OK, this is my hypothesis.
Due to how much motive liberals have to "find" wacism, because of the way it greatly empowers them, giving them, generally speaking, the ability to marginalize any argument, idea, person or group they want to,
that they are and can never be, even close to objective judges of what is or is not wacist,
thus, my conclusion,
NO ACCUSATION OF WACISM FROM ANY LEFTIST SHOULD EVER BE GIVEN ANY CONSIDERATION.
Also, in any valid discussion of actual racism, there is an unfair or unjust action associated with it, and that action can be discussed on it's own merits, with no need of bringing "wacism" into the dicussion.
Discuss.
Due to how much motive liberals have to "find" wacism, because of the way it greatly empowers them, giving them, generally speaking, the ability to marginalize any argument, idea, person or group they want to,
that they are and can never be, even close to objective judges of what is or is not wacist,
thus, my conclusion,
NO ACCUSATION OF WACISM FROM ANY LEFTIST SHOULD EVER BE GIVEN ANY CONSIDERATION.
Also, in any valid discussion of actual racism, there is an unfair or unjust action associated with it, and that action can be discussed on it's own merits, with no need of bringing "wacism" into the dicussion.
Discuss.