NetJedi
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2024
- 1,123
- 1,614
- 1,938
I'm not "downplaying" anything, the problem is certainly severe, however that doesn't mean that the solution(s) to it should be purely reactive and extreme.You’re downplaying the magnitude of the immigration problem…I think you and those who share your passive position have simply refused to understand or acknowledge that radical shit requires radical measures to fix it…30-50 illegals within our borders is radical shit.
I'm glad we agree on that partRand Paul has a right to the public square like everyone does, I’m not saying otherwise, I simply think his position needs to be challenged and debated right now in public with his constituents and Laken Riley’s parents present.
Are you suggesting that President Trump should declare martial law? No way, no how, uh-uh would I ever support that, IMHO that would not only plunge the country into a deep morass from whence it might not return but would also be political suicide for the GOP for even suggesting it.Martial law stays posse comitatus…the point is moot.
I think you couldn’t be more wrong…those of us actually living in or near sanctuary shitholes full of Mexico’s people would happily invite such an imposition…we know and understand such as a necessary evil, we understand that solving big problems always leads to some collateral damage.
I believe there are several reasons the 2016 Trump Administration could not accomplish deportations at scale, not the least of which were the fact that by his own admission he had no idea how things were done in Washington and who was who (leading him to trust all the wrong people) and the fact that he had the entire Democrat machine and the media constantly throwing road blocks in his way no matter what he wanted to do. This time around he not only has more experience and a far more honest and competent team, he also has a political mandate and the fact that he doesn't have to worry about re-election.That’s going to happen either way all the way through it…SCOTUS will have to get involved
Why wasn’t that done in 2016 when Trump had both chambers?
I think the best course of action for the Administration at this point would be to let Tom Homan formulate specific plans of action, he seems like a VERY competent individual when it comes to immigration matters, once he has some specifics, we can debate those in a point-by-point manner.