked...look it up yourself and inform yourself...Again, you have no links for this......
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,319
- 32,332
- 2,300
The only person making a circus show out of it, is Trump...he announced his arrest before a grand jury decision, and has been trying to control the narrative and circus he created since....
The billionaire hussler needs your last dollar...
He is unfit to serve America...imo.
And no complaint about the person who leaked the indictment count from you....typical.
You came to that conclusion 6 years ago, so your current opinion on it is worthless.
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,319
- 32,332
- 2,300
It's the law, protocol on how trial dates are picked...look it up yourself and inform yourself...
Depends on the State. you are the one confident about Trump's lawyers having a say in it, prove it or admit you are just making shit up.
Reporter's job, is to find out what gvt is doing behind closed doors...sometimes they succeed...And no complaint about the person who leaked the indictment count from you....typical.
You came to that conclusion 6 years ago, so your current opinion on it is worthless.
Trump was suppose to be arraigned on Friday, but trump team refused because he wanted a protest, so he chose 4 days later....on Tuesday.
This time laps between indictment and arraignment allowed the leak of how many counts against trump in his indictment..
It's all a show Marty
That's false!Most prosecutors don't string things out like this
Most prosecutors do exactly what Bragg did...a separate count for each criminal offense.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 66
- Views
- 887
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 88
- Replies
- 281
- Views
- 2K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 121
- Views
- 683
- Replies
- 12
- Views
- 34
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 269
- Replies
- 16
- Views
- 69
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8059
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-