To try and mitigate the devastation of the RFK announcement

[Gracie]

The irony of people voting for party only and not the politician is warped.

 

[Blaster]

RFK Jr is putting country over party.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

RFK Jr is putting country over party.

What a joke. He is putting personal gain above all else.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

MSM or some legal entity somewhere will file charges against Trump or circulate a new, inflammatory (but false) accusation against Trump within 24 hours

I do not think his announcement did that much damage to Trump, there is not much to mitigate.

 

[task0778]

I do not know if Kennedy's decision to support Trump over Harris is a sign that the Kennedys as a group are leaving the Democratic Party, or if it's just him. But many people in recent years have left the DNP, citing the same reasons that Kennedy did and when you lose the Kennedys that has to reverberate. Frankly I do not see the democrats changing course away from the Far Left, but one wonders about their future as a party if they continue to push for policies that are not in favor of the majority of Americans. They're running this time mostly on Trump demagoguery and we'll see if it works for them, but what about 2028 and beyond when Trump ain't running? The next repub nominee might not be the jerk that Trump sometimes is, so can the dems get by with ignoring their policies in the future?

 

[task0778]

The irony of people voting for party only and not the politician is warped.

IMHO, the decision for who to vote for ought to be less on the personality and character of the nominee but rather on the soundness of his policies. A person might be the greatest person in the world, but I cannot vote for somebody who won't show more responsibility for the southern border, taxes and spending, and the people in general. IOW, I'd rather have an asshole in the WH that makes the country better off over the next 4 years and beyond than a really nice person that screws things up worse than they already are.

 

[Edgetho]

If dimocrap scum had the brains of a day-old goat, they might notice how dimocrap scum Richy-Rich and powerful were railing about income inequality at the Crime Family Convention.

Stupid.
Motherfuckers.

 

[Edgetho]

IMHO, the decision for who to vote for ought to be less on the personality and character of the nominee but rather on the soundness of his policies. A person might be the greatest person in the world, but I cannot vote for somebody who won't show more responsibility for the southern border, taxes and spending, and the people in general. IOW, I'd rather have an asshole in the WH that makes the country better off over the next 4 years and beyond than a really nice person that screws things up worse than they already are.

It's also okay to vote against something....... Like-- Totalitarianism, the Hive Mind, Lying Scum, Murderers, Baby-Killers, Child Molesters, Deviants, Child Mutilators...... You know -- dimocrap scum. The people who ruin everything they touch.... Cities, Counties, States, entire Industries, Education, Energy, Countries. Yeah, those people.

 

[mamooth]

It's also okay to vote against something....... Like-- Totalitarianism, the Hive Mind, Lying Scum, Murderers, Baby-Killers, Child Molesters, Deviants, Child Mutilators.....

Sweet Jeebus, you're weird and creepy.

No wonder you have to hide in a SafeSpace here. I'm guessing you've been banned, by force of law, from most of the areas where normal people hang out.

 

[Gracie]

I like RFK. I am an independent, and I go with whomever I think will benefit all citizens of the USA as well as loving their country enough to protect it from invaders. If he would have stayed in the race, I would have voted for him since he was running as an independent. But he woke up about his own party and bailed. Can't say I blame him. Too bad his own family turned on him, but if JFK and RFKs dad were alive, I bet they would have bailed from the Democrats as well. Its not the same party it used to be.

 

[Gracie]