Top Intelligence Officials Contradicted Brennan: ‘No Intelligence’ To Support Key Russia Hoax Claim

That is exactly what they said.
"The dispute was over the “key judgment” in a January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that Russia had interfered in the election specifically because Putin and the Russian government “aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances.
The senior intelligence officials pointed out the lack of evidence to substantiate the claim. “We have no intelligence to directly support this ‘aspiration’ point,” said one member of the small group of individuals working with Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on the assessment of Russian activity in the lead-up to the 2016 election.”

That one part was the only part (manufactured) to tie Trump the Russians. It was the genesis of the Russia Russia Russia hoax.
Also Rawley...go to the link of the assessment in your post....


Then go to page ii, and page iii.
This is where I got my info from....or most of it....
 
Also Rawley...go to the link of the assessment in your post....


Then go to page ii, and page iii.
This is where I got my info from....or most of it....
Understood. Those were Brennen's manufactured lies. Nothing related to Trump and Russia was based on any actual intelligence. Fourth, and last time. "We have no intelligence to directly support this ‘aspiration’ point,”
 
But it doesn't say otherwise...I read the Pdf documents released that Gabbard is opining on.... She's not talking facts or showing evidence....she's giving her political opinion based on her own politics...and distraction abilities....

Nothing in that release shows what she is claiming and there is not a court in Heaven or Hell that would prosecute Obama for being President and making his own presidential decisions for furthering the investigation in to Russian interference in the 2016 election, until they got to the bottom of all the Russians did.

Obama's skin color will probably save him
The rest of your post is not true.
 
I think a good chunk of them are deep staters that are afraid of Trump and Gabbard as posing an existential threat to their very existence.

Pardon me, but give me a ******* break. Comey, Clapper, Brennen, McCabe, Strzok, Page ... are all proven lying, dishonest, IMHO criminal, scumbags that hated Trump and cooked up the entire Russia Russia Russia hoax to **** over a President they didn't like.

It really doesn't get any worse than that. Except perhaps Obama's role in this whole thing.

Obama ordered it.
 
No one believes a word out of this administration, so kindly **** off.
 
All the "top intelligence officials" have been replaced by idiots like Gabbard and Bondi. There is no credibility left in the US intelligence service at this point.
And?
 
Weakening Clinton is helping Trump. It’s a two party system.

Jesus, they’re splitting hairs.
 

Brennan ignored objections: ‘The assessment will stay the same.’​


Top officials working on an intelligence community analysis about Russia’s interference in the 2016 election were overruled by CIA Director John Brennan, according to records exclusively reviewed by The Federalist. The records are related to ongoing criminal investigations into Brennan and other top intelligence officials for their roles in launching the Russia collusion hoax.

The dispute was over the “key judgment” in a January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that Russia had interfered in the election specifically because Putin and the Russian government “aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances.”


BJ-
As much as I believe that Brennan should hang for any convictions associated with his crimes -this directive came directly from Obama.

What crime is that exactly? Sedition, was it? A 'coup' attempt was it? Laughably, 'treason'?

Its adorable how hard y'all are trying to talk about ANYTHING other than Trump's cover up of his association with Jeffrey Epstein.
 
Judges don't have JACK SHIT to say about what charges are brought against whom.

Stop getting your education from the dumbest ***** on the Planet -- Televison.
When the court case is filed and goes before a judge, doesn't the judge get a preliminary view and determine merit or whether the crimes charged are within statute of limitations, or whether the defendant got all of their rights...like Miranda, before being charged and all kinds of things like that?
 
YOu kids already tried this with the Durham circle jerk.

It was a waste of time and money then too.
Like I said.
If b.o. and his pals didn't do anything wrong then they should welcome this investigation with open arms.
If they've done nothing wrong they have nothing to worry about.
Right?
 
Obama's skin color will probably save him
The rest of your post is not true.
There is no crime Billiejeans, to charge Obama with....

What US CODE STATUTE will he be charged with....??? You can't list them, because there are NONE that he could be charged with or even did wrong on this Russia issue...he told us all along that they believed Russia did not hack our voting systems, but Russia still interfered HEAVILY in our election, which needed investigation. What in the hell is treasonous about that? Do you even know what you are talking about?

Y'all are like puppets, with no thoughts or reasoning of your own....they pull your strings and you move the way they planned you to.

God did NOT make you, to be like that.....
 
Well the DOJ has the goods now, and they don't do the rubber stamp Senate thing, princess.
What are "the goods" on him now? There's nothing, nada, zip.... to support any crime by Obama, in this matter....

Explain what evidence you think was presented that shows any crime, please!
 
What are "the goods" on him now? There's nothing, nada, zip.... to support any crime by Obama, in this matter....

Explain what evidence you think was presented that shows any crime, please!
Turn OFF your CNN, turn OFF your MSLSD, KILL YOUR TEE VEE, princess.
They ALL have ROTTED YOUR BRAIN.
You make NO SENSE at ALL.
You are here denying REALITY.
We were ALL lied to.
The RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA narrative was, and is STILL, FAKE AS FUGAZY.
The "goods" are CRIMINAL IMPLICATIONS OF TREASON.
What Obama did in ORDERING the CIA to MAKE UP FALSE BULLFEATHERS is ILLEAGAL.
Suck it up butter cup, put on your warrior princess big girl pants and face the TRUTH.
And, have a nice day.
😚
 
15th post
When the court case is filed and goes before a judge, doesn't the judge get a preliminary view and determine merit or whether the crimes charged are within statute of limitations, or whether the defendant got all of their rights...like Miranda, before being charged and all kinds of things like that?
Stop watching TV. No, it goes in front of a Grand Jury first. The Grand Jury indicts. A judge doesn't have a lot of control over a Grand Jury.

Grand Juries don't sit for just one case, they sit for aspecified term. Once the Bastard Son Of Frank Marshall Davis is indicted, he will go in front of a Petit Jury. Judges have more power there. But not as much as you think.

They're going after The Bastard with a vengeance. I don't think they actually convict The Bastard of anything. I'm not even sure it's a good idea.

But they're gonna get a whole lot of his co-conspirators -- Brennan, Comey, maybe Schiff-for-brains. And I'd love to see Nazi Pelousy's rotting corpse in prison. I want her to die HARD.

What those scum did is inexcusable, unforgiveable. Yeah, politics is a 'contact sport' but when you go in the face of The American People, spit in our faces and try to usurp power illegally and through illegal means....... That has to be stopped. Stopped HARD.
 
Like I said.
If b.o. and his pals didn't do anything wrong then they should welcome this investigation with open arms.
If they've done nothing wrong they have nothing to worry about.
Right?
YOu mean like tRump and releasing the Epstein files?
 
YOu mean like tRump and releasing the Epstein files?
Nope.
cackles and tater had intention to release epstein court records.
You leftists didn't care about it.
If leftists/dems had any legitimate info against President Trump they would have exposed it.
It seems as though you are trying to change the subject because b.o. is under investigation.
Again, innocent people welcome investigations and cooperate.
b.o. doesn't appear to be cooperating. 😎
 
Nope.
cackles and tater had intention to release epstein court records.
You leftists didn't care about it.
If leftists/dems had any legitimate info against President Trump they would have exposed it.
It seems as though you are trying to change the subject because b.o. is under investigation.
Again, innocent people welcome investigations and cooperate.
b.o. doesn't appear to be cooperating. 😎
Epstein was always the distraction from Obama’s un American actions….This shows why Democrats can never again be trusted with power.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom