He had no business interfering in a serious trial. Our criminals are dealt with in court and not on the street. And that fuckwit knew it as well. Hope he enjoys his latest stint in jail. The world is a better place.
He didnāt interfere in any trial, moron. He was asking them questions outside of the courtroom. Only in fascist UK where there is no free speech would that be breaking any laws.
You are an idiot. You cannot interfere in the judicial process. That is why he is having an early night tonight and for the next 13 months.
Feel free to show how he āinterferedā in any way. There was no crowd, he caused no ādisturbanceā. All he did was ask two Muslim men who were already convicted of raping under aged British white girls how they felt about their verdicts. The men then threatened him.
Of course you are upset that anyone would pay any attention to Muslim rapists and expose them. Youāre a Muslim apologist and despise anyone that points out their many savage acts.
Funny how Mr. Robinson got no trial, just straight from arrrest to conviction and sentencing within a day. Yet Muslim rapists of young girls got a trial, and even after being convicted were free to walk around until they decided to show up to their sentencing hearing.
Your total ignorance makes me chuckle.
Let me try and educate you.
Firstly he was not convicted and sentenced. He was free on a suspended 13 month sentence. Perhaps you dont have them in the US. Its more or less a second chance. You have been found guilty and sentenced already. But you are free under license. If you break the terms of the license you go straight to jail. Thats it.
Secondly, there are reasons why courts impose gagging orders on trials like this. I will explain this slowly and not use big words to confuse you. Where there are multiple defendants in a case there will be different trials held.
Some might last longer than others.
To ensure that all are fair the judge orders a media ban until the last trial is over.
If this is not done then the lawyers for the later trials could claim that their clients right to a fair trial was prejudiced by press reports.
The jury has to decide the case based on the evidence put before them. Not by something they have read in the paper or online.
This clowns actions jeopardise the trial and could possibly have led to rapists being set free.
His actions were helping racists. Why do you not understand that ?
I suspect that when the dust has settled on this that he will be facing contempt of court charges and may face a lengthier sentence. Fingers crossed.