Tranny Defends Exposing Penis In Women's Locker Room: Free Speech/Protests "Locked Down".

[Papageorgio]

It is obvious you are clueless and causeless without the LAW.

the common law?

like we are supposed to believe all women are intimidated by a "dick of One", and should cower in the corners as a result.

You do not know what you do not know, it seems you are clueless and causeless when it comes to understanding the LAW which will naturally be called into force whether you know or not know.

the common law?

there is no appeal to ignorance.

you have to make a superior, but common case for the common law to adjudicate.

like we are supposed to believe all women are intimidated by a "dick of One", and should cower in the corners as a result.

where are the brave women in modern times?

Please up grade to the LAW and not the clueless causeless common law of which you tripe.

that won't work in open Court. you need an argument.

You don't argue the LAW, the LAW is and always will be regardless of the time, you seem to be stuck in the clueless and causeless.

 

[danielpalos]

the common law?

like we are supposed to believe all women are intimidated by a "dick of One", and should cower in the corners as a result.

You do not know what you do not know, it seems you are clueless and causeless when it comes to understanding the LAW which will naturally be called into force whether you know or not know.

the common law?

there is no appeal to ignorance.

you have to make a superior, but common case for the common law to adjudicate.

like we are supposed to believe all women are intimidated by a "dick of One", and should cower in the corners as a result.

where are the brave women in modern times?

Please up grade to the LAW and not the clueless causeless common law of which you tripe.

that won't work in open Court. you need an argument.

You don't argue the LAW, the LAW is and always will be regardless of the time, you seem to be stuck in the clueless and causeless.

it is about a conflict of laws.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

It should be illegal to be a tranny -- is there a way we can criminalize these people?


This country was a lot safer before trannies were invented....Damn you Satan!!!!

 

[Papageorgio]

You do not know what you do not know, it seems you are clueless and causeless when it comes to understanding the LAW which will naturally be called into force whether you know or not know.

the common law?

there is no appeal to ignorance.

you have to make a superior, but common case for the common law to adjudicate.

like we are supposed to believe all women are intimidated by a "dick of One", and should cower in the corners as a result.

where are the brave women in modern times?

Please up grade to the LAW and not the clueless causeless common law of which you tripe.

that won't work in open Court. you need an argument.

You don't argue the LAW, the LAW is and always will be regardless of the time, you seem to be stuck in the clueless and causeless.

it is about a conflict of laws.

There is NO conflict with LAW, it is the LAW.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

by the way, a so-called straight guy exposed himself in a women's bathroom to a 63 year old woman.....there really needs to be laws against this, this is getting to be a national crisis now...

 

[danielpalos]

the common law?

there is no appeal to ignorance.

you have to make a superior, but common case for the common law to adjudicate.

like we are supposed to believe all women are intimidated by a "dick of One", and should cower in the corners as a result.

where are the brave women in modern times?

Please up grade to the LAW and not the clueless causeless common law of which you tripe.

that won't work in open Court. you need an argument.

You don't argue the LAW, the LAW is and always will be regardless of the time, you seem to be stuck in the clueless and causeless.

it is about a conflict of laws.

There is NO conflict with LAW, it is the LAW.

which law?

 

[danielpalos]

by the way, a so-called straight guy exposed himself in a women's bathroom to a 63 year old woman.....there really needs to be laws against this, this is getting to be a national crisis now...

why are women not being more proactive in modern times.

 

[Papageorgio]

Please up grade to the LAW and not the clueless causeless common law of which you tripe.

that won't work in open Court. you need an argument.

You don't argue the LAW, the LAW is and always will be regardless of the time, you seem to be stuck in the clueless and causeless.

it is about a conflict of laws.

There is NO conflict with LAW, it is the LAW.

which law?

THE LAW of course.

 

[Silhouette]

by the way, a so-called straight guy exposed himself in a women's bathroom to a 63 year old woman.....there really needs to be laws against this, this is getting to be a national crisis now...

I think the Trump Administration is gearing up for a Public Service Announcement on how to check what's in your underwear if you're in doubt how your genitals might affect someone undressing behind a door marked "women"..

 

[danielpalos]

that won't work in open Court. you need an argument.

You don't argue the LAW, the LAW is and always will be regardless of the time, you seem to be stuck in the clueless and causeless.

it is about a conflict of laws.

There is NO conflict with LAW, it is the LAW.

which law?

THE LAW of course.

citation, please.

 

[captkaos]

There's a new hand over your mouth ladies..and his name is Always-Autumn

(*mine) Trans Woman Declares She’s No Longer ‘Ashamed’ to Expose Penis in Women’s Locker Room
"While countless girls walk around the locker room naked, I felt like I couldn't... because I have a penis."...*he found it difficult to expose *himself in female company. At least until this weekend, when *he "finally said 'fuck it,'" and, to the "disapproving looks" of ** women, undressed in the middle of the locker room, *his male genitalia exposed, and "walked naked to the shower."

..."I live in Manhattan and work out at a gym in Soho, so I figured that this is as safe a place as any to push the envelope."..

..Some critics even tried to steer the conversation into taking into account the feelings of women traumatized by male abuse. How would a woman who suffered through sexual harassment feel upon seeing Always-Autumn naked in a locker room? How would a female rape victim feel?

But this criticism, like all others, has been shut down."...
Eventually, the subreddit's moderators deleted all responses critical of Always-Autumn, given the group's guidelines that prohibit " stirring the post." The thread has later been locked altogether.


The article refers to the man as "she" and "her" which is terrible journalism. Some people 'even' tried to take into account the feelings of women rape victims? Really? Wow, what an edgy concept. You've come a long way baby..

Imagine a site for debate locking down a thread where women are complaining that they must undress in front of a man and enduring him naked in the WOMEN'S locker room? What website nazis would do such a thing to drown the cries of distressed women? They could've covertly squelched the cries of protest by just dungeoning the conversation; ie: soft-banning any protests of women rape victims and their defenders.

This fails as a hasty generalization fallacy.

Of course, bigotry and hate are devoid of logic and critical thinking, this thread being a prime example.

^^^


And this is why Trump won



.

Equal rights for LGBT people has been pushed for along time "they have the right to be recognized" Their rights should be respected etc. Now that these deviants are exercising these "rights" it's a Problem. They should have thought about how shallow the pool was before they dove in for these deviant. Getting just what they asked for. Good for the heshe. "Stand up straight before entering the shower"

 

[Papageorgio]

You don't argue the LAW, the LAW is and always will be regardless of the time, you seem to be stuck in the clueless and causeless.

it is about a conflict of laws.

There is NO conflict with LAW, it is the LAW.

which law?

THE LAW of course.

citation, please.

Why am I posting a LAW everyone is following?

 

[danielpalos]

it is about a conflict of laws.

There is NO conflict with LAW, it is the LAW.

which law?

THE LAW of course.

citation, please.

Why am I posting a LAW everyone is following?

what law and why is this in Court, if it is the common law?

 

[Silhouette]

someone posted that women are going to have to get used to guys exposing themselves in their locker rooms.

I’m sure that’s how the new USSC will come down on the conflict.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

someone posted that women are going to have to get used to guys exposing themselves in their locker rooms.

I’m sure that’s how the new USSC will come down on the conflict.

I would accept that women should get used to men exposing themselves. IF men were likewise obligated to accept women pointing and laughing.

 

[danielpalos]

someone posted that women are going to have to get used to guys exposing themselves in their locker rooms.

I’m sure that’s how the new USSC will come down on the conflict.

thank goodness women don't really believe in equality or equal rights.

 

[Silhouette]

Again, he won 30 states to 20.

Awesome... which doesn't reflect what the people wanted at all.

What the people wanted was/is no guys flashing their dicks around women’s locker rooms.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

Bleh, as much as I hate to say it, Sil actually has a real and valid issue on this one.

Karma says that they whined their way to "feel comfortable" in the bathroom/locker room of the opposite gender - and now they're going to reward that hesitant acceptance with pushing the envelope and waving their dick around in front of the girls. Fuck that.

This is why I hate third-wave LGBT fucks. It's never enough. Get them out of the fucking bathroom, the less than 1% of the fucking population of transgenders can suck it up and leave the 50% of the female, and figure what? 30% of the male, population that finds it exceedingly uncomfortable to share a bathroom with the opposite sex; regardless of fi they're hiking a dress over their dick (or boobs) that day or not.

No support from this LGBT'er and I know a bunch more who find it an "abuse of victim-hood status"

Female reporters are ok in Mens locker rooms so I guess its ok in reverse. if its a sporting event. The courts said so.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

The Transexual Revolution is why President Trump's adversaries no longer wear pink hats.

The new realization of the past couple of years is that all women don't have female equipment, many have penises.

I don't know any women that have penises.

That you noticed....Don't really look around that much do you.

 

[danielpalos]

Again, he won 30 states to 20.

Awesome... which doesn't reflect what the people wanted at all.

What the people wanted was/is no guys flashing their dicks around women’s locker rooms.

why not insist on the Equality of; you do it to us, so we can do it to You. no more complaints, guys.